[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 224 KB, 808x548, 4440C333A60F4AD4A948CB051BC1176A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10579017 No.10579017 [Reply] [Original]

For me it just reminds the importance of versatile education.
Also reminder that science is another kind of philosophy field with it's own special features just like christianity. Studying only one philosophy makes a mind one dimensional. Experiments are a great feature, but they won't make science the source of objective truth, since you can't possibly know what is objective truth because each possible interpretation is subjective. It would be foolish to think that something is objective truth while being a human, I hope you don't do it.

http://dailynous.com/value-of-philosophy/charts-and-graphs/

http://dailynous.com/value-of-philosophy/charts-and-graphs/

>> No.10579067

I think academia is a great way to limit your thinking

>> No.10579080

>>10579017
>Computer Science that low
OH NOES CS BROS WHAT HAPPENED

>> No.10579110

>>10579017
GRE is easy and anyone who doesn't earn a top score is a moron.

>> No.10579120

>>10579017
>my two options for a bachelors were CS and Philosophy.
>I chose CS

..What does this say about me?

>> No.10579144

>>10579017
I'm studying for the GRE general right now and I anticipate taking it in 6-8 months. This graph doesn't surprise me. Recall that the GRE tests one's ability to dissect and synthesize relatively complex ideas, which is something that students of philosophy engage in throughout the duration of their education.

On a side note, I'm aiming for a 330+ and a 4.5+ on AWA. Any ideas/excellent resources?

>> No.10579184
File: 349 KB, 905x435, GRE.01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10579184

>> No.10579190
File: 90 KB, 708x547, gre1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10579190

>> No.10579195
File: 31 KB, 459x327, GMAT_scores.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10579195

>> No.10579201
File: 295 KB, 1012x1817, phil-test-scores-salaries.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10579201

>> No.10579217
File: 229 KB, 2048x1638, schematic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10579217

>> No.10579339

>>10579067
Why do you think that?

>>10579017
It's not a surprise, philosophers understand math since math is philosophy, philosophers are used to thinking about edge and corner cases, and philosophers are of course good at extracting meaning from text and have wide vocabularies from reading so much

>> No.10579544

Congratulations, philosophers, on edging out English majors in language skills.

>science: it's just like christianity
>science: you can't possibly know
Thanks for your tremendous contribution, philosophy majors.

>> No.10579553

>>10579017
I'm a medfag so I really don't understand the GRE. If someone wants to get into a science PhD do they take the same test as people going for english PhD's? If so that's fucking terrible and the test wouldn't mean shit.

>> No.10579559

>>10579544
What kind of contribution are you being sarcastic about?

>> No.10579571

>>10579559
there arent any thats the point

>> No.10579578

>>10579553
Because being a scientist is more than performing experiments. That said, I don't think it's considered enormously important compared to research experience and such.

>> No.10579584

>>10579571
In other words define 'contribution'

>> No.10579590

>>10579339
It sounds like a quote from rick & morty. I wouldn't take him too seriously.