/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.10631412]

What's the scientific consensus on whether traps are gay?

On the one hand, traps are biologically male, so that could be considered gay. On the other hand, they're behaviorally/aesthetically feminine, so that could be considered non-gay.

Is it gayer to be attracted to a very feminine male or a very masculine female?

[Anonymous No.10631415]

whatever rocks your boat

[Anonymous No.10631438]

>>10631412
If you're attracted to male features, you're gay. If you're attracted to female features you're straight. This is regardless of what's between the legs of the object of your attraction. If you want to dispute that you might as well say you're handsexual because you enjoy masturbation.

[Anonymous No.10631800]

>>10631412
homosexual
/ˌhɒmə(ʊ)ˈsɛkʃʊəl,ˌhəʊmə(ʊ)ˈsɛkʃʊəl/
adjective
1.
sexually attracted to people of one's own sex.
noun
1.
a person who is sexually attracted to people of their own sex.

there is no debate, per definition it's gay to like traps no matter how feminine they present themself.

everyone who argues otherwise is just insecure about their own sexuality. men who like tomboys aren’t gay and gay men that like very feminine men aren’t straight. deal with it.
if you think liking traps isn’t gay you aren't any different from feminist that argue trans women are women

[Anonymous No.10631810]

>>10631412
not
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26498424/#fft

[Anonymous No.10631870]

>Results provide clear evidence that GAMP men are not homosexual. They also indicate that GAMP men are especially likely to eroticize the idea of being a woman.

oh no no no

it's literally worse than being gay

[http://i.4cdn.org/lit/15574513(...) No.10631881]

>>10631800

exactly. a feminine man is still a man.

[Anonymous No.10631884]

"are traps gay?" Is a semantic shithole of a question

[Anonymous No.10631912]

>>10631412
Traps are gay but It's okay to be gay, let's rejoice with the boys in the gay way.

[Anonymous No.10631924]

>>10631438
t.

>>10631412
If you like dick you're gay faggot. If you loke feminine features there's a thing for that: WOMEN

[Anonymous No.10632030]

>>10631412
Why? Are you a homophobe?

[Anonymous No.10632056]

I’m gonna have to go with Aristotle on this one. No matter how feminine they are, their defining characteristic is to have a penis, so if you seek out traps then yes you are at least bi

[Anonymous No.10632061]

traps are NOT gay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.10632066]

I only like traps because I want to rape/dominate them. In my mind they only exist to serve my cock. The idea of a man becoming such a lowlife for me is extremely satisfying, to become my personal sex toy, at times its even more so hotter than a woman doing the same thing. I don't care for their penis, only their holes.
So is it gay? Probably yes.

[Anonymous No.10632216]

>>10632056
>their defining characteristic is to have a penis
Wrong. They have a penis, but that alone is not their defining characteristic.

[Anonymous No.10632280]

>>10632061
Why is this so arousing?

[Anonymous No.10632471]

>>10632216
I assume you didn’t read the image then. It’s the defining characteristic that distinguishes traps from women

[Anonymous No.10632475]

>>10631924
>If you loke feminine features there's a thing for that: WOMEN
Like the one you posted?

[Anonymous No.10632493]

>>10632280
you’re a pedophile

[Anonymous No.10632604]

>>10632056
>pic
Based Diogenes

[Anonymous No.10632680]

>>10631412
homosexual
/ˌhɒmə(ʊ)ˈsɛkʃʊəl,ˌhəʊmə(ʊ)ˈsɛkʃʊəl/
adjective
1.
sexually attracted to people of one's own sex.
noun
1.
a person who is sexually attracted to people of their own sex.

It doesn't matter if they look female, they're still gay.

[Anonymous No.10632681]

Didn't grothendieck prove traps were gay?

[Anonymous No.10632685]

>>10632493
How? Looks quite mature.