beyond Pascal triangle

[Anonymous No.10606787]

What have I found?

[Anonymous No.10606791]

>>10606787
Here's where it begins.

[Anonymous No.10606798]

>i have schizophrenia pls respond

[Anonymous No.10606804]

>>10606787
Something like
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpi%C5%84ski_triangle

[Anonymous No.10606817]

>>10606798
Too bad academia is mostly governed by useless faggots like you.

[Anonymous No.10606820]

>>10606804
Yep, something like that. And it even includes Sierpinski triangle in it (where 5's & 10's meet)
So I'm looking for specialists in that field.

[Anonymous No.10607698]

So how do you people figure out if something is new or not?
Have any field of science used long-available ai-powers to catalogue and index all their knowledge?

[Anonymous No.10607844]

>>10606798
What makes you think he is a schizo? Is it a general banter on (amateur) mathematicians?

[Anonymous No.10607981]

>>10607698
If you are interested in a particular field, you should know generally what is known and what are the open questions.

[Anonymous No.10608005]

>>10606787
Looks like one of the 1D cellular automata. Look up the different 1D cellular automata rulesets on Wikipedia and see if one generates that.

[Anonymous No.10608009]

>>10607981
What if I answered something nobody ever asked?
Also haven't you heard that in every field each year more new knowledge is created, than a specialist can read for his lifetime? This part undermines the importance of general education (especially in the age of internets) but you are not supposed to think this because education is even more than just big motherfucking business.

[Anonymous No.10608073]

>>10608005
>1D cellular automata
Thank you. I also scrolled down all the google images for these words, but it is not among them.
Somebody please send it to somebody who may care enough to research it properly.

[Anonymous No.10608696]

>>10606791
Looks like the sum of all digits to the left mod 10

[Anonymous No.10608801]

>>10606787
Neat. Good job OP.