/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.10558310]

Get over it /sci/

She's a legit winner, even if other people did the bulk of the work and she added the details in. The theory of relativity wasn't developped by a single guy really, but was becoming apparent to a lot of scientists back then and Einstein just snatched. Same thing with Darwinian evolution. The names on the findings are often fake. Grow up.

[Anonymous No.10558314]

>>10558310
sure, she did a good job as part of the collaboration. and her picture was cute. all that is fine, it's just that normies who don't understand how scientific collaborations work misunderstood the entire thing

[Anonymous No.10558321]

>>10558310
>>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.10558325]

>>10558314
>her picture was cute
She is so ugly. How can you find that jew nose cute?

[Anonymous No.10558329]

Are feminist so stupid they don't realize they insulted her by accrediting her with work she didn't do, and insulted other women who worked in that project who are now being ignored?

[Anonymous No.10558333]

>>10558329
it’s normies in general, not just feminazis

[Anonymous No.10558336]

>>10558325
solid 9 by stem standards

[Anonymous No.10558337]

>>10558325
how's the neo-nazi dating pool looking right now?

[Anonymous No.10558344]

>>10558314
lol, legit getting jimmy neutron vibes from this pic. she's cute in some of the others though

[Anonymous No.10558345]

>>10558329
They simply do not care. They have an agenda to push and their friends in the media have clicks to harvest. Nothing else matters even if they have made it more difficult for Katie to become accepted as a member of future teams.

[Anonymous No.10558356]

>>10558344
it’s a shoop i made for the phenotype meme. her head isn’t really witten level

[Anonymous No.10558390]

She is the next Einstein, can't wait for her next big breakthrough.

[Anonymous No.10558403]

>>10558314
fact: Her algorithm was not used for the image

Of the four imaging teams, hers was the one not used for the composite. It was a composite of the other three.

[Anonymous No.10558408]

>>10558345
She wrote on facebook "I made" exact quote for the image. Despite her algorithm not being used for said image creation.

[Anonymous No.10558521]

>>10558310
I don't really get it...

> makes an emotional post about probably the most important achievement on her life time
> feminist media takes the post
> feminist media politicizes the post
> people gets mad at her
> people start harassing her
> what the actual fuck?

[Anonymous No.10558540]

>>10558337
even their tradgirl heros are coalburners.

[Anonymous No.10558562]

>>10558540
>coalburner
>dudes are whiter than me and I'm brown
Alright, I guess there's no place in 4chan(nel) that isn't infected with /pol/ idiocy.

[Anonymous No.10558569]

>>10558562
yeah, even /cgl/ has girls spouting pol shit

[Anonymous No.10558941]

>>10558540
>12 dudes
>1 reasonably good looking girl

yeah that looks about right

[Anonymous No.10558948]

>>10558521
She literally didn't ask for this. If retards want someone to be mad at, try the sites that twisted a simple happy post into a political tool.

[Anonymous No.10559026]

>>10558540
yeah, lauren simonsen sure has em conned

[Anonymous No.10559036]

>>10559026
i thought that was ivanka?

[Anonymous No.10559094]

>>10558562
>I guess there's no place in 4chan(nel) that isn't infected with /pol/ idiocy.

that's because a little group of "operators" from /pol/ decided to "infiltrate" various other boards to "influence" their "thought patterns".

[Anonymous No.10559097]

>>10559026
>>10559036
Lauren Southern

[Anonymous No.10559110]

>>10559094
/pol/ nor any other board on 4chan made this woman the face of black hole research. This is completely the creation of click bait media.

[Anonymous No.10559119]

>>10559110
not what I was saying.
it's pretty fucking clear that this:
>that's because a little group of "operators" from /pol/ decided to "infiltrate" various other boards to "influence" their "thought patterns"
is an answer to this:
>>10558562
>I guess there's no place in 4chan(nel) that isn't infected with /pol/ idiocy.

lurk moar, pls become familiar with how post-quoting works

[Anonymous No.10560482]

>>10558329
Incel

[Anonymous No.10560501]

>>10559094
how do you know this? did you go there and see them talking about it?
I swear "/pol/" is the liberal's equivalent of "the jews"

[Anonymous No.10560505]

>>10560482
daddy will never come back

[Anonymous No.10560544]

https://twitter.com/thisgreyspirit/status/1116518544961830918?s=20
>So apparently some (I hope very few) people online are using the fact that I am the primary developer of the eht-imaging software library (https://github.com/achael/eht-imaging …) to launch awful and sexist attacks on my colleague and friend Katie Bouman. Stop. Our papers used three independent imaging software libraries (including one developed by my friend @sparse_k). While I wrote much of the code for one of these pipelines, Katie was a huge contributor to the software; it would have never worked without her contributions and the work of many others who wrote code, debugged, and figured out how to use the code on challenging EHT data. With a few others, Katie also developed the imaging framework that rigorously tested all three codes and shaped the entire paper ...; as a result, this is probably the most vetted image in the history of radio interferometry. I'm thrilled Katie is getting recognition for her work and that she's inspiring people as an example of women's leadership in STEM. I'm also thrilled she's pointing out that this was a team effort including contributions from many junior scientists, including many women junior scientists .... Together, we all make each other's work better; the number of commits doesn't tell the full story of who was indispensable. So while I appreciate the congratulations on a result that I worked hard on for years, if you are congratulating me because you have a sexist vendetta against Katie, please go away and reconsider your priorities in life. Otherwise, stick around -- I hope to start tweeting more about black holes and other subjects I am passionate about -- including space, being a gay astronomer, Ursula K. Le Guin, architecture, and musicals. Thanks for following me, and let me know if you have any questions about the EHT!

[Anonymous No.10561879]

>>10558314
As it was intended. In orther for this news get real traction the research receives maximun funding, they need guilible 15y/o "i love science" girls spamming this in their social media, while incels blow it up to the stratosphere with their autistic scrutiny.
The is why the "women in sciece" push, although stupid in and of itself, is actually helping scientific research, by creating commotion and giving visibility to things that would otherwise be confined to some scholar circles.
Same thing happens with women in the military and the eagerness to celebrate their silly accomplishments. This will make politicians increase their funding.
It's all about the benjamins™

[Anonymous No.10561889]

>>10560544
>Stop.

[Anonymous No.10561901]

>>10560544
>being a gay astronomer
I hope he put that in his resume.

[Anonymous No.10561909]

>>10558329
Are you still under the impression that the point of feminism is to help women?

[Anonymous No.10561919]

>>10559094
>that's because a little group of "operators" from /pol/ decided to "infiltrate" various other boards to "influence" their "thought patterns".
It's not that, we just like to stir the pot. It's so easy. People tend to get triggered when they can't refute truths that they don't like.

[Anonymous No.10561923]

>>10561919
these aren't "truths" though, they're just opinions. you're shit-stirrers sure but you're not doing anything profound

[Anonymous No.10561931]

This reminds of the NPC posting crazy when that """"study"""" came out. Y'all a bunch of fucking obsessed retarded autistics.

[Anonymous No.10562188]

>>10558310
She is a harlot and a fraud.

[Anonymous No.10562209]

>>10561923
>http://astronomy.com/news/2019/01/billboards-in-space
But they're doing what they *can* do. They are operating at the limits of their mental capacities.
Sad, but true.If one can't create, destruction is the remaining option.

[Anonymous No.10562924]

>>10561931
https://twitter.com/MIT_CSAIL/status/1116775487420997632

Anyone who believed she was important is an npc. Even MIT admits she didn't do much. Most people are just sheep waiting for the medias next order.

[Anonymous No.10562932]

>>10562924
>Anyone who believed she was important is an npc
>the primary developer on the whole project is an npc

[Anonymous No.10562935]

>>10562924
>bumps bl*ck h*le threads
>believes in NPCs
checks out. Did you get here in 2016 or 2017?

[Anonymous No.10562943]

>>10562932
>the primary developer on the whole project

[Anonymous No.10562946]

>>10562943
see: >>10560544
ya know, the guy with his name on the github repo

[Anonymous No.10563099]

>>10558562
the coal she burned isn't in the picture genius

>>10558310
>>10558314
you know damn well if it was some skinny beta dude nobody would have even questioned it

[Anonymous No.10563111]

I know this was a troll post but onviously taking credit for 40 other people's work is a little different than crystallizing a theory that people were "working up to." but had not yet solidified.

[Anonymous No.10563188]

>>10563099
If it was a skinny beta dude no one would have published the photo much less try to give him credit for the entire project. Unless of course he was a race other than white or east Asian.

[Anonymous No.10563197]

>>10560544
The beta boys at NASA fell over each other to defend Linda Ham but that doesn't change the fact that she is responsible for the death of seven astronauts.

[Anonymous No.10563203]

>>10563188
>If it was a skinny beta dude no one would have published the photo
ok

[Anonymous No.10563207]

>>10558314
>her picture was cute

Are we looking at the same picture? How can anyone find that disgusting hook nosed Jew beak “cute”? It looks like a real life caricature of the happy merchant in drag.

This isn’t even bringing into account the fact she did nothing but edit the font size in the code, which is publicly available. Another example of typical kike nepotism.

[Anonymous No.10563211]

>>10558310
>Get over it /sci/
It's crossboarding cancer that cant shut the fuck up about it though.

[Anonymous No.10563217]

>>10563203
Funny how all it takes to dismantle the entire narrative is a 30 second Google search. Why don't they ever do it for themselves? Are they brainlets, or do they just enjoy seething?

[Anonymous No.10563362]

>>10563217
Everyone loves getting mad at things

[Anonymous No.10564100]

>>10558314
does she have it??
the phenotype

[Anonymous No.10564250]

>>10563203
You're the only person here who has seen that article before today. Meanwhile every dufus at Starbucks knows who "Katie" is and that she is responsible for the black hole photo.

[Anonymous No.10564401]

>>10558310
Look at her, trying to hide that massive honker

[Anonymous No.10564468]

>>10564250
>all that backpedaling
So we've gone from "there won't even be a picture" to "no one will care"?
He got a nobel