leibniz newton and riemann sum

[mathlover3001 No.10535291]

can someone explain me the connection between these two plz

[Anonymous No.10535321]

they liked to make math symbols and syntax as annoying and confusing as possible
because

[Anonymous No.10535328]

>Leibniz sum and newton sum
Never heard of those

[Anonymous No.10535339]

>>10535328
fluxions and fluents, u dumdum

[Anonymous No.10535348]

>>10535339
>500 year old antiquated terminology
No thanks

[Anonymous No.10535360]

>>10535348
lol Fatio look at this faggot, using the notation of a german robber

[Anonymous No.10536590]

>>10535291
Leibniz defined the integral as a magical sum(S) that would sum an infinite amount of instances of f(x) from 0 to x and multiplying that sum by a proportionately infinitesimally small number dx. Riemann formally defined this as:
lim n -> infinity
sum from i to n
f( x/n * i ) * x/n

[Anonymous No.10537005]

>>10535291
They were all representatives of the white male patriarchy, we should burn their books and stop using any of their accomplishments.

Also Leibniz and Newton developed early calculus (though kept bickering and accused each other of being hack frauds), Riemann (among others) gave it solid background with proofs 'n sheet.