[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 49 KB, 504x459, 49.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Tue Apr 16 16:56:54 2019 No.10564300 [Reply] [Original]

im fucking crying lads
we took a standardised iq test this past week and my qt supervisor just smiled and giggles when she handed me my results
i got a fucking 72 iq

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 16:58:23 2019 No.10564301 >>10564300 cool story

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:00:40 2019 No.10564302 isnt sub 80 iq considered literally mentally retarded?

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:01:20 2019 No.10564303 2

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:01:32 2019 No.10564304 >>10564300 are you black

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:02:33 2019 No.10564305 >>10564302 pretty sure it's 70 iq

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:03:41 2019 No.10564306 >>10564300 I spent 5 minutes trying to make sense from the patterns below and didn't notice you had to solve the ones above. I know your feel iqbro.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:08:56 2019 No.10564307 >>10564306 Isn't it just rotating/mirroring, and adding a new one? If it kept going there isn't a second version of 5, so the answer is 2, because each new row becomes more complex. The row after would have 6 in the third column.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:10:27 2019 No.10564308 >>10564300 iq is a pseudo-science and meme.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:10:47 2019 No.10564309 >>10564300 So, not quite ready for the /pol/ jugend yet?

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:12:03 2019 No.10564310 File: 6 KB, 207x243, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10564307 >Isn't it just rotating/mirroring, and adding a new one? it's left and right overlapped

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:12:46 2019 No.10564311 It doesn't really make sense. Is the fat arrow a kinf of placeholder? The correct answer is probably 2 though.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:13:22 2019 No.10564312 >>10564308 Its not psuedo science.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:14:25 2019 No.10564313 2

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:14:35 2019 No.10564314 >>10564308 This. Literally nobody in the world cares about IQ tests except ameritards.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:14:42 2019 No.10564315 File: 21 KB, 297x491, IMG_20190311_133038.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10564300 >72 iq >goes on /pol/ checks out

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:14:51 2019 No.10564316 >>10564310 Its also top and bottom overlapped

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:15:36 2019 No.10564317 Why would you ever waste your time with an IQ test?

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:16:00 2019 No.10564318 >>10564305 It used to be 80 but that would have made most of African clinically retarded so they lowered the threshold. Despite this Somalia is still on average a nation of retards by objective metrics with it's 68 IQ average.

>>	FPH !FATHATE.v6 Tue Apr 16 17:17:01 2019 No.10564319 >think my score is 142 my whole life >turns out it was only 132 Lads I'm shook

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:17:03 2019 No.10564320 >>10564300 all those test don't mean anything in the long run, all that matters is that you are a good human being.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:17:20 2019 No.10564321 >>10564316 This is what I saw. I didn't realize the pattern from left to right was the same as well.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:17:46 2019 No.10564322 >tfw 135 self tested >thw still no gf

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:23:04 2019 No.10564323 >>10564320 Yes, and size doesn't matter.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:23:53 2019 No.10564324 >>10564323 It really doesn't much. What really matters is your face.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:23:56 2019 No.10564325 File: 162 KB, 456x367, 3nh59dkj.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10564316

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:25:43 2019 No.10564326 File: 25 KB, 326x325, 1543817184141.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] 1

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:26:24 2019 No.10564327 Was it a culture fair test? They are designed to throw you off to even out results.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:27:02 2019 No.10564328 >>10564318 Source?

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:27:08 2019 No.10564329 I don't even really understand the question.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:35:39 2019 No.10564330 >>10564303 that's correct well done anon

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:39:03 2019 No.10564331 >>10564330 The notation is weird. The fat arrow works as a kind of placeholder I guess, but it's still not great without an explanation. This is why I stick to formal languages like JS.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:50:10 2019 No.10564332 >>10564328 Hitler.com

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:57:24 2019 No.10564333 >>10564328 CIA world fact book.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 17:59:23 2019 No.10564334 >>10564318 The IQ averages from Africa are all very misleading. The only people there that get IQ tested attend special needs schools, the average person there would never take one.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:00:58 2019 No.10564335 >>10564302 About right for this board

Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:01:49 2019 No.10564336

>>10564334
>The only people there that get IQ tested attend special needs schools, the average person there would never take one.
That's a blatant lie and you only need to look at the methodology of the studies those numbers are derived from to see that.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:04:44 2019 No.10564337 File: 36 KB, 758x612, 20190416_170419.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I think I solved it

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:05:27 2019 No.10564338 >>10564336 https://www.nature.com/articles/6800418 Most of the egregiously low IQ scores come from small sample sizes of disabled children. Equatorial Guinea (59) comes from a 2002 test of 48 10 year olds.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:07:22 2019 No.10564339 >>10564335 After the /pol/ invasion the average IQ of /g/ has dropped by more than 100 points. And /g/ used to be really dumb before that.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:11:01 2019 No.10564340 >>10564321 These tests are always made to work multiple ways without clear indication as to which one is intended to be the right one. I check my initial guesses that way.

Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:11:39 2019 No.10564341

>>10564318
>Somalia is still on average a nation of retards by objective metrics with it's 68 IQ average
People in Somalia has more serious problems than boasting about points received in psychological tests.
You wouldn't have survived in Somalia for a week.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:13:14 2019 No.10564342 >>10564300 dont worry op its just a jew test now go to /pol/ and never look back

Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:16:03 2019 No.10564343

>>10564341
IQ tests are BS and I say that as someone who scores well.
You simply can not score someone who was not exposed to the concepts used in an IQ test. IQ tests are supposed to score the pure hardware of your brain, without taking into consideration anything that you ever learned, but they don't.

Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:20:01 2019 No.10564344

>>10564338
>This is because IQ tests are not constructed on the basis of any scientific model of intelligence: they are simply created (by statistical manipulation of item content) to identify individuals who have already been deemed to be ‘intelligent’ by other, more subjective, criteria.
Calling something that show clear correlations, and a high degree of predictability unscientific is either pure ignorance or intentionally disingenuous. That pretty much sets the stage for the entire review which makes copious use of intentional omission of facts or blatant misrepresentations.

There was also a direct followup written to that book so if you're going to cite something related to it it should probably be the most recent example.

>>10564341
Maybe if they worried more about scoring well on tests instead of wallowing in a perpetual state of tribal warfare and Islamic fundamentalism they wouldn't be stuck in a shithole country.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:24:05 2019 No.10564345 >>10564337 oy vey

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:24:19 2019 No.10564346 >>10564343 >You simply can not score someone who was not exposed to the concepts used in an IQ test. It's simple pattern recognition and spatial reasoning. There's no learned concepts involved.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:27:27 2019 No.10564347 >>10564300 Its #2 obviously But pattern recognition isnt iq

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:29:53 2019 No.10564348 >>10564337 Kek

Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:30:29 2019 No.10564349
File: 2.83 MB, 1132x1705, 1555075829306.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10564300
If you take 7,5,1 ,symbols and get them inside each other its supposed to look like 6 but 6/3 is 2 + 1 so its 3 or 8 or 1 without 3 is 1 + 3 is 4 × 2 is 8 - 3 is 5
yeh..

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:30:48 2019 No.10564350 >>10564334 Nice try, Jamal Abdul.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:33:01 2019 No.10564351 >>10564350 >hasn't even killed a lion and cut off part of his dick when reaching maturity I feel sorry for you John Smith

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:39:15 2019 No.10564352 >>10564346 >mentions two abilities that are learned ?

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:41:41 2019 No.10564353 The test isn't in figuring out the correct answer, it's in figuring out the rules. As soon as you realize it's a transposition the answer is trivial.

Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:49:46 2019 No.10564354

>>10564352
Are you for real? Pattern recognition isn't a learned skill anymore than walking is a learned skill. It's an inherent feature of the human brain and any human beyond the age of infancy will have developed it to a degree and any human older than childhood will have likely developed almost all of the capacity for it they'll ever have. Spatial reasoning is exactly the same and is not a skill that can be taught or trained to any real degree which is why they comprise a significant aspect of an IQ test along with memory and sometimes verbal reasoning skills depending on the specific test.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:50:19 2019 No.10564355 >>10564300 what does this have to do with technology

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 18:56:40 2019 No.10564362 I feel intimidated. Is this a safe space?

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 19:01:19 2019 No.10564376 >when the mods are even dumber than OP. How do fuck if this /sci/? If anywhere on 4chan, this shitty thread belongs on /pol/ or /thrash/. It probably should've been deleted all together.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 19:05:53 2019 No.10564390 >>10564376 >It probably should've been deleted all together. That sounds like /sci/ so I can understand the confusion.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 19:16:13 2019 No.10564413 File: 119 KB, 583x482, 1548672444364.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >another IQ thread

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 19:37:56 2019 No.10564471 >>10564413 Blame /g/ mods for moving it here.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 16 19:40:32 2019 No.10564476 >>10564303 2

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 17 00:28:26 2019 No.10565280 >>10564376 >>10564376 Science could easily cure the suffering that is brainletism if it wasn't filled with unempathetic asshole brainchads.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 21 11:15:12 2019 No.10565280,1 >>10564330 Nigger

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]