/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.10606676]

/SGG/ - Steven Goddard/Tony Heller general. Come here to discuss the climate alarmist propaganda and expose the bullshit that is global warming.

[Anonymous No.10606682]

>>10606676
republishit detected

[Anonymous No.10606684]

>>10606676
Just for clarity, OP, is this general intended to be for discussing claims and hypothesis that are egregious and extraordinary? Or, is it supposed to refute the entire premise that some result of human activities could have any effect on the global or local climates?

Or is this another one of those pseudo-/pol/ threads?

[Anonymous No.10606691]

>>10606684
The former

[Anonymous No.10606701]

>>10606676
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eK6pYLhcJx4

[Anonymous No.10606720]

>>10606701
>climate denier
>posts KKK pepe
you /pol/ guys are real subtle ain’t cha

[Anonymous No.10606723]

>>10606720
just report and move on, engaging him is like scratching a rash

[Anonymous No.10606761]

>>10606720
>KKK pepe
Imagine being this retarded

[Anonymous No.10606777]

>>10606682
>webm
Ur an ass I’m on mobile what is it

[Anonymous No.10606784]

>>10606676
Don't reproduce

[Anonymous No.10606789]

>>10606761
>Being such a retard you've no sarcasm detection

[Anonymous No.10606794]

>>10606784
Yes anon. Don’t reproduce and don’t question SCIENCE. Also remember to have your BLACKED subscription set to auto renew!

[Anonymous No.10606799]

>>10606794
Anyone who replies to this post is scratching a rash. It might feel good but the result isn't worth it.

[Anonymous No.10606802]

>>10606676
Yeah bro, like putting more CO2 into our atmosphere is a good thing and CO2 totally doesn't vibrate at IR frequencies.

[Anonymous No.10606806]

>>10606794
Don't question science when you don't have any fucking training in it. Do some actual research instead of watching your redpilled neonaxi trump-fondling YouTube videos and learn to be scientifically literate instead.

I'm sure your 89 IQ won't hold you back too too much.

[Anonymous No.10606822]

>>10606806
>science
>training
>don’t question
Calling out bullshit requires no credentials or formal education.

[Anonymous No.10606849]

>>10606822
But it does require education, mouth breather. You just puppet spun stories you find on the internet with no context to question or verify what you hear. You're as bad as a flat earther.
>inb4 anon i...
gtfo.

[Anonymous No.10606850]

>>10606723
>>10606799
>”don’t reply”
>bumps thread

[Anonymous No.10606855]

>>10606849
>unironically using flat-earther as an insult

[Anonymous No.10606859]

>>10606850
sage is no longer visible, but it still works

[Anonymous No.10606884]

>>10606855
you need to go back to English class, too.

[Anonymous No.10606891]

>>10606884
>unironically not knowing that unironically is a commonly used but unofficial word on the 4chan

[Anonymous No.10606894]

>>10606891
>unironically not realizing we're on 4channel not 4chan

[Anonymous No.10606897]

>>10606891
ironically you don't know that unironically actually has a meaning and retards like you show your puppetting tendencies by repeating shit mindlessly.

[Anonymous No.10606905]

>>10606891
you remind me of normalfags who insist everything is a meme. you're retarded.

[Anonymous No.10606927]

>>10606682
>200 years
Stop cherry picking. Show a graph for 10 million years. Our temperature variation is well within the norm. There have been far more variable trends.

[Anonymous No.10606931]

>>10606927
>implying the Earth is any older than 10,000 years

[Anonymous No.10606934]

>>10606927
>>10606931
But I do agree that the variation is normal

[Anonymous No.10606961]

There are 328,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 particles in the universe that we can observe yo momma took the stupidiest ones and put them into a fucking brainlet.

Fuck off back to >>>/pol/ this thread shit bait.

[Anonymous No.10606971]

>>10606961
>actually using an insult from a years old ERBOH video
Unoriginal piece of shit. Pathetic

[Anonymous No.10606972]

/Pol/tards just being /Pol/tards.

[Anonymous No.10606975]

>>10606971
>Using pathetic insults for pathetic threads

Do you rly think anyone is gonna debate here? You must be dumb.

[Anonymous No.10606977]

>>10606972
>global temperature change
>data supposedly as far back as 1850

Surely you must be joking?

[Anonymous No.10606989]

>>10606977
How much far back do you want brainlet?

This far back? (Pic related)
Just so you can go

>hurr durr temperatures changed in the past climate change hoax.

Go ahead im waiting for it

[Anonymous No.10607021]

>>10606927

>Stop cherry picking

Ironic

Remember when Ted Cruz another fucktard denier used this graph to argue that there was no significant warming?

Who knew... he took a part out of the real graph and put a Y axis and X axis and there you go. A new way to spread propaganda.

Video here: https://youtu.be/ZCSnKNoyWtw

Real data here: https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/graph_data/Global_Mean_Estimates_based_on_Land_and_Ocean_Data/graph.txt

http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/GlobalWarming
You guys sure are idiots.

[Anonymous No.10607056]

>>10606927

>Stop cherry picking

Ironic

Remember when Ted Cruz another fucktard denier used this graph to argue that there was no significant warming?

Who knew... he took a part out of the real graph and put a Y axis and X axis and there you go. A new way to spread propaganda.

Video here: https://youtu.be/ZCSnKNoyWtw

Real data here: https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/graph_data/Global_Mean_Estimates_based_on_Land_and_Ocean_Data/graph.txt

>>10606927

>Stop cherry picking

Ironic

Remember when Ted Cruz another fucktard denier used this graph to argue that there was no significant warming?

Who knew... he took a part out of the real graph and put a Y axis and X axis and there you go. A new way to spread propaganda.

Video here: https://youtu.be/ZCSnKNoyWtw

Real data here:>>10606927

>Stop cherry picking

Ironic

Remember when Ted Cruz another fucktard denier used this graph to argue that there was no significant warming?

Who knew... he took a part out of the real graph and put a Y axis and X axis and there you go. A new way to spread propaganda.

Video here: https://youtu.be/ZCSnKNoyWtw

Real data here: https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/graph_data/Global_Mean_Estimates_based_on_Land_and_Ocean_Data/graph.txt>>10606927

>Stop cherry picking

Ironic

Remember when Ted Cruz another fucktard denier used this graph to argue that there was no significant warming?

Who knew... he took a part out of the real graph and put a Y axis and X axis and there you go. A new way to spread propaganda.

Video here: https://youtu.be/ZCSnKNoyWtw

Real data here: https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/graph_data/Global_Mean_Estimates_based_on_Land_and_Ocean_Data/graph.txt


https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series

You guys sure are idiots.

[Anonymous No.10607068]

>>10607056
Oops what the fuck this got copied 3 times or so kek...

[Anonymous No.10607095]

>>10606777
>Ur an ass I’m on mobile
no Ur the ass, Phonephag

[Anonymous No.10607113]

>>10606989
That wasn’t my point brainlet. My point was that we didn’t have sufficient data in the 19th century and even for most of the past century to calculate a mean temperature of the Earth. That’s difficult even today. That data is fabricated, and useful idiots like you don’t even question the origin.

>>10607056
I don’t give a fuck about Ted Cruz

[Anonymous No.10607120]

>>10606701
Heller is a fountain of lies and half-truths.
Here he is systematically picked apart, and revealed to be nothing but a clown:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLjkLPnIPPw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weQ-N4iymrQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5fncpSikwk

[Anonymous No.10607131]

>>10607120
Did you say clown? Anyway, the picture you provide is hilarious to me. Not only was the data up until fairly recently not very accurate, but there was no data for almost the entire Southern Hemisphere except for Australia.

[Anonymous No.10607132]

>>10606676
>general
Please fuck off.

[Anonymous No.10607135]

>>10606927
The change in average temperature that occurred over the last 50-100 years has historically taken thousands to hundreds of thousands of years. The only exceptions are extinction events involving things like giant volcanic eruptions. Here's a comparison of current warming with the Eocene Thermal Maximum:

https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/08/new-study-were-outpacing-the-most-radical-climate-event-we-know-of/

[Anonymous No.10607173]

>>10607113
Poor retard acting like this hasn't been explained to idiots like you time and time again. Thinks its difficult...just because its difficult for you doesn't mean the data is fabricated it just means you are a complete fucking braindead human being who can't understand it.

Why data goes back to the 1880:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/qz.com/1055629/why-does-all-our-climate-data-start-in-1880/amp/

Stop being on /pol/ so much and go to college.

[Anonymous No.10607199]

>>10607113
>i don't give a fuck about Ted cruz

Ofc you dont you blind moron the fact that he was shilling infront of your very eyes and you still dont care and you still want to believe that this is all a massive conspirancy theory proves how braindead you are and how in denial you are.

Graph that he used on blue the real data on red (pic related). You are an idiot.

[Anonymous No.10607205]

>>10607173
Nice blogpost. It is well known that the majority of the Earth did not have temperature data that far back. You climate alarmists really get cranky when someone calls you out on your bullshit huh?

[Anonymous No.10607226]

Reminder that this is OP's third open thread on the same topic. He demands people watch his stupid YouTube videos and then runs away when they get debunked. He is incapable of making a substantive argument and should be ignored. Thanks.

[Anonymous No.10607227]

>>10607199
No I just dgaf about Ted but if that makes you feel better then ok. Pic related, it is a more complete graph dating even farther back

[Anonymous No.10607230]

>>10607205
Thats why there is error margins you fucking idiot. Do even saw the graphs? Its shown there. Ofc they are not 100% certain of the temperature back then but they have records of it and they uncertainty margins.

Also you have no fucking clue about basic physics and chemistry about CO2 and you dont understand that now the rate of CO2 ppm is way faster causing ecosystems to unbalance. Kys pls. Thx

[Anonymous No.10607231]

>>10607226
Oi cunt, get the fuck out of my thread

[Anonymous No.10607238]

>>10607227
>Cherrypicking US temp change when we're talking about global temp change
Nice try, but no.

[Anonymous No.10607242]

>>10607230
>coping this fucking hard

You do realize that uncertainty is for when you actually have data, not for when you literally have no data right?

[Anonymous No.10607250]

>>10607238
The US data is used because there is no data for the majority of the world’s land mass dating that far back.

[Anonymous No.10607263]

>>10607250
Hmmm

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/docs/peterson-vose-1997.pdf

http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00006.1

[Anonymous No.10607266]

>>10607227
Nice try faggot but thats only from the US

https://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/epubs/ndp/ushcn/ushcn.html

Imagine thinking that 2% of the surface area is the entire globe fucking kek

[Anonymous No.10607270]

>>10607250
Hmmmmmm

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201713

[Anonymous No.10607276]

>>10607250
This kills the deniertard.

[Anonymous No.10607278]

>>10607242
They have data dating far back as 1750 in archives. But since is not as accurate as it is today they have to have wide uncertainty ranges. You brainlet

[Anonymous No.10607286]

>>10607263
>>10607270
>believing false data

Again, the majority of Earth’s landmass does not have temperature data going back to 1880. This graph is nothing but an incomplete picture that has been manipulated to fit an already decided conclusion.

[Anonymous No.10607328]

>>10607286
Literally read the methodology if you're not a brainlet, they describe exactly how they get the temperature measurements.

[The Pencil Cunts No.10607342]

>>10606676
How have your kind not been run out of 4chan yet?