World’s Largest Animal Study on Cell Tower Radiation Confirms Cancer Link https://ehtrust.org/worlds-largest-animal-study-on-cell-tower-radiation-confirms-cancer-link/ https://youtu.be/tqYczFa_KZM

File: 28 KB, 474x320, 5g cactus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 05:32:04 2019 No.10526542 [Reply] [Original]

World’s Largest Animal Study on Cell Tower Radiation Confirms Cancer Link

https://ehtrust.org/worlds-largest-animal-study-on-cell-tower-radiation-confirms-cancer-link/

https://youtu.be/tqYczFa_KZM

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 05:47:26 2019 No.10526566 May as well just work on curing cancer because people aren't giving up their phones.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 05:49:16 2019 No.10526567 File: 101 KB, 785x731, 1554538325018.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10526542 NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO REDDIT TOLD ME PHONES WERE SAFE AND THAT THE GOVERNMENT WOULD NEVER LIE OR BE PLAGUED WITH GROSS INCOMPETENCE NOOOOOOO

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 05:57:10 2019 No.10526579 >>10526566 if they knew that it causes cancer maybe they would

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 06:03:07 2019 No.10526588 >>10526579 At this point, phones are too entrenched into everyday life that it would be hard to convince people to do so.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 06:08:19 2019 No.10526596 >>10526588 at the very least they would reduce the amount of activity on their phones and turn off their wifis

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 06:11:02 2019 No.10526602 >>10526579 Nope. The risk is too low and it takes too long for people to care. People know all kinds of shit causes cancer or heart attacks or whatever, but they keep doing it anyway because they don't care what happens decades down the road.

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 06:12:51 2019 No.10526606

>>10526602
parents expose their children to this radiation
i think they would change their behaviour drastically if they were in the clear about the risks involved
and they have to know for sure that it poses a threat to the health of their children, who are most exposed to the dangers of radiation

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 06:32:37 2019 No.10526638 >>10526542 can I get an actual link to the study

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 07:34:04 2019 No.10526732 >>10526638 No. That would dispell OP's conspiracy theory.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 12:50:17 2019 No.10527331 >>10526732 There are legitimate studies showing links between cell phone radiation and cancer https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/index.html

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 12:51:44 2019 No.10527333 >>10526732 > conspiracy theory Do you understand that there's a history of corporations hiding negative health effects of their products (including cancer)? Are you aware of the kinds of things the tobacco industry used to do to lie to people?

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 13:01:50 2019 No.10527350
File: 11 KB, 356x297, 1554010018942.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10526566
>>10526567
>>10526579
>>10526588
>>10526602
>>10526606

What the fuck are we going to do this is fucking crazy how society set itself up for everyone to get fucking cancer its not even a joke like if only you knew how serious and how much this affects people and how you actually need to take all these bullshit precautions and behaviors that most people will never engage in and then you realize that society has conveniently and systemically constructed this fucking new level of Social Darwinism and a Medieval plague, and its evil as fuck, and only if you have the eyes to see it do you slightly stand a chance to survive the hellish cancerous new world order

Then again I partially don't care because I've gone over the stats myself and it seems to thin out the population regardless of racial identity, and it really sucks that i feel that way, but then again multicultural society has failed us

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 13:05:35 2019 No.10527358

>>10527331
How high a dose?
>>10527333
Mobile phones have been widespread since the the early 2000s and there has been no surge in brain cancer. The smoking and cancer link was proven because there was a surge in lung cancer in the 1960s after smoking peaked in the 1940s. Same time difference. At the end of the day it's microwave radiation but people hear the word "radiation" and get scared. If it is true we're all fucked anyway because >>10526566

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 13:15:15 2019 No.10527379

>>10527358
>Mobile phones have been widespread since the the early 2000s and there has been no surge in brain cancer.
A latency period of several decades is to be expected. Smoking causes you to get lung cancer until much later in life.

>How high a dose?
I haven't gone through the studies myself (since I only recently realized that this could be an issue), I'm not making any claims one way or another, just saying that there are studies showing links (under whatever conditions they used), and there are industry funded studies that don't show links (like there were for tobacco back in the day).

Oh and apparently, there are studies that show a rise in certain types of brain cancers:
>he rate of glioblastoma climbed from 2.4 to 5.0 per 100,000 people in England between 1995 and 2015
https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/02/health/brain-tumors-cell-phones-study/index.html

My initial impression is that there's a decent chance there's an issue, but we don't have enough evidence yet to really be sure.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 13:24:30 2019 No.10527398 File: 344 KB, 467x453, 1445970790924.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10526542 I FUCKING HATE CORPORATIONS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 14:03:34 2019 No.10527486

>>10526542
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkW3yNjzMmQ&t=243

Most people are unaware of what the "safe" separation distance is for their phone.
If you keep it in your pocket (or bra if ur female) then it is probably not "safe".

In the US, the safety tests don't resemble real-world use.

Get yourself a holster.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 14:10:31 2019 No.10527510 >>10526542 lets ban the sun

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 14:30:54 2019 No.10527581 >>10526542 The sun is also linked to cancer, what do?

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 14:40:48 2019 No.10527614

>b-b-buh i thought you guys were the schitzos
Learn to have skepticism, if we never wondered why people who wore hats went insane we wouldnt have figured out that mercury is bad to have in contact with skin, or if we never wondered why asbestos miners got lung cancer we would still have asbestos roofing. I hate reddit niggers who listen to corperation backed studies and then proceed to make fun of conservitards who do the exact same thing but with global warming.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 14:43:31 2019 No.10527619 >>10527581 it's actually the sunscreen that causes cancer

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 14:44:26 2019 No.10527620

>>10527614
Adding on to my own post
I can remember hearing about studies that proved that cigarettes releived stomach aches and increased your lifespan. It should be obvious that when the scientific community cannot reach a consensus on a topic related intimately with a corperation, that perhaps the corperations have a vested intrest in supressing dome information.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 14:46:08 2019 No.10527621 will my cancer chances decrease if i turn off wifi when im not using it

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 14:46:38 2019 No.10527622 >>10526579 and yet billions of people still smoke tobacco really makes you think

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 14:58:16 2019 No.10527645 >>10527622 addiction is a bitch i smoked a pack a day until a year ago

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 15:00:09 2019 No.10527654

>>10527621

Only by a very small percentage but its safer to disable it to prevent people from either using your wifi as a source for free internet or to prevent hackers/crackers from infiltrating your network/computer.

But even then those two arent that much of a threat.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 15:04:18 2019 No.10527671 File: 534 KB, 1280x720, 1538870204863.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10527621 no its too late, the only way to saVE YOURSEFL IS BY WRAPPING YOUR BODY IN TINFOIL. DO IT NOW

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 15:07:54 2019 No.10527681 >>10526542 fuck these studies, they should be banned. I want fast mobile internet, who cares about small risk of cancer. Studies like these could lead to heavy radiation limits

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 15:10:14 2019 No.10527684

>>10526542
>Results
>A statistically significant increase in the incidence of heart Schwannomas was observed in treated male rats at the highest dose (50V/m). Furthermore, an increase in the incidence of heart Schwann cells hyperplasia was observed in treated male and female rats at the highest dose (50V/m), although this was not statistically significant. An increase in the incidence of malignant glial tumors was observed in treated female rats at the highest dose (50V/m), although not statistically significant.

So what you shouldn't is literally live on top of a radio antenna.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 15:11:50 2019 No.10527686 File: 241 KB, 1200x1200, DwbedmTVYAAzR3k.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10527671 Anti science shill.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 15:17:43 2019 No.10527707 >>10527684 reddit science crew reviews more evidence and declares it insignificant

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 15:21:26 2019 No.10527714 File: 27 KB, 384x478, b_JbIpOwmtPmSLKz_Ok74rvMTCtPmjvlAY17LpDbSlQ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10527684 NOOOOOOOOOO we are going to DIEEEEEE ITS EVERYWHERE and invISIBLE, the RADiatION is KILling ussSSS

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 15:21:59 2019 No.10527715 >>10527671 >t. science denier

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 15:23:12 2019 No.10527718 >>10527684 guess what a cell phone is

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 15:23:59 2019 No.10527721 >>10527714 haha look at this fag who wants to remove organic lead from petrol OOOOOOOOOOH NOOOOOOOOOOO it's EVERYWHERE IT'S POISONING USssS OOOOOOOOOOOOH OOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 17:07:20 2019 No.10527959 >>10526542 literally who gives a shit, everything in the world gives you cancer because biochemistry is so fucking fragile already. it's a miracle biochemistry functions at all.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 18:43:04 2019 No.10528212 File: 65 KB, 568x546, shut it down.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10526542

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 18:44:21 2019 No.10528214 >>10527350 Wait till you find out what happens to your food and what you are really consuming. >t. farmer

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 18:47:00 2019 No.10528221 >>10527721 Imagine in 50-70 years there being a documentary about how people today used radio so pervasively in every day life despite there being evidence of it being a health hazard.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 18:55:30 2019 No.10528238 >>10528212 he is iN THE CONSPIRACY, he is usiNG A RADIO!!!!!!!!11!!1! jewS confirmED FOR LIZARd peoplE!!!!1!

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 19:00:55 2019 No.10528247

>>10526542
>/sci/
>going to the source and reading the paper

pick one

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300367?via%3Dihub

I don't have access to this paper, but from the highlights...
>A statistically significant increase in the incidence of heart Schwannomas was observed in treated male rats at the highest dose (50V/m). Furthermore, an increase in the incidence of heart Schwann cells hyperplasia was observed in treated male and female rats at the highest dose (50V/m), although this was not statistically significant. An increase in the incidence of malignant glial tumors was observed in treated female rats at the highest dose (50V/m), although not statistically significant.
>50 V/m
>19 h/day

Does anybody here know how much 50V/m is? Because it's a fucking ton and nowhere close to what you'd usually get from your cellphone or from a cell site, and even less 19 h/day for your entire life.

Everything is toxic in overdoses. Try drinking 1000 liters of water in a day and see if you can survive that.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 19:04:14 2019 No.10528253 >>10528247 b-but /pol/ redpilled me on cell phones and the globalist lizard conspiracy to give everyone cancer

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 19:04:31 2019 No.10528257 >>10528238 >tfw i was going to post the one using sign language but thought it'd be too obtuse

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 19:06:52 2019 No.10528269
File: 92 KB, 661x1949, Brain and heart tumors - Cancer causing Radio Cell Phone Towers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10528247
>Does anybody here know how much 50V/m is? Because it's a fucking ton

That is how all cancer studies are done. The mice are given super doses of whatever they are testing.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 19:09:42 2019 No.10528274 >>10528247 >Everything is toxic in overdoses. Try drinking 1000 liters of water in a day and see if you can survive that. Or, just expose yourself to several decades worth of cell phone tower emissions over the course of your life.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 19:21:05 2019 No.10528296 Well cool and all but is it the radiation causing this, or something else? Metal or paint reaching ground water? Something similar to why animals die near wind power plants? And if it is indeed the radiation, are the results transferable to humans?

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 19:29:38 2019 No.10528312 >>10528247 > don't have access Heard of Sci-Hub? https://sci-hub.se/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fpii%2FS0013935118300367

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 19:33:20 2019 No.10528321 Wait wtf WiFi and Mobile Data are the same thing? RIP zoomers I guess, they literally use their phones 24/7.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 19:37:55 2019 No.10528336 >>10527718 >dosage is irrelevant

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 19:41:28 2019 No.10528346 >>10528312 Based kazakhstanis

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 19:52:54 2019 No.10528378

I have yet to see any actual numbers posted by anyone. How much higher is the occurrence of cancer than the control population? Did they even have a control and how did they block any environmental RF radiation that could affect the results? Where is the actual report?

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 22:05:00 2019 No.10528642 >>10528247 >this specious argument again

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 22:23:56 2019 No.10528677

Wait...what!?
If radio waves cause cancer, then it must follow that visible light causes cancer as well,because each visible light photon cares more energy than each radio photon.

Also, does this mean that there is no escape from radio waves? Besides isn't our entire universe flooded with this background radiation?

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 22:27:26 2019 No.10528686 >>10528677 yeah all bandwidths interact with matter in exactly the same way I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE!!!!!

Anonymous Sat Apr 6 22:33:16 2019 No.10528695

>>10528686
If you are suggesting that radio of out cell towers is absorbed more by our bodies than other kinds for radiation, then how hard would it be to used a different frequency for our radio communications? Besides, isn't our entire universe flooded with UHF bandwidth radiation? So wouldn't getting rid of the cell towers do nothing to prevent us from getting exposed by carcinogenic radiation?

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 22:37:45 2019 No.10528708 >>10528677 sunlight absolutely does cause cancer (mostly UV)

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 23:06:45 2019 No.10528767 So what can I do to protect myself? I put my phone on airplane mode when I sleep and set it across the room, and when I go to work I leave it in the car.

>>	Anonymous Sat Apr 6 23:09:02 2019 No.10528771 >>10528677 I think it’s more to do with the intensity of the radiation

Anonymous Sun Apr 7 00:11:19 2019 No.10528888

>>10528677
no man made radio does not have a photon. we have faux radio. faux radio and faux microwave do not have photons. they are electrons which simply oscilate. why dont they have one? they dont actually travel at the speed of light. electricity in a circuit that simply goes through a wire spiral or through a magnetron never even get close to the speed of light. when broadcast they move at the speed electricity moves which is a fraction of the speed of light. higher frequency (shorter wave length light) made using laser diodes or leds do move faster that the speed of electricity

now some would laugh saying the second it becomes radio its got a photon or others would say photons arent real everything is a wave. the wave is literally just electrons oscillating or shorter wavelength light diffusion the wave is made of particles. its the difference between highschool science and college level. physics 2 all waves are particles in physics because if its not physical its not real

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 00:12:55 2019 No.10528889 >>10528888 and they tested this coast to coast in america its not actually moving at the speed of light

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 00:13:36 2019 No.10528891 Correlation isn't causation. I am yet to hear a rational, fully explained picture of how non-ionizing radiation crates cancer. Until then, acting crassly and jumping to conclusions isn't science, it's fear.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 00:16:06 2019 No.10528897 >>10528891 Multi-photon interactions with a single atom which are extremely rare but possible, and they get more likely the higher the intensity of em radiation

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 00:31:01 2019 No.10528925 >>10527350 Hasn't failed me, chummer

Anonymous Sun Apr 7 01:05:48 2019 No.10528978

>>10528274
You're not exposed to 50V/m 19h/day. My bachelor's thesis involved measuring radiation in the cellular bands in urban areas (among other things) and the meter never hit 50V/m.

>>10528888
What a stupid post. Light waves are generated by electrons oscillating just like any radio wave, just at a smaller scale (it happens at atomic scale). Radio waves travel at the speed of light in a vacuum. In Earth, they travel slower because of the atmosphere's permitivity, but they still travel at the same speed as light.

You should go back to college.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 01:27:41 2019 No.10528991 >>10527707 /pol/ tactical science user calls real science man leddit man

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 01:38:23 2019 No.10529004 >>10527358 > No surge of brain cancer > Surge of cancer in general though Do people actually think you can only get one type of cancer just because it's on your ear but most people use speaker anyway?

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 01:39:25 2019 No.10529005 >>10527358 Tell that to Asians they smoke all they want and don't get lung cancer. Correlation is garbage

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 01:52:03 2019 No.10529026 >>10529004 nigger the cancers most often caused by radio frequency are brain and heart cancers

Anonymous Sun Apr 7 02:12:42 2019 No.10529059

>>10526542
>he LITERALLY thinks people who live in desert communities think a cactus would look like that
>he's LITERALLY spreading this shit on /pol/ where people who live in Indiana will see this pic and believe it.
>he doesn't know that there are LITERALLY hundreds of people every single day who trek mountain paths and highways which are lined with cacti and would notice a "perfect" cactus and report the fuck out of it
>mfw I'm one of the locals
/pol/ on fucking suicide watch
how old were you when you realized /pol/ was a meme that only exists to spread memes as fast as they can before reddit gets a hold of them?

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 02:52:13 2019 No.10529117 File: 84 KB, 800x450, work.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10528214 >When you dump carcinogens over acres of crops as far as the eye can see

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 05:47:50 2019 No.10529339 >>10528269 this is fucking retarded, because if you jack up the dose enough most of anything will give you cancer.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 06:46:43 2019 No.10529443 the anti wireless guy (you know him) said that this stuff gradually lowers fertility in a way that can be inherited, which is much worse desu since at least cancer just kills you and you were dying eventually anyway

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 08:54:23 2019 No.10529687 >>10529005 Asians do get lung cancer as well. >t. korean

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 09:10:52 2019 No.10529715 >>10526579 Millions of people are killed by cars. Nobody is going to abandon cars.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 09:12:47 2019 No.10529720 >>10526542 >effects only seen at 50v/m So nothing, then.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 11:09:11 2019 No.10529940 >>10529339 >>10529720 is this how you cope with having been wrong?

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 11:15:39 2019 No.10529951 >>10526542 Does this apply to WiFi too?

Anonymous Sun Apr 7 11:42:29 2019 No.10530008
File: 68 KB, 1027x592, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10526542
Maybe it's better that the population is culled. The average human is fucking retarded. Just look at these comments. It really makes you wonder if these people are even conscious

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 11:52:27 2019 No.10530037 It's literally impossible for infrared radiation to cause cancer. If it did then you would get cancer from your own bodyheat. Radiowaves are among the weakest radiation types and therefor pose even less threat than your own body heat.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 11:54:25 2019 No.10530043 >>10530037 >It's literally impossible for infrared radiation to cause cancer. more intensity

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 11:55:51 2019 No.10530045 >>10527379 Cancer rises are generally due to people living longer.

Anonymous Sun Apr 7 11:57:16 2019 No.10530048
File: 743 KB, 2276x1200, 1-electromagnetic-spectrum-me4f6eea1c9d84083a9cb32e9cc26c89d[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

You guys are a bunch of retards.

Here you can see the intensity (power) of different types of radiation. Radiowaves used by wi-fi and telecommunications are literally millions of times less powerful than the color blue.

This means that the color blue is about a million times more cancer inducing than your cell phone tower. You people are absolutely fucking retarded if you believe in this trash. Learn some basic physics.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 12:05:54 2019 No.10530092 dunning kruger is in full force in this thread I wonder how long people can argue over the same thing while having no facts to argue about? Does the act of arguing while ignorant hardens them against accepting new facts as they become available?

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 12:08:09 2019 No.10530100 >>10530092 Believing non-ionizing radiation causes cancer is worse than thinking vaccines cause autism.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 12:10:40 2019 No.10530113 >>10530100 you're replying to the wrong post

Anonymous Sun Apr 7 12:28:09 2019 No.10530141

>>10527619
Incorrect, it's the dangerous sunscreen CHEMICALS that cause cancer. If you just use 100% organic fairtrade sunscreen you'll never get sunburned + never get cancer.
>>10526542
>non-ionizing radiation
>causing cancer
It's trash. These """scientists""" don't know shit about statistics. They p-hack everything to shit. Oh look, 5% significance level on this obscure cancer form? CANCER LINK CONFIRMED.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 12:34:03 2019 No.10530156 >>10530048 I guess I should stop using Yotsuba B now

Anonymous Sun Apr 7 12:34:48 2019 No.10530161

>>10530048
>Learn some basic physics.
No, you're the one who needs to learn basic physics. Do you really think the energy of a single photon is even remotely relevant? You can shoot one single photon at whichever wave length you want at me, I'd gladly let you.

What matters with radiation is not the wave length, it is not what one photon does, it is the amount of photons. This is referred to as the photon flux.
If you throw enough photons at something in a short amount of time you will cause damage, even if they have a very low frequency.

But all that doesn't really matter too much because the real question you are asking is, "how do certain wave lengths affect matter".
And the answer for the relevant wave length areas is this:
UV/VIS light stimulate transitions of electrons in the HOMO, the highest occupied molecular orbital to the LUMO, the lowest occupied molecular orbital. This is what causes phenomena like Absorbance, fluorescence and phosphorescence. It also causes photoreactions, this is why UV radiation gives you sunburns and skin cancer.
Then you have IR radiation, which stimulates vibrational transitions in molecules, i.e. the position of atoms relative to each other.
The next band is microwave radiation where the effects are even less pronounced, this time the whole molecule undergoes a rotational transition, this causes friction and in turn heat. It's how your microwave oven functions.
And lastly the radio waves do not really do anything big to the molecules, it causes the magnetic orientation of the nucleus to shift temporarily. This phenomenon is used in MRI and NMR spectroscopy .

I think you should take a basic course on Spectroscopy, everything will be more clear to you then.

>>10530100
You mean non-ionizing radiation like UV light?

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 12:50:20 2019 No.10530219 >>10530161 UV is ionizing you absolute fucking retard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionizing_radiation "Gamma rays, X-rays, and the higher ultraviolet part of the electromagnetic spectrum are ionizing,"

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 13:03:39 2019 No.10530273 >>10530219 >UV is ionizing you absolute fucking retard. Generally only far UV is considered to be ionizing, but near UV gives you cancer just as much.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 13:21:32 2019 No.10530339 >>10529687 The very likely fact that smoking doesn't cause lung cancer, doesn't mean you are entirely immune to getting it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 13:22:39 2019 No.10530345 >>10529026 >what is the radiobiological bystander effect

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 14:15:12 2019 No.10530499 >>10530219 Do you understand that being hit with huge amounts of photons of even visible or IR light will kill you? >muh only ionizing radiation can damage tissues >.t dunning kruger poster child

Anonymous Sun Apr 7 14:18:11 2019 No.10530509

>>10526542
>50 V/m
You retards do realize that you can't get this level even if you sleep on a cell tower, right?
You can't even get 10 times less than that. Phones and router are in the mV/m range.
>...although not statistically significant
Tinfoilers raped by their own source. Even with the extreme levels of RF, you still get nothing.

Anonymous Sun Apr 7 14:20:43 2019 No.10530519

>>10526542
Does anyone else use LTE on the road? Sometimes my phone feels like its getting really hot and my hand starts to burn, and its not a surface burn it feels like the inside of my hand has been cooked. I also remember this one girl in my high school who was diagnosed with hand cancer in the dead center of her palm. She had it excised, but I recall she was ALWAYS texting and watching youtube back in 2013. She had an LG ENV2. I remember using my cousins for watching youtube and I recall that the freaking phone would get up to 130 F*. Just really uncomfortably hot.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 14:24:27 2019 No.10530542 >>10527621 can we use correct terminology here? Wifi will never cause cancer, it is radio waves. Cell Tower Data Connection LTE on the other hand uses microwaves.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 15:54:00 2019 No.10530773 >>10530542 how would rotational excitation of small molecules cause cancer, explain the chemical process here, because I can't see it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 16:23:38 2019 No.10530855 File: 184 KB, 359x255, 6C4F5818-6FD6-487E-A2A1-F1AB98E53F03.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10530156

Anonymous Sun Apr 7 16:28:10 2019 No.10530867

>>10526542
>ehtrust.org

Was this reported on any site that is not created, staffed and populated by the lunatic fringe?

I mean, the fact that the source has a nutty axe to grind does not necessarily mean the conclusions are not correct -- but it would be worth knowing whether non-crazy people have also reported this.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 16:30:37 2019 No.10530873 >>10527620 THEY'RE SUPPRESSING INFORMATION ABOUT THE DOME!!!!!

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 16:36:04 2019 No.10530887 >>10529951 Well, yes, given that WiFi won't hurt you, either.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 16:38:15 2019 No.10530893 >>10530048 >This means that the color blue is about a million times more cancer inducing than your cell phone tower. Then why is red THE BAD COLOR??? >>10530156 1 free Internet to his guy.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 16:40:27 2019 No.10530904 File: 16 KB, 480x360, goalposts move 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10530499 Killing you /= causes cancer

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 16:41:43 2019 No.10530908 File: 24 KB, 500x375, 177_baboon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10530519 >diagnosed with hand cancer

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 16:44:01 2019 No.10530918 >>10530519 >Sometimes my phone feels like its getting really hot and my hand starts to burn, and its not a surface burn it feels like the inside of my hand has been cooked Muscles getting tired.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 16:57:13 2019 No.10530957 >>10530773 >explain how rotational excitation of small molecules cause cancer >explain how gamma waves cause cancer retard

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 17:08:02 2019 No.10530983 >>10530908 You can get cancer literally anywhere.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 17:08:23 2019 No.10530986 >>10530904 >doesn't understand that cancer has many ways of forming beyond the direct breaking of chemical bonds by high energy radiation

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 17:10:52 2019 No.10530993 >>10526542 will wearing a Faraday helmet (aluminum hat) unironically protect my brain from cancer?

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 17:11:51 2019 No.10530998 >>10530986 >doesn't understand that cancer is literally mutations in DNA caused by chemical bonds in DNA being broken and not repaired properly It's like a meta dunning-kruger. Too dumb to understand you're too dumb to understand.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 17:13:37 2019 No.10531006 >>10530998 >doesn't understand that cancer is literally mutations in DNA caused by chemical bonds in DNA being broken and not repaired properly That's not necessarily true.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 17:27:06 2019 No.10531053 >>10531006 Alright then genius, what sorts of cancers exist where there are no physical changes in the genome sequence?

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 17:36:21 2019 No.10531080 >>10530993 YES, SEE >>10527671

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 17:42:25 2019 No.10531092 File: 5 KB, 255x197, 1527990422235.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10530998 You're still stuck in this >only ionizing radiation is relevant idiocy and you're too dumb or ashamed to realize how full of shit you are

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 17:49:49 2019 No.10531113 >Small increase in cancer risk when exposed to highest level of radiation Bait.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 19:57:26 2019 No.10531431 >>10529339 That is how all studies are done it seems. At least all the ones that make it into the news or get laws passed. All science studies and published papers are extremely suspect.

Anonymous Sun Apr 7 20:02:07 2019 No.10531445
File: 42 KB, 500x500, ScreamingPiBonds.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10526567
>>10527350
>>10527398
Lol calm the fuck down, your lightbulb gives you more cancer than radiowaves, its just that you are exposed to radiowaves for longer times

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 20:11:37 2019 No.10531462 >>10527959 it needs to be unstable for bigger boobies to evolve

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 20:41:48 2019 No.10531499 >>10530998 >Too dumb to understand you're too dumb to understand that's literally regular Dunning Kruger you nonce

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 20:49:26 2019 No.10531511 >>10526567 kek

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 20:58:18 2019 No.10531529 >>10527614 Except it wasn't useless "skepticism" from laymans like yourself, it was from scientific studies. Keep believing in your anecdotes though.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 21:19:19 2019 No.10531569 >>10528274 That's not how it works, retard. >expose yourself to several decades worth of water drinking

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 21:49:57 2019 No.10531630 >>10531569 everyone who has ever died used to drink water. if that isn't proof that water is bad for you I don't know what it is.

>>	Anonymous Sun Apr 7 21:51:11 2019 No.10531633 >>10527331 By what mechanism?

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 00:32:51 2019 No.10531980 File: 7 KB, 200x200, 1529921616271.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Toastin in the daily schitzo thread

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 01:37:59 2019 No.10532100 >>10526542 It's not ionizing radiation, you commie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionizing_radiation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_radiation_and_health

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 02:53:08 2019 No.10532204 >>10526567 ahh, I love posts like this, they make me laugh.

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 04:02:36 2019 No.10532276 File: 217 KB, 1296x1458, 1551323197528.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I just read the actual paper, and it's F U C K I N G N O T H I N G

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 04:03:53 2019 No.10532279 File: 47 KB, 997x435, ss.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10532276 >statistically significant my ass

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 05:09:14 2019 No.10532351 >>10526542 ANIMALS ARE NOT HUMANS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 05:24:32 2019 No.10532371 File: 110 KB, 275x326, 1549787051998.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10532279 >It's such a small correlation that it might as well be explained by random chance, or literally anything else. Lmao. Schitzo posters BTFO yet again.

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 05:37:24 2019 No.10532389 >>10527350 Hey I really enjoy this picture. Would you mind if I downloaded it and used it as a profile picture for my 4channel gold account?

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 06:35:10 2019 No.10532456 File: 44 KB, 252x102, 1548210427_1327_23012019_252x102.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10532279 >~800 rats died for this

Anonymous Mon Apr 8 09:12:06 2019 No.10532646

>>10527358
>Mobile phones have been widespread since the the early 2000s and there has been no surge in brain cancer
OK, and? you know mobile phones use a wide range of frequencies and power. and 5G has different characteristics to other mobile comms generations (adds freqs, adds power reqs, etc.).

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 09:39:25 2019 No.10532699 >>10532279 b-but muh p-value right? I mean it's not like sample size affects the p-value right? If it's below 0.05 it must be important regardless of effect size right? All prior assumptions are left out but who cares right?

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 10:53:15 2019 No.10532870 >>10526638 it's literally in the OP

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 11:07:46 2019 No.10532896 >>10532870 That's not a reputable source

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 11:10:56 2019 No.10532905 >>10532896 you haven't bothered to click the link have you

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 11:12:12 2019 No.10532909 >>10532905 I'm not clicking your schizo clickbait

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 11:15:15 2019 No.10532920 >>10532909 lol, you're a moron

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 11:58:38 2019 No.10533039 >>10532279 /thread

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 18:39:25 2019 No.10534063 bump read the fucking papers for yourself

Anonymous Mon Apr 8 19:17:24 2019 No.10534152
File: 76 KB, 520x519, 1528774550634.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10529059
Are you retarded?

They don't make cell phone towers look like cactuses or pine trees to subtley hide them and try to trick people. They do that because a clearly fake cactus or tree is less obtrusive than a bare cell phone tower. It's less ugly. That's literally it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 19:50:19 2019 No.10534257 >>10534152 T. Tricked citizen

>>	Anonymous Mon Apr 8 20:53:40 2019 No.10534380 >>10534152 Actually, they do it for both reasons. They do it for aesthetic reasons, but also to hide them from paranoid citizens in order to get fewer complaints. Source: People working for network providers told me this.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 9 11:07:14 2019 No.10535860 bomp

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 9 23:12:36 2019 No.10537697 >>10526542 this is just mom science you'll be fine /thread

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 10 02:13:30 2019 No.10538154 >>10526732 https://youtu.be/aH9i8Tev9vE

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 10 02:15:34 2019 No.10538161 >>10532905 I clicked the link and can confirm its a fucking joke

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 10 04:49:51 2019 No.10538359 >>10538161 The point is the study is the first link on that page

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 10 04:59:36 2019 No.10538372 >>10532279 It's over for schizos

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 10 06:08:01 2019 No.10538437 >>10530048 but blue light is carcinogenic https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp1837

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 10 06:14:46 2019 No.10538444 >>10530008 Maybe it's better that the population is culled. The average human is fucking retarded. Just look at this comment. It really makes you wonder if this person is even conscious

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 10 14:01:35 2019 No.10541449 >>10530957 >mobile phones use gamma waves to communicate

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 10 14:24:44 2019 No.10541587 >>10526588 Phones work with 2G just fine.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math