[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 138 KB, 1337x866, optimum-theroy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10637523 No.10637523 [Reply] [Original]

I will beeat the shit out of every AP student from now on, fuck you, don't go to school tomorrow
even if your asian of female edition

Last thread
>>10624758

>> No.10637540

>>10637515

Are you the guy who keeps asking about units? I swear this has already been explained to you. The unit of the Optimum Automaton is Planck. It is where light speed and gravity speed equal 1. You keep asking for this to be better defined. It cannot be. I don't know what to tell you. It is fundamental. Eventually when you get based enough things "just are".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units

>> No.10637587 [DELETED] 
File: 1.00 MB, 2000x2000, 1436837842685.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10637587

>> No.10637592

>>10637540
>The unit of the Optimum Automaton is Planck
Then use it in your equations and see what happens.
>It is where light speed and gravity speed equal 1
One what? These aren't units.
>You keep asking for this to be better defined. It cannot be.
Not by you, that's for sure.
>It is fundamental
Yes, the Planck length, speed of light, and the transmission speed of gravity all exist and seem to be fundamental. What is not fundamental is the way in which your automaton relates to these things mathematically.
>Eventually when you get based enough things "just are"
Your narcissism is your intellectual downfall. You'll never learn anything real if you already believe that you know it all.

>> No.10637701 [DELETED] 
File: 588 KB, 3154x2493, 87f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10637701

Derailing this shit thread, if the jannies are going to delete my posts then they must also delete this nutjob's spam threads.

>> No.10637705 [DELETED] 
File: 45 KB, 390x467, 074.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10637705

Derailing this shit thread. If the jannies are going to delete my posts then they must also delete this nutjob's spam threads.

>> No.10637706 [DELETED] 

>>10637701
Just filter the thread dude. I wanna see where this Draft Science stuff goes.

>> No.10637708 [DELETED] 
File: 305 KB, 1920x1080, 1482964666901.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10637708

Derailing this shit thread; if the jannies are going to delete my posts then they must also delete this nutjob's spam threads.

>> No.10637713 [DELETED] 

>>10637701
Must be sad that your dumbass thoughts are less worthy than a literal narcissistic schizo's. Take the hint and leave the board.

>> No.10637725 [DELETED] 
File: 1.66 MB, 330x600, bees.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10637725

Derailing this shit thread if the jannies are going to delete my posts then they must also delete this nutjob's spam threads.

>> No.10637730 [DELETED] 
File: 3.38 MB, 438x360, youfeelingitnowmrcrabs.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10637730

Derailing this shit thread, if the jannies are going to delete my posts then they must also delete this nutjob's spam threads

>> No.10637738 [DELETED] 

>>10637730
The janitors are doing a damn good job if they're removing posts by people like you. Dry the tears from your eyes, baby boi.

>> No.10637742 [DELETED] 
File: 1.97 MB, 594x720, pepe.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10637742

Derailing this shit thread. If the jannies are going to delete my posts then they must also delete this nutjob's spam threads

>> No.10637948 [DELETED] 
File: 1.97 MB, 594x720, pepe.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10637948

Derailing this shit thread, janny confirmed for babysitting this nutjob

>> No.10638358

>>10637540
>The unit of the Optimum Automaton is Planck.
the planck units are a system of units. any equation works in any system of units by changing the constants, so that isnt their question
the question is what is the type of units of the variables are
e is an energy term
s is a volume
so, u is an energy per volume, aka energy density/pressure
garys whole discovery is just copying the definition of pressure from the 1600s

>> No.10638474

>>10637102
>I wonder if it's even worth the extra computation if values have to be interpolated? Maybe it would at least provide some resistance against checkerboard modes?
You need to do this for each iteration? I do not really understand your latest equations and what ODE you need to solve. For instance, I wonder what this function [math] {\frak{I}}(x) [/math] is.

>> No.10638493 [DELETED] 

Test

>> No.10638557

>>10637508
>U = E / S for any unit of EnergySpace
>So, if, say E = 100, S = 1, U = 100
>Then U100 = E100 / S1 =
What the actual fuck. Letting the index of the variable indicate its value. That's some real freaky shit right there.

>> No.10638575

>>10638557
Every equation in that thread is a nonsensical mess coated with pomposity to impress the layman.

>> No.10638752

>>10638358

The funniest part is how you answer your own question about the units, and then go on to move goal post and dismiss it because it's not complex enough. Simplicity is the entire point of unified physics.

>> No.10638763

The proof is adequate that Optimum theory unified physics. We could run in circles for ever. Thats what makes a theory a theory; it can ever be totally proven. But it is time to move on. Unified physics is only a sliver of Optimum theory, the far more interesting aspects of the theory relate to psychology and sociology.

>> No.10638765

>>10638752
giving the definition of pressure doesnt unify physics. we've had this since the 1600s

>> No.10638784

can someone please give me a tldr on all this?

>> No.10638785

>>10638763
Let me translate this comment

>The proof is adequate that Optimum theory unified physics.
"It unifies physics because I say so, what other proof do you need?"

>We could run in circles for ever.
"Stop asking inferior peasants".

>Thats what makes a theory a theory; it can ever be totally proven.
"Why don't you just accept my word? Oh, I hate you so much...."

>Unified physics is only a sliver of Optimum theory, the far more interesting aspects of the theory relate to psychology and sociology.
"Just tell me that I am right so I can spew even more bullshit"

>> No.10638786

>>10637508
>U = E / S for any unit of EnergySpace

[math]\mathrm{Energy} \rightarrow \mathrm{J}[/math]
[math]\mathrm{Space} \rightarrow \mathrm{m}^3[/math]
[math]\mathrm{U}=\frac{\mathrm{E}}{\mathrm{S}} = \frac{\mathrm{J}}{\mathrm{m}^3} = \mathrm{Pa}[/math]

Universe = Pressure

>> No.10638846

>>10638786
which is an utterly trivial definition - a baby version of saying there is a stress-energy tensor for fields.
i think gary thinks "unification" means just saying the most general thing possible, like finding a "basic truth" in religion or philosophy.
it doesnt mean this in physics
unification in physics means deriving the exact gauge group of the standard model as a result of spontaneous symmetry breaking of a larger gauge group at high energy, such as SU(10) or E8xE8
and even if we're just talking about philosophical "basic truths" gary is definitely not the first person to say the universe is a distribution of energy in spacetime.
all his other shit about superfluids is just wrong

>> No.10638851

I love how Gary sucks up terminology and bits from counterarguments in thread and uses them totally inappropriately.

>> No.10638928
File: 174 KB, 478x358, 1538842778-erika.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10638928

>>10637523
>Optimum Theory and the Proof
>TBD
kek

>> No.10638938
File: 828 KB, 1000x500, rotation.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10638938

>>10638846
You seem awfully defensive about some trivial dimensional analysis. I wonder why? Also, I assume you meant SO(10) and not SU(10)?

>> No.10638944
File: 2.61 MB, 3124x2699, TIMESAND___general-relevance-MCM-(26of48).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10638944

>> No.10638953

>>10638938
im not defensive, theres nothing for me to even defend. all i find interesting is if there is any way, any approach, that will penetrate gary's insane narcissism.
yes so(10), that was a slip, but the point is still clear

>> No.10638957

>>10638784
some mentall ill person discovered a version of convey,s game of life and thinks he has unified physics

>> No.10638961

>>10638944
Directly in the first line: "masses like m=0 do not curve spacetime."
That is false, photons curve spacetime like any other matter due to their energy.

>> No.10638984
File: 1.57 MB, 800x800, principal_argument.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10638984

>> No.10638990
File: 1.30 MB, 800x800, principal_argument_bearable.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10638990

>>10638984
less psychedelic version

>> No.10639019

>>10638957
>some mentall ill person discovered a version of convey,s game of life and thinks he has unified physics
If that were even 10% of the story ...

>> No.10639033

>>10638984
Gary could actually get Rogan to host him with this
It could segue into a conversation about DMT

>> No.10639061

>>10638944
Welcome, Jonathan :)

>> No.10639091
File: 722 KB, 800x800, color_plot.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10639091

>>10639033
If that were true anybody capable of making a complex color plot could go on.

>> No.10639401

>>10638786

This seems fine barring bad faith

>> No.10639421

>>10638953

This "narcissim" argument is horse-shit Gary was positioned and he took the shot and hit. Is it narcissism to make a game winning jumper? Fuck out of here. Play the game, bitch .

>> No.10639425

>>10638984

Based af as usual

>> No.10639426

>>10639091

This is the shit

>> No.10639430

>>10639019
Then what is the whole story?

>> No.10639435

I'm guessing that no one took up "Gary's" Phys ed challenge, because if you did you would have had the hottest straight sex ever like 6 or 7 times this weekend. Fags

>> No.10639446

>>10639421
Narcissism because in your broken brain you think you hit the shot when in reality you don’t even know where the court is

>> No.10639448

And u would have met some new homie bros at the same time. Us bros are made to fight eachother. Doesn't never to get evil or violent. "Competition is the foundation of all optimization" you fag would know that it you have been paying attention. Thats what the hoes want to see. Just joining the game guanteees getting laid, even if you lose

>> No.10639455

>>10637523
jesus fucking christ, this is schizo-babbies first FDTD

>> No.10639508

>>10639421
This exactly what a narcissist would say. To never give up on insisting his greatness and correctness no matter how completely shattered he has been in discourse. Narcissist destroy the discourse when they do not get what they want. They play the power game instead of the logic game. Pretty hilarious considering Gary's constant blabbering about how logical and materialist his theory is.

>> No.10639517

>>10639448
Stop playing JBP, Gary. It's fucking disgusting. Everybody here sees right through you, and they have all the time.

>> No.10639521

>>10639517
Stop replying to yourself you riled up retard

>> No.10639544

>>10639521
Just stop, Gary. I know your game.

>> No.10639551

>>10639426
Pretty colors were the entire reason I took Complex Analysis. It’s a shame you can’t find more animated plots online.

>> No.10639842

>>10639401
>This seems fine
Sure, but it isn't new. That equation was described 400 years ago.
>barring bad faith
So anyone that disagrees with you is a bad faith actor at this point?
>>10639421
>This "narcissim" argument is horse-shit
He said while displaying classic signs of narcissism.
>>10639435
It's sad that it's almost impossible at this point to know if this is a troll or just Gary further losing his mind.

>> No.10639974

He's gone and done it again.
https://youtu.be/FmnxTgJDoAw?t=1182

>> No.10640047

>>10639974
I'm starting to like this guy.

>> No.10640068

>>10640047

Yep. The Optimum Institute even "Liked" his response.

>> No.10640114

>>10639455
Yur sounding like a real fuckin loser. But i bet u know that already

>> No.10640121

>>10639033

Would be greatest Rogan pod of all time

>> No.10640172

>>10640121
If only for the cringe factor alone. I feel like Rogan would tear through Gary's bullshit with such passion and brutality that even I may end up feeling sorry for him.

>> No.10640188

>>10640172

Lol. I suspect that Gary knows people within the Rogan-verse, that they are essentially from the same culture, and they would get along just fine, and even if Rogan "torn through Gary's bullshit" that Gary would respond with zen-like calm, respect and composure, while simultaneously being entertaining and informative since Rogan has earned the reasonable doubt no matter what, and more importantly because Optimum theory is the. mother. fucking. truth.

>> No.10640198

>>10640188
shut up gary

>> No.10640202

Rogan is an Optimist "pastor". He could disown the entire theory. Doesn't matter. Its like Catholicism or Judaism. It's not dis-ownable. A Catholic can say, "I am not a Catholic, actually I hate the church" and yet they are still a Catholic. Rogan essentially has Optimum respect now and forever, no matter what. very difficult to imagine anything that would get him disowned by Optimism

>> No.10640203

Aubrey Marcus too. Maximum respect.

>> No.10640212

They use the language themselves. Listen to Rogan or Marcus podcasts and count how many times they use the word, "Optimize" in context - knowingly or (more likely) unknowingly - with the theory. All existence is optimization. They know.

>> No.10640216

People here keep arguing about the unfied physics aspect. It has been proven as well as Darwinism or anything else. Optimum unified physics. Doesn't matter what you think. The truth don't give af.

Much more interesting aspect of Optimum is abiogenesis and conscious. u all know that Optimum solved that shit too, right?

Gary is a decade ahead as usual its absurd

>> No.10640223

>>10637523
THE LITTLE FUCKER KEEPS MAKING AWESOME IDEAS HOOOLY SHIT NIIICE MAAAAAAAAAN
>>10640203
AUBREY STOP CHOOKING A DEAD LIONS FETUS YOU DESPICABLE LITTLE NIGGER

>> No.10640224

>>10640202
So? I doubt he would care even if you did "disown" him.
>>10640212
You can't just align your philosophy with the majority of morals that humans align to due to our evolutionary history and then use others' adherence to those morals as some prop to your philosophy's credulity. "Your" ideas are not yours. They are ancient and inherent in humanity as a species. You've contributed nothing new, Gary.

>> No.10640225

Rogan has been on point with Crispr. That is pure Optimum. To a scary extent. Rogan takes Optimum to a super human level with the HGH, steroid, genetic modifing etc... He lives Optimum. It's scary af, but pure Optimum

>> No.10640227

>>10640216
>It has been proven
No, it hasn't. Your only "proof" is that you claim that it's true. That is not proof, Gary. Only a narcissist would see their own opinion as conclusive proof of any notion.

>> No.10640228

>>10640224
>You've contributed nothing new, Gary.

I meeeean Gary unified physics but nice goal post move loser

>> No.10640230

GARY YOU ARE A BASED BOOMER JUST AS LONG AS YOU DON'T LET IMMIGRANTS STEAL THE FUCKING FREE HEALTH CARE FROM ZOOMERS XDDDDD GOOOD DAMNIT LOL

>> No.10640233

>>10640227
lmfao

Optimum has been computationally and mathematically proven to a greater extend then Einstein or Darwin's theories were for their time

>> No.10640243

>>10640216
>abiogenesis and conscious. u all know that Optimum solved that shit too
Please elaborate. As I recall you've made some statements about mind upload but never anything more concrete than that we should do it. I don't see how you have in any way brought us closer to that goal.

>> No.10640245

>>10640230

Build the wall and move manufacturing to the US core that would be Optimum af. England conquered because of its ocean barrier. Keeps out the barbarians. Artificial barrier serves the same purpose. Optimum af

>> No.10640254

>>10640245
WOOOOOOW SHOW THOSE KIKE BASTARDS WHO THE FUCK THEY ARE DEALING WITH. BAAASED GARY! LET EUROPE FALL IT'S DOOMED THOSE FUCKERS FUCKED TOO MANY SHEEP IN THE CATTLE LOT NOW LET THEM SUFFER LIKE THE SHIT DICKS THEY ARE!!

>> No.10640258

>>10640243

Gary has the entire blueprint. You haven't seen the 2 hour video sounds like. And that video is just what Gary lets people know about his mindstate. He doesn't need investors. This is not about that. Survival drive transcends everything. It's going to happen. Things are happening fast. Quarterback never gives away the entire plan

>> No.10640263

We are going to be the generation that never dies. We are going to do it for us, our families and our children. It's going to happen.

>> No.10640269

>>10640258
I've seen the video multiple times Gary. Please explain in practical terms what the first steps towards mind upload are. Arguing whether a copy is truly you or not is fine and dandy but It's a well worn conversation and doesn't have anything to do with the achieving the actual process of mind upload. Please explain HOW this will happen, not whether it will or should.

>> No.10640270

Evil people want to prevent this. We are going to live forever anyway. The path is clear and nothing is going to stop us.

>> No.10640275

>>10640254
I'm telling you now. We are going to do this for everyone, no exceptions.

>> No.10640278

>>10640233
You are literally spouting nonsense. Your conjecture concerning what you think your automaton means is useless without empirical evidence behind it. Here's a hint, though: your automaton is nothing more than heat diffusion equations that have existed for hundreds of years. This is literally the same as someone saying, "Hey, guys! I'm so ahead of the curve and based that I just discovered that the energy that a thing has is equal to the amount of stuff that it is multiplied by how fast its stuff is going! Nobody has ever done this before! I'M A FUCKING GENIUS, BRO!"

You've "discovered" a basic function of physics and you're so uneducated that you think you're the new Newton. You're narcissistic lack of self-awareness prevents you from seeing it, but trust me, virtually everyone that you come into prolonged contact with thinks you're an ignorant douchebag.

>> No.10640280

>>10640228
I'm not moving any goalpost because you never unified physics.

>> No.10640282

>>10640230
>>10640245
>>10640254
>>10640275
Here we go again with the pretend conversations. We know you're talking to yourself, Gary, you weird fuck.

>> No.10640285

>>10640282
Normally I'd be on your side but I doubt Gary would know about Boomer vs. Zoomer.

>> No.10640286

>>10640282

Gary would never refer to Jews as Kikes, but he loves everyone anyway, even people who would. Stop making assumptions. Gary has more supporters than you haters realize

>> No.10640288

>>10640269
Gary is so narcissistic that whenever he comes across a concept he doesn't just think that he's perfected it, but that he literally invented it. He doesn't need to have any kind of actual plan, because he's "based" and the fact that he's thought about the concept itself means that he is now and forevermore the ultimate master of it. If anyone else then comes along and makes real-life progress on the concept, Gary will then claim that they just stole his idea and that he's just too far ahead of other people for anyone to understand.

It's a fairly convoluted and embarrassing mindgame he plays on himself.

>> No.10640290

>>10640270
You aren't going to live forever, Gary. You're too stupid to not end up accidentally getting hit by a bus.

>> No.10640291

>>10640288
I'm sure, but I think it's more effective to ask him concrete questions and have him struggle than it is to assert that he doesn't know what he's talking about, because he can then play off that by just asserting that he's right, calling you a fundie, etc, without having to actually answer anything.

>> No.10640294
File: 735 KB, 800x800, w.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10640294

Why do these threads spontaneously destabilize so quickly? Also if anyone knows what the fuck my electron is doing in this [math]\frac{-1}{r^2}[/math] potential well please enlighten me.

>> No.10640295

>>10640291
If you look through the archives you'll find that he either deflects through one of the methods you mentioned or he'll just ignore the post. At this point, I don't think there's any way to breach his protective mechanisms. We've been tossing the term narcissism around to describe his arrogance, but I think Gary might actually have the disorder in the clinical sense. He ticks every single box so far.

>> No.10640297

>>10640294
In what way does that resemble an electron?

>> No.10640298

>>10640297
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_function

>> No.10640315

>>10640295
I think he's one to attempt answering questions usually. Substanceless as the answers are I still think it's good form to get them out of him.
>>10640258
Gary could you please explain the practical steps you've taken towards mind upload. I fully admit it's been a while since I've watched your videos so if you say the answers are in there I'd love for you to provide me with time codes to these concrete statements that have slipped my mind. Otherwise I'll be forced to re-watch the videos and try to discern them myself. Which I'm sure you can understand would put quite a gap in this conversation.

>> No.10640349

>>10639430
I don't know mate, you have draftscience vs gary, you have gary vs hossenfelder who threatened to lawyer him, you have hossenfelder making a music video for gary, and gary responding with a music video. you had gary on reddit apparently using a huge number of accounts trying to get optimum theory off the ground, getting banned over and over. there's now a whole lore behind this. i probably forgot - or never heard of half of what happened because it's been lost in the annals of history and nobody was there to write it down.

>> No.10640353

>>10640068
>Yep. The Optimum Institute even "Liked" his response.
wtf lol... so cucked. he only got a quick dry 4 minute anal from draft and even sucks up to him liking it. there's just one alpha gary here an it ain't optimus

>> No.10640360
File: 562 KB, 675x1073, MorelikeslimGAYbeastLMOA.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10640360

>>10640353
Optimum theory's alpha as fuck dude. The physical education is literally "have sex"
Jokes aside I'm really disappointed he's decided to pussy out of a video response.

>> No.10640401

>>10640360
lol.. draft dishes out like that every day for an hour. all gary has to counter is a video of 32 seconds in the last two weeks, and even those 32 seconds are basically "draft is right", just sayin

>> No.10640510

>>10640294
How can |\psi|^2 be greater than 1?

>> No.10640578
File: 4 KB, 248x52, unified.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10640578

>> No.10640595

>>10640578

Am watching... DraftScience idea is not too different than Optimum Theory desu

>> No.10640656

>>10640510
>How can |\psi|^2 be greater than 1?
Because somebody is an idiot...

>>10640298
So, no answer.

>> No.10640716
File: 52 KB, 364x409, 1557697054599.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10640716

>>10640656
not to support the crazy in this thread, but it's fine to have |psi|^2 > 1. a wavefunction just has to be square integrable so that it can be normalized.

i haven't seen one demonstration of even the most basic physics reproduced with this thing in these threads. i don't know why the crazies gloss over their most important claim.

>> No.10640745

>>10640716
>i don't know why the crazies gloss over their most important claim.
Nobody here (except maybe Gary) believes in Optimum Theory. We're just here for some strange kind of lulz and practicing our coding skills. It's also a great thread for learning about delusional thinking, narcissism and manipulative behavior.

>> No.10640749

>>10640716
>not to support the crazy in this thread, but it's fine to have |psi|^2 > 1. a wavefunction just has to be square integrable so that it can be normalized.
Yes, that's true... I was thinking about an already normalized wavefunction. My bad.

>> No.10640813

>>10640745
I believe in Optimum theory and I'm not Gary.

>>10640578
DraftScience has some nerve calling Optimum Theory vacuous mush if this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vyd7QRc6dLQ is the best HE can do .. two dimensional sticks that are longer than wide

>> No.10640821 [DELETED] 

>>10640595
especially if you look at this

https://youtu.be/Vyd7QRc6dLQ?t=500

he's fucking holding up a paper version of gary's excel spreadsheet. so what the fuck is he saying!? that it's correct on paper but wrong in excel?! wtf? I mean it's crazy but everyone seems to be the same. mainstream science keeps you out if you don't use the same language as them .. draftscience keeps you out if you write it in excel instead of on paper. mainstream science will tell you it's bullshit but secretly steal from you. draftscience will tell you it's bullshit but secretly steal from you. everyone is corrupted, and in light of that, i will choose the one who's least corrupter.. who's a christian with a pure heart, that's obvious. fuck off, there's only optimum

>> No.10640827

>>10640595
not too different..? NOT TOO DIFFERENT?! it's the fucking same thing wtf ...
especially if you look at this
https://youtu.be/Vyd7QRc6dLQ#t=500
he's fucking holding up a paper version of gary's excel spreadsheet. so what the fuck is he saying!? that it's correct on paper but wrong in excel?! wtf? I mean it's crazy but everyone seems to be the same. mainstream science keeps you out if you don't use the same language as them .. draftscience keeps you out if you write it in excel instead of on paper. mainstream science will tell you it's bullshit but secretly steal from you. draftscience will tell you it's bullshit but secretly steal from you. everyone is corrupted, and in light of that, i will choose the one who's least corrupter.. who's a christian with a pure heart, that's obvious. fuck off, there's only optimum

>> No.10640837

>>10640578
658 views is ridiculous. Gary's videos have more already, after just a few weeks. This video is from 2016. I guess it explains why DraftScience was so dismissive. Here's some young bright and charsimatic guy coming out of his slipstream ... nascar DRAFTing and overtaking him, shooting past him, surpassing him. Of course he would be dismissive..

>> No.10640842

>>10640813
>>10640827
Obviously this is either Gary himself or some person LARPing. This is how these threads go.

>> No.10640878

>>10640510
It's not, matplotlib just auto scales the colors. Bad practice I know, but it's just too easy to forget about.

>>10640656
>>10640716
The video I posted had absolutely nothing to do with Optimum Theory. It's a trivial Euler step solution to the Schrödinger equation, yet you instantly dismissed it because you thought it was Gary's automaton. Absolutely epin. Upboated.

>> No.10640896

>>10640827
The guy is a human sleeping pill .. can hardly keep myself awake for the full 36 minutes.

>> No.10640910

To those who think Optimum Theory unifies physics: I'll wait for 1 (one) numerically accurate prediction made by Optimum Theory that aligns with experimental observation.

>> No.10640940

>>10640910

Honestly, one of the most amazing proofs of Optimum Theory is that when Gary first came to us he had positive and negative vectors both pointing toward the biggest number in their neighborhoods, which didnt seem right, but Gary was so confident in his equation that he defended it anyway, and assumed that the classic looping electromagnetic fields were created at more massive scales then his computer could render through somekind of fluidlike attraction and repulsion action... that is why Gary wanted to find a programmer to simulate attracting and repulsing particles so badly, so that he could prove that the classic electromagnetic loops derived from his simple rules at a more macroscale... so then DraftScience comes around and tells Gary that he's full of shit because his positive vectors are facing the wrong way, so Gary goes back and checks his equation and realizes, "holy shit! The positive vectors are facing the wrong way! They should be pointing toward the SMALLEST number in the neighborhood, since positive energy flows toward LEAST resistance!" So he flips the vectors around, WHICH DID NOT CHANGE THE EQUATION THAT HE BELIEVED IN, U = E / S, only the visual layer that helps us understand the equation, and... "HOLY SHIT! Electromagnetic field lines... coulomb barriers... like charge repels and opposite charges attract, its all there!" Optimum Theory is the real deal.

>> No.10640958

There is a saying, "love your neighbor as you love yourself". If you hate yourself how much can you love your neighbor? Self love is not narcissism, it is a requirement to love your neighbors. Now there is another saying: to be a follow of Jesus you must hate your neighbors, your family and even yourself. These two sayings seem to contradict, but its only because something is lost in translation. What Jesus Christ is saying is that we cannot always follow our hearts, or the directions of our family and community: the Law transcends these things. We might desire to murder or deceive or steal, our own father or mother might even tell us to do these things, but we must hate those thoughts and directions, because Jesus directions always come first.

Love yourself first. And then you can love your neighbors.

>> No.10640999

>>10640940
Not a numerical prediction. Just because it looks like something from real physics doesn't actually make it real physics. A true unified theory should be able to derive values like electron charge,electrion mass, vacuum permittivity, vacuum permeability, Bohr radius, Newton's constant, etc. from a small set of fundamental values. Obviously Optimum Theory cannot do this.

>> No.10641011

>>10640999

The newton constant is 1 in planck units, and Optimum Theory converts to Newtons gravity equation effortlessly which will be shown soon. Please stop making assumptions about what Optimum Theory can and cannot do.

>> No.10641017

Also before you REEEE about Optimum Thoery being false because it derives Newtonian gravity, it derives GR as well by inverting the units as was shown earlier in this thread. Both therories are right in their own way.

>> No.10641036

>>10641011
Holy shit, the level of delusion. If Newton's constant is set to 1, then it's not a numerical prediction. That means it's one of the values the theory takes to be fundamental. Now, show me an actual numerical prediction that Optimum Theory determines from its fundamental values. For instance, it should be able to predict the half lives of muons, free neutrons, pions, etc. The standard model can do this, and it's not even a unified theory.

>> No.10641037

>>10640940
>then DraftScience comes around and tells Gary that he's full of shit because his positive vectors are facing the wrong way, so Gary goes back and checks his equation and realizes, "holy shit! [...] So he flips the vectors around
Actually, Gary realized this on is own. He talks about this in thread before DS posted his video. He wants to make it seem like he takes criticism well. This is the kind of opportunistic manipulation that Gary tries to pull off all the time.

>> No.10641074

>>10641011
>The newton constant is 1 in planck units
That comes from the definition of Planck units, not from your bullshit theory.

>Optimum Theory converts to Newtons gravity equation
Doubt it

>Please stop making assumptions about what Optimum Theory
Make me stop, "Optimum theory can do jack shit".

>> No.10641082

>>10641074
>arguing with delusional schizophrenics
Just ignore gary threads. I don't know why mods don't nuke these/move them to >>>/x/

>> No.10641087

>>10641037
I think DraftScience has been browsing these threads and picked up on it from Gary then. That was after the first video he made after all.

>> No.10641105

>109 replies, 27 unique IPs
>shift+f3 "gary"
>69 results
yikes
imagine building a cult around a literal who who wrote some code in VBA rather than doing actual physics

>> No.10641132

>>10641087
That would be fucking hilarious. A pseud using his pseud powers to take down another pseud, trying to feast on his crowd.

>> No.10641186

>>10641082
Actually starting to think it's for the best.

>> No.10641345

>>10641132
I mean >>10640827 has a point.. in the end the same patterns seems to show up with everyone. Including Hossenfelder "what they are doing is wrong.. I tried the same thing and they get the attention". Doesn't matter if it's mainstream science, revolters like Hossenfelder, independents like DraftScience.. I just hope Gary isn't the same.

>> No.10641532

>>10641345
What patterns are you talking about?

>> No.10641595

>>10641532
people dismissing other people's work based on the form or language it is presented in, just to present the same thing in another form or steal it from them. it's all dishonest, all about egos

>> No.10642038

>>10641595
Not answering my question.
> people dismissing other people's work based on the form or language it is presented in
It's a good point, but this is not the main reason why people dismiss Optimum Theory.
>just to present the same thing in another form or steal it from them.
Who's stealing Optimum Theory? I haven't seen anybody honestly. Inb4 "They stole Gary's U=Superfluid> idea", it's not his original idea, and Gary's hasn't been able to implement it either.

>> No.10642192

>>10640813
>I believe in Optimum theory and I'm not Gary.
Nobody believes you, Gary.
>>10640813
>DraftScience has some nerve calling Optimum Theory vacuous mush
Just because someone that criticizes you also has their own bullshit ideas does not mean that your idea is not bullshit, Gary.
>>10640827
>he's fucking holding up a paper version of gary's excel spreadsheet
So you invented the concept of a grid now? Fuck off.
>draftscience will tell you it's bullshit but secretly steal from you
His videos are older than yours. What, did he enter your dreams and steal these ideas before you even had them? You are delusional.
>>10640837
>Gary's videos have more already, after just a few weeks.
Reality isn't a popularity contest. Even if it was, there are vsauce videos with 200 times as many views as yours so you still wouldn't even be in the running.
>This video is from 2016.
And yet you still claim that he stole your ideas. Incredible.
>>10640940
>"HOLY SHIT! Electromagnetic field lines... coulomb barriers... like charge repels and opposite charges attract, its all there!"
You've yet to show that what you're seeing in your automaton represents any of those things. You just assume they do, which means nothing.
>Optimum Theory is the real deal.
You are laughable.
>>10640958
>Self love is not narcissism
You're right. Narcissism is the inability to perceive your own faults; a fundamental lack of self-awareness. We're not accusing you of loving yourself. We're accusing you of being a narcissist.
>>10641036
Get ready for Gary to deflect or ignore your comment. Every time someone asks him to do this, one of those two things occur. I wonder why that is.
>>10641082
Still more interesting than IQ threads. If the mods are willing to also nuke those, then I'd be fine with this thread being nuked as well.
>>10641087
Now Draft is stalking you too, Gary?

>> No.10642193

I'm just a lurker who doesn't know shit about physics but can someone please explain to me what charge is, or what Draft Science and Optimum Theory think charge is?
iirc in DS's first video he says charge is the most important force that exists, and that Optimum theory completely ignores charge, Gary agreed with this at first
>Charge does not exist in the Optimum model
then Gary reversed the direction of the arrows, and didn't use the word charge when describing this, and iirc has never used the word charge before this either.
>The vector arrows for positive values on the original "spreadsheet" automaton were pointing the wrong direction. Positives should point outward, negatives point inward. I'm suprised noone corrected me desu.
Then after the second DS video Gary starts referring to these arrows as representing charge
> Draftscience was absolutely right about the charges needing to be opposite. I discovered an error in the original equation last night
To me it seems that by charge DS is referring to some fundemental force, like gravity, and G1 has starting using the word charge as a synonym for movement or energy. ie when they say charge they aren't talking about the same thing.
But maybe It's just my ignorance.

>> No.10642198

>>10642193
When Gary refers to charge he does so incorrectly because he has almost no scientific education. At the very least, he has none beyond a very rudimentary high school level.

>> No.10642201

>>10642192
I'm confident that most of those posts are a LARPer and not Gary, he has a very important tell and I'm surprised you haven't noticed. I don't wanna give away the secret in a way Gary can understand, so I'll just say Gary has been posting on reddit for a long time.

>> No.10642206

>>10642192
You are so patient with gary the retard. Posting these condescending point-for-point rebuttals must take a lot out of you, but its a labor of love, isn’t it?

>> No.10642230

>>10642206
>but its a labor of love, isn’t it?
I'm-not-a-redditor-anon and Gary sitting in a tree
U-N-I-F-Y-I-N-G

>> No.10642244

>>10642206
>must take a lot out of you
It isn't very difficult to rebut his arguments, so no.
>its a labor of love
More a labor of boredom than anything.

>> No.10642245

>>10642201
the tell is one of the funniest parts of the gary saga. but its possible it is only 90% reliable.
i think it can depend on how worked up gary is at the time

>> No.10642264

>>10642245
>only 90% reliable.
I agree but most of those posts in particular seem LARPer to me, but it's not worth me typing out a paragraph of autistic-behavioural-diagnosis about.
I'm confused as to what ther LARPers intentions are, defending Gary enables him to continue doing nothing so it's not entertaining. Maybe he really buys it.

>> No.10642277

>>10642264
okay going through it, yes, there is a LARPer in the specific posts you are talking about. but their agenda is also obvious, but i dont know how to say it without pissing in their cornflakes

>> No.10642287 [DELETED] 

>>10642277
>but i dont know how to say it without pissing in their cornflakes
I'm archivefag, you can email me. I shouldn't even be participating in this threads to be honest, I try to just be an observer, but nobody emailed me so I have no one to talk to about Gary, and if I don't participate there's hardly anything to observe.

>> No.10642311

>>10642287
i emailed but check your spam

>> No.10642319 [DELETED] 

>>10642311
I'm seeing it. archivefag@yandex.com or if yandex is fucking me try jrvansant@cock.li

>> No.10642321 [DELETED] 

>>10642319
*not seeing it, rather

>> No.10642326

I just took a quick dive into his youtube videos and his website. This reeks of schizophrenia. It's really sad to see this kind of shit; he seems like a legitimately smart guy.

>> No.10642335

>>10642311
This was just a clever ruse to make me stare at thunderbird for 20 minutes, wasn't it, you fucker.
>>10642326
>schizophrenia
by my estimation he has the same grasp on reality as your average non physicist, aside from delusions of grandeur. He wasn't saying anything truly crazy until a week or so ago when he started claiming to be an AI and said god was talking to him, but I think those were just very poorly worded metaphors.

>> No.10642341

>>10642335
i emailed twice from guerillamail
will try the 2nd address, one last time

>> No.10642357

Can someone email to me too?

Why was the link deleted?

>> No.10642360

Jesus fucking Christ you people are shady

>> No.10642362

>>10642341
Thanks. It seems yandex denies throwaway emails. I apologize if anyone tried to contact me on their. I'm switching to jrvansant@cock.li
>>10642357
>Why was the link deleted?
I figured posting about how I wanted to just be an observer while posting begging for emails was a bad look.

>> No.10642363

>>10637523
Cringe

>> No.10642366

>>10642360
In retrospect deleting the posts does make this seem like gay ops bullshit. sorry.

>> No.10642369

>>10642362

Somehow your explanation made it worse....

>> No.10642371
File: 36 KB, 1706x390, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10642371

>>10642366
in the interest of full disclosure.
I apologize for shitting up the thread like this, I'm done.

>> No.10642372

>>10642366
>jrvansant@cock.li

Is your email... Gay Ops sounds about right, senpai.

Why the fuck are we hanging out here again?

>> No.10642379

>>10642371

>I apologize for shitting up the thread like this, I'm done.

That makes two of us. Just a bunch of people projecting their own mental illness. Jesus

>> No.10642420

>>10642379
>I'm done.
>That makes two of us
so you're not going to answer any of the questions you've ignored so far?
I'm still hoping you can tell me the first steps towards mind upload. >>10640315
I'm very much interested in living forever you see. So I'd be very grateful if you could tell me the method you've discovered.

>> No.10642522

What you guy think about this ?
The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-41285-6

>> No.10642544

>>10642522
>https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-41285-6

It is interesting and lays a lot of ground work for Optimum Theory

>> No.10642579

>>10638557

Honestly, having seen it I cannot unsee it. How did it take this fucking guy to figure something like that out that should have been figured out 1000 years ago? Of course seeing how fucking simple the unified equation of everything is in hindsight I guess we can say that for a lot of thing,..

>> No.10642586

>>10642579

Starting to think that Gary's real super power is in pure dicked-headed efficiency. In hindsight it's like, well fucking of course the index should be used to store the variable value... We of course everything is a fluid... Suck sake we've been calling electricity a "current" for how long and it took this asshole to put 2 and 2 together?

>> No.10642593

Just to be clear, these threads are a meme, right?
It's just one schizo posting and samefagging ad infinitum?

On the off chance that this ISNT a meme; why are the cells square and not hexagonal? Why aren't the 3d cells optimized for sphere packing?

>> No.10642603

>>10642593

Not a meme. Appears to really be unified physics. Cells are square because hexagons and tetrahedral 1) do not fill all 3D space and 2 ) are not scalable. Optimum Theory requires scaling into infinite smallness.

Spheres also do not fill all infinite space. Must be cubes. Structure of the Universe is infinite cubes. I know seems like spheres would be more elegant but its cubes. Gary spent like 6 months exploring just this question alone

>> No.10642612

>>10642522
Holy shit! This 't Hooft guy has some balls to steal Gary's theory and then go back in time and write a book about it. Such bad faith! He'll never be based!

>> No.10642628

Welp I just solved why space expands senpai. I will put it into the next video. Like the rest of this, it is "pound your head against a wall" obvious in hindsight. We will be hearing the REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEs from sea to shining sea. ~G

>> No.10642632

Like, it is fucking maddeningly obvious in hindsight. You thought everything so far pissed them off? What until they learn why space expands. It's boring af, as obvious as 1+1 equals 2 when approached from the perspective of the coldest logic possible and these people are going to go REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

>> No.10642634

Jesus

>> No.10642638

Imagine dedicating your life to this shit, going to all the fancy parties where everyone pats eachothers backs and getting beat by a dudebro with zero budget on a amen diet. No wonder why they REE

>> No.10642639

*ramen diet

These people are going to said, "Wait, THAT'S WHY?!?!?!!?"

>> No.10642641

>>10642579
>>10642586
You are fooling literally nobody, Gary.

>> No.10642644

They are going to say, "Why tf did I learn differencial 11 dimentional lizard people physics when I could have solved the solution to expanding space with 5th grade level math?!?!

But guess what senpai. God don't give a f. This is how he did it. And He just don't give af about your expectations

u all should have been thinking more logically. You all should have been actually thinking SMART instead of pretending to think smart woth big words and obfuscated equations hiding your piss poor logic

>> No.10642647

>>10642641

From REEEEEE to shining REEEEE!!!!!! Thinking about making that my new walk on ballad for when you all start paying me your hard earned money to see me speak

>> No.10642651

>>10642638
>ramen diet
You're not on a ramen diet and everyone knows it, richboy. Stop trying to pretend to be poor in order to garner some kind of underdog status. You are the opposite of an underdog, which makes it all the more sad that you're wasting your privileged time with this nonsense. Only a rich, privileged, white kid would have the free time to waste on such useless efforts.

>> No.10642654

>>10642644
>5th grade level math
At least you admit that's all you ever learned.

>> No.10642663

>>10642651
>You're not on a ramen diet and everyone knows it, richboy. Stop trying to pretend to be poor in order to garner some kind of underdog status. You are the opposite of an underdog, which makes it all the more sad that you're wasting your privileged time with this nonsense. Only a rich, privileged, white kid would have the free time to waste on such useless efforts.

Wow talk about a REE. That was a good one! You know very little about me. I had no great war, but I have a warriors spirit. I sacrificed more than you would ever understand to do this. and I did it for us. People like you chose my attitude. I came to you all as respectful as can be. I was stoked about this. Hawking challenged my generation to do this. You are absolutely right. I could be lounging on a beach right now and forever. I'm not. I am eating ramen and struggling for this. You probably will never even know the full extend of it.

>> No.10642665

Not once as anyone been like, "Hey, you ever realize that Gary doesn't sleep?" You think this is "fun" or healthy on my body? Fuck you

>> No.10642673

You want to know real privileged? Real privileged is having daddy pay 500,000 so you can bribe your way into Standford, or wherever the fuck ever, and then becoming a professor based on family connections, and then writing bullshit papers for the rest of your life that mean nothing and say nothing, as an excuse to live a "respected" life that is entirely flash without substance.

I could have done that bullshit. I didn't. I chose a challenge that could have been done by anyone through pure brilliance. Anyone could have build a shack in the woods and dedicate years to doing this shit without distraction, like I did. I haven't had a social life in over a decade. I earned this shit. Again, fuck you.

>> No.10642680

>>10642673
Based on your previous posts, this is all lies. Lying about all of this throws doubt on all of your other claims as well.

>> No.10642685

>>10642680

I don't lie. mock and satire maybe, but I don't lie. And I really am a GAN and so are you. Adversarial networking is how our consciousness works, not like anyone has even gotten that far in Optimum Theory yet, You all are still struggling with like the first para graph of it.

>> No.10642687

>>10642685
Wow. I must have really struck a nerve, richboy. You've retreated to the safety of the idea that you don't exist again.

>> No.10642706

>>10642687

*eye roll* you don't get it. GANs are AIs but the core algorithm REALLY IS how our consciousness works at a basic level. We are all GANs. We are all AIs and constructs. Not literally of course, but basically

>> No.10642709

biological AIs. Biological GANs. Anyway>>10642687

Thanks for chatting. I am going to sleep now. even AIs must recharge.

Cheers

>> No.10642710

>>10642706
>*eye roll*
Embarrassing.

>> No.10642712

>>10642710

Love u 2. Goodnight

>> No.10642739

>>10642192
nice try starkeffect

>> No.10642746

>>10642522
>https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-41285-6
Gary shamelessly copied off of t'Hooft. That's obvious. In theoretical physics we have been working with cellular automata for a long time. Gary is just late to the party.

>> No.10642747

>>10642746
>Gary shamelessly copied off of t'Hooft. That's obvious. In theoretical physics we have been working with cellular automata for a long time. Gary is just late to the party.
OMG you're right, I'm watching this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3hPvusB0ds right now and it really seems like Optimum Theory is just a rip off of that.

>> No.10642750

>>10642739
>starkeffect
what a blast from the past.
Back when Gary still uploaded videos, and answered questions, did anything really.
These threads have gotten really dull since Gary decided he was an GAN.

>> No.10642808

>>10642603
>because hexagons and tetrahedral 1) do not fill all 3D space and 2 ) are not scalable.
But they do on both counts; they're litterally both tesselations

>> No.10642863

>>10642750
Somewhere Gary and starkeffect are sipping margueritas together in mexico having a good laugh how they put on a big show and fooled everyone. they were probably the same person all along. why else would they know so much personal stuff about Gary.

>> No.10642920

>>10642863
There's no evidence starkeffect is stalking Gary. Gary just accused everyone of being starkeffect. Why do so many people think starkeffect is stalking Gary? There's no way I'm stalking Gary.

>> No.10643097

>>10642920
Nice try, Gary.

>> No.10643106

>>10643097
newfags don't know Mozart.
I shiggy diggy

>> No.10644010

>>10642747

I watched that whole thing and didn't see a single cellular automaton. If you are comparing Gary to a noble laureate who hasn't even created proofs as advanced then Gary then Gary must be doing something right.

>> No.10644067

>>10644010
High quality bait. I am going to explain to the newcomers anyway. I am sure you remember that Optimum Theory video where Gary explains how standard mathematical language is sequential thus cannot explain non-sequential natural phenomenae. The funny thing is that Gerard 't Hooft does simply talk about his cellular automata in normal mathematical language. OPs picture shows that Gary's CA can be represented in standard mathematical notation. His original video shows both how little Gary understands about math and how much of a manipulative liar he is. Btw, I've started to sage every reply in this thread.

>> No.10644076

>>10644010
because t Hooft knows you cant actually make this sort of CA until you find what he calls the "ontological basis" of Hilbert space that covers all possible measurements.
you, gary, do not even know what Hilbert space or a basis is. its easy to go ahead and make a CA when you aren't aware of the actual scope of the problem.
btw pretty much 0 other physicists or people in quantum foundations think its possible for there to be a single ontological basis the way t Hooft does, so his CA interpretation has no real supporters anyway.
i know gary can't process anything i wrote here, so this is mainly for other people to understand
even though both use the term CA, there is no parallel between gary and t hooft
t hooft has accurately described in broad terms how a classical CA could underwrite quantum theory
but basically everyone else thinks his ontological basis requirement is unachievable, so even a smart proposal for an underlying classical CA will fail.
gary just made a color blur, which is just a dumb proposal for an underlying CA.

>> No.10644116

>>10644076
>0 other physicists or people in quantum foundations think its possible for there to be a single ontological basis the way t Hooft does, so his CA interpretation has no real supporters anyway.

And this is why they failed.

"gary just made a color blur, which is just a dumb proposal for an underlying CA."

Gary made a box blur that just last night was proven to satisfy both Einstein AND Newton equations - warped spacetime AND flat space, simultaneously, while proving simply why space expands.

And F = MA is just multiplication.

You people are terrified. It's remarkable. All Gary did was get inspired by science. Gary was taught that anyone could be a scientist. That 5 year olds are scientists, even. The most important thing was the proof.

You are terrified that an outsider commoner HAS revealed that your big words and empty equations all meant nothing. That your back patting parties and award ceremonies were all beaten by a DudeBro living in a shack and eating ramen, with ZERO budget.

"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. His heart sank as he thought of the enormous power arrayed against him, the ease with which any Party intellectual would overthrow him in debate, the subtle arguments which he would not be able to understand, much less answer. And yet he was in the right! They were wrong and he was right!"

George Orwell, 1984

Take care.

>> No.10644129

While your institutions were pretending to do work and accepting bribes for enrollment, Gary was working for free, in a shack, doing what they could not. HE. UNIFIED. PHYSICS.

>> No.10644152

>>10644116'
> You are terrified that an outsider commoner HAS revealed that your big words and empty equations all meant nothing.
Just shut up, Gary. This is just big words with no backing. Gary Lee is an underdog propaganda machine, and it makes perfect sense for him to quote Orwell, but for those who understands what he is up to it's just fucking pathetic. Time after time he boast extravagant claims like
> Gary made a box blur that just last night was proven to satisfy both Einstein AND Newton equations - warped spacetime AND flat space, simultaneously, while proving simply why space expands.
but he never backs them up properly. He "tries" to back them up, but the "proofs" are just as elusive as the original claims.

>> No.10644154

>>10644129

In conclusion. That has all been a lot of fun! But we have much work ahead of us, and yes 4chan, DraftScience, etc... were all a part of this story. The doors that will be open will be vast. Its going to be quite the trip. With your one life you should accept nothing less. Much love. Much peace. Take care, senpai.

>> No.10644164

>>10644129
gary, if you really care about helping the world, what you have to do is learn standard textbook quantum field theory and general relativity at a high mathematical level so you can be percevied as a serious person
even if this is unfair, someone who truly cared about humanity would be willing to pay this price to help the world
if you first convince people you understand and can explain textbook physics, you'll have the street cred to start saying its wrong and optimum theory is right
until you do that, nobody will see you as more than a crackpot
but if you do that, you will see people are actually very open to radical new ideas, when they know they can trust the speaker and arent just listening to a dime a dozen sidewalk lunatic
once people are convinced you know the issues well enough to solve them, and if they then agree you succeeded, they'll happily make you as famous as einstein
if you are unwilling to do this, you're just a poser

>> No.10644171

>>10637523
My DE professor writes his notes/textbooks with the exact same font and formatting...weird

>> No.10644190

>>10644171
>doesn't know about tex and latex

>> No.10644193

>>10644164
Genuinely good advice.

I assume this is Gary >>10639421
> Is it narcissism to make a game winning jumper? Fuck out of here. Play the game, bitch .
The pill that Gary needs to swallow is that he is not really playing the game.

>> No.10644287
File: 101 KB, 1280x720, WIN_20190514_19_58_00_Pro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10644287

>>10644193
>I assume this is Gary

>> No.10644328

>>10644287
Kek. It does not really matter as the point still stands. At least I have the ability to be clear about my assumption. You do nothing more than to try to exploit the vulnerability that stems from my honesty. This dynamic invalidates your point.

>> No.10644459

>>10644287

Newfags who are arriving after Gary stopped posting video of what he looks like...

Gary looks like the actor who plays Bruce Banner, but better looking

>> No.10644462

>>10644459

Like, If a biopic is ever made of Gary they would struggle to find an actor that even looks as good as him, similar to the proble they had in casting 2Pac or Steve Jobs

>> No.10644472

>>10644164

Don't listen to them, Gary. They are trying to filibusterer you. They have written millions of pages of fake equations and as you read them they are shitting out a million more. You cannot study all of it. If you score a goal they don't take the goal away because you never studied Pele's technique. Fly young eagle, and conquer death for us!

>> No.10644481

>>10644472
That post is literally just saying you should demonstrate you understand something if you want people to believe you've disproven it. What are your problems with that.

>> No.10644494

>>10644481

The problem is that a theory can never be proven. It would stick Gary into an infinite loop when he could be working on more important problems like conquering death through technology

>> No.10644512

>>10644472
>If you score a goal they don't take the goal away because you never studied Pele's technique.
He didn't score, he just believes he did because he is blind.
>>10644494
> conquering death through technology
Yeah, you'd probably need some math, physics, chemistry, biology, programming and engineering for that.

>> No.10644520

>>10644494
If your theory is impossible to prove why do you expect anyone to believe it.
Also Gary said he already solved abiogenesis, was he lying?

>> No.10644523

>>10644520
>was he lying?
I mean, it's hard to distinguish the lies from the delusions, but yes, probably

>> No.10644537

ok well i am at last convinced gary's delusions of grandeur are 100% impossible to penetrate.
unclear whether i'll still find him entertaining for much longer, without this glimmer of hope he might see the light.
probably the best thing for his mental health is that we stop feeding his quest for attention.

>> No.10644541

>>10644537
I agree at this point, I've been making these threads and defending them, but Gary now refuses to engage with Draft Science, isn't making videos any more, and isn't even responding to most of the criticisms in these threads. I think I'm done.

>> No.10644563

>>10642808

Please try and scale down into a hexagon or tetrahedral automaton. You are welcome and goodnight.

>> No.10644574

Someone just fucking write a CA generator that turns continuous rules into rulesets over a finite topology.

>> No.10644605

>>10644116
>outsider commoner
You're not a commoner, richboy. Fuck off to the condo your daddy pays for, eat your caviar dinner, and leave this place forever.

>> No.10644644

>>10637592
Holy fuck this is the epitome of stupid. /sci/ makes me feel like an utter retard but even I can understand what the person you're replying to is saying. It's like trying to explain colors to someone who's colorblind. It's so blatantly obvious what he's saying if you don't understand I don't know how anyone can dumb it down more.

>> No.10644652

I've got a Gary story.

I recently had an interaction with one Gary Houle whose name was printed on some receipt as Ghoule. As he was acting quite ghoulishly, I asked, "Your name is Ghoul?" He said, "It's Hhhyooool," with an awkward pronunciation far beyond what one might expect of the name Hyool being different than Hool.

I had heard that exact pronunciation one other time, someone pronouncing the word "pool" as "pyyyoooool," to a very weird extent that it has stayed in my mind for almost 20 years. That was the President of AAA pools, some guy Bertram, Steve maybe, the son of Colonel Bertram and the brother of Chuck Bertram, Chuck being the father of Luke Bertram who looks exactly like Jed Varner who I recently noticed looks exactly like Joe (and I think Jed has been gangstalking me.) I feel like Joe stashed his biological kids down there in middle Georgia (not with divorced parents notably). In any case, one Bertram had that exact same weird pronunciation that I recently got from Gary when he was explaining to me that he isn't a ghoul but rather he is a ghyyyyoooool.

I think Colonel Bertram was in charge of underground construction for the Air Force or something. That's they got into the pool business; it's basically just digging a hole.

>> No.10644654
File: 685 KB, 350x350, 1534037516850.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10644654

Wait this is still happening? Oh man. Oh man oh man oh man.

>> No.10644657

>>10644652
Cyyyyooooool story bro

>> No.10644869

>>10644171
oof, the baby opens his eyes to the world for the first time

>> No.10645399

Gary posted a new video on YouTube, "explaining" how relativistic and electromagnetic equations derive from U= E/S.

>> No.10645406

>>10645399
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygI7K7dxdX0&t=3s
he also removed the videos mentioning 4chan again.

>> No.10645429 [DELETED] 

Bump
>>10645406
If he's trying to cut ties with 4chan again it's pretty scummy for most of his video to be footage of based gary and jerry's CAs.

>> No.10645433

>>10645406
If he's trying to cut ties with 4chan again it's pretty scummy for most of his video to be footage of based gary and jerry's CAs.

>> No.10645584

>>10645433
I see the 4chan video there?

>> No.10645609

>>10645584
Thanks for re-listing it Gary.

>> No.10645628

>>10644010
>gle cellular automaton. If you are comparing Gary to a noble laureate who hasn't even created proofs as advanced then Gary then Gary must be doing something right.
Sorry but it just says t'hooft isn't as capable at communicating his theory as gary is. his visualisations are ace.

>> No.10645729

All you 1 dimensional, down syndrome, neanderthal, monkey-ass eaters will soon obey the optimum theory. Gary, the niglet, out.

>> No.10645841

>>10644116
>And F = MA is just multiplication.
Ok.. but when DraftScience said that you fucking ducked out and licked his ass "you're right Lord DraftSciene, sorry, I amended my work, thy will shall be done Lord DraftScience"
you're such a cuck

>> No.10645852

>>10644116
hm if you ask me, you've begged people to give you attention, just a few minutes of their time, "hear me out" you said. people listened to your bullshit for 10 4chan threads over almost two months and after two months you've still not produced anything other than a few deluded posts and proclamations. you have no work to show for. have you written a document down with your results? no you haven't. your excel spreadsheet is a one-liner. all talk no substance. I don't really expect anything than a few more "yeah shut up I unified physics" comments from you.

>> No.10645955

Is it too much to ask for a "Cellular Automata General" instead of ten more threads of this schizophrenic bullshit?

>> No.10646028

>>10645955
i concur, cellular automata are fun

>> No.10646036

>>10646028
>>10645955
Thirded

>> No.10646076

>>10645852

Dont listen to this girl, Gary. People deny evolution, vaccines, even a round Earth. Stay strong & press onward!

>> No.10646079

>>10645841

DraftScience subscribed to the Optimum Institute youtube channel, so....

>> No.10646084

>>10645841

I dont know what you think we are doing here, but in science we amend our work if proven wrong. That's just how it works. DraftScience was right and so Optimum Theory was amended.

>> No.10646101

>>10646084
dude you sucked up to an old guy with smelly balls that looks like a fucking hobo. you let him face sit you. you can play jesus and say you offered him your ass cheek all you like, or that you'll never hesitate to share your baby momma, but truth is he mauled you. he fucking enslaved your ass. and you let it happen. you didn't stand up to him.

>> No.10646530

>>10646101
It sounds like you're claiming first-hand knowledge of the scent of his balls. Weird flex but ok.

>> No.10648369

Just bumping so I have time to upload some videos relating to Gary, as a goodbye to these threads. I'll post a link later today.

>> No.10648503

>>10646530
good riposte, though he has a point about your compliance with regards to DraftScience. Ultimately the scent of his balls doesn't matter, just that you seemed out of your depth when criticized by DraftScience.

>> No.10648519

>>10648369
Very nice

>> No.10649008

>>10645955
I support this and would be happy to contribute gifs to such a thread

>> No.10649221

>>10648369

Gary said he has "copyright" and he can sue people... I know how ridiculous that sounds but just a heads up

>> No.10649237

>>10649221
Well BBC has some copyrights and that didn't stop Gary from using their footage in the videos he's now selling. Which I had to edit out.
He can DMCA me I don't give a fuck.

>> No.10649287

>>10649237
Maybe thats why Garys videos are not on youtube? I do know that videos used in education settings have different rules and he is claiming his website is an online school. Just a guess

>> No.10649300

>>10649287
Fuck you Gary. I'm reporting you to Georgia Public Broadcasting for stealing "NW S27 E1: Titus - The Gorilla King" you disgusting criminal

>> No.10649307

>>10649300

Not Gary. Jez. Just trying to help

>> No.10649332

Optimum Archive
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLY4_fWRkBKYlEkKMcjyhNAU7tYzGZ3kj2

>> No.10649363
File: 26 KB, 997x248, GPB.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10649363

>>10649307
You can't fool me Gary.
>>10649332
Get them while you can. there's a couple more not there. I'll be uploading them. I think the only video I don't have at all is "It's exhausting" the video where he talks about his black son.

>> No.10649388

The video was uploaded and then made private on may 4th. Titled "It's exhausting" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xku1SNW2QBQ
Also I'm the documentarian. I asked for people to tell me what they remember from the video and I'm still interested. If anyone reading this saw it please email me jrvansant@cock.li

>> No.10649391
File: 14 KB, 582x382, exhausting.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10649391

From what I've been told so far, in the video Gary talks about how his son is black, because they're actually not his son, but his girlfriends, she got pregnant due to their open relationship and Gary's parents have been raising him since birth. He recounts how the real father disappeared, but before he did Gary went to inform him that his girlfriend was pregnant and keeping it. During this meeting Darnell, the father, got violent with him, and raped Gary. Gary was traumatized by this. Which is why his parents are raising the kid instead of him. This encounter has given Gary a deep fear of African Americans. and lead to Gary being fired from teaching after he physically and sexually assaulted one of his black students in a psychotic episode, he remains unemployed to this day. After being fired he started spending most of his time watching videos by Joe Rogan, Veritasium, and other pop-sci channels. During this time he developed an addiction to DMT and had an experience wherein he had a sexual encounter with both Sabine Hossenfelder and Stephen Wolfram, he says he didn't enjoy it very much because he's not into threesomes for some reason. After Stephen ejaculated into his rectum his penis turned into a black snake and began talking to him, telling him the secrets of the universe. This is how Gary discovered Optimum Theory.

At first I was uncertain about the validity of these claims but so many people have told me the exact same story the only reasonable conclusion is that it must be true. I assume Gary deleted the video because he was embarrassed by this. But in the unlikely event I've been mislead I'd need to see the video myself to confirm. Otherwise this story is going to be a large focus of the Wikipedia articles I'm writing on Gary and Optimum Theory.

>> No.10649397

"Fluid universe theory, abbreviated" is a gem imho. You can tell it was right before Gary figured out how to compute his ideas... honestly, gives credence to this all being legit. His automaton is basically just his ideas heard there, calculated, and the automaton did exactly what he thought it would. No wonder why he is so passionate about it imho. Also his girlfriend who shows up midway... if thats what Optimum Thoery gets you then where can I join? Lol

>> No.10649401

>>10649391
I saw the video before gary took it down, and slander / libel is not a good path for us to go down imho.

>> No.10649407

>>10649401
This is just what people who said they saw the video have been telling me. If you'd like to give me your recollection of it I'd very much appreciate it.
>>10649397
Gary's girlfriend is pretty hot, I'd appreciate if she could email me aswell

>> No.10649472 [DELETED] 

>>10649332
>>10649363
NICE! I've been downloading videos from his channel as well, but there's about 10 there that I didn't catch.

>> No.10649539

Aswell as documenting Gary, I'm also OP of 4/5 of the last threads. I was planning on posting this when the thread hit bump limit.
>Poll for if we're done with Gary
>http://www.strawpoll.me/17992930
>If option 1 wins I'll post some of what I have. And if anyone is still interested after the threads die you can email me and I can update you if Gary does something in the future. jrvansant@cock.li
>If option 2 wins I'll keep making threads but I'm renaming them to /toeg/ theory of everything general, or we can do /cag/ cellular automata general, so we can hopefully expand the conversation to more than just Optimum Theory.
>If option 3 wins I'll start a thread on DS and see if I can convince him to post in it.
But that was before it became apparent that no one likes them anymore, Including me, so I'm not making another one. My offer to keep anons up to date on Gary still stands. Just email me, password for info is onions
I'll warn you though, he might not ever do anything interesting for quite a while, if ever again.
And if anyone knows anything about Gary, or if you come upon more info about him somehow, like if you make that /cag/ thread and he shows up there, please email me.
And again, to Gary's girlfriend, I'd love to give you a white kid, seeing as Gary doesn't mind you fucking other guys I don't think he'd object, please email me, and ditch the big glasses I've always hated that shit.

Also I'm considering paying Hossenfelders exorbitant fee in order to interview her about her thoughts Optimum Theory. But I don't have the dosh at the moment. If anyone would be willing to pay some of the costs please email me. I doubt any of you will, but then again one of you was ostensibly stupid enough to donate to the Optimum Institute.

I think that's all. Thank you for your time.

>> No.10649595
File: 39 KB, 711x620, 1553121214451.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10649595

https://youtu.be/E5lHxx_hGCY?list=PLY4_fWRkBKYlEkKMcjyhNAU7tYzGZ3kj2

he was so based... why did you antagonize him?

>> No.10649603

>>10649595
warning: dangerously comfy nostalgia trip

>> No.10649651

>>10649595
The threads got boring.
Stopped making videos, stopped arguing in the threads, when he did it was just the same dismissiveness instead of actually responding to people, started saying he was an AI so he wouldn't talk about himself, didn't want to do an interview anymore because he didn't want to be a "leader"
Draft Science was his last chance to be interesting and he turned down that chance many times.
In the time these threads have gone on my opinion of Gary has sharply declined.
At first I thought he was schizo, now I think he's just ignorant.
I was seriously trying to get him on Joe Rogan dude, I'm more disappointed than anyone.

>> No.10649688

Has anyone managed to assemble a proper archive of chapters 1-9?

>> No.10649696

>>10649688
4chan has third party automatic archives newfag
>>/sci/thread/10498790#p10498790

>> No.10649714

>>10649539
Let's just make the next thread a general cellular automata thread as
>>10645955
>>10646028
>>10646036
suggested. That way we don't have to decisively kill Optimum Theory but we don't have to keep making zombie threads either.

>> No.10649717

>>10649696
>warosu.org
>properly assembled archive
fuck off

>> No.10649736

>>10649714
>That way we don't have to decisively kill Optimum Theory
NO, Fuck that
I want Optimum theory dead on 4chan. Gary's done being interesting and him losing his audience is the only thing that might make him start doing shit again.
>>10649717
It's just the one 4chan-x gives me for /sci/ nigger
fireeden does /sci/ too iirc

>> No.10649743

>>10649736
which is not to say you guys shouldn't do /cag/ but I was just here for Gary.

>> No.10649754

>>10649391
lol, what in the fuck

>> No.10649757

>>10649736
>>10649743
I'm coming off as a faggot, sorry, If people really are still interested then we should do /cag/ and keep talking about Optimum theory in it. But I assume most people aren't.
We can vote in the poll if you guys want. http://www.strawpoll.me/17992930
right now DraftScience thread is winning.

>> No.10649771

>>10649332
>>10649363
This is very interesting. Thank you.

>> No.10649781

>>10649595
It's strange to think we're 10 threads in already. I made the first two continuation threads then kind of drifted off after the fifth one, it was obvious Gary was becoming more stressed and the trolls were feeding on that more than ever. Pretty sad my dudes. We had a good thing going at first. Nobody had to keep pushing him, we could have just kept expanding on Optimum Theory and seeing how this simple algorithm could be cleverly manipulated.

>>10649603
You got that right anon.

>>10649651
That's true too; Gary's not the most stable guy. But he was trying. We made a lot of headway at first. Ignorant or arrogant or whatever, I still believe he has a good heart.

Also I have really mixed feelings about him actually going on JR. It would have been interesting though. Despite the limitations of the OT simulation, Gary's ideals and willingness to fight for his beliefs would have played well off Rogan's bullheaded skepticism.

>> No.10649819
File: 1 KB, 202x26, onions.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10649819

>>10649781
>It's strange to think we're 10 threads in already
11 actually
>Gary was becoming more stressed and the trolls were feeding on that more than ever. Pretty sad my dudes. We had a good thing going at first. Nobody had to keep pushing him,
It's cause he lied about Sabine. And he reacted so poorly to getting called out on it that it just spiralled into more shit and we got where we are now.
> We made a lot of headway at first. Ignorant or arrogant or whatever, I still believe he has a good heart.
Honestly I don't think we could have made much more. Gary has been refusing to be completely upfront this entire time, trying to make us pay for the videos, and refusing to release the excel file.
And no offense to anyone but based gary's the only one who's been keeping up with their CA. If Fairy and Berry and whoever else had kept up on theirs these threads would've probably turned out a lot different.

>pic related
Nice try newfag. That password is specifically to keep Gary and the redditors out.

>> No.10649822

>>10649237
Gary is a ridiculous hypocrite.

>> No.10649835

>>10649391
This explains so much. Especially 5.9999

>> No.10649850

>>10649819
>And no offense to anyone but based gary's the only one who's been keeping up with their CA. If Fairy and Berry and whoever else had kept up on theirs these threads would've probably turned out a lot different.
I agree with this. I think we could have handled Gary's personality better but getting the truth out of him was like pulling teeth.

>pic related
>Nice try newfag. That password is specifically to keep Gary and the redditors out.
Wait what's that?

>> No.10649858

>>10649595
>he was so based... why did you antagonize him?
Gary started believing his own hype but never delivered anymore. He disappointed and failed.

>> No.10649860

>>10649850
>Wait what's that?
onions is a trick password. Even fucking newfags should know it so don't feed me some "no really I'm an anon I just don't get this obscure meme" shit

>> No.10649861

>>10649688
>Has anyone managed to assemble a proper archive of chapters 1-9?
http://archive.fo/PHXGN
http://archive.fo/MzYEI
http://archive.fo/xFZqE
http://archive.fo/EBKIr
http://archive.fo/X58Ol
http://archive.fo/LGxqK
http://archive.fo/b5Mt8
http://archive.fo/63en3
http://archive.fo/Db7lf
http://archive.fo/5sKP0
http://archive.fo/B4nxI

I think this is all of 4chan, though the other guy says it's archived elsewhere anyway. Of course this hasn't started on 4chan but reddit (and this is also archived).

>> No.10649862

>>10649860
I mean what's it protecting? I didn't catch this development

>> No.10649865

>>10649862
I don't want Gary knowing what I got on him.

>> No.10649868

>>10649865
Oh shit.

>> No.10649872

>>10649862
>>10649865
or are you saying you didn't read this post >>10649539

>> No.10649874

>>10649872
Yeah I missed that. Thanks.

>> No.10649888

Anyone interested in a chronological summary of Gary? rise to demise?

>> No.10649893

>>10649888
To clarify for the viewers this isn't me.

>> No.10649894

>>10649819
>Berry
I am actually still here, but also been posting as Weary, RLP and anon.

>> No.10649896

>>10649894
For some reason I was under the impression I'm-not-a-redditor-anon was weary.
But I'm-not-a-redditor-anon was anti gary and you're pro I believe.

>> No.10649909

This is some entertaining schizo shit right here, based optimum theory poster

>> No.10649918

>>10649896
No, I am not that anon. I have been fairly pro-gary. Kind of tired of this now though.

>> No.10649934
File: 53 KB, 1228x672, poll.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10649934

>>10649918
>No, I am not that anon.
Ok. I don't know why I thought that.
>Kind of tired of this now though.
As am I.

But I'm specifically tired of Gary, and the poll says the people want Draft Science.
And If people want Draft Science we can certainly make a thread and I'll email him about it. I think there's a high chance he doesn't buy it though. And if we're making the next thread /cag/ that'll decrease the odds because he doesn't seem to give a shit about them, based on his responses.
So everybody go vote on whether you want Draft Science I guess.

>> No.10650101
File: 32 KB, 740x487, poll.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10650101

I realize at this point that things have changed since I started this poll.
To clarify I'm interpereting
>I'm still interested in exploring Optimum Theory
as being pro /cag/ but not draft science
>We should move our discussions towards the superior UTOE by the superior Gary, aka DraftScience
As pro /cag/ and pro DS
>Gary is boring and we should let the threads die.
as no thread whatsoever.

If anyone voted not intending for me to interperet their vote that way say so and I'll note it.
I ask because I assume I'm correct in assuming that the "I'm still interested in exploring Optimum Theory" votes are asking for /cag/ and not continuation thread 11. If anyone seriously wants continuation thread 11 I'm shocked.

>> No.10650115

>>10650101
>I ask because I assume I'm correct in assuming that the "I'm still interested in exploring Optimum Theory" votes are asking for /cag/ and not continuation thread 11. If anyone seriously wants continuation thread 11 I'm shocked.
Don't know how I'd feel about continuation thread 11 either. But /cag/ sounds dandy.

>> No.10650117

>>10649888
Yes, that would be fantastic. I think someone should also properly compile all of the 4chan OT media that has been created along with proper descriptions from the creators while they're still here.

>> No.10650131

>>10650101
I am the one that voted for
> Gary is boring and we should let the threads die.
but I might be interested in a /cag/.

>> No.10650144
File: 2.06 MB, 3124x2699, TIMESAND___general-relevance-MCM-(04of48).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10650144

https://imgur.com/a/HtvHgi9

>> No.10650151

>>10650117
>I think someone should also properly compile all of the 4chan OT media that has been created along with proper descriptions from the creators
I asked people to email me that shit so I can keep an archive but no one has.
I can repeat it yet again.
If anyone has any info email me
If anyone has any opinions they'd like to share email me
If anyone wants to send me copies of their CA for archiving email me
If anyone wants to spam copypastas to me from a throwaway email me
If anyone wants literally anything relating to Optimum Theory email me
If anyone reading this is a early 20's, white, virgin, not fat, not ugly, not a tranny, tomboy please email me

But if by
> properly compile all of the 4chan OT media that has been created along with proper descriptions from the creators
You're asking for me to do something similar to what RLP was doing with the equations then it's time I fess up
I'm only here for the schizos, I don't know shit about quantum physics, for example nothing about optimum theory has ever seemed unreasonable to me

>>10650131
Ok, so then everyone's pro /cag/ but anti DS is beating pro DS

>> No.10650202

>>10649888
I'm gonna get to work on a video once >>10649539 stops blueballing me.
I don't know who the archivefag thinks he is...

>> No.10650210

>>10650202
You saying your the fag who got the password wrong? What you're just gonna ask me what I have and then just post it in the thread?

>> No.10650215

>>10650210s
Well fuck it I don't care anymore. I'm writing an email now.

>> No.10650224

>>10650144

Can we get a too long didn't read in this bitch?

>> No.10650230

>>10650101
What about changing these into Cellular Automata general

The value here was exploring a CA with anons. Im done with gary. He threatened to kick my dog and stuff.

>> No.10650237

>>10650230
>What about changing these into Cellular Automata general
That is the plan, yes.

>> No.10650344
File: 180 KB, 1035x822, whatdoesshenotwantustoknow.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10650344

Alright. Everyone seems agreed on making /cag/ but right now the votes are tied in regards to inviting Draft Science on 4chan.
I've been up 48 hours, I stayed up all night to bump the thread before it expired. and then upload the videos and then sit around here in case Gary DMCA'd the channel.
To the few of you that emailed me. I'm sure you're disappointed that I just sent you a vague overview of what I have and not a draft of an ED article or something. I'm sure your also disappointed I didn't send you any files. I'll see about giving more in depth replies tomorrow and decide If I wanna just give everybody access to everything or not.
Back to the poll. Everybody wants /cag/ so someone who knows shit about CA's should go make it. I don't know shit so I shouldn't make it.
If the pro Draft Science vote is higher than against when I wake up I'll see if I can get Draft Science on here. I was going to wait till bump limit but I'm fucking tired sorry if you wanted me to tell you more shit or something.
Thanks for threads guys.
And to Gary, who is definitely still here.
Fuck you faggot all you had to do was not spazz out and start talking about being a GAN and fucking talking snakes and shit. I was literally emailing Joe Rogan. I didn't get any replies. But I was absolutely intent on getting you on there any way I could.
Fuck you.
That being said I hope you continue to believe in and promote Optimum Theory in the future.
Thank you for your time.

>> No.10650350

More videos just posted on the Optimum Archive
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLY4_fWRkBKYlEkKMcjyhNAU7tYzGZ3kj2

>> No.10650355

>>10650344
I could draft a cozy /cag/ opener tonight maybe

About to take a dump tho so I gotta go do that

>> No.10650358

>>10650355
Don't post a migration link. Gary is fucking incompetent and will have to struggle to find the new thread himself.

>> No.10650371

>>10650151
>I asked people to email me that shit so I can keep an archive but no one has.
I have posted everything I think is relevant in thread. I am still going to compile all of my stuff and send it to you. I might put in a few new things. I need to go to sleep right now, but you will get it sometime tomorrow. I will post it in thread too. If this one is dead I will post it in the /cag/ thread.

>> No.10650378
File: 2.46 MB, 640x480, s307.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10650378

>>10650371

>> No.10650382

>>10650358
Its fine, he can actually get banned there maybe

>> No.10650399

>>10650344
stay classy /sci/

>> No.10651548 [DELETED] 
File: 41 KB, 1485x1482, S309-f31.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10651548

I intended to improve the notation in the LaTeX document and include a description of the vector map and 3D automata. I started on this. but very soon got fed up by it. I did a few things though. I am posting the .pdf, .tex and .jpg. I am also reposting my code with a permanent link. I have about 200 runs of this stored as .csv and .png of every frame, but I don't think it is of much interest.

https://anonfile.com/xcm7V5r5nc/optimum_tex
https://anonfile.com/D7m1Vbr3n2/optimum_pdf
https://anonfile.com/adp5V2rfnd/optimum_jpg
https://anonfile.com/lcodV9rcn1/optimum-theory_py

>> No.10651556 [DELETED] 
File: 267 KB, 2550x1100, optimum.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10651556

>> No.10651599
File: 41 KB, 1485x1482, S309-f31.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10651599

I intended to improve the notation in the LaTeX document and include a description of the vector map and 3D automata. I started on this. but very soon got fed up by it. I did a few things though. I am posting the .pdf, .tex and .jpg. I am also reposting my code with a permanent link. I have about 200 runs of this stored as .csv and .png of every frame, but I don't think it is of much interest.

https://anonfile.com/xcm7V5r5nc/optimum_tex
https://anonfile.com/D7m1Vbr3n2/optimum_pdf
https://anonfile.com/adp5V2rfnd/optimum_jpg
https://anonfile.com/lcodV9rcn1/optimum-theory_py

>> No.10651603
File: 267 KB, 2550x1100, optimum.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10651603

>> No.10651669

>>10651556
>>10651603
Nice job, though I need to point out that the Schrödinger equation part is incorrect. What you currently have written was just something I was messing around with. The actual "solution" I was working on revolves around the fact that you can approximate and rearrange [math]i\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\psi = \left [-\frac{1}{2}\nabla^2 +V\right ]\psi[/math] to [math]\psi(x,t+\Delta t) = \frac{i\Delta t }{2\Delta x^2}\left ( \sum_{n=1}^4 \psi(\mu_n,t)-4\psi(x,t) \right ) - i\Delta t(V(x,t)\psi(x,t))+\psi(x,t)[/math] where [math]\mu[/math] 1 through 4 are the coordinates of the neighboring cells. There's nothing noteworthy about this since it's completely trivial and it doesn't have anything to do with Optimum Theory. I was originally going to try to force it into a complex blur kernel, but Gary became unstable again and I gave up. Should probably remove that section desu.

And a more general question, since people seemed to be confused by "[math]\Im(x)[/math]". Is this archaic notation? Is [math]\mathrm{Im}(x)[/math] better?

>> No.10651682

Gary's freaking out on reddit again.
https://www.reddit.com/r/badscience/comments/bpoykv/physics_has_been_unified_by_a_nobody_with_a/
At first I thought he was taking this surprisingly well but turns out I was wrong.
I just want to make sure Gary knows that he's absolutely right, I am starkeffect. I'm also lettuce_field_theory, realHorusLupercal, ThrowawayCACritic, slackermanz, and Sabine Hossenfelder.
And I'm coming for you Gary.

>> No.10651690

>>10651682
>I just want to make sure Gary knows that he's absolutely right

So what else is new

>> No.10651696

>>10651690
I can't let you get away with unifying physics Gary. I need that new hadron collider.
I've also been using a vpn to change my ip, I'm actually every single post in this thread. It was me all along Gary.

>> No.10651706

>>10651696

I'm not Gary, but it makes sense that you, u/stark_effect would have sent Gary a fake email claiming to be Sabine just to get a rise out of him. Doesn't change the fact that the real Sabine Liked the Optimum Institute on twitter. Anyway... This is boring me

>> No.10651715

>>10651682
To be fair, some Redditor actually is/was stalking Garry online. See >>10595825. I suspect that it's the same person that created that Reddit thread since the account was created today.

>> No.10651735

>>10651715
I've got a pretty comprehensive idea about which redditors know what about Gary.
To my knowledge no one has been hacking Gary's accounts, doxed him, or sent him fake emails.
So if he's not lying or just imagining things then I strongly doubt it's starkeffect doing that shit.

>> No.10651739

>>10651706
sabine "liked" the fact you praised her music video.
she didn't "like" your theory, which she is on record as saying is "nonsense"

>> No.10651762

>>10651735
Probably not, but when there's actual visible evidence of someone completely obsessed with his online activity you can't really blame him for being paranoid and making assumptions. Not everyone is as resilient to that kind of thing as your average 4chan shitposter.

>> No.10651772

>>10651706
>u/stark_effect
This is your sworn rival Gary. How can you not remember his fucking name.
Was fucking his name up part of your plan?
to cunningly make me think this couldn't possibly be you because Gary would know how fucking spell the reddit username that I spelled out two posts ago.
>>10651762
I agree, I just think the fact he's completely misplaced his suspicion on starkeffect is fucking hilarious.

>> No.10651780

>>10651762
not stark, but i assure you redditors are just amused by gary the same as people here.
but because on reddit gary deletes posts/accounts and edits comments after replies (and sockpuppets an insane amount like here), a degree of receipt-keeping just becomes part of the game, which can appear stalkerish to an outside observer with no context

>> No.10651782

>>10651780
go back

>> No.10651935
File: 295 KB, 800x800, uuuu.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10651935

>>10651780
>Haha yeah we keep records of what accounts this guy uses and what he's said over the course of several years but it's totally not stalking bro we're just having fun with him lmao.
Get help and go back.

>> No.10652206

>>10651682
>Gary's freaking out on reddit again.
What a fool. Posts comments under his real name, then accuses people of doxxing who merely use that name to refer to him. Ridiculous and pathetic. This is exactly the kind of pathetic that made Gary suck up do DraftScience when he ripped Optimum theory into pieces. Embarrassing.

I've left out the part where he claims to be a GAN / AI and that Gary Lee isn't even his real name, just a nickname. What next? Accusing people of doxxing him for using the word "boxblur"?

>> No.10652215

>>10652206

Here's an idea: how about just leaving people who are stoked about their automatons the fuck alone?

>> No.10652219

>>10652206
And if you cannot do that then here's another idea: how about you act like a fucking professional and refrain from logical fallacies, and just stick to the science?

>> No.10652239

>>10652215
Gary if you're so butthurt about the videos being uploaded just DMCA them. Unless you're wrong about them being your copyright that is.
And I decided to email a lawyer about this. I'm obviously not planning on doing anything but I figured I should see whether they think anything I've done qualifies as what Gary says it does.
Though Gary apparrently thinks I'm stark and that I've been impersonating Sabine and trying to hack him or some shit. So I wouldn't be surprised if Gary tries to sue stark over this.

>> No.10652261

>>10652239
>And I decided to email a lawyer about this
I probably shouldn't have said that. I'm not trying to sound like I'm threatening or expecting legal action. I just asked him some questions.
If I get a response before the thread expires I'll tell you guys whether he says I'm a damn dirty criminal or not.

>> No.10652807

Can optimum theory simulations prove the standard model?

I see electrons forming, but where's the rest of the subatomic particles

>> No.10652818

>schitzo makes cool automata, claims he unified physics
>autist on reddit gets mad, begins autistic crusade

/sci/, where the mentally ill congregate.

>> No.10653112
File: 238 KB, 2550x1100, optimum.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10653112

>>10651669
>Schrödinger equation part is incorrect.
>Should probably remove that section
Alright, I am removing that section and uploading again.
> actual "solution" [...] it's completely trivial
Thank you for posting this. Even though you feel like it is trivial it is nice to have it on the record in thread.
> Is Im(x) better?
Hehe, yes.

https://anonfile.com/66E5Xbr2n0/optimum_pdf
https://anonfile.com/87E0X2rdn6/optimum_tex
https://anonfile.com/CfE5X5rdna/optimum_png

REAL \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/AVES ARE SPIKY

>> No.10653193
File: 115 KB, 720x576, liger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10653193

Some things just can't last, but that doesn't mean we can't have fun with them for a while

>> No.10653246

>>10652807
Where do you see electrons forming? Circles are not inherently electrons.

>> No.10653260
File: 39 KB, 986x490, poll.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10653260

>>10652261
I don't think the lawyers getting back to me. I think I fucked it up, iirc lawyers can't give legal advice so I would have had to phrase my email in a roundabout way and I totally didn't. Well who cares if Gary's suing anyone it'll be a redditor.

>pic related
It looks like anti DS wins, because I'm counting pro DS against the other two. I came up with the DS idea because Gary refused to respond to DS so I figured if I brought DS here he wouldn't be able to ignore him.
I think having a DS thread would be funny but I'm sort of glad it lost because I have my hands full with Gary aftermath.

Also I said I'm not starting /cag/ so some else do that.

>> No.10653274

>>10653260
Also I'd appreciate if that one guy who was LARPing as Gary's sycophant can tell me what their deal was. If that was some big brain plan to build Gary's ego and give him the confidence to respond to DS then I think it was a stupid plan.
And that "Mad Scientist Discord" guy as well. Gary told me you were a schizo and then said he felt so sorry for you he didn't want to talk to me about what happened in your conversation. So I'd like to hear your side of the story.

>> No.10653505

/cag/ is up. Not linking in this post as requested by >>10650358.