Optimum Theory Continuation Thread 9

File: 144 KB, 1000x500, psi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Optimum Theory Continuation Thread 9 Anonymous Tue May 7 20:37:56 2019 No.10624758 [Reply] [Original]

Gary vs G1/fixed title edition

>last thread
>>10616117

>>	RIP Tue May 7 20:58:50 2019 No.10624819 File: 3.70 MB, 640x480, s326.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Dying is not that bad. Let us face death with optimism.

Anonymous Tue May 7 21:15:38 2019 No.10624840

Has anyone read the things that Ga... um, I mean, "G1" has posted on the optimum institute website about horizontal leadership? Apparantly he wants the organization to only admit / ban, new members based on a vote, up to and including his own banishment?? Is that even possible for an org? Completely level structure? He says this is how "wolves and apes" are made to organize??

Anonymous Tue May 7 21:16:22 2019 No.10624841

so to recap:

gary found a mirror of david tong's royal society popsci lecture with a typo in the title (replaced "fields" with "fluids"). based on this, he became convinced he is going to win between 1 and 2 clay millenium prizes, but will donate some of the money to 4chan and some to religious charities.

anyone who disagrees with gary does so because they believe in talking snakes and cant handle the fact that optimum theory says this is not true

there were some weird detours through polyamory and racism

after 9 threads, the amount of linear algebra and calculus remains at 0

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 21:19:00 2019 No.10624850 >>10624840 Yeah. And he deleted my why can't I build muscle post too. That fucker.

Anonymous Tue May 7 21:30:13 2019 No.10624868

>>10624840
Yes. I also saw these posts in the previous thread.

>>10622157
>The amount of work we could get done if I could just be the boss / dictator and people who just listen.
>>10622170
>I just need to some who can program and listen, and do what I say even when it sounds completely mad.
>>10622194
>Let me direct the fucking process directly and we will build a mother fucking company bigger than Apple.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 21:32:39 2019 No.10624871 >>10624850 That was a mistake. Im sorry. ~G1

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 21:34:27 2019 No.10624875 >>10624841 Didnt Best Gary prove the Schwarzinger equation in this model? (too lazy to spell correct)

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 21:40:30 2019 No.10624888 >>10624841 What? Therss been som actual math Some

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 21:41:25 2019 No.10624890 >>10624875 No, he implemented Schrödinger equation on top of it Amazing When you add behavior to something it then has that behavior Wow

Anonymous Tue May 7 21:45:07 2019 No.10624894

>>10624841
Worst Gary was not advocating "polygamy", as typically defined, if you are going to criticize at least come correct. What he was saying is that if every guy in a society has a child with two different women then the family structure becomes a perfect interconnected "mesh" (his word), and it would effectively end familial / racial conflict... in theory... and would bring massive cohesion and unity to any tribe... in theory... he uses this reasoning to conclude that evolution actually selected for this trait and that is why "cheating" is actually a "feature" of our genetics and not a "bug", because interwoven primate families would be more cohesive and therefore more likely to survive. He also dabbled with an idea that grandparents are evolved to be the caregivers of the youth while the middle generation is evolved to hunt and forage, and that is why the human lifespan is 3 gen long, and that its "depressing and sad" that humans have become so detatched from their evolved purpose that they stuff the elderly into nursing homes instead of giving them purpose.

Anonymous Tue May 7 21:48:30 2019 No.10624904

>>10624841
>after 9 threads, the amount of linear algebra and calculus remains at 0
0 out of what? 0? Also, known as the solution of the equation [eqn]0x = 0[/eqn] which has infinitely many solutions, hence there is all amounts of math in this thread all at once.

>>	Liger_Lover Tue May 7 22:03:22 2019 No.10624948 File: 42 KB, 410x410, tiger&lion.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Sometimes we feel that the only way to move forwards is to combine things that have been kept apart.

>>	based gary Tue May 7 22:04:32 2019 No.10624954 >>10624841 >thread about cellular automata >calculus Is the product rule your specialty anon?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 22:05:21 2019 No.10624955 >>10624948 Sexy

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 22:18:27 2019 No.10624994 Legit af. This is what optimum theory says about dreams too https://youtu.be/-H5_VSdWBIU

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 22:20:07 2019 No.10624997 >>10624840 It's possible but usually goes poorly if you try it.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 22:21:00 2019 No.10625002 >>10624954 i dont know what you are trying to imply, but legit work on quantum cellular automata makes frequent use of differential equations

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 22:32:37 2019 No.10625054 >>10625002 Is the "change function" as Gary called it not a differential equation? Differential equations do not need to be complex. F=MA is a differential equation. Actually the whole point of a unified equation is that it is simple.

Anonymous Tue May 7 22:42:24 2019 No.10625083

>>10625054
>F=MA is a differential equation
no.
>Actually the whole point of a unified equation is that it is simple.
no, the whole point is it is complex enough to actually explain things.

only equation gary has ever written down is u=e/s, which is somewhere between nothing and the rudimentary definition of pressure/energy density.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 22:46:12 2019 No.10625092 >>10625083 https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2890262/how-is-f-ma-a-differential-equation-confirmation How about you do us all a favor and shut the fuck up from now on?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 22:47:54 2019 No.10625097 I wasnt really asking you if F=MA is a differential equation, I was trying to let you save face. Now shut the fuck up.

>>	Liger_Lover Tue May 7 22:52:39 2019 No.10625109 >>10625083 >>Actually the whole point of a unified equation is that it is simple. >no, the whole point is it is complex enough to actually explain things. This is a cute discussion. You two will merge sooner than you think.

Anonymous Tue May 7 22:55:13 2019 No.10625114

>>10625092
gary, this is just saying acceleration can be rewritten as the second derivative of displacement. but f=ma is still routinely solved by 5th graders. my point was clearly about your complete lack of sophisticated mathematics, including the class of differential equations one first encounters in university math and physics, requiring advanced techniques that you plainly don't know

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 23:02:59 2019 No.10625133 >>10625114 Not Gary. But he said from the jump that optimum theory is made to be understood not even by 5th graders, but by 5 year olds.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 23:03:36 2019 No.10625134 File: 43 KB, 723x780, 23d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Ok guys it took a couple days, but optimum theory is legit. I had sex and I bent a metal bar with my HANDS.

Anonymous Tue May 7 23:12:57 2019 No.10625149

>>10625114
>my point was clearly about your complete lack of sophisticated mathematics, including the class of differential equations one first encounters in university math and physics, requiring advanced techniques that you plainly don't know
Jesus, how close-minded do you have to be to presuppose that an UTOE needs to have differential equations. I mean, I do not think Optimim Theory is a legit UTOE, but this opinion is kinda small braned.

Anonymous Tue May 7 23:20:01 2019 No.10625156

>>10625149
i dont know what the exact mathematical framework will be, but it will 100% require more advanced math than what gary is capable of. i was merely referencing a couple examples of medium difficulty math for rhetorical purposes, to highlight how little math gary can do, relative to his grandiose claims

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 23:26:29 2019 No.10625166 >>10624758 Do us all a favor and take this bullshit off sci

>>	based gary Tue May 7 23:29:56 2019 No.10625181 >>10625002 >Numerical analysis is the same as calculus found the CSlet.

Liger_Lover Tue May 7 23:40:35 2019 No.10625202

>>10625156
I mean, I agree, but I think you should be more optimistic. Have you seen Gary stating in the previous thread that he want to learn to code? What I (an infertile cross-breed) would personally love to see is Gary actually getting motivated to learn the stuff that he needs to fulfill his goals. If he puts in the effort to learn more math, physics and programming I am daring to say that he might actually become the man he is currently claiming to be.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 23:43:25 2019 No.10625209 File: 15 KB, 251x242, B28D0C8B-B9B1-48E1-9885-41133EEA6BAE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10624954 >Is the product rule your specialty anon? Oh fuck my sides. It’s been a while.

Anonymous Wed May 8 01:12:44 2019 No.10625372

>>10625156

Name something not derived from space / energy. Similarly name something more base than energy or space

While you are attempting that (good luck) here is some advice, take it or leave it: stop trying to act smart, and actually be smart. Being smart is not about big vocabs and complex equation, and if you could ask Gary I am sure he would tell you that he wrote his theory to be understood by as many people as possible, not just Ivy League grads, and that does not mean he could not write some incomprehensible jibberish if he wanted to, in fact thats even easier than writing plainly, because when you write plainly there is nowhere to hide poor logic.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 01:14:47 2019 No.10625378 Optimum Theory is Christianity. God uses the equation to create everything, and he send his son Jesus Christ to teach us how to act so that we may not just survive, but truly live.

Anonymous Wed May 8 01:20:38 2019 No.10625393

Jesus Christ said not to get so upset anymore when people do not understand the truth, but also not to martyr ourselves like He did by not fighting back. He paid that price so that we dont have to. Instead calmly remind people that defense is our right, as is happiness, health and success across generations.

Anonymous Wed May 8 01:28:36 2019 No.10625405

I picked the logo for Optimum Theory because I thought it looked cool, but God later told me that it was because it has 3 crosses for the trinity, and this is for His glory, as were the crosses that appeared when I simulated the singularity with a value of 777, one digit above evil, and the singularity because He is one. God told me that he picked April Fools Day as the day I should reveal Optimum Theory to remind us of Paul's prophecy that He will reveal himself even in the smallest, (most quantum) ways (like within a singularity) and those who deny what they can see with their own eyes are fools. I did not pick April 1st. It was just the day this fell on for me... only later did God tell me the significants, that even I myself am a fool for thinking I can ever know everything. God has a sense of humor :-)

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 02:02:26 2019 No.10625471 Proverbs 18:15 An intelligent heart acquires knowledge, and the ear of the wise seeks knowledge.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 02:04:32 2019 No.10625476 Hosea 4:6-7 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge; because you have rejected knowledge,

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 02:06:05 2019 No.10625479 Proverbs 24:5 A wise man is full of strength, and a man of knowledge enhances his might,

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 02:08:41 2019 No.10625486 Ecclesiastes 7:12 For the protection of wisdom is like the protection of money, and the advantage of knowledge is that wisdom preserves the life of him who has it.

Anonymous Wed May 8 02:11:13 2019 No.10625494

James 3:13-18
Who is wise and understanding among you? By his good conduct let him show his works in the meekness of wisdom. But if you have bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in your hearts, do not boast and be false to the truth. This is not the wisdom that comes down from above, but is earthly, unspiritual, demonic. For where jealousy and selfish ambition exist, there will be disorder and every vile practice. But the wisdom from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, open to reason, full of mercy and good fruits, impartial and sincere. ...

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 02:13:09 2019 No.10625500 >>10625405 This is certainly an about face. One day everyone who disagree's with you is a fundie. The next God is talking to you. And stop spamming bible quotes.

Anonymous Wed May 8 02:29:48 2019 No.10625537

>>10625500
The Universe is not 6,000 years old, and evolution is a fact. Even Pat Robertson tried to purge this scientific illiteracy from his people. Truth cannot contradict truth. Genesis is the most beautiful metaphor for evolution ever written. I even said that in the Optimum Theory video. Evolution REALLY IS a tree of life. Our species REALLY DID "eat the fruit of knowedge" and evolve. God's equation really did craft us from the ATOM / ADAM of dirt, and breath us to life EVE (Eve is a Hebrew word, fyi. It means "breath to life")

Anonymous Wed May 8 02:33:05 2019 No.10625546

>>10625500

"Religious" people attack Optimum Theory because they do not understand. They are the Vatican when it used to burn people alive for saying the Earth rotated the Sun. They are WEAK IN FAITH they think that knowedge will disprove Gods existance, but in reality, the Equation of everything AND EVEN ABIOGENESIS have only GLORIFED God and his creation.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 02:50:53 2019 No.10625582 >>10625537 You've been playing too much Assassin's Creed, Gary.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 02:52:10 2019 No.10625586 >>10625582 Why do you say that? Great game, but I dont get the reference

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 03:02:05 2019 No.10625599 File: 1.60 MB, 350x197, 50332344.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10625586 Literally zero self-awareness.

Anonymous Wed May 8 03:46:33 2019 No.10625653

Optimum Theory is also compatible with the beautiful philosophy of Taoism & its founding document the Tao Te Ching (Taoism is the founding philosophy of Asia, and the foundation of Buddhism and Hinduism - however, I am not sure if Optimum Theory is fully compatible with Buddhism / Hinduism / Islam, yet; I imagine it is, but that has not been revealed to me yet; Taoism is not necessarily Buddhism / Hinduism, though they were inspired by Taoism).

From the Tao Te Ching:

There was something undifferentiated and yet complete,
Which existed before heaven and earth.
Soundless and formless, it depends on nothing and does not change.
It operates everywhere and is free from danger.
It may be considered the mother of the universe.
I do not know its name; I call it Tao.{15}

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 03:49:16 2019 No.10625656 Thank you for letting me work out these ideas here, bros. I don't know if I have been suitably thankful. Even our conflicts are valuable to this work. ~G1

Anonymous Wed May 8 03:52:00 2019 No.10625662

Taoism describes all of reality, including mankind, as a fluid. Really remarkable insight for its time.

"The best (man) is like water.
Water is good; it benefits all things and does not compete with them.
It dwells in (lowly) places that all disdain.
This is why it is so near to Tao."

>>	Jerry Wed May 8 03:57:18 2019 No.10625667 Jesus Christ what the fuck Stop Just fucking stop

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 04:14:57 2019 No.10625692 "God" is a linguistic concept. It is a word that we have used to comprehend the infinite, the improbable and the unimaginable. John said so himself. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John 1:1)

Anonymous Wed May 8 04:17:42 2019 No.10625698

There is no amount of knowledge that Optimum Theory can reveal that can destroy this mystery. Optimum Theory has been very clear from the beginning: the Universe is infinite and we cannot truly comprehend even a square inch of it because we are merely finite beings, and it is only our ego that says otherwise.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 04:19:39 2019 No.10625705 >>10625698 Nice blog faggot.

Anonymous Wed May 8 04:21:13 2019 No.10625710

Me and my buddies do this thing called pound night where we all get together at somebody's house to fuck eachother. We don't actually finish inside eachother, rather we shoot into a cup. At sunrise we put our clothes back on, mix the cup with nesquick cocoa and milk, and equally divide its contents between us, becoming one with the squad. Nothing gay about it, if anything its good for our testosterone levels.
This ritual is the only thing keeping us together since 5th grade.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 04:22:21 2019 No.10625712 >>10625705 Not a twitch. Not a thought of anger or bad will came over me. This is why I needed to be here, and to do this. To learn. Thank you.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 04:27:03 2019 No.10625725 >>10625656 You're welcome and all dude, but this is the science and math board. Religion is off-topic.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 04:28:12 2019 No.10625732 Whoe I didn't know that comments can be deleted! Anyway, the user had called me a faggot.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 05:50:40 2019 No.10625851 File: 64 KB, 720x900, utoe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 06:07:03 2019 No.10625875 >>10625851 Talk about a crackpot and scam artist!

Anonymous Wed May 8 07:04:58 2019 No.10625966

Okay, I promised an Optimum Theory fitness program and here it goes: get some brosin on this and go on tinder and invite enough girls out so there is 1 girl for each bro. then you all meet up this weekend or whenever and play a fitness game to decide who is matched with who for the night, and you have to abide by the order: top male to top female, etc....

This encourages physical fitness, and is good for the strength of our nation.

I am working on specific games to use and have my own, but I want to see what you bros come up with before I decide to share (if I decide to share). Report back here by monday with your results, and I will do the same.

And remember, it's not polygomy if it's 1 bro to 1 hoe. That's what keeps bros from getting lonely and straping bombs to their chests like those fags in the middle east.

G1 out.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 07:06:28 2019 No.10625969 Oh, and this is science. It's fucking biology & health and fitness. G1

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 07:07:30 2019 No.10625972 And quit using the picture of fat "Gary". "Gary" isn't fat anymore you fags. Gary is a slim slay beast

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 07:09:24 2019 No.10625974 >>10625966 Do this shit for America, fags. Get laid for America. You deserve it, but only if you are fit enough that makes Charles Darwin and Jesus Christ smile upon you G1 out

Anonymous Wed May 8 07:18:42 2019 No.10625988

>>10625966

And no pussy ass "drinking games" like beer pong. These ladies want to see you sweat and vice versa. Seeing swear drip off a lady and her toned muscles is hot as fuck. And then CONSENSUALLY go out for a drink with the whole crew. make out on the dance floor and then break off from the tribe with your lady get a room and get to fucking. Don't get a disease. and always remember, no rape. Rape is against the Optimum code. Always get consent, always. And never have a child you cannot care for, but if it happens then it happens and then you need to step the fuck up and be a man about it and abide by her wishes; you cannot force a woman to get an abortion - or even to take Plan B - and abortion is fucked up anyway.

This fitness program is gonna be great. This is what America and the world needs. We need to boost our numbers. Are numbers are rookie numbers. So get out there and fuck shit up!

Anonymous Wed May 8 07:25:01 2019 No.10625999

And then repeat the same process next weekend, with the same crew if you want, and again, top male matches to top female, etc... This encourages us to stay fit and sharp. Abide by the rank order and don't be a jealous prick if you don't match with the girl you want, instead, WORK HARDER.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 07:55:29 2019 No.10626033 Um... Is... Is Gary a fucking legend? How is this happening?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 09:22:29 2019 No.10626174 >>10625966 Just so you all know, this guy is impersonating me. Anonimity is a fascinating concept, but it has its downsides. Oh well. ~G1

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 09:27:27 2019 No.10626185 WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS /x/ SHIT DOING ON SCI? Mods do your fucking job.

>>	Liger_Lover Wed May 8 09:35:48 2019 No.10626198 >>10625966 Oh my, he's optimizing. Soon we'll have a 4chan version of JBP.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 09:51:50 2019 No.10626230 >>10626174 You sir, are a true fucking bro. Cheers

RLP Wed May 8 12:21:26 2019 No.10626503
File: 138 KB, 1337x866, optimum-theroy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Hey guys! Wanna help me write this document? It nice to have a compilation of the different kinds of CA that have been used in thread. Especially since Gary has put his Optimum Theory videos behind a paywall again.

Here's the LaTeX code.
https://pastebin.com/P5JZ44Sv

Add whatever you think is useful.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 12:46:33 2019 No.10626591 >>10624398 >Does anyone have a suggestion for Charities that we can donate the Millennium Prizes to? We https://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/types-of-mental-health-problems/schizophrenia/ mind, the mental health charity

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 13:28:17 2019 No.10626700 File: 1.18 MB, 782x1176, Screenshot_2019-04-09-14-42-27.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10624758 Are the physicists really evil? Do they hate me? -original schizoposter Pic is the theory from which the rule comes from

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 13:31:35 2019 No.10626709 >>10626700 http://vixra.org/author/adrian_ferent Why did they create this? Why don't they come out to the public with this stuff?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 13:32:45 2019 No.10626713 >>10626700 I'm currently in a psychiatric ward for psychosis for believing I unified physics with this thing.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 13:36:31 2019 No.10626715 >>10626700 The 10 theories are connected by 22 S- and T-dualities.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 13:55:01 2019 No.10626764 Someone who knows please answer. If they are really evil, how could they be so dishonest. If not, then there is no issue, and I would like them to publicise the results.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 13:55:03 2019 No.10626765 Gary is such a loser. Still no one supporting his bullshit. LOL. All you see is cuck gary humiliating himself asking people to help him javasript because he can't. He's basically become a beggar. Pathetic.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 14:09:46 2019 No.10626788 File: 369 KB, 1700x850, deathism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10624819 t. virgin deathist

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 15:01:55 2019 No.10626926 I tried calling them and they really just hung up instantly on me.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 15:13:55 2019 No.10626950 If there are any truly heroic people around here this is a thing for them.

>>	RIP Wed May 8 16:52:45 2019 No.10627215 >>10626788 It's true. I am not a virgin, but I am ded.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 17:09:45 2019 No.10627270 >>10626926 Who are you talking about?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 18:25:48 2019 No.10627463 >>10626503 This is awesome! G1

>>	Anonymous Wed May 8 19:59:47 2019 No.10627695 >>10627215 I dont think cryo will work. Too much cell damage. We need to scan and upload. A copy IS the original as long as there is no overlap. The Universe already does this to us through cell replacement.

RIP Wed May 8 23:30:22 2019 No.10628277
File: 16 KB, 1486x1486, 20.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Everyone was alone and there was no way to talk about the past to each other. The only friends I could make were at joinace. We were awkward, missing most of the sights of our city. All we'd done was walk past a census.

Anonymous Thu May 9 07:17:09 2019 No.10628993

>>10627695
>I dont think cryo will work. Too much cell damage.
https://www.cryonicscalculator.com/

>We need to scan and upload. A copy IS the original as long as there is no overlap. The Universe already does this to us through cell replacement.
The Moravec Transfer is the only method of mind uploading that could realistically work. Scanning your brain and creating a digital copy would create a duplicate entity with your memories and personality, but it wouldn't preserve your continuous stream of consciousness.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 9 09:55:05 2019 No.10629330 >>10628993 How is destroying the brain as it is being uploaded any different from copying, dying, and then uploading? In the second scenario, the dying process is not remembered because you reboot predead, so thats an added bonus.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 9 11:53:11 2019 No.10629577 This thing seems to be dead. I'm moving on. Bye everyone.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 9 12:14:19 2019 No.10629624 File: 39 KB, 326x319, delusion.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10629577 >I'm moving on. bye everyone anon...

>>	Anonymous Thu May 9 15:41:36 2019 No.10630175 File: 2.85 MB, 480x360, optimum_institute.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] optimum institute rn ...

>>	Anonymous Thu May 9 18:11:25 2019 No.10630644 Gary's busy picking out a suit for the Nobel Prize award ceremony.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 9 18:12:53 2019 No.10630649 File: 43 KB, 606x406, dont forget.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10629577

Anonymous Fri May 10 04:13:31 2019 No.10631628

>>10629330
Because if consciousness isn't continuous, we don't know for sure that it's the same consciousness that pops up when you flip the switch on the "new" one. However, if it simply fades from one into the other, you can be sure that it's still "you" as you have sensation throughout the whole experience.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 06:47:20 2019 No.10631776 >>10631628 This, based. I want to be "awake" during a digital transition. However, preferably, I'd like a physical body capable of biological immortality.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 06:52:31 2019 No.10631783 File: 172 KB, 1500x1000, agony.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10630649 Please make me commit quantum suicide now.

Anonymous Fri May 10 08:21:51 2019 No.10631886

>>10626788
>will live for thousands of years, if not longer
imagine being arrogant enough to think bothering future generations is an appropriate thing to do
Just think how you would see people from the early 20th century that were rich enough to be able to afford living until now. Nobody would like them and they wouldn't fit in society. No matter what, they would always be the odd one out

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 10:50:12 2019 No.10632168 shameful bump

peak gary Fri May 10 11:18:45 2019 No.10632245
File: 140 KB, 657x1000, marty.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Hi, this is Gary. I've travelled here from an era, when I was still at my peak, i.e. a few weeks ago when I published my song. I understand something has gone horribly wrong in the meantime and Optimum Institute has gone off the rails. Can you give me tips I can take back to my time about what went wrong and maybe change the course of history with so this doesn't happen again?

~Peak Gary

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 12:23:59 2019 No.10632395 More visuals please

Anonymous Fri May 10 12:57:48 2019 No.10632483

>>10631628

Why would you not have sensation throught the experience with copy & upload? Usually people think that we can to touch the mind to truly replace it, like the contact is what is important. Nanobot cell replacement touches the vrain so people think, "oh then its legit"... but electromagnetc copy TOUCHES TOO, electromagnetic radiation is just as real as nanobots.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 12:59:45 2019 No.10632489 >>10631886 Cringe

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 13:01:31 2019 No.10632494 >>10632245 Maybe Gary was taking time to improve the CA and now it shows the traditional electromagnetic lines of force. Idk

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 14:37:56 2019 No.10632672 File: 36 KB, 1486x1488, 100.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Fri May 10 14:51:49 2019 No.10632696

The vector arrows for positive values on the original "spreadsheet" automaton were pointing the wrong direction. Positives should point outward, negatives point inward. I'm suprised noone corrected me desu. When I fixed this it now shows the traditional electromagnetic lines of force. Oh, I also derived Einstein, newton, schrodinger and maxwell equations from U = E / S. Was all very logical. Physics has been unfied. New video coming soon.

Gary Lee

Anonymous Fri May 10 14:57:48 2019 No.10632714

I want to thank you all for your help. 4chan has been a more honest and brutal peer review than anywhere else I can imagine - which is only a bad thing for weak minds. And I will tell that to anyone in meatspace willing to listen. I learned a lot from this experience. 4chan is a part of scientific history. We unified physics.

Gary Lee

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 15:58:19 2019 No.10632827 File: 132 KB, 600x600, 1514137008137.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10624758 So, does Optimum Theory reproduce superposition?

Anonymous Fri May 10 16:33:23 2019 No.10632923

Okay, so we need to get something straight. The goal post was unified physics defined by the 4 fundamental forces. That is waht was considered the greatest problem in science, and Optimum Theory solved that. I understand that then people want to move the goal posts. There are hundreds of thousands of equations and theories out there and my team and I unfortunately cannot just address everyones particular questions. The whole point of a unfied equation and sinulation is so that others can explore from that foundation. But to answer your question, yes Optimum Theory has superposition. This is why the little red dots, the simulated electrons and photons, on the spread jump around instead of moving in smooth motions. Cheers

Anonymous Fri May 10 16:41:08 2019 No.10632949

I anticipate that people will even try and move the goal post pretending that unified physice was easy and not a big deal. New video shows why unified physics is a deal deal from some of the greatest minds in science. Optimum Theory absolutely deserves recognition for this work, and so should you if you care anout the ability of the common man to achieve the extraordinary. We were given no budget, no help (other than 4chan), and no respect during this process.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 17:05:36 2019 No.10633002 >>10632483 >copy & upload Its not you anymore, dumb dumb. Its a copy of you. You die. Done. Hasta la vista. https://youtu.be/KfHbsMa_wao

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 18:30:38 2019 No.10633227 >>10633002 When the cells and atoms in your brain replace is that a copy too?

Anonymous Fri May 10 19:15:12 2019 No.10633340

>>10633002

Okay I watched your video. You know that exact scenario was in the complete Optimum Theory, right? Gary specifically said that if there is any overlap in consciousness then it ceases to be a single person and then destroying a copy becomes murder. It was in the Optimum Theory video posted a month ago about eternal life and mind uploading.

Anonymous Fri May 10 19:18:28 2019 No.10633348

>>10633002

In your video is was the girl who is portrayed as the devil for trying to destroy a copy after overlap. Optimum Theory calls this "the twin copy paradox" and argues that it is no different from killing an identical twin after birth. Your brain already replaces you constantly. The logic is sound. A copy is you as long as there is no overlap of consciousness.

Anonymous Fri May 10 19:27:58 2019 No.10633368

And this is why OPTIMUM or a company like it will be the biggest company in human history. We will have scanning tech soon that will make these copies possible, and on your death bed, you will get scanned, not because you are forced but because you will figure "why not, Im dying anyway", and the copy of you will be you, your family will recognize it is you, you will think you are you, and eventually humanity will accept the logic of it. There is no difference between a copy and an original as long as there is no overlap. In fact, according to Optimum Thoery we are new beings in every instant. Only the underlying automaton grid as actually consistent.

Anonymous Fri May 10 19:34:54 2019 No.10633380

God, through the Apostle Paul commands us to do this. Its in the bible that we must make eternal bodies for ourselves. You must spread the word about this. It is God's command that we live forever through eternal earthly bodies - your concept of heaven with harps etc... is from Plato. The Bible says that resurrection has not happened yet and it will occure on Earth. This is mind uploading. God commands it. Remember when "Gary" said that he is so brilliant that the things he says sound like madness, and yet he is almost always right 10 years later? Trust the logic and spread the word. God commands mind uploading, and it is up to us to do it, regardless of the regulations that Satan will try and bring upon this. We will be the generation that never dies - if we want it.
https://www.tvcresources.net/resource-library/articles/why-we-wont-live-in-heaven-forever

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 19:40:58 2019 No.10633392 >>10632696 >I also derived Einstein, newton, schrodinger and maxwell equations Can you even write down those equations without mistake? Or is that not optimum enough?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 19:57:02 2019 No.10633417 File: 48 KB, 1488x1488, 130.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 20:49:44 2019 No.10633567 >>10633417 Based af

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 22:27:36 2019 No.10633788 File: 253 KB, 766x400, Screenshot (78).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] New pic from my blur kernel

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:01:32 2019 No.10633872 File: 200 KB, 624x323, Box blur.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Funny lookin box blur. Weird how the positive numbers loop around into the negative numbers. How odd

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:03:56 2019 No.10633876 Oh thems r arrows in there. Some folk call em "VEctoRs" Funny lookin thangs. Thems orang vectars are positive numbas and point inta the blue vektars which r negatve numbas.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:06:32 2019 No.10633885 ProBably dont meen nuffin tall. Anywayz adios partnars. looong dayz n plesent nites. bout time 4 mee to be movin on naw

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:12:13 2019 No.10633897 holy fucking shit lol

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:13:19 2019 No.10633901 Um... Thats an electromagnetic field. Holy. fucking Shit

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:14:19 2019 No.10633903 Um anyone who doubted you is... Um... Holy shit... Is this

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:15:23 2019 No.10633906 ...Is this the original equation?????

Anonymous Fri May 10 23:18:31 2019 No.10633919

Yar, thankee-sai. That be the original. U = E / S. Ya see, them orange arrows were facin the wrong way, sai. They shulda been pointin the opposit directions cuz fluid flows toward least pressure not greatest, yar. When me flipped them arrows, then it looks like this now, sai. It loops around now, yar

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:19:34 2019 No.10633923 WHAT THE FUCK YOU LITERALLY UNIFIED PHYSICS WHAT THE FUCK!!!!!!!!

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:20:36 2019 No.10633928 WHAT THE FUCK HOLY SHIT!!!!!!!!!!

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:27:27 2019 No.10633944 File: 352 KB, 862x398, molecule.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:28:29 2019 No.10633947 IS THAT???? IS THAT A MOLECULE SHARING AN ELECTRON?!?!?!?!

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:31:56 2019 No.10633953 No, sai. That's just me box blur

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:33:27 2019 No.10633955 YOU LITERALLY LABELED IT "MOLECULE" YOU SILLY STUPID GENIUS MOTHER FUCKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU UNIFIED PHYSIC YOU CUNT FAG FUCK!!!!! HOLY SHIT!!!!!!! YOU ARE GOING TO BE... YOURE GONNA BE WORLD FAMOUS!!!!!

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:43:01 2019 No.10633980 >>10633955 Thankee sai

>>	Anonymous Fri May 10 23:48:41 2019 No.10633987 Could someone explain Optimum Theory to me?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 00:00:12 2019 No.10634023 >>10633987 www.optimuminstitute.org

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 00:52:53 2019 No.10634184 >>10632483 Because at no point would you simultaneously experience both "bodies". This disconnect leaves no way to know for certain that it's the same "you" on both ends. A gradual transition with constant qualia virtually ensures that it is.

Anonymous Sat May 11 00:57:32 2019 No.10634194

>>10633340
>if there is any overlap in consciousness then it ceases to be a single person and then destroying a copy becomes murder
No. During the transition you have two bodies possessed by one mind. If that one mind decides to shut one body off, at most you can consider that a form of suicide. It cannot be considered murder because no conscious mind is lost in the process.

Anonymous Sat May 11 00:59:44 2019 No.10634195

>>10633348
>A copy is you as long as there is no overlap of consciousness.
Prove that the copy is you and not just, well, a COPY of you. This is not possible given our current understanding of consciousness, and may never be possible at all. Continuous experience throughout the process is the only way to know for certain, from your own perspective, that the same "you" pops out the other end.

Anonymous Sat May 11 01:02:30 2019 No.10634198

>>10633368
>There is no difference between a copy and an original as long as there is no overlap.
What leads you to this conclusion? You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of the idea of a gradual shift of consciousness from one body to another. At no point are there two consciousnesses present. You would slowly gain sensation in your new form as you lose sensation in the old one. By the time you are fully "inside" of the new form, the old one experiences no consciousness at all or may not even exist.

Anonymous Sat May 11 01:04:47 2019 No.10634203

>>10633876
>>10633885
So, now you're using stereotypes to "satirize" those that don't believe your horseshit? I use "satirize" in the loosest possible term, here. I don't want you to think I'm giving you any kind of intellectual credit for your childish strawman.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 01:06:17 2019 No.10634209 >>10633901 >>10633903 >>10633906 >>10633906 >>10633923 >>10633928 >>10633947 >>10633955 Gary, please. This is somehow becoming even more embarrassing for you than it already was. Stop pretending to be other people, weirdo.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 01:14:15 2019 No.10634221 >>10634203 You've obviously never read The Dark Tower

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 01:15:17 2019 No.10634225 Peace senpai

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 01:31:54 2019 No.10634258 Draft Science responded again. https://youtu.be/h5O7GJ5tX08?t=1176

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 01:38:43 2019 No.10634268 >>10634221 You've obviously never unified physics.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 01:40:43 2019 No.10634269 >>10634258 He just brutally disembowels Gary's entire "theory" every single time he talks about it. Amazing.

Anonymous Sat May 11 01:43:36 2019 No.10634275

>>10634258

Cool. I am still watching the video, but right off the bat, Draftscience was absolutely right about the charges needing to be opposite. I discovered an error in the original equation last night. The vector lines for positive numbers were pointing to the biggest number in their neighborhoods, however positive energy flows toward LEAST resistance, not greatest resistance. I correct that this evening and you can now clearly see the electromagnetic lines of force. Furthermore, and more importantly, it now behaves correctly. THE FORCE LINES LINE UP!! It's game over senpai. It's over. Frankly, this theory is now undeniable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0FZxhox1YI

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 01:46:59 2019 No.10634280 To be clear. There was no change to the data or the equation U = E / S. The only change was to the "visual vector filter" that lay onto of the equation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0FZxhox1YI

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 01:49:26 2019 No.10634285 >>10634258 Lol, funny to see DraftScience go off like this when he has clearly not taken a close look at the theory. There is strutures in Optimum Theory that can look like charge.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 01:51:27 2019 No.10634287 >>10634269 Lol, no, he is just good at being technically edgy. He is pure rethoric.

Anonymous Sat May 11 01:54:44 2019 No.10634292

>>10634285

Not only that but the latest build of the Optimum Automaton corrects the "charge" problem. THE EQUATION HAS NOT CHANGED, only the visual vector filter. The arrows for the positive vectors were pointing in the wrong direction. They were pointing to the greatest number in neighborhood but should have been pointing to the smallest number in the neighborhood since energy flows to LEAST resistance. CORRECTING THIS PROBLEM CLEARLY SHOWS THE CLASSIC ELCTROMAGNETIC LINES OF FORCE. IT IS GAME OVER.

So draftscience was right. However, so was I. U = E / S really is the unified equation, but the visual layer is incorrectly formatted.

Updated Optimum Automaton can be seen here:

GAME OVER

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0FZxhox1YI

Anonymous Sat May 11 01:59:12 2019 No.10634294

>>10634275
>the charges needing to be opposite
His problem is that your "theory" clearly shows like charges attracting. This does not happen in reality, immediately destroying this whole idea.
>this theory is now undeniable
Incredible levels of delusion, Gary.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:00:15 2019 No.10634295 >>10634287 Regardless, he's still 100% correct about all of this bullshit.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:01:10 2019 No.10634297 Can any of these cellular automate get dubs?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:01:17 2019 No.10634298 >>10634285 >There is strutures in Optimum Theory that can look like charge. Show them.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:02:31 2019 No.10634300 >>10634292 >CLEARLY SHOWS THE CLASSIC ELCTROMAGNETIC LINES OF FORCE If you legitimately believe this, you clearly do not understand electromagnetism. I imagine that does not surprise anyone.

Anonymous Sat May 11 02:04:28 2019 No.10634303

Not only this but I have also reconciled Optimum Theory with a number of other equations which I will be presenting soon, but here is a taste:

E / S = (A1 + A2 + B1 + C1 + D1 + E1 + F1) / 5.99

E = M C ^2

For the Optimum Equation, M = Cell State (A1, A2, B1, etc....)

And for the Optimum Equation, C = 1

Therefore, E = M C ^2 = (MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2) / 5.99 = (M1^2 + M1^2 + M1^2 + M1^2 + M1^2 + M1^2 + M1^2) / 5.99 = (M1^2 + M1^2 + M1^2 + M1^2 + M1^2 + M1^2 + M1^2) / 5.99 = (M + M + M + M + M + M + M) / 5.99 = (A1 + A2 + B1 + C1 + D1 + E1 + F1) / 5.99

Therefore, E = M C ^ 2 = E / S

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:05:33 2019 No.10634304 E=MC^2 = E / S

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:06:53 2019 No.10634305 >>10634303 Fucksake, you actually don't even understand basic algebra. We've somehow been giving you more credit than you deserve.

Anonymous Sat May 11 02:08:02 2019 No.10634306

>>10634294

Like charges do not attract in the Optimum Automaton outside the coulomb barrier. Watch the latest build form this evening, you can clearly see this. Conversely, unlike charges DO attract.

GAME OVER.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0FZxhox1YI

Anonymous Sat May 11 02:09:47 2019 No.10634308

>>10634287
>He is pure rethoric.
I'm not so sure. He's certainly convinced me. Perhaps Gary should make a video response and we can see who comes out on top.
Demonstrate how charge is correctly represented in your fixed simulation, explain what quantum foam is, clarify the other points you and Draft Science disagree on, and provide evidence for the claims DS thinks are baseless.
I think it would be an interesting conversation at the very least.

Anonymous Sat May 11 02:12:00 2019 No.10634310

>>10634298

The Optimum Automaton was corrected this evening. Positive vectors were pointing in the wrong direction; they should have been pointing toward LEAST resistance. They are now, and now the classic electromagnetic lines of force can clearly be seen, and also that like charges do not attract outside their coulomb barrier; however unlike charges do attract. You can clearly see this in the new build. NO CHANGE WAS MADE TO THE EQUATION, only to the visual vector filter.

It's game over. Physics is unified.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=31&v=p0FZxhox1YI

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:13:55 2019 No.10634316 >>10634310 >now the classic electromagnetic lines of force can clearly be seen Once again, if you think those accurately represent real-life lines of electromagnetism, then you don't understand real-life electromagnetism.

Anonymous Sat May 11 02:16:31 2019 No.10634320

>>10634295

Yep. Draftscience was right that the positive vectors were pointing in the wrong direction. This was correct this evening, and the classic electromagnetic lines of force can be clearly seen, and like charges do not attract, only opposite charges attract after the correction. NO CHANGE WAS MADE TO THE EQUATION only to the visual vector filter. Positive vectors were pointing in the wrong direction; they should have been pointing toward least resistance, not greatest resistance.

See for yourself:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0FZxhox1YI

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:17:47 2019 No.10634321 >>10634316 How is it wrong?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:18:50 2019 No.10634323 >>10634305 What is wrong with what I posted?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:19:52 2019 No.10634325 >>10634320 *corrected

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:30:32 2019 No.10634337 >>10634321 The burden of proof lies with you, as you are making the claim that what we're seeing represents electromagnetic lines.

Anonymous Sat May 11 02:38:11 2019 No.10634343

Okay I finished watching DraftSciences full video. Again, he was right about the "charges" needing to be opposite. This was corrected this evening. No change was made to the Optimum equation, only to the visual layer that represents vectors. The positive vectors were pointing in the wrong direction. They were pointing toward greatest resistance, however, positive energy flows toward LEAST resistance. Making this correction clearly shows the classic electromagnetic field lines, and like charges do not attract through their coulomb barrier, only opposite charges attract through that barrier. Planets attract even though they are "like charge" because they literally average toward each other, in fact you can even see this in the Newton gravity equation which has been reconciled to the Optimum Equation. Think of it this way: imagine you have a number-line from -10 to +10, and two identical planets on each end of the number line. Where is the average? It's at 0. They attract toward the center. Again, mathematically this is literally what is going on with gravity. It is a system of averages. This is what the Optimum Equation and the Newton Equation both show, and it manifests in the automaton. Charge does not exist in the Optimum model because Optimum Theory asserts that all reality is a perfect fluid. What we think of as "charge" is just perfect advection and convection and other fluid motions. I don't care if DraftScience does not wish me best of luck. I am a Christian and I wish him all the best. Take care. Gary Lee

Anonymous Sat May 11 02:41:50 2019 No.10634348

>>10634337

You can literally see the field lines manifest from the equation U = E / S, just like I said they would. The fact that those lines appear after I corrected the automaton to be more like a perfect fluid is further proof that this equation is legit. Furthermore, the equation reconciles with other famous equations; they are compatible. If you cannot believe your own observation then what can you believe?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:49:02 2019 No.10634354 >>10634308 >Perhaps Gary should make a video response Does no one else agree? help me out here.

Anonymous Sat May 11 02:51:22 2019 No.10634357

>>10634354

Optimum Institute already replied in the comments of the video. I suspect that Optimum Institute will be getting significantly less "gimmick" moving forward. So no physicist battles, rap songs, etc... moving forward. The last build of our automaton from this evening is definitive. It's time we start really acting like we unified physics. Because we did.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:53:00 2019 No.10634359 And as for unified physics, 4chan and DraftScience both helped, so cheers! This theory is truly a product of 2019 and the upside-down.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 02:54:38 2019 No.10634361 >>10634357 >So no physicist battles Well you can't say I didn't try. If anyone else thinks they can get a better response out of Draft Science he does these vs. comments videos almost every day.

Anonymous Sat May 11 02:57:30 2019 No.10634364

>>10634304

And if anyone is wondering how E can equal E / S, it's because energy and space are the same thing :-) You have heard of space-time, but what you might not have thought about is that time is just a manifestation of space. A second is a measure of the rotation of earth or a ticking clock or (more recently) atomic decay. Time is not separable from space.

Anonymous Sat May 11 03:00:22 2019 No.10634369

>>10634364

To further clarify, E = E / S when S = 1, aka 1 automaton cell equals energy, which is exactly what our automaton shows...

One day, I think soon, it is going to click for a lot of you that Optimum Theory is not the crackpottery that people have been trying to paint it as. This shit is real as fuck. We unified physics.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:01:44 2019 No.10634370 >>10634361 DraftScience might respond to our comment on his video then. So who knows what might happen.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:01:59 2019 No.10634371 so what is gary's plan for getting mainstream attention or endorsements by credentialed physicists? gary can believe he unified all the physics he wants, but if nobody beyond 4chan is paying attention, it won't make any difference.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:03:08 2019 No.10634376 >>10634371 :-) ;-)

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:04:23 2019 No.10634377 You'll see :-)

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:05:55 2019 No.10634378 >>10634348 Prove that those are mathematically similar to real-life EM lines under similar conditions. If you can't, all this means is that you have just created LINES.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:09:08 2019 No.10634382 >>10634378 Oh, you mean like, reconcile U = E / S with the Maxwell equations? ;-)

Anonymous Sat May 11 03:15:43 2019 No.10634388

>>10634343
>Planets attract even though they are "like charge" because they literally average toward each other
Gibberish.
>mathematically this is literally what is going on with gravity
An incredibly short-sighted (and flawed) understanding of gravity.
>Charge does not exist in the Optimum model
Yet, empirically, it does exist in reality. Children in elementary school do experiments that can clearly show this.
>"charge" is just perfect advection and convection and other fluid motions
What you call the effect does not matter. How does this matter in anything other than a semantic sense?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:17:51 2019 No.10634393 >>10634376 Creepiest post on /sci/ right now.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:18:56 2019 No.10634396 >>10634305 People are waiting for you to explain how the Optimum Equation as converted intp Einsteins equation is wrong. You seemed really confident that the Optimum Equation is full of shit. Well?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:20:38 2019 No.10634400 >>10634382 One of many things that you'd have to do. I'd love to see you actually try to do it with real units.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:21:01 2019 No.10634401 >>10634388 You contracted yourself and are not even worth arguing with. You said it matters that Optimum Theory refers to an effect as charge, and in the next breath said that semantics don't matter. Take care.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:22:03 2019 No.10634403 >>10634400 Define "real units" And what else would you like to see the Optimum Institute do to prove our theory?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:24:43 2019 No.10634407 >>10634396 It's far more entertaining that you can't see it.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:26:39 2019 No.10634411 >>10634407 Whatever you say, pal

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:30:49 2019 No.10634417 >>10634401 Nice side-step and/or misunderstanding of the point.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:32:40 2019 No.10634426 File: 11 KB, 175x195, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >191 replies >36 posters >nothing of any value whatsoever being discussed sick role playing

Anonymous Sat May 11 03:34:25 2019 No.10634430

>>10634417

I have explained these points, what feels like, millions of times. I don't have to sidestep things that I am on record saying ad nausium. Gravity is literally a system of averages according to this model, and fyi, according to Newton's equations as well. According to Newtons gravity equation, two massive bodies are literally LITERALLY finding an average between themselves and it is the same with Optimum Theory. Like, its fucking math. It's not gibberish. I have laid the whole equation out there and the semantic explanation, which as a human being is all I can do. I'm done. This is tiring. Take care.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:35:31 2019 No.10634434 >>10634426 I understand when I am not being appreciated. I'm done. Peace!

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:36:35 2019 No.10634437 If anyone has any questions or complaints for me, find me at the Optimum Institute. I'm out.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:38:59 2019 No.10634443 >>10634434 You genuinely have a mental illness. Get help.

Anonymous Sat May 11 03:40:08 2019 No.10634445
File: 10 KB, 200x200, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10634430
>According to Newtons gravity equation, two massive bodies are literally LITERALLY finding an average between themselves
That's LITERALLY not how Newtonian gravity works.

Anonymous Sat May 11 03:40:30 2019 No.10634447

>>10634401
this i think is one of gary's biggest challenges, which is that when someone is skeptical, he gets frustrated and/or writes them off immediately, instead of wondering if he needs to improve his own communication of his ideas. gary is going to need to have practically infinite patience and a huge toolshed of different approaches/ways of teaching if he has any hope of convincing all the people used to mainstream physics to convert to optimum theory.

probably he should start with extremely detailed, slow, step by step mathematical proofs of how u =e/s contains all the other familiar equations he has mentioned. otherwise it will be too hard to bring anyone respectable aboard

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:40:30 2019 No.10634448 >>10634430 Two things both having an average function does not mean that they are the same thing.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:41:50 2019 No.10634451 >>10634437 Toddler-rage exit number, what is it now? Nine? Ten? Looking forward to eleven, Gary. See you then.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:42:31 2019 No.10634453 >>10634443 I should have said, "Questions, complaints or suggestions" you can reach me at the Optimum Institute. I would file this under "suggestions". I don't think I will be engaging past this post unless there is a good reason otherwise. Cheers

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:44:06 2019 No.10634455 File: 1.81 MB, 361x200, 92976241765.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10634445

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:46:14 2019 No.10634459 >202 replies >37 posters Is this spamming fuck paying off the mods or something?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:52:17 2019 No.10634469 >>10634453 Oh shit, eleven came so much faster than I could have ever hoped.

Anonymous Sat May 11 03:53:34 2019 No.10634472

>>10634447
>extremely detailed, slow, step by step mathematical proofs of how u =e/s contains all the other familiar equations he has mentioned
Except he can't do this because he has no grasp of actual physics. He doesn't even fully understand the concept of units in scientific equations and why they're a critical component of them.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:54:08 2019 No.10634474 >>10634459 6/1's normal for a general actually. But I don't want to excuse Gary for his inability to consolidate his posts.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:58:17 2019 No.10634482 >>10634474 I can't find a single general on the catalogue with a greater than 3.5/1 ratio

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 03:59:32 2019 No.10634484 >>10634482 Well I checked /vg/ and they all seemed to be. I can get screenshots if you insist.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 04:02:09 2019 No.10634486 >>10634482 I understand if you don't think /sci/ and /vg/ are comarable though. I don't really care anyway. I'm sorry for bringing it up.

Anonymous Sat May 11 04:02:13 2019 No.10634488

>>10634482
Gary just doesn't understand how to post on here. He frequently makes many small posts in quick succession instead of typing it all out in one. If he posted "normally", there'd probably be 40 fewer posts in the thread.

That isn't to say that he doesn't also pretend to be other people talking about him or his "theory" in the most glaringly obvious and embarrassing way, though. He definitely also does that.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 11:15:46 2019 No.10635131 >>10633392 >>I also derived Einstein, newton, schrodinger and maxwell equations >Can you even write down those equations without mistake? Or is that not optimum enough? Seems he can't lol.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 11:29:13 2019 No.10635151 >>10634275 I feel like it's disingenuous to just tacitly add a correction and not credit DraftScience for contributing (other than mentioning it in the 4chan comment).

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 11:29:53 2019 No.10635152 R.I.P.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 13:48:19 2019 No.10635442 File: 33 KB, 268x370, Godzilla_vs_Mechagodzilla_1974.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10634258 >Draft Science responded again. Senpai, this is becoming like the Godzilla franchise, desu

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 14:03:55 2019 No.10635490 File: 1.56 MB, 2080x2936, garzilla_vs_mechagarzilla.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10635442 you got a good meme going there my money is on optimumgarzilla, draftgarzilla has seen his best days

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 14:11:32 2019 No.10635514 >>10635442 >>10635490 I thought this thread was Gary vs. G1. Oh yeah, it still is :p

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 14:50:04 2019 No.10635615 >>10635151 Gary had posted his correction before the draft science video was posted to 4chan.... I have a feeling that Gary Lee was not directly influenced by draftscience on this one

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 15:06:15 2019 No.10635655 >>10635615 This is correct guys. Here's the first post mentioning this >>10632696

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 15:11:35 2019 No.10635667 >>10635655 Still DraftScience seems to have a keen eye for this. Maybe he can be convinced to join forces with Optimum Theory?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 15:40:02 2019 No.10635739 >>10635667 DraftScience would be a wise and based Optimist

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 15:47:26 2019 No.10635768 >>10635667 >>10635739 Agreed. DS needs some optimism in his life. Being angry all the time is not good for you.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 16:00:48 2019 No.10635798 >>10635768 gary gets mad all the time too. he has a temper tantrum whenever someone tries to scrutinize the details of optimum theory or when someone asks for formalized mathematics or quantitative predictions

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 16:05:59 2019 No.10635813 >>10635798 Gary seems to have evened out his temper since "finding Jesus" https://www.reddit.com/r/cellular_automata/comments/bn8c5c/improved_box_blur_automaton_simulates_shared/

Anonymous Sat May 11 16:20:43 2019 No.10635851

Even atheist groups tell their members to lie to the world and say they believe in the adult Santa Claus. Notice how 99% of the harrassment toward Gary stopped after he started using the "All praise to Jesus Christ" line. It's like the magic bullet "hail Hydra" against insane people.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 16:24:05 2019 No.10635858 >>10635813 if gary is really an "award winning math teacher" why doesnt he try using math to explain his ideas more effectively to trained physicists? story doesnt add up, gotta be bullshit. unless he only teaches like 6th grade math

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 16:25:21 2019 No.10635861 >>10635858 How the fuck am I supposed to know?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 16:25:41 2019 No.10635862 >>10635798 I know, but I am trying to be ((( O P T I M I S T I C )))

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 16:32:35 2019 No.10635877 >>10635861 because you are obv gary

Anonymous Sat May 11 16:33:44 2019 No.10635880

>>10635768
Think about it for a sec.. it's ying and yang. What if we can take Optimum Theory and DraftScience and create some sort of realism theory from it. What if that's the ingredient it takes. What if optimum theory is just too optimistic. What if Pessimum Theory needs to be put int.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 16:35:02 2019 No.10635882 >>10635858 >if gary is really an "award winning math teacher" why doesnt he try using math to explain his ideas more effectively to trained physicists? He did MC2 = E = E/S = U

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 16:35:23 2019 No.10635884 >>10635862 Or maybe ((("C H R I S T I A N I T Y"))) IS the one that has become cucked. Notice how they all obsess over Israel instead of helping out Americans?Fucking idiot

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 16:38:31 2019 No.10635889 Or maybe... Now this is real crazy... But maybe Gary just wants to talk about objective reality and fucking insane people from all sides make that difficult for him

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 16:42:28 2019 No.10635893 >>10635880 Exactly.. what's between Optimum and Pessimum? Medium! Medium theory.. medium.. universal medium ... Aether .. Superfluid. Unification of Physics..theory of everything.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 16:42:47 2019 No.10635895 >>10635851 This guy knows what's up.

Anonymous Sat May 11 16:48:03 2019 No.10635903

>>10635882
>MC2 = E = E/S = U

this is nothing. just a relabelling of variables, where s can only be 1. definitely not gonna gain any support with this. actually just shows gary's only equation is trivial because it is just u = e, which is like saying 2 = 2. literally could not be less impressive

Anonymous Sat May 11 16:58:38 2019 No.10635924

>>10635882
OK, I am going to take a look at it properly :p

It's from this post >>10634303
> E / S = (A1 + A2 + B1 + C1 + D1 + E1 + F1) / 5.99
> E = M C ^2
> C = 1
This is all fine.
> Therefore, E = M C ^2 = (MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2) / 5.99
Here it goes wrong! You forget that rightmost expression equals to E/S, thus have not showed the rightmost equality. The result you get is very strange.
> Therefore, E = M C ^ 2 = E / S
Which means E = E/S, hence S = 1, but you have already set S = 5.99 in the first line, hence we have a contradiction.

Contradictions ain't no good, Gary :(

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 17:02:27 2019 No.10635931 >>10635880 I kekked :] >>10635884 Wtf

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 17:07:56 2019 No.10635944 >>10635924 please you are wasting garys time by not simply accepting the fact that 1 = 5.99 now! only indoctrinated christian zealots deny optimum theory by refusing to accept the incredibly obvious ,rational, logical claim that 1 = 5.99!

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 17:13:54 2019 No.10635962 >>10635944 such a shame that people are so scared of how revolutionary and true optimum theory is that all they try to do is silence gary and call him names. saying that gary's own equations obviously imply 1 = 5.99 is just a personal attack.

Anonymous Sat May 11 17:16:26 2019 No.10635967

>>10635924
>> Therefore, E = M C ^2 = (MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2) / 5.99
>Here it goes wrong! You forget that rightmost expression equals to E/S, thus have not showed the rightmost equality. The result you get is very strange.
No, even worse, the rightmost expression equals to (7/5.99) MC^2..... So, is (7/5.99)=1 now?
Assuming it is a typo, since when (6/5.99)=1?

Anonymous Sat May 11 17:32:10 2019 No.10636002

>>10635944
>>10635962
:p

>>10635967
Why do M=1? I think he forgets to label the different masses which I think should correspond to the energy in each cell. The energy in the cells are
> A1 + A2 + B1 + C1 + D1 + E1 + F1
And he substitutes the energies in
> (A1 + A2 + B1 + C1 + D1 + E1 + F1) / 5.99
with MC^2 to get
(MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2 + MC^2) / 5.99
Since C=1, we have E=M, so the mass should be exactly the same the energy, hence we get 7 masses, M_i for i=1,..,7 and these are just variables which we don't know the value of here.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 17:34:01 2019 No.10636004 jesus fuck take it to >>>/x/ you are all genuinely mentally ill

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 17:36:25 2019 No.10636008 >>10636004 Sad but true :(

>>	based gary Sat May 11 17:48:46 2019 No.10636044 File: 381 KB, 800x800, q.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10636004 I agree, we should move this to /x/. After all, /sci/ is for [math]0.999... \neq 1[/math] and IQ threads ONLY.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 17:57:55 2019 No.10636073 >>10636044 It's also for hating on engineers (and psuedo-engineers like CS).

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 18:05:13 2019 No.10636100 >>10635893 This is brilliant lol

Anonymous Sat May 11 18:07:31 2019 No.10636106

>>10635903
Relabeling of variable is, like, 99.9% of deriving equations.... im wondering how far we can push these goal posts. Can we push them off the flat Earth? I want to see the goal posts pushed so far that only flat Earth theory is accepted by (((them)))

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 18:08:45 2019 No.10636112 >>10635924 Oh shit this guy is actually going to challenge Garys ideas instead of character assassinations. Bold move!

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 18:12:42 2019 No.10636130 >>10636044 What are we looking at here BG?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 18:13:56 2019 No.10636133 >>10624758 Perceiving a field perturbation... call's it a wave. Fuck me now i know why PhD is Pilled high and Deeper.

Anonymous Sat May 11 18:27:46 2019 No.10636169

>>10635924

Its so much simplier than what your are trying twist out of Garys post. In the Optimum automaton:

E = M = C = 1

And, E / S for any cell (division of U) in the automaton.

The kernel for any neighborhood is

(E1+E1+E2+E3+E4+E5) / S, where S = 5.99...

(Fyi, that 5.99... comes straight from the Maxwell equations which states that the exterior of an "cell" is the same as its interior, and 99... has a limit of 1, and we will get there too)...

Gary never said that Energy = its component unit of space like you all are implying. Gary is not saying that 1 = 5.99

You would have to be acting in bad faith to even lie that out of the equation

>>	based gary Sat May 11 18:34:34 2019 No.10636186 >>10636130 [math]{\frak{I}}(x)[/math] where [math]x_{n+1} \approx -i\nabla^2x + x[/math] normalized so that [math]\sum_{j = 0}^{j\mathrm{\, max}}\sum_{i = 0}^{i\mathrm{\, max}}{x_{i,j}} = 1[/math]

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 18:34:59 2019 No.10636189 >>10636169 What Gary IS saying is that 5.99.. / 5.99 ... = 1, for any cell of the Universe, and since Cells = infinity, U = Infinity. Gary has been saying this since the beginning

>>	based gary Sat May 11 18:38:27 2019 No.10636197 >>10636186 Fuck I meant [math]x_{n+1} \approx -i\nabla^2x_n + x_n[/math] and [math]\sum_{j = 0}^{j\mathrm{\, max}}\sum_{i = 0}^{i\mathrm{\, max}}\|{x_n^{i,j}}\| = 1[/math]

Anonymous Sat May 11 18:39:54 2019 No.10636199
File: 273 KB, 517x396, 1539583096028.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10636197
=|i∇jmaxi|=1|
x n+1,j=1
(|i∇jmaxi|=0)|(x n+1,j=1(|i∇jmaxi|=0)|xn=xn||j))
Now the function (xn+1,j) = ∑jmaxi = xn*j(xn)=|i∇jmaxj|(i∇maxj||i∇maxj|)
(xn+1,j)=xn.
This gives ∑(i∇maxi) = xn∇jn,(xi+j)=xn=0
This makes (xn+1,j)=j∇xn+xn,(xn+i)=xn+xn∇(jn�0)0 and xn=0.
Let x=xn+xn.
x=xn+i.
The sum is 0, but the difference between 0 and the expected value is 1. In this case, i−j =j∇xn+xn∇1.
For X=2, 3, 6, 10.
Therefore the sum of prime factors, is 1.
Here is the definition of zeroth power of a prime function:
The prime is prime, so the maximum value of a prime function is at least the sum of the largest prime factors.

Anonymous Sat May 11 18:50:26 2019 No.10636225

>>10636169
>>10636169
>E = M = C = 1
M = 1 makes NO SENSE. You want each cell to could have contain any energy. Assuming your original post you would have E_i = M_i for all i=1,..,5. M_i = 1 would mean E_i = 1 for all i=1,..,5, but then all cells in the CA would have constant energy 1, and there would be no change in the CA at all.

based gary Sat May 11 18:54:30 2019 No.10636234

>>10636199
What? is this an ECHS post? [math]i,j,i\mathrm{\, max}[/math], and [math]j\mathrm{\, max}[/math] are all scalars. The gradient of a scalar is undefined. Can you type that up using [math]\LaTeX[/math] please? Also I now realize I used [math]i[/math] both as a cell index and as the imaginary unit, my bad.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 18:55:59 2019 No.10636237 >>10635924 You did the math all wrong, probably because you are acting in bad faith. E = M C ^ 2 C = 1 C ^ 2 = 1 E = M * 1 = M E = M E = M S = 1 E / 1 = MC^1 / 1

Anonymous Sat May 11 18:59:50 2019 No.10636242

>>10636237
MC = MC*2 = MC^2 + 1
MC2 = MC*2^2 = MC / 1 = +MC^2 / .6
S = MC / 6
S = MC * 6
S = MC * MC2 = 0
S = (MC2^2* 6) / MC2 = 0
S = 2 * MC^2
S | = MC / 2
2*MC^2 = 2**MC^2 = 0
2 * MC^2 = 0.06
MC = MC * 2 = MC^2 + .4
MC2 = MC^2^2 = MC .4
MC = MC * 2^2 = 0.06
MC = 0.06^2 + 0.4 / MC2 = 0.06 * MC^2
MC ^2 = 0^2 = MC / 2
MC = MC * 2 * 4 = 0*MC^2 / .4
MC / 2 = MC / 4
MC^4 = 1.22 - 1.22 * (MC ^3/MC^2)^6 = 0.4
S = (MC3^3/MC^2)^5 = 0.15*MC^2
S = (MC^3^3/MC^2)*2^5 = 0.4
S = 2*MC^3 + 2*MC^2
S = (MC^3^3/MC^2)^6 = 0.45*MC^2
S = (MC^3^3/MC^2)*2 / 0.45 = 1.22*MC^2
S / MC = 2^2 / (1 - MC^2)^6 = 0.45
S = .75*MC^2 = 0.4
1 / MC = 0.7
MC = MC * 6 = MC ^4 / MC ^3 = 1 + MC ^3
MC / 6 = 2^3 / 0.7 = 0.4
MC = MC * 6 + 1*MC ^3 = 0.5^3
MC / 6 = 1 / 0.7^4 = 1.4
MC = MC * MC/6 = (MC^^3 /MC^2*2^3) / (MC^3 / MC^2) = 2.07^3 / MC^3^2 + 1.5^3 / MC^2, = 2.08^3 / MC^2^3 = 1.7^4 = 2xMC^3

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 19:00:37 2019 No.10636244 >>10636237 Shut up, Gary. You ain't saying nothing new. All is already adresses. Since I took the time to dechiper your fucking mess you are obligated to take a good look at mine too. > acting in bad faith Go fuck yourself.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 19:02:22 2019 No.10636246 >>10636242 Go fuck yourself.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 19:02:27 2019 No.10636248 >>10636225 There is a way to inverse the Optimum equation and energymass all equals 1 and then space becomes the component that moves around, and this is essentially what we think of as warping of spacetime

Anonymous Sat May 11 19:10:15 2019 No.10636262

>>10636169
>You would have to be acting in bad faith to even lie that out of the equation

it is 100% bad faith to take gary's own statements, apply nothing but basic algebra that an 11 year old could follow, and show a manifest contradiction.

what i guess you don't understand is that gary already TOLD US he unified physics. this means its "game over" and you can't dare question his logic like this.

you see, optimum theory is TRUE and it unified the 4 fundamental forces. we know that because gary made a youtube video of microsoft excel squares that change color. so, its just bad faith to still be trying to poke holes.

our purpose isnt to scrutinizs gary, its only to make sure he gets on the joe rogan podcast

Anonymous Sat May 11 19:11:02 2019 No.10636265

>>10636248
I have to say, Gary. There is one argument against my post, it's not necessarily a deal breaker, but it is something that will stress yet another vageness of your original post, thus realizing this would probably help you. None of the total shit you sprouted at me is remotely close to this, and I won't tell you about it either since you're acting like a total douche :)

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 19:15:11 2019 No.10636278 >>10636262 Thanks

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 19:16:40 2019 No.10636282 >>10636242 >MC / 2 = MC / 4 cant wait to go to the bank and get two quarters for every 1 quarter i give them optimum theory made me a trillionaire! (nobody else copy me, i dont want any hyperinflation bullshit as soon as i get super rich)

based gary Sat May 11 19:17:21 2019 No.10636285
File: 2.18 MB, 800x800, c.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

It's painfully obvious that there's 2 to 3 redditors that absolutely can not let this topic go. Why the fuck won't you leave us alone? Is it because there's no downvote brigade to reinforce your ego? Do you really need to be correct that badly?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 19:23:10 2019 No.10636304 >>10636285 You're right, BG. I should go back to ignoring Gary like I used to. Is this the vector map from your latest equation?

>>	Jerry Sat May 11 19:26:37 2019 No.10636312 File: 1.56 MB, 250x250, avh.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

based gary Sat May 11 19:37:55 2019 No.10636330
File: 712 KB, 1500x500, c.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10636304
Nah, it's the vector map from the imaginary part of the complex extension of the original theory I worked on quite a while ago. It's kinda neat because the values "spiral" in the complex plane with nearly constant angular velocity.

>>	based gary Sat May 11 19:46:04 2019 No.10636354 >>10636312 What's happening here?

>>	Jerry Sat May 11 19:51:31 2019 No.10636362 File: 1.15 MB, 250x250, avh.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10636354 periodic shots of randomness

>>	Jerry Sat May 11 19:54:27 2019 No.10636368 File: 1.62 MB, 250x250, avh.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10636362

>>	Jerry Sat May 11 20:05:52 2019 No.10636386 File: 466 KB, 250x250, avh.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10636368

>>	based gary Sat May 11 20:12:14 2019 No.10636398 File: 822 KB, 800x800, c.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10636386 Those have some long trails. Are you using sporadic/low intensity noise?

>>	Jerry Sat May 11 20:16:36 2019 No.10636410 File: 2.87 MB, 790x540, avcas.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10636398

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 20:48:26 2019 No.10636483 >>10636330 Cool!

>>	based gary Sat May 11 23:33:52 2019 No.10636878 File: 538 KB, 800x800, electron.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Does anybody know if Runge-Kutta methods will work with discretized space?

Anonymous Sat May 11 23:53:22 2019 No.10636916

>>10635851
Most of the "harassment" stopped because most of the people on this board stopped giving a shit about this when it became insanely obvious that it isn't going anywhere. That isn't to say that many of us ever actually believed this was going anywhere to begin with. It's just fun to mess around with the new schizos for a little while. If you honestly believe that there's any kind of religious majority on this board, you're incredibly misled.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 23:54:35 2019 No.10636917 >>10635615 >>10635655 >>10635851 >>10635895 STOP PRETENDING TO BE OTHER PEOPLE, GARY.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 23:56:01 2019 No.10636922 >>10635889 >Gary just wants to talk about objective reality Then why do you ignore any and all requests to tie your "theory" to objective reality mathematically? I have a feeling it's because you are incapable of doing so.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 11 23:58:10 2019 No.10636925 >>10635903 Not to mention that he's even incapable of applying real-world units to his "equation", let alone reconciling those units with the established physical equations he claims it to be related to.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 00:00:27 2019 No.10636931 >>10635962 Or maybe you just don't understand high-school level physics, Gary.

Anonymous Sun May 12 00:03:17 2019 No.10636938

>>10636112
Yet Gary will still only reply to it with pure butthurt. He will make zero attempt to correct his math. He will instead resort to strawmen and claiming that we "just don't get it". Or he will just ignore it. These have been his deflection strategies this whole time.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 00:05:58 2019 No.10636945 >>10636197 In other words, something that barely has anything to do with Gary's original equation. I only say this to attempt to prevent Gary from assuming your model's behaviour in any way validates his bullshit.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 00:07:36 2019 No.10636950 >>10636248 Show us, mathematically, what you mean by this, please.

Anonymous Sun May 12 00:10:56 2019 No.10636961

>>10636285
I've made a good number of the posts in this thread, and I've literally only been on a reddit page a handful of times. Don't assume that /sci/-posters can't see the holes in Gary's bullshit. I'm sure you do as well but you're also having fun messing around with all of this, just like I am.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 00:16:07 2019 No.10636975 >>10636961 There's more redditors in this thread than just you dude.

based gary Sun May 12 00:19:23 2019 No.10636987

>>10636961
>I've literally only been on a reddit page a handful of times.
The fact that you personally felt the need to reply to that post in combination with the fact that you just made 7 posts in a row to reply to 7 people really puts that into question.

Anonymous Sun May 12 00:31:18 2019 No.10637008

>>10636975
I have no idea if any of the other posters are redditors.
>>10636987
I just don't like that criticism is being deflected from Gary by pretending that it's coming from reddit. I should have condensed that all into one or two posts, but I just got off a 14-hour shift and I'm a little stupid right now. I went through the thread in full short-term thinking mode and just replied to posts directly after reading them. I apologize for that.

Anonymous Sun May 12 00:33:32 2019 No.10637018

>>10636878
Not sure if this is what you're looking for:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19732442/solving-an-ode-when-the-function-is-given-as-discrete-values-matlab
Interpolate the function values to get a continous function to use with Runge-Kutta.

Anonymous Sun May 12 00:48:08 2019 No.10637048

>>10637008
>I have no idea if any of the other posters are redditors.
Well there are some strong signifiers, like spacing, or them literally admitting it >>10623450
Personally I think they're helping keep the thread alive at this point. So I don't mind as much as I normally would.
>I just don't like that criticism is being deflected from Gary by pretending that it's coming from reddit.
I don't think that was based gary's intention.
In any case I'd advise you to stop being so defensive dude.

Anonymous Sun May 12 00:58:54 2019 No.10637071

>>10637048
>So I don't mind as much as I normally would.
I agree for the same reasons. I obviously don't believe that Gary's discovered anything here, but I've been in these threads since the first one so for some reason I feel invested.
>I don't think that was based gary's intention.
Perhaps not. I was just attempting to show that at least one major poster in these threads disagreeing with Gary isn't from reddit, ultimately.

Anonymous Sun May 12 01:06:59 2019 No.10637089

>>10636987
I am actually glad someone is still challenging Gary on his ideas, especially if they are doing it in a proper way. I don't care if they are from reddit or if they posts 7 posts in a row to reply to 7 different posts (which arguably seems natural).

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 01:11:32 2019 No.10637101 I am not from reddit either.

based gary Sun May 12 01:12:39 2019 No.10637102

>>10637008
I'm not deflecting your criticism, it's perfectly valid. I'm pointing out that the only people who would still be attempting to prove Gary "wrong" after 46 days of him reacting extremely poorly to criticism or downright ignoring it would be those who can't let go of the fact that "wrong" ideas are allowed to be investigated (i.e. the majority of Reddit).

>>10637018
I wonder if it's even worth the extra computation if values have to be interpolated? Maybe it would at least provide some resistance against checkerboard modes?

>>10637089
It keeps the threads alive I guess.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 01:16:37 2019 No.10637110 >>10637089 >I am actually glad someone is still challenging Gary on his ideas sure >I don't care if they are from reddit I wouldn't go that far

Anonymous Sun May 12 01:21:45 2019 No.10637115

>>10637102
>those who can't let go of the fact that "wrong" ideas are allowed to be investigated
I don't care about that. As I said to the other guy, I've been here since the first thread and I feel invested in this whole saga. At this point, I just want to test the depths of Gary's narcissism out of pure curiosity.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 01:27:14 2019 No.10637119 >>10637115 I will beeat the shit out of every AP student from now on, fuck you, don't go to school tomorrow even if your asian of female

Anonymous Sun May 12 02:19:21 2019 No.10637184

>>10637115
There is no bottom to his narcissism.

Notice that he hasn't meaningfully criticized DraftScience. That's because he thinks DS is beneath him, so he doesn't take him seriously.

What he craves is validation from professional physicists (like Hossenfelder). He wants to be an Important Person, with all the trappings of fame and success, like a Wikipedia page.

At best, he'll get an Encyclopaedia Dramatica page.

Anonymous Sun May 12 02:40:47 2019 No.10637231

>>10637184
>Notice that he hasn't meaningfully criticized DraftScience. That's because he thinks DS is beneath him, so he doesn't take him seriously.
This is definitely true. I suggested he make a video response, to which he said
>It's time we start really acting like we unified physics
As if Draft Science isn't worthy of his time.
First he comes here because he's ignored by professional physicists, and now that he thinks he's got definitive proof he does the same, by refusing to give Draft Science a full-fledged response. It's disheartening how quickly power can go to one's head.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 02:44:04 2019 No.10637236 >>10637184 Didn't Gary reply in the comments of DS video and even say that DS was right? How many of the people who DS calls out do that? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5O7GJ5tX08&t=3998s

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 02:51:29 2019 No.10637246 >>10637236 The bystander effect in action everyone

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 02:54:48 2019 No.10637252 >>10636242 What a mess of nonsensical equations...

Anonymous Sun May 12 02:57:46 2019 No.10637256

>>10637102
>who can't let go of the fact that "wrong" ideas are allowed to be investigated (i.e. the majority of Reddit).
there's nothing interesting about this idea except finding out if there's any type or threshold of negative reaction that can penetrate gary's narcissism.
these are boring physics notions and boring CAs to amuse potheads. the only cutting edge investigation here is into narcissism at the planck scale

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 03:05:02 2019 No.10637269 >>10635903 >this is nothing. just a relabelling of variables, where s can only be 1 But what if it's not 1? What if there's new physics if you look beyond your own preconceptions and be open-minded?

Anonymous Sun May 12 03:06:22 2019 No.10637273

>>10637231
I have a feeling that "power" was in Gary's head long before it was even unjustly earned. He displays signs of true clinical narcissism, so he has likely acted this way his whole life. The fact that he was born into a wealthy family only compounded his issues, as he has no true concept of adversity in any form.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 03:07:49 2019 No.10637274 >>10636169 >Its so much simplier than what your are trying twist out of Garys post. In the Optimum automaton: >E = M = C = 1 We are 1. G1. We are all one. Unified.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 03:11:00 2019 No.10637281 >>10636878 This looks like the Big Bang right there! Something out of one thing!

u/ftl20xx Sun May 12 03:28:18 2019 No.10637315

Since r/physics deleted this post despite me being polite as can be with inferiors such as yourself (I knew they would since they are frauds who hate science and only care about grifting 21 billion euros for an unnecessary collider), I see no reason to keep the gloves on any longer. Please tell me, without resorting to logical fallacy, what is wrong with my UTOE other than that it makes your way of thinking look like a backward, broken, overpriced, frauduent, corrupted, ignorant and grifting parasite on society? My theory is faster, more powerful, more efficient and less expensive then the souless, bloated nonsense that you call your schema of reality. Your way of thinking had 100 years to figure out unified physics, but it was too obsessed with engorging itself on tax payer funding by lying to the public and intentionally ofuscating science to care about something as nobel as the advancement of knowledge. You = joke, fraud, liar. You wouldn't last even an hour with me in an unbiased and unmoderated medium. This is not even me laying into you, this is me slightly irritated. The only reason you even got this far with me is because you know that the moderators here are as corrupt and false as you are, and they ban any account that speaks even the slightest hint of truth. Enjoy your 11-dimentional hologram bubble horeshit; you don't even deserve the attention or effort of someone like me. Saddest thing of all is that I should have learned by now not to try giving pearls to swine; you are better with the scraps that fall from your master's table. Take care, pal!

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 03:31:34 2019 No.10637319 >>10637281 Will you please explain how that resembles the Big Bang mathematically, Gary?

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 03:42:26 2019 No.10637345 File: 572 B, 42x43, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I can't believe we're still going Someone make the next thread

Anonymous Sun May 12 05:21:00 2019 No.10637508

>>10636950

U = E / S for any unit of EnergySpace

So, if, say E = 100, S = 1, U = 100

Then U100 = E100 / S1 =

U100 * S1 = (E100 / S1) * S1 =

U100 * S1 = E100 =

U100 S1 / 100 = E100 / 100 =

U1 * S0.01 = E1 =

(U1 * S0.01) / U1 = E1 / U1 =

S = E / U =

S = 0.01

E = 1

Basically we normalize the energy levels by expanding and contacting space. Warped space.
U =1

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 05:27:06 2019 No.10637515 >>10637508 Literally all that demonstrates is a basic property of algebra. What are your units? 100 of what is E, 1 of what is S, 100 of what is U. And don't just say energy, space, and universe. You need actual, physical units.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 12 05:37:18 2019 No.10637524 >>10637345 I don't know why I bother asking. New thread >>10637523

Anonymous Sun May 12 13:25:10 2019 No.10638455

>>10637102
>I wonder if it's even worth the extra computation if values have to be interpolated? Maybe it would at least provide some resistance against checkerboard modes?
You need to do this for each iteration? If so, yeah probably. I do not really understand your latest equations and what ODE you need to solve though.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math