Crazy guy invents weird cellular automata

[Anonymous No.10498790]

So this guy (who is clearly bonkers) created a strange cellular automaton he claims "can simulate all 4 fundamental forces from a single equation". The whole thing is made of 10+ layers of cells he coded in a spreadsheet. He says he's going to post a paper 200 pages long to explain it in detail.
This is a Terry A. Davis kind of situation. The guy is clearly insane, but the automata itself looks interesting.

He posted this thread on reddit:
https://old.reddit.com/r/cellular_automata/comments/b48xcz/double_slit_experiment_recreated_inside_of_a/

Watch videos of the automata in action on his youtube channel here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg1MePVososjk_i6haMJEdQ/videos

Pic is what happens when you put zero in the automata, according to him.

[Anonymous No.10498826]

he made an excel spreadsheet and films it with his cellphone from the screen.

[Anonymous No.10498898]

>>10498826
Don't question genius, anon.
He says its a "vector field automaton". What the fuck does that even mean?

[Anonymous No.10498916]

>>10498826
Newer bost my fäjse here evr agian!!

[Anonymous No.10499191]

cool stuff

[Anonymous No.10499336]

One of you should send this to edward witten

[Anonymous No.10499436]

>>10498790
Even if this guy is incorrect and delusional, I'm still gonna call him a genius for creating this. Wish I knew more.

[Anonymous No.10499608]

>>10498790
This is the first time I've seen one of these schizos create something really interesting. Clearly it's not a GUT or anything, but it still exhibits some fascinating behavior. I'm just not sure if I can make it through 200 pages of
>muh n-r-g pressure.

[Anonymous No.10499908]

This is impressive

[Anonymous No.10499967]

TL;DR

[Anonymous No.10499968]

So, this seems neat and all. But, for a brainlet like me, what is the significance of what he's put together here?

He's very excited about tying all four of these fundamental forces together on a single spreadsheet equation, but what sort of use would this equation have for modeling or predicting things or what?

[Anonymous No.10499982]

>>10499968
As far as I can tell, if it is what he says it is (hint: it's not) then he's essentially "solved" a big part of physics. Such a model would be immensely useful for a multitude of things. One example that comes to mind is simulating chemical reactions.

[Anonymous No.10500019]

I don't see the significance of his double slit experiment. Getting two waves is the expected result. The same thing happens if you were to do the experiment with water. If he can reproduce the waveform collapse under measurement then I will be impressed.

[Anonymous No.10500084]

>>10498898
It's pretty straightforward. It's just that every cell has a vector associated with it. With that and multiple layers, what he's done is pretty cool but not really that impressive.

[Anonymous No.10500133]

looks like a variation on lattice gas automaton methods which i know from like, PBS spacetime, have been used for analysing fundamental fields and shit by some people already ages ago so if a schizo pulled off 'something' it might just be, you know, implementing something old and established
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_gas_automaton

[Anonymous No.10500175]

>>10498790
Sci needs to learn to let go of quacks.

[Anonymous No.10500323]

>>10498790
>The walls are not "natural" to this automaton. To create a natural "wall" inside this automaton would probably require a supercomputer, but it's theoretically possible - theoretically you could create anything with this automaton if you have enough cells. So adding the walls took around an hour, like I said in the video, because they required a work around so they don't affect their neighboring cells.
Glad that he's following God's advice and painstakingly hard-coding the locations of wall blocks

[Anonymous No.10500342]

>>10500175
They're the antidote to normies. Think about it, most scientists are as reddit as one gets, and by removing Johnny and the like from here you're removing the protective bubble against them, which will make them flood in and demand excessive reddit-tier censorship almost instantly as they always do in every single forum they infest. Schizos help us prevent that by filtering out those who obsess over "muh quality of discussion" because inherently 4chan was never about quality of discussion, it was about shitting up the boards as hard as possible until quality randomly manifested by pure chance in the sea of shit and piss. Trying to change that and enforcing quality guidelines on this place will only make it a discount subreddit

[Anonymous No.10500444]

>>10498790
what type of course would cover something like this? im a brainlet in terms of math and science so i have no idea. Googling cellular automata gives hints towards physics,mathematics and coding? Is this something tbat would be covered in a computational mathmematics course?

sorry for dumb question

[Anonymous No.10500758]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBIB-QchDxI

what the fuck is this lmao

[Anonymous No.10500775]

>he has a patreon
Why didn't you pledge already?

[Anonymous No.10500799]

>muh n-r-g pressure
tfw too smart for other hoomans

[Anonymous No.10500839]

>>10500444
Wolfram's New kind of Science

[Anonymous No.10500842]

Terry Davis died last year. He got hit by a train. Go look up the operating system he created “TempleOS”

[Anonymous No.10500852]

>>10500842
Oh wow I had never heard of it before, thanks anon!

/s

[Anonymous No.10500901]

>>10500342
Now I'm definitely not saying we should be censoring things. I think I was making a cultural comment more than anything. Like as a set of users, we should all learn to let go of these quacks.

[Anonymous No.10500938]

>>10500019
It's impossible to recreate waveform collapse using classical computers so that would absolutely never happen even if he somehow actually had a unified forces formula of everything.

[Anonymous No.10501079]

>>10500938
>It's impossible to recreate waveform collapse using classical computers
this doesn't sound true

[Anonymous No.10501134]

>>10500444
At my uni there is a course called "computational science" (in the compsci bachelor) that is exactly about things like this. Mostly a mixture of cellular automata, networks/graphs, and simulations (event-driven and continuous).
There's also a master's degree for it
http://www.uva.nl/shared-content/programmas/en/masters/computational-science/computational-science.html?origin=znSrDUT%2BQ5uz6dso72fBmw

[Anonymous No.10501139]

>in excel
the absolute madman

[Anonymous No.10501278]

>>10500342
ye

[Anonymous No.10501333]

Is your butt ready?

[Anonymous No.10501339]

>>10501134
daaamn we go to the same uni
and if you're following that course right now, then we're even in the same course!

[Anonymous No.10501823]

>>10500852
>/s

[Anonymous No.10502116]

Has anyone watched his 20 minute "patreon announcement"? I tried to sit through it but it was pretty useless. I searched for the Gary Lee -computational scientist and inventor of the first smart speaker that seems to talk throughout the video but I didn't find anything. I also searched patreon for anything named optimum theory and found nothing.

[Anonymous No.10502135]

>>10498790
>coded in a spreadsheet

This is on par with created a working computer in Minecraft.

[Anonymous No.10502145]

>guy has to eventually generalise to 3D
>new video about how he has invented 4D spreadsheets
Can't wait.

[Anonymous No.10502597]

>>10498790
Why doesn't he just upload it to google sheets? Then we can all play with it ourselves and see what all the fuss is about.

[Anonymous No.10502937]

>>10502135
I don't see why, I can guarantee you I could implement something like this either in Excel or in native c++ (with much, much better performance,) probably in a few days at most.

[Anonymous No.10503019]

3d when

[Anonymous No.10503050]

>>10503019
That's a tensor not a matrix.

[Anonymous No.10503097]

>>10501079
I think it is honestly

[Anonymous No.10504006]

>Optimum Theory is the first to unify physics and solve abiogenesis as well as address a wide range of other topics including the origin and fate of the Universe, the hard problem of consciousness, the solution to artificial general intelligence, basic income and mind uploading.

Impressive.

[Anonymous No.10504664]

Hey 4chan! I have never posted here before! I made that automaton, I'm glad you are interested! Some of you are pretty close to figuring out how I did it, so props!

[Anonymous No.10504723]

>>10504664
How is the paper coming along?

[Anonymous No.10504867]

Paper is coming along great! Should be done by Monday at the latest. Also, I might as well say this now so people can get their pitchforks ready, but I will probably be putting it behind a paywall; not a lot of money... Less than a physics textbook... And less than a subscription to a journal as well... I am thinking it should almost be setup like an academic style institution, with its own message board, etc... You pay the "lab fee" and then you are a part of this online institution. I spent 20 years on this theory - and these past 2 months straight working 12+ hour days on this. Optimum Theory covers a lot more than this particular automaton. The automaton is the first principles, but then it branches from there into the origins of life, consciousness, society, artificial intelligence, universal basic income, and finally mind uploading...

[Anonymous No.10504873]

>>10504664
Secure the bag!

[Anonymous No.10505071]

>>10504873

[Anonymous No.10505195]

>>10504867
Allow me to be the first in this thread to ask this: what medications have you stopped taking?

[Anonymous No.10505210]

>>10505195
Those are all the concepts necessary to explain consciousness in a purely constructive manner. If this isn't just a ruse, then he might have a pretty interesting paper. If properly applied and fully understood, it could even turn psychology into an actual science, with sociology in hot pursuit. If it comes across as Schizo, that should be attributed to the high-concept questions involved in answering the question that is, "What is the theory of everything?"

Hope this isn't a ruse, because it would be interesting to read such a paper even if it's wrong.

[Anonymous No.10505245]

>>10504867
You do realize that currently the only people interested in your work are the kind of people that pirate everything, right?

[Anonymous No.10505266]

>>10504867
Can it tell me how to get my bench press higher?

[Anonymous No.10505271]

>>10498790
>so the universe is essentially a cellular automaton
i see

[Anonymous No.10505377]

>>10500342
My man anon gets it.

[Anonymous No.10505384]

>>10504006
What a madman.

[Anonymous No.10505387]

so im finally going to get to download my ram

[Anonymous No.10505391]

>>10500901
>Like as a set of users, we should all learn to let go of these quacks.
This guy doesn't get it. Don't group us with you. You're only a hair away from being a complete tool, but you're still on 4chan because you have an idea of what we're about and you want to be part of it on some level. On the other hand, if you want a sterile forum full of people unwilling to even glance at the strange, wonderful, frightening world of fringe theories and wayward academics, where they bureaucratically and diligently lord their so-called "authority" over everyone who even suggests something out-of-the-ordinary, you have literally the rest of the internet to fuck off to.

[Anonymous No.10505392]

>>10504867
Why does your program require you to click for each progression cycle? It's triggering me.

[Anonymous No.10505459]

>>10504867
>Paper is coming along great! Should be done by Monday at the latest.

You aren't the man. I can tell. If you are the man. What was the last comment you got from youtube?

[Anonymous No.10505505]

>>10505459
It's him.

[Anonymous No.10505522]

>>10504867
I'm interesting in hearing how you think you've solved the hard problem of consciousness. That's arguably a bigger claim than you having found a unifying equation of everything in physics.

[Anonymous No.10505560]

>>10505505
He is like the Enterprise B.
Tractor beam, medical staff, photon torpedoes, all due on Tuesday.

Hope to be proven wrong come Monday.

[Anonymous No.10505750]

>>10505391
Yeah, you get it. I would rather see a bunch of fringe theories than things everyone agrees on already.

[Anonymous No.10505769]

>>10504867
hey guy that made said insane automaton. im>>10500444
Mind helping understand what you made so I can appreciate it better? Maybe just point me in the right direction is alls im asking. ty!

[Anonymous No.10505987]

what is conways game of life?

its cool but nothing new

he should publish the rules of his automaton

[Anonymous No.10506269]

*interstellar music intensifies*

[Anonymous No.10506672]

>>10506269
This is getting good.

[Anonymous No.10506682]

>>10505987
I was just going to say that.

[Anonymous No.10506823]

>>10506682
well too late bro

but its nice to see other people knowing about it

[Anonymous No.10506846]

>>10505987
>>10506682
yeah Conway's game of life is a good example of why cellular automota are interesting, but the rules for conway's game of life don't replicate things like particles or waves or other physical phenomena.

[Anonymous No.10506850]

>>10506846
if he were familiar with wolfram's work on cellular automata he would have posted that instead

[Anonymous No.10506852]

pretty fucking based

[Anonymous No.10506863]

inb4 shotgun to the back of the head suicide

[Anonymous No.10506866]

can I use this to simulate realistic physics for video games?

[Anonymous No.10506869]

Okay, instead of all this bullshit, can someone with a good grasp of how the 4 forces work on the micro level give a good indication of whether his simple cellular automata rules actually emerge into representations of them, without hard coding the 4 forces into the program (which we can't really check before he releases his shit but lets just take his word for it)? Because that's what this whole meme hinges on.

[Anonymous No.10506879]

>>10500852
>forgetting you're not on plebbit
One whole yike

[Anonymous No.10506891]

>>10506850
Like Conway, Wolfram also found a lot of examples that show that cellular automata are interesting, and that they seem to be doing things in a similar way to the way that they are done in nature, but to my knowledge, he never found a rule for cellular automata that replicates fundamental physical forces. The most surprising automata rule-produced patterns tend to be either spontaneous generation of fractals, or things like conway's game of life that look like cellular machinery or ecosystems. These are patterns that resemble nature at a much larger scale. I've never heard of a cellular automaton that resembles nature at the the scale of particles and electromagnetic radiation before.

[Anonymous No.10506907]

>>10506869
Of course it's fucking fake. For instance quantum wave collapse can't even be done by a standard computer due to it being binary instead of using superposition so a simulation on a classical computer will never be able to properly simulate quantum behavior of the 4 forces properly.

This means that he absolutely can't have a single unified formula and instead uses approximations or false formula for how quantum behavior should be

[Anonymous No.10506916]

>>10506891
according to the man himself he had to layer several distinct models of cellular vector fields to get the behavior of "reproducing" the double slit experiment. i have no idea how this works but it doesn't seem farfetched to "compile" several cellular rules into a single object like this. maybe it's actually super effective. guess we're all waiting on his paper though.

[Anonymous No.10506923]

>>10506907
How do we know that the measurement problem isn't simply a limit of our quantum models, not something ontological in the actual world, and that a more fundamental theory could account for quantum phenomena with normal computation?

[Anonymous No.10506925]

>>10506907
How do we know that the measurement problem isn't simply a limit of our quantum models, not something ontological in the actual world, and that a more fundamental theory couldn't account for quantum phenomena with normal computation?

[Anonymous No.10506943]

>>10506925
Because there are a lot of problems with hidden variable theories like the one you're describing and copenhagen interpretation is the only theory out there with completed mathematics for it.

[Anonymous No.10506996]

>>10506916
he keeps saying "it's just energy over space" over and over again, though, but what the fuck does he mean by that? How does this layering of differently-regulated cellular automata simply represent "energy over space"? The thing that feels really uncanny about this is how it's something that actually looks pretty cool, which, if I'd made it, I'd present in a nice way and explain clearly, but he literally films his computer screen with a cellphone and just spews nonsense about it. It's so fucking weird.

[Anonymous No.10506999]

>>10505391
If by fringe theories you mean half baked nonsense then by all means, go for it. I doubt you even know enough to understand why what this man is doing is completely unimpressive and a waste of time beyond just recreation.

[Anonymous No.10507035]

>>10506996
He's keeping the actual equation that drives it behind a paywall it looks like.

>>10504867

[Anonymous No.10507079]

>>10503097
You stated it as fact initially now you state it as opinion.

[Anonymous No.10507092]

>>10506999
I don't think exploring computational physics using cellular automatons is a waste of time at all. If nothing else he built an interesting toy and something that he states underpins the rest of his theories on consciousness and complexity, which I'm pretty curious to read his paper about based on that alone. He could have been another guy on Jewtube fucking with Tesla coils and saying he rediscovered free energy and death beams, in which case it'd be justified to ridicule and demean him because who doesn't already know that that stuff is bullshit. But instead he says he's spent 20 years developing these theories and has a mathematical model to show for it, more than your garden variety crank sending word salad emails to physics professors could accomplish. And yeah I get that he's basically proclaiming to have "discovered" a GUT which is unlikely unless he could actually compute quantum states but the fact he even made this model with fucking spreadsheets is interesting enough in its own right.

[Anonymous No.10507111]

>>10501823
>

[Anonymous No.10507112]

>>10507092
This. Anyone who refuses to accept the validity of CA models is taking a massive shit on every researcher studying big bang cosmology. There are optimization to be made. Simple as that.

[Anonymous No.10507119]

>>10504867
do people not realize this isn't him? or this guy must be REALLY crazy

[Anonymous No.10507125]

>>10507119
it is him
>>10505505

[Anonymous No.10507129]

>>10507119
>implying being crazy isn't based

However fuck buying shit, I'm looting that book.

[Anonymous No.10507134]

[Anonymous No.10507144]

>>10507134
whelp, we've got a loonie

[Anonymous No.10507147]

>>10507129
>I'm looting that book
We all are.

[Anonymous No.10507165]

>>10505210 here.

>>10505505
Does my white knighting mean nothing to you?

I've been waiting all thread for a (You) and nobody has had the argument to refute my assessment. Dammit, read the consensus from the silence, not the shitposting.

How can you make a ToE that doesn't explain the complex dynamics of trolling?!

[Anonymous No.10507193]

>>10506269
>Monday
>april fools
my heart is sad

[Anonymous No.10507197]

>>10507193
oh shit
fuck
fuck
:(

[Anonymous No.10507221]

>>10507193
Yep, it's an April Fools joke. Pack up, everyone.

[Anonymous No.10507230]

>>10507144
>>10507134
Honestly, what's wrong with this line of thinking? Military research budgets must outclass academia ten times over, and the potential in using cutting edge physics for military technology and encryption-breaking must surely incentivize multiple countries to do secret physics research. No doubt at least 1 country is 10 years ahead of the public science community. How is this even a controversial statement?

[Anonymous No.10507266]

>>10507197
>>10507221
Welp.

[Anonymous No.10508264]

>>10506943
>copenhagen interpretation
>theory

[Anonymous No.10508274]

>>10506907
>quantum wave collapse can't even be done by a standard computer
you keep spouting this meme like you think it means something. you can add integers on a computer even though they aren't binary

[Anonymous No.10508691]

how can it explain "everything" and be finite in resolution?

also cellular automata can ofc remodell wave dynamics, its the most basic programming excercise to be honest...

[Anonymous No.10508702]

I never even considered that Monday is April Fools. Good thing I'm not superstitious. Like I said, my plan is to release sometime this weekend. (I'm the guy who made this automaton). More info soon if anyone is still interested.

[Anonymous No.10508705]

>>10508264
It's a theory in the sense that it's a falsifiable model that predicts the behavior of the system.

>>10508274
You can't model superposition on a classical computer because you can't have a single bit be a 0 and 1 at the same time like waves are before collapse.

[Anonymous No.10508720]

"how can it explain "everything" and be finite in resolution?"

One of my biggest insights while developing this automaton was that we cannot truly reproduce the Universe, even with knowledge of its underlying equation. Full stop. We are not "God". This is actually a pretty radical assumption. The assumption is generally that someday we will make simulations that are indistinguishable from our material reality in every way. Optimum Theory says, "no". What we CAN do, however, is build ever more powerful simulations, but they will never be perfect, not ever. To help illustrate this concept, imagine a drop of pond water. Pretty easy to simulate, right? You've probably seen water simulated online... But is it real, or just a simulation? In our material reality, that drop of water contains thousands of microorganisms, each one comprised of millions of molecules, suspended in billions of atoms. A drop of water is an insanely complex thing. We will never truly recreate even a square-inch of this universe. but we can try to understand it. And that's what I've done.

[Anonymous No.10508748]

... Now, you might be thinking, "but someday, we can truly recreate that drop of water, maybe a million years from now". No, not even then, according to Optimum Theory. Go outside in the pitch black of night, take in the trillions of stars around you, and their orbiting planets, the clouds of cosmic dust; take it all in. According to Optimum Theory, there is more complexity in that drop of water than in all that you can see in the brilliance of space. How much more? Infinitely more.

[Anonymous No.10508751]

... And yes, I am a fool.

[Anonymous No.10508805]

>>10508720
>>10508748
>>10508751
Will you make a video of the inside of a black hole?

like you said here >>10506269

[Anonymous No.10508894]

I will post video of the inside of a black hole, but in the meantime here is YangGang 2020 written in the source code of the Universe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09pR14fkQcc

[Anonymous No.10508923]

>>10508894
based enlightened NEET.

[Anonymous No.10508937]

AHAHAHAHH THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09pR14fkQcc

[Anonymous No.10508938]

>>10501079
That depends on what goes in the model

[Anonymous No.10508943]

>all of /sci/ falls for an april fools joke just because of a colorful spreadsheet

[Anonymous No.10508972]

>>10508943
Hey man, I've seen some spreadsheets in my time.

[Anonymous No.10508979]

>>10508943
Spreadsheets literally keep the global stock market rolling. Don't hate on them.

[Anonymous No.10509049]

[Anonymous No.10509419]

>>10509049
Well memed!

[Anonymous No.10509582]

>>10498790
Of course he can simulate a wave equation, heat equation or Schroedinger equation with a cellular automata on a grid, instead of doing the time difference method on a matrix of equidistantly spaced mesh.

The problem is the sampling theorem and the CFL condition, as you cannot simulate things with frequencies higher than your time step allows and with details smaller than your cell size. And CFL condition means that the two are linked and there is a common condition limiting the time step in respect to dimension step.

It is a fucking pain in the ass to analyze the stability of numerical differential schemes, and people are still up to this day writing papers about new numerical schemes and deducing its stability and so on.

Source: Yuropoor physics phd student who had some classes on numerical methods and is glad to work in a laboratory instead of simulations precisely because of this.

[Anonymous No.10509992]

"as you cannot simulate things with frequencies higher than your time step allows and with details smaller than your cell size"

This is addressed in the Optimum Theory "paper" I will be releasing soon (It's more of a multimedia presentation than a paper in the traditional sense).

[Anonymous No.10509999]

>>10509992
Will it be released in PPT format?

Please say it will be a PPT.

[Anonymous No.10510003]

>>10501823
>>10506879
Loooool.
Updooted

[Anonymous No.10510007]

I’m gonna disagree with that, the math behind the cells is a more important decider, cell size is just a function of display resolution, if the math behind each cell can represent multiple states/colours like in this guys automata, then things of a frequency of the dimension of calculation times the number states the cells may occupy, which cam massively increase the apparent potential complexity, especially if the math is done in more dimensions than the display can represent, like what we see in nature from our POV.

[Anonymous No.10510010]

>>10509582
>>10510007

This post in reference to that.

[Anonymous No.10510019]

>>10500342
This is what I have been thinking for years now but was unable to put it into words. Well done, anon.

[Anonymous No.10510020]

>>10509999
It's obviously going to be a rick roll

[Anonymous No.10510092]

>>10498826
>>10498916
etsala ihr haider

[Anonymous No.10510509]

Inside of a black hole seen with this simulation. People were requesting this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVM8GfoMD-E

[Anonymous No.10510513]

>>10510509
absolutely based

[Anonymous No.10510550]

>>10510509
Could you replicate a very small version of the universe moments after the big bang, and then run the simulation backwards?

[Anonymous No.10510554]

>>10510550
Yes, yes you can. Ask him to do it in his youtube comments hes very active on there, and he'll most likely do it

[Anonymous No.10510556]

>>10510509
sacred geometry did better than this

[Anonymous No.10510577]

>>10508705
>falsifiable
lmao

[Anonymous No.10510590]

>>10504664
>1,000 USD for everyone

So you are going to decrease the yearly budget by ~7,5%... How? Don't tell me you burgers are actually thinking that shit like this can work.

[Anonymous No.10510593]

>>10508705
Hehehe, Cristopher Fuchs.

[Anonymous No.10510599]

>>10504867
So you're saying that once we get Yang into office, next comes uploading myself directly into my hentai?

[Anonymous No.10510608]

"Could you replicate a very small version of the universe moments after the big bang, and then run the simulation backwards"

The simulation is not reversible. It's mathematically impossible since with each time step the number of potential paths that could have reached a particular end state also increase. Think of it this way; imagine a guy drove his car to his friend's house out of state. You know that he started at his house, and ended up a state away at his friend's house, but you cannot deduce the exact roads he took with 100% certainty based only on that information. Now multiply that by an infinite number of cars (particles). It's mathematically and logically impossible. And this is why time only has one direction.

[Anonymous No.10510619]

... But with that said, yes Optimum Theory can simulate the Big Bang, it just cannot reverse time backward. I know this is a pretty radical statement in the world of physics; common assumption has been that physical laws always work the same backward and forward... It's really interesting actually, so much of "mainstream physics" is wrong according to Optimum Theory, and not just kind of wrong, but so wrong it almost feels intentional... It almost feels like a massive shit-test at times coming from whomever put our common knowledge together, to see who would have the brains / balls to call "bullshit" on it. 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is another one. People say all the time, "The Universe tends toward disorder - big bang was much more ordered than our messy world today." And here these guys are, conscious meat that self assembled over billions of years talking about how disordered everything is, like bitch, a single cell from your fingertip has more order than the entire soup of the big bang, the fuck are you talking about???

[Anonymous No.10510624]

>>10510619

[Anonymous No.10510628]

>>10510608
>>10510619
I feel like I'm reading a lecture from a guy who graduated 4chan university. And I must say that I am quickly becoming a fan.

[Anonymous No.10510640]

>>10510619
Wow sounds real neat, is the multimedia ready yet?

[Anonymous No.10510642]

"sacred geometry did better than this". Well, yeah, because Optimum Theory is not even remotely mystical. It is the most materialist, literal, logical, and complete theory in human history. When I draw connections between Optimum Theory and human heritage / religion, it's only because I enjoy the "poetry" of it. Even the Optimum Theory logo is an illusion to this. I intentionally picked the automaton rule that generates three crosses (trinity), because it's fucking awesome. And by the way, the crosses that manifest into the singularity (black hole) automaton are not something that "I" programmed into it. They generate spontaneously from the equation. I only discovered the pattern from this particular rule set. There is no contradiction here. People should not feel hesitant to discuss these things. Our Universe is pure fucking magic. The fact that 777 spontaneously manifests crosses into a mathematically complete equation of everything is pure fucking magic. What good is even having a mouth if we cannot say how fucking awesome that is?

[Anonymous No.10510644]

an "allusion" to this... I meant to say

[Anonymous No.10510647]

>>10510642
ok but why putting it behind a paywall?
anyway I like how you are very interactive and reply to our posts/comments

[Anonymous No.10510650]

So you are going to decrease (I think you mean increase) the yearly budget by ~7,5%... How?

I'm going to upload something soon that explains how. But essentially you can think of it as watering a garden. Increasing velocity of money grows the economy.

[Anonymous No.10510661]

>>10507230
Maybe just in the realm of production? To be really advanced you kind of have to invent a new branch so that means these people would be
1)discovering new ideas
2)deriving these new ideas from old ideas
3)applying these ideas to problems with known solutions
and
4)Finding assumptions
It should be no different than a PhD student, although a PhD student has a guide. But no different.
But the real question is point 4. Trying to figure out what assumptions are needed is quite hard even when you know what you are doing. Like when Linear Algebra was invented.When you solve quadratics you start off real numbers but there is no guarantee that your solutions are real. So all assumptions need to be found before they are used to jump ahead into something that has never been found.
I simply believe military tech does what is known to be possible, only that no one has found it profitable yet due to costs. That's why IBM and the like are military subcontractors while the military just uses the tech.

[Anonymous No.10510673]

... Anyway, I have to go... I'm trying to have Optimum Theory uploaded either today or tomorrow (I think it's hilarious that this could end up being posted on April Fools, like I said the Universe is fucking magic, and that would be the biggest fuck you from the Universe - and would not even contradict Optimum Theory, because it readily acknowledges that we are all fools in this grand design compared to the brilliance of totality). As for the paywall... if I end up with a paywall I will still have plenty of materials available explaining the theory so you can understand the gist of it. But the complete theory will probably have to be behind a paywall for a few reasons - one big one is because of the format I plan on transmitting this, US Department of EDU has certain requirements, and those requirements cost money, and I'm not nice enough to pay for that all myself. Another reason, we're going to have to rent super computer time as some point... I could go on...

[Anonymous No.10510687]

>>10510509
based and optimum-pilled

[Anonymous No.10510729]

>>10499968
Iirc the “””””Big Bang”””””” (not real, btw) was the result of the 4 fundamental forces, once bound together harmoniously, shattering apart. I imagine this fellow thinks he’s proven that happened

[Anonymous No.10511050]

>>10500175
Letting go of quacks always works out so well for science.

Remember those crazy bastards that thought the sun was the center of the universe? What dipshits.

[Anonymous No.10511756]

>>10511050
Yeah, those fucking Greeks

>You are now aware ['you' being King Gelon] that the "universe" is the name given by most astronomers to the sphere the centre of which is the centre of the earth, while its radius is equal to the straight line between the centre of the sun and the centre of the earth. This is the common account (τά γραφόμενα) as you have heard from astronomers. But Aristarchus has brought out a book consisting of certain hypotheses, wherein it appears, as a consequence of the assumptions made, that the universe is many times greater than the "universe" just mentioned. His hypotheses are that the fixed stars and the sun remain unmoved, that the earth revolves about the sun on the circumference of a circle, the sun lying in the middle of the orbit, and that the sphere of the fixed stars, situated about the same centre as the sun, is so great that the circle in which he supposes the earth to revolve bears such a proportion to the distance of the fixed stars as the centre of the sphere bears to its surface.

[Anonymous No.10511799]

what a fucking dunce. He has some pretty tile colours which follow some automaton rules. But his 'recreation' of the double slit experiment doesn't even work. There is no interference pattern in the waves.

[Anonymous No.10511989]

>>10510650
No, I really mean decrease. If you are giving back 300B, that means that your budget of 3,8T is now 3,5T. You will have to get even more debt, which is ludicrous.

[Anonymous No.10511997]

>>10511989
No, wait a fucking second! I thought that it was 1000 dollars per year, but it is per month! 1k*300m*12 = 3,6 trillion dollars, but your budget is 3,8!!!!!!!

Are you smoking crack?!

[Anonymous No.10512035]

>>10501134

science parkkkk lekker dan. ben je van de VIA?

[Anonymous No.10512088]

>>10500842
Shit, I didn't know he died.

[Anonymous No.10512379]

How does this work on scale? It seems like the sizes are all off.

[Anonymous No.10512396]

>>10500444
At my uni we literally have a course called "Advanced Automata Theory"

[Anonymous No.10512591]

>>10498790
What a retard hope this person kills himself.

[Anonymous No.10512598]

>>10512591
HEY

[Anonymous No.10512611]

>>10498790
>coded in a spreadsheet

[Anonymous No.10512681]

>>10512035
heeuuj drie mensen in deze draad van science park
ik ben >>10501339

[Anonymous No.10512897]

>>10512591
well that's what happened to terry

[Anonymous No.10513223]

>>10503050
Hi, Mr. Dunning-Krueger, did you know a tensor is not just any 3D array?

[Anonymous No.10513227]

>>10506879
>the recently came from reddit anti-reddit police who know what Reddit is like

[Anonymous No.10513236]

>>10508748
Hook me up with your acid connect, bruh.

[Anonymous No.10513242]

>>10510590
>people won’t spend the $1,000 giving it a multiplier
Oof. Imagine not knowing anything about macro.

[Anonymous No.10513245]

>>10510673
>I think it's hilarious that this could end up being posted on April Fool’s
There it is.

[Anonymous No.10513266]

>>10510509
Now that we have seen inside a black hole.
Can we make gravity drives like in interstellar?

[samefag No.10513274]

I cant wait for this to get released, people to get their hands on the equations, re-writing it in something like c++, and running stuff at 200 hertz recording it in OBS

[Anonymous No.10513294]

>>10513274
Why wait? Apparently I've made a black hole in Excel!

[Anonymous No.10513297]

>>10513274
I really wish he wasn't being so proprietary about the whole thing; its not like he won't be getting recognition for it and you know there are plenty of people smart enough to use his algorithm in a more polished way, not to mention the speed at which questions would be answered would be exponentially greater if multiple people could answer them.

He said he wants to paywall the 200 page paper or write and sell a book to fund super computer time and all that.

[Anonymous No.10513308]

>>10513297
>He said he wants to paywall the 200 page paper or write and sell a book to fund super computer time and all that.

Yeah, but he also knows that info is on reddit and 4chan so someone is going to send it out to everyone anyway.

[samefag No.10513312]

>>10513297
Releasing the exel file is probably the best way for him to profit in the short term, I just hope he does it before he gets killed

[samefag No.10513322]

>>10510619
I thought the 2nd Law of Thermo was more about energy/pressure differences in a closed system, not complexity of something on a planet orbiting a radiating sun

[Anonymous No.10513333]

>>10513297
>>10513274
What reason do we really have for buying into any of this right now?

[Anonymous No.10513335]

>>10500342
>because inherently 4chan was never about quality of discussion,
true
>it was about shitting up the boards as hard as possible until quality randomly manifested by pure chance in the sea of shit and piss. Trying to change that and enforcing quality guidelines on this place will only make it a discount subreddit
>t. r*dditor
this is literally r*ddits mind on anonymous discussion.

[Anonymous No.10513362]

>>10504006
>basic income

[Anonymous No.10513371]

>>10513333
If you drop your strict scientific hat it sort of has the appeal a unique toy has to a small child, except I'm an adult and want to play.

[Anonymous No.10513413]

>>10501333
>1st April

[Anonymous No.10513482]

Like!

[Anonymous No.10513483]

>>10513335

[Anonymous No.10513919]

when he uploads the paper which one of you going to take the bullet so the rest of us can view freely

[Anonymous No.10514029]

>>10502135
I've seen full games made in Excel spreadsheets. Well I guess more like just a graphics renderer, besides moving the "camera" there wasn't a whole lot else to the "game"

[Anonymous No.10514041]

>>10509999
I think someone proved turning completeness on PPT, or at least started proving it, so it can be done

[Anonymous No.10514282]

>>10500342
>it was about shitting up the boards as hard as possible until quality randomly manifested by pure chance in the sea of shit and piss
fuck off back to t_d

[Anonymous No.10514314]

>>10508705
>You can't model superposition on a classical computer
a quantum computer has the exact same computing capability as a regular computer, in the sense they are both turning complete and can run computable programs. the only difference is how fast they can complete certain types of programs.

[Anonymous No.10514319]

>>10498790
Did you just plug your own crap on 4chan? You need Jesus to save your soul from this cringiness.

[Anonymous No.10514444]

>>10513335
>>10514282
show me where he's wrong, newfriends

[Anonymous No.10514476]

>>10514041
Yes, yes they did.

[Anonymous No.10514529]

>>10513266

All I know is my gut says maybe

[Anonymous No.10514844]

>>10498790
you guys are gonna have to give me a rundown of whats going on here. Is the paper up, is he full of shit, whats going on?

[Anonymous No.10514851]

>>10500342
this is one of those times. well done anon

[Anonymous No.10515222]

>>10498790
I'll wait for the Big Boys to determine if this is bullshit or not.<div class="like-perk-cnt"><img alt="" width="451" height="75" src="//s.4cdn.org/image/temp/dinosaur.gif"></div>

[Anonymous No.10515233]

>>10498790
Are we /YangGang2020/ 50g of a particular weed for everyone.

[Anonymous No.10515258]

>>10515233
Kookko is law

[Anonymous No.10515368]

you can't make this shit up

[󠛡 No.10515374]

>>10498790
Cellular automata?<div class="like-perk-cnt">&#x2665;&#xFE0F;</div>

[Anonymous No.10515385]

>>10507079
im not the original guy retard, I was a different person stating my opinion

[Anonymous No.10515409]

>>10504867
Is it powered by any new results in computational complexity

[Anonymous No.10515458]

>>10500842
*stood in-front of a train

make no qualms about it, dude realized just how fucked his life was and ended it in the best way he could

[Anonymous No.10515466]

Any examples of some random fuck with an internet connection making huge discoveries like this? Obviously not theory of everything-tier, but I know /sci/s done it once before:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZzIvl1tbPo

[Anonymous No.10515652]

>>10515466
chris langan for sure
op is probably rick rosner or something, man does seem to be a crazy jew after all

[Anonymous No.10515690]

>>10515652
>chris langan for sure
This guy's wiki page reads like he wrote it himself
>has 200 IQ
>was beaten by stepfather
>got swole at age 14 and kicked his stepdad out
>believes he can mathematically unite the universe, consciousness, and god
>took a nap during the SAT test and got a perfect score
>taught himself math, physics, philosophy, latin, greek

fuck off, this guy's a phony

[Anonymous No.10515700]

>>10515690
well he has been telling the same story for years, its all anyone knows about him

[Anonymous No.10515702]

>>10515690
Its funny what above average intelligence people think genius's would brag about.

[Anonymous No.10515709]

>>10515690
>200 iq
>perfect SAT score pre-1995
>self taught math,physics,philosophy,latin,greek
>
>goes to liberal arts college then soon after transfer to a unknown uni
>drops out because of funds

He would have got a scholarship on a perfect SAT score alone this guy has bullshit written all over him, albeit I don't doubt he may or may not have self taught himself mathematics I do doubt everything else.

[Anonymous No.10515711]

>>10504006
based excel

[Anonymous No.10515717]

INB4

>Took longer than I expected, expect it in a week.

into

>waiting longer than a week

[Anonymous No.10515724]

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg1MePVososjk_i6haMJEdQ

>4 new videos, all of which are sneakpeaks of
a Full 2.5 hour movie locked behind patreon paywall
>Looks to be from some non-profit organization rather than 1 guy
>Everything is about philosophy and the meaning of life

WHERE ARE MY FUCKING SCUFFED EXCEL CELLUAR AUTOMATAS?

[Anonymous No.10515730]

>>10515717
He posted in the YT comments it's done, he's just figuring out the best way to upload it. Hopefully the paper/video get thrown up on a mega quickly

[Anonymous No.10515740]

>>10515724
There is so little substance to these videos that it's actually hilarious. We've been had...

[Anonymous No.10515742]

>>10515724
IT'S HAPPENING

[Anonymous No.10515747]

>>10515724
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
HES UPLOADED THE SAME PATREON VIDEO 3 WEEKS BEFOREEEE.

pack your shit bois its fucking over, I don't doubt this guy must have discovered SOMETHING(def not the equation for the universe) but it seems like this is a huge promo he has been building up with his equation for "everything" as the teaser. In his black hole video he states he is from a business background, not from a math background so it seems if we take him for his word he is using this "discovery" hes been working on to push his shitty indie 2.5 hour film-student movie.
Either way this is disappointing to say the least, I had hope.

[Anonymous No.10515756]

Sup 4Chan! Not an April Fools joke! I just uploaded the first 5 videos to Patreon, and I should have 1 or 2 more uploaded tonight, and another uploaded later this week. Now you might be wondering, "what about the paper?" The paper is the video. The video is 2.5 hours long, and although it is only accessible to Patreons, you can watch approx 30 minutes of excerpts on the Patreon, plus read a description of Optimum Theory's core assertions.The video's script is 200 pages long. It's a modern concept, but I'm trying to be fresh with this, and after you watch the video I think you will agree that it is much more engaging this way. The cost for access to all the materials is $99 per month, but obviously you can cancel after the first month and I believe you will still get your money's worth. I know that might seem like a lot, but it's less than most textbooks not to mention the cost of a college level class; and what I have produced here is arguably much more than that. What I have created (and am creating) is a modern education and research institution call "The Optimum Institute". Videos and resources will be posted regularly for members which build off the core principles of the Optimum Theory philosophy. Subjects that will be covered included advanced monetary theories (how money works at a fundamental level), advanced relationship theories (how to maximizes happiness, health and success in our friendships, networks, relationships and family lives), advanced social theories and models, advanced theories of addiction, mental health and dependency; law and government, and more. Interaction with the materials and with other members and me will be strongly encouraged, and I will be awarding degrees in "Advanced Computational Studies from the Optimum Institute" at the end of the year for participating members; this is not a "degree mill". I will not be giving out degrees to people who will not represent this Institution well. https://www.patreon.com/Optimum_Institute

[Anonymous No.10515760]

>>10515756
oh no no youre not playing jesus now boi WHERE IS THAT PAPER YOU PROMISED

[Anonymous No.10515766]

>>10515756
>Now you might be wondering, "what about the paper?" The paper is the video
Ah nope. You lost us mate, now don't try and shill your guava basketweaving degrees here. Try reddit.

[Anonymous No.10515782]

>>10515756
>Optimum Theory Philosophy
We have to pay $99 to join a cult?

[Anonymous No.10515784]

... To be clear, I have a business and math / science background. People can earn more than one degree you know. Also I posted 3 new videos in addition to the one you saw 3 weeks ago, and I will be posting more tonight. What I discovered is what I'm claiming it to be, theoretically. I am convinced that it is the Unified Theory of Everything. Patreon members will have access to the complete 2.5 hour video explaining the theory / philosophy in depth, and a 1 hour long video explaining the automaton in depth: how it works and why it works, and I will be uploading the Patreon with new material regularly related to advanced models of material reality. It's an Institution (The Optimum Institution) I will even be awarding degrees at the end of the year in Advanced Computational Studies.

[Anonymous No.10515786]

>>10515784
Dude I just wasted like two hours on you shilling your cult

[Anonymous No.10515795]

It's not a cult. It's an institution built around a philosophy like most Institutions are. There is nothing in the philosophy that is not either 1) material & computational science 2) debatable if you happen to disagree. It just seems like a cult because everyone tip toes around the big questions so much that when someone addresses them head on it stands out. It's a philosophy. If you had to compare it to another philosophy then probably Taoism is most similar, but Optimum Theory is far more quantitatively driven than Lao Tzu could have ever written into Taoism during his time.

[Anonymous No.10515797]

We also have a cooler name: Optimism. And members are Optimists, lol

[Anonymous No.10515799]

>>10515795
It's more that you're not able to speak in a manner that bypasses what we would expect from a con artist who cared to make the same claims. You have to apply your philosophy to the art of communicate and demonstrate honesty beyond your organic existence, or we have to make the reasonable assumption that it really is a sham. It's not about you wanting to be honest, it's about the maximum bandwidth that your honest can accrue in a random sample of a human population. If your theory is as expansive as you say it is, then it shouldn't be hard for you to apply it here, to this, to us.

[Anonymous No.10515803]

>>10515799
>If your theory is as expansive as you say it is, then it shouldn't be hard for you to apply it here, to this, to us.

[Anonymous No.10515804]

>>10515795
>It's an institution built around philosophy
>There is nothing in philosophy that is not debatable.

Open up the paywall to allow communication and debate. Or elaborate your philosophies presented so we can debate that. You're literally saying you have the secrets of the universe for $100. It's fucking stupid.

[Anonymous No.10515811]

>>10515756

[Anonymous No.10515814]

He released ze video?
Poll eet

[Anonymous No.10515819]

>>10515756
Do you cover the hard problem of consciousness in the video? I'd like a preview video of that.

[Anonymous No.10515823]

>>10515756
So basically:

Pay $100 to decipher your video informally explaining your automaton and spend hours recreating it and verifying your claims for you. If you aren't able to prove your claims and release them you should be paying people to review your work, not the opposite.

[Anonymous No.10515836]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsvpVdpJ01o

I'm 5 min in and nothing new or interesting. Nothing that let's me know you know what you're talking about. You can know all this with high school education + smoking a doob and having a think

[Anonymous No.10515841]

Yes, Optimum Theory's solution to the hard problem of consciousness is in the video, including discussion of P-Zombies, etc... And more than that, it goes in depth into the actual algorithms of human consciousness and General Artificial Intelligence. I am uploading another preview video related to Universal Basic Income now, which will be available in around 30 minutes (maybe less) which has some pretty radical insights into it (I am all for UBI, fyi), and I will be uploading one more video tonight showing the Big Bang simulated in the Optimum Theory automaton. As for the paywall, you can read a summary of Optimum Theory's core assertions publicly on the Patreon page, the paywall materials just flesh them out. And like I said, Optimum Theory is much cheaper than a college class (or even a textbook!) and I will even be awarding degrees in Advanced Computational Studies to members who participate for a year - and not degree mill degrees. I am only interested in awarding degrees to really solid people who can represent the Institution and its ideas well, and if I cannot find anyone like that then so be it. I will also say this, several really high profile physicists have reach out to me already in support. If you are active in physics you will recognize one of them. I don't want to say who yet, and if you doubt me that's fine, but it's exciting.

[Anonymous No.10515847]

>>10515841
why can't I just buy Wolfram's New kind of Science for 31$ on amazon rather than a 99$ monthly subscription for a very niche topic.

[Anonymous No.10515848]

If you are only 5 minutes into that video then it's mostly summary to get people up to date before the ideas start getting really radical. The complete video is 2.5 hours.

[Anonymous No.10515850]

>>10515841
If you can't explain the relationship between emergence and memetic social symbols ITT we're done here.

[Anonymous No.10515851]

You can cancel the subscription before one month and I believe you will still get your money's worth.

[Anonymous No.10515852]

>>10515756

Dude, if it is actually something good, you would publish it so people can read it. It is clear you are hoping for some sort of monetary gain. Nobody will watch a 2.5 hour video, but I'll be more than willing to start reading through your paper. Free of course, not $99.

I'm not joining your spreadsheet cult, I just think it looks cool. By hiding behind a paywall you are legitimately forming a cult. This is starting to sound like Scientology not a cool automata

[Anonymous No.10515856]

Here is the excerpt about Universal Basic Income. I will be uploading one more video before calling it a night: the Optimum Theory automaton simulating the Big Bang, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpTebWA9FpE

[Anonymous No.10515859]

>>10515841
>>10515851
I'd actually consider the 99$ paywall if it was a paper of-course and even then it would be still very unlikely, if you wanted to do something such as an academy of some sort based around your love of Optimum Theory you could have easily wrote a 200-700pg book/bible students can follow to essentially fully join with your ideas. But this video I cannot due especially when it looks like stock footage of people smiling/universe animations from a sellout illegal website

[Anonymous No.10515865]

>>10515856
okay so youre saying if i follow you, not-jesus, youll reimburse me for $99 and we can also solve the world's problems while we're at it?

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

[Anonymous No.10515868]

>>10515856
Just started this one it's a kicker
>Just tax robots and give that money to the people
>Robots are taking away jobs at a rate that requires UBI

Let's also tax hammer for putting nails in walls, and printers for printing. Also jobs going out creates more jobs, That's how the schtick market works. 20 years ago if you told someone you could be a livestreamer or 5G tech they would have no clue what the fuck you're talking about

[Anonymous No.10515871]

>>10515868
putting a robot tax on businesses seems alright actually, the problem is making sure the money actually goes where it should

[Anonymous No.10515872]

All these videos he's uploading are part of the 2.5 hour video that isn't anything close to a paper and doesn't describe the cellular automata like promised.

[Anonymous No.10515874]

>>10515871
>exporting production and robotics development to avoid taxes is good for the consumer

[Anonymous No.10515876]

>>10515850
They can, it'll just turn us into the Jojo reference.

[Anonymous No.10515878]

If The Optimum Institute is a cult then so is every other educational institution. The money is only to buy super computer time and fund experiments. It's a nonprofit. Furthermore, every institution has a philosophy. I get that The Optimum Institute's driving philosophy is unique and extremely modern; if it wasn't then why even bother? Furthermore, the philosophy is quantitatively driven. Our computational models are 100% real, and that is where we get the ideas from, and if proven wrong we will change our assertions on a dime. The guiding philosophy has been rewritten countless times already based on what have discovered from our models, and I am sure we have plenty of rewrites yet to come.

[Anonymous No.10515883]

>>10498790
Who is this semen demon?

[Anonymous No.10515890]

>>10515878
>I get that The Optimum Institute's driving philosophy is unique and extremely modern
It's really not, there's nothing new in selling the secrets of life. And everything in your YT videos is already on YT
>Furthermore, the philosophy is quantitatively driven. Our computational models are 100% real, and that is where we get the ideas from, and if proven wrong we will change our assertions on a dime.
You make the computational models unavailable to scrutiny and I sincerely doubt based off your videos that you've posted that it's behind that paywall.

[Anonymous No.10515897]

The script for the video is 200 pages long; I said this was more of a multimedia presentation than a a paper earlier. And it does explain the automaton in depth. There is a 1 hour video just explaining the automaton in addition to the 2.5 hour video explaining the complete Optimum Theory philosophy.

[Anonymous No.10515911]

>he actually demands cash

Dude if your theory is as revolutionary as you think, you will get extremely rich even if you released it for free now.

Pack it up boys, its a scam.

[Anonymous No.10515918]

>>10515911
Some generous soul will pay up and recreate the automata. They might even end up with credit for it it its both ToE material, and release the information for free in a formal way. Anyone smart enough will probably recode it and heavily optimize it so it can test all sorts of phenomena.

[Anonymous No.10515921]

The automaton video is there, and it explains it in depth, and you can ask me any questions why might have once you are a member. Heck you could even become a member and then blab all the info to everyone on 4chan if you'd like.

[Anonymous No.10515926]

>>10515918
>>10515921
Legit. We just had our first morphic resonance between believers and doubters of the phenomenon. Optimum theory must be tapping into some universal truths to get that kind of effect.

[Anonymous No.10515941]

jesus this guy sprinted from intriguing to brainlet in 5 minutes

[Anonymous No.10515946]

"okay so youre saying if i follow you, not-jesus, youll reimburse me for $99 and we can also solve the world's problems while we're at it?"

I'm not asking you to follow me. This is an education and research institution with a unique and modern philosophy - not a religion - and furthermore, if you watch the videos you would see that the philosophy is completely compatible with Christianity and I even give a shout out to Jesus in the UBI video and elsewhere for inspiring my ideas about how we should treat each other and conduct our lives. If that disagrees with your interpretation of scripture, that's fine. There are tons of denominations out there and you are not going to completely agree with all of them.

[Anonymous No.10515953]

>>10515941
sup rob

[Anonymous No.10515954]

>>10515926
Are you replying to yourself? Who else would both advertise the website and believe that the forum itself is encompassing your esoteric theory?

[Anonymous No.10515958]

should have been $69 for the excel file

[Anonymous No.10516007]

>>10515756
The philosophy of some random guy on the internet behind a $100 paywall and it doesn't even include the rule set for your cellular automaton. Who do you think is going to fall for this?

[Anonymous No.10516008]

>>10515756
Listen here you Mark Ruffalo fuck, You had once fucking chance to give your paper some light but instead you've shown us nothing but pseudo-intellectual virtue-signalling videos about love and acceptance and a semi-impressive excel spreadsheet.
That paywall is you compensating for 20 years of nothing. If you truly believe you are right you wouldn't even have a paywall.
Get your ass off 4chan, we can smell bullshit from a mile away.

DO NOT give this scammer a single dime so he is forced to release his paper publicly.

saged, hidden, unliked, downvoted reported and ignored, pic related is me laughing at this nonsense.

[Anonymous No.10516031]

>>10515954
>morphic resonance
I was straight up trolling. Guess my fascination with fringe theories isn't as ubiquitous as I'd hoped.

[Anonymous No.10516036]

>>10515756
You dumb faggot lol
You might have gotten a few shekels out of a couple posters here if you'd written a paper, you ain't getting shit now

[Anonymous No.10516040]

>>10516008
>DO NOT give this scammer a single dime so he is forced to release his paper publicly.

There is no paper. He realized he caught the attention of some nerds on the internet and thought "oh shit how do I make $100 off of this?" and proceeded to tell everyone that he had a 200 page paper in the works. 2 hours of stock footage, a Patreon account, and exactly 0 papers later here we are.

[Anonymous No.10516044]

>>10516031
>>morphic resonance
>I was straight up trolling
You can never really tell with that kind of stuff. This topic was mentioned in >>>/x/22435445 yesterday.

[Anonymous No.10516107]

>is jewish
>I am judeo-christian
everytime

[Anonymous No.10516110]

Alrighty, this will probably be my last video here about the automaton. Here is my automaton simulating the Big Bang, also I go more in depth about what gravity is from a computational perspective, and how it is being calculated along with the other fundamental forces from a single equation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqHWa5EVXXY

[Anonymous No.10516116]

Judeo-Christian. That's right. I'm half Jewish and Christian. What term would you prefer? I am baptized and have walked in the holy land where I walked in the footsteps of Jesus Christ. We could have a wonderful conversation about it, but I am exhausted.

[Anonymous No.10516119]

>>10515756
idiot

[Anonymous No.10516127]

the simulation of the big bang in excel is quite impressive

physics just got dunked on by excel

[Anonymous No.10516129]

>>10500342

[Anonymous No.10516135]

>>10498790
>computations done in excel
Deer god.

[Anonymous No.10516233]

>>10516008
>you Mark Ruffalo fuck
I'm in tears

[Anonymous No.10516371]

>>10499982
yes. physicists so far haven't been able to find a formula that can account for all 4 forces simultaneously.

[Anonymous No.10516383]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zfw0O0vGztY

Immortality when?

[Anonymous No.10516386]

>>10516107
>implying he isn't a mischling

[Anonymous No.10516388]

What does Optimum Theory have to say about 9/11?

[Anonymous No.10516404]

>>10516388
The real twin towers were moved to a secret location before 9/11. The ones you saw? Inflatable replicas

[Anonymous No.10516453]

thread tl;dr for anyone only looking in now: Excel fag tries to channel his inner L Ron Hubbard but runs into the obvious result

[Anonymous No.10516495]

>>10513294
holy shit
is this real?

[Anonymous No.10516499]

>>10516404
Based af

[Anonymous No.10516510]

>>10516388
Lucifer did nothing wrong

[Anonymous No.10516671]

Yeah he's like L Ron Hubbard... if Hubbard was an atheist, and Scientology wasn't a religion but rather just a super advanced school for gifted people that unified physics. Not everyone is engaged by the level of education at traditional schools, having a super advanced alternative for people who want a higher level might not be such a bad thing, because those will be the people who cure death and shit.

[Anonymous No.10516681]

Also, you all are missing a huge thing here that this guy already alluded to. Running a private school take resources, and there are regulations involved that cost money as well (I work at a private school so I know). A private school cannot just be free. It's not physically possible. the funding has to come from somewhere

[Anonymous No.10516686]

>>10516671
>>10516681
Your lack of proper response tags makes you stand out like a sore thumb Gary.

[Anonymous No.10516694]

I expected rules for a very cool automaton. He is just a con artist. Disappointed.

[Anonymous No.10516708]

Rules for the automaton are behind a paywall. He literally said that would be the case in like his very first post here, and people were making means about how Chad he was to be upfront about it until they realized they were too cheap to pay less than the price of a textbook for the mother fucking Unified Theory of Everything. Jesus fucking Christ he even showed how the entire thing works in his video about the big bang from last night. If you all were so smart he literally gave you all the pieces you need to reverse engineer it for yourselves.

[Anonymous No.10516719]

LMFAO at people who are so morally bankrupt that just because some modern school has an actual code of ethics in our day and age of "the kid is always right" cry baby bullshit, that the school must be fucking "virtue signaling" or some faggot cult like Scientology. You all deserve the bullshit that modern education has devolved into. Mother fuck

[Anonymous No.10516727]

No wonder China is eating our lunch. Some fucker unifies physics, greatest theory achievement in American history, and sells it for less than the price of comparable academia articles, and all you fucks do is complain about his race because he's slightly, SLIGHTLY less "white" then you racist fucks while in the same breathe claiming this on Christian grounds despite the fact that this fucking guy's slight racial deviation is of the same race as the founder of your Christian religion! Jesus fuck!!! China is going to wreck the shit out of this country if you fucks don't get your shit together

[Anonymous No.10516729]

>>10516694
And not a very good con artist either.

[Anonymous No.10516736]

LMFAO!! This fucking guy posted his automaton modeling the mother fucking big bang, and showed how the entire automaton worked she you would know there was no tricks involved and all you can say is HW MusT Be A CoN ArTisT

[Anonymous No.10516764]

The worst thing he did is revealing his background in economy. Everyone can see marketing techniques littered over the thread. "It cost less than the big bad textbooks" ,"wow this guy gave his life for this and you can't give ONLY 99.99?". This shit screams moneygrab. And yes I know Economics /= Marketing, but you can't refute that when you deal with a major given subject, you also have a good grasp of it's derivatives.

[Anonymous No.10516777]

>>10516736
>>10516727
>>10516719
>>10516708
Try replying to people to not make you standout so much, you sound like your having a breakdown because you blew your chance of anyone ever caring about this mathematics that had consumed so much of your time;too late. You can post an equation that would make my dick bigger and I could care less. You blew it Gary, you blew it.

[Anonymous No.10516791]

>>10516708
He is not selling a unified theory of everything, he is an obviously biased source trying to sell an unverified claim of a unified theory of everything without making any meaningful attempt to prove the worth of what he is selling.

Nobody is surprised by the lack of interest in this thread in buying what this man is selling, be it for $1 or $1000.

Furthermore, we don't even have reason to believe the rules for the automaton will ever be provided based on the content of the videos posted thus far. The man has been suggesting the 2.5 hrs of video he wants to sell is just more of the same crap. Saying "it works by filtering input through multiple layers to produce a vector field that models positive and negative energy of all the forces" is not an explanation of the automaton rules and is not enough information to reverse engineer the automaton.

If he appeared to express even the slightest bit of credibility in his videos thus far then he'd probably have gotten a buyer, but he has failed to do that.

[Anonymous No.10516800]

>>10516791
also the fact that the videos are just terrible stock footage with some stock *inspirational track3.jpg* in the background, its just shit I rather read the script its the same exact shit, no interaction in the video at all just 2.5 hours of stock video with monotone voice and stock music;absolute trash.

[Anonymous No.10516801]

>>10516791
And don't forget he's having a mental breakdown right in this thread. A stable genius indeed.

[Anonymous No.10516819]

>>10516708
>>10516719
>>10516727
>>10516736
I guarantee you would have made at least $100 by now had you actually posted a 200 page paper detailing your automaton. This is the board for science and mathematics, not new age philosophy and alternate education schemes. This topic stopped being /sci/ related right here:
>>10515756
>The paper is the video.

[Anonymous No.10516861]

I don't know whether to be more disappointed about the 99$ inspirational background music stock footage video, or more disappointed that /sci/ thought the guy had actually written a useful 200 page math paper.

[Anonymous No.10517022]

This guy is a clearly a scam. Time to become a big boy and embrace my CTMU.

[Anonymous No.10517042]

>>10514314
no. a quantum computer collapses bits that are 1 and 0 at the same time into the bit it needs to be based on optimum outcome

[Anonymous No.10517044]

You fuck

At least release the fucking rule you use you asshole

I wanna play with that fucking automata and I could easily run 10 layers of 4k CA at 60fps with up to 10iterations of computation per cell

You give me the rule, I render it out and can explain it in a better way. Then maybe people will buy your stupid scam, maybe even I would.

[Anonymous No.10517048]

>>10517022

[Anonymous No.10517049]

>>10517042
Yea. You need multiple bits in a classical computer in order to represent that, but there's nothing special about it

[Anonymous No.10517054]

>>10516819
this. i was fully prepared to pay for an actual paper.

[Anonymous No.10517062]

>>10517054
Same

Im slightly temped to pay him in hopes that the actual rule for the automata is in there, but I see no real reason to expect that.
Fucker should pay me to render it out for him, I honestly think I may be the best suited to do so of any anons heree

But the shithead wont release the rule

[Anonymous No.10517069]

>>10515756
>he thinks he can delete things

[Anonymous No.10517084]

>>10517048
now do it between the biggest frauds
>The virgin CTNU lagan
>The chad optimum theory spreadhseet cult gary

[Anonymous No.10517090]

>>10517069
you can delete your own post wut

[Anonymous No.10517099]

>>10517044
it's energy over space you dumbfuck

[Anonymous No.10517103]

>>10516764
hes for UBI, he obviously doesnt have any econ background.
its 100% sales/marketing as you mentioned

[Anonymous No.10517120]

>>10517069
Oof. He really reads like a con man.

[Anonymous No.10517210]

>>10517099
Just post the source code, Gary.

[Anonymous No.10517222]

>>10517210
THIS

dudebro thought he could scam literal autists and got BTFO on april fools. that was his final getout if it all goes shit up.

A-april fools, you didnt just destroy a 200 hrs of my life on this scam.

muh energy over space

[Anonymous No.10517227]

Bro here's what you do. Start a YouTube channel and start pulling in ad revenue. Pop sci kids and exurbia fans and the like will enjoy this shit. But it's not the kind of thing that /sci/ takes seriously

[Anonymous No.10517232]

Just want to point out in case anyone actually buys into the scam that cellular automata are not copyrightable, so you can share it with the Internet and someone will make a GPU-accelerated version in C.

[Anonymous No.10517242]

This guy has the walls in his mind broken down is such a way that he can create this beautiful automaton but also in a way that he has no idea how to cope with the idea of releasing it and possibly being criticized. I understand how you would just want to believe that the beautiful thing you spent time on is also intellectually important but hiding behind scrupulous claims and the inability to defend and modify the idea will result in a worse fate for the idea; i.e. it gets disregarded.

At least when people want to criticize it they are genuinely interested. If you make people pay to try and figure it out rather than helping them understand it it really just seems like the creator himself doesn't have much faith in the idea. Bad look.

[Anonymous No.10517250]

>>10517242
gary?are you talking about yourself in third person?

[Anonymous No.10517253]

>>10517250
no, bud, finish reading before you respond

[Anonymous No.10517264]

>>10517242
>beautiful automaton
>"(He) has no idea..."
>"I understand how (You) would just want to believe that the beautiful thing (You) spent time on..."
>If (You) make people pay... it really just seems like the creator (Himself) doesn't have much faith..."
Your samefagging is getting better, Gary. Helpful Tip: You probably should keep a consistent perspective when pretending to be someone talking about you.

[Anonymous No.10517266]

>>10517264
holy shit dude that isn't gary you are just a paranoid schiz, probs a flat earther

[Anonymous No.10517271]

Many people have already reach out to me to make GPU versions of this. I WANT THAT. I'm not trying to stifle progress on this. This equation appears to be exactly what I am saying it is, and I want the best simulations of it possible. The problem is a few fold: 1) Patreon is shit, the page is not even showing in their search results, and they only allow me to charge monthly. You think I wanted to charge you guys fucking $100 PER MONTH? No, I just wanted to charge $100, period. Which is reasonable for what I am offering and in line with academic journals and much less than textbooks, which is exactly what I said from the beginning. Patreon also does not let me gift Patreonage. IF IT DID I WOULD GIFT PATREONAGE TO ANYONE WHO CAN IMPROVE THE SIMULATION. I don't give a fuck, bros. This equation is legit. 2) a big thing holding back acceptance of a UTOE is the way that the research, funding and academic system is designed. You all are probably not even aware that the EU is debating on building a 21 BILLION EURO particle collider. Like, dudes, in the US people are going nuts about spending 7 billion on a wall, and the EU is trying to spend 21 billion on a single machine EVEN THOUGH THE LHC HAS BEEN CRITICIZED FOR NOT DISCOVERING ANYTHING SIGNIFICANT. The reason why the UTOE has been stuck in a rut since the end of WW2 is precisely because of this bullshit. The entire "game of physics" has turned into a funding trap. The only way to break through and advance our species is through really radical models because the old models are corrupted. Just releasing the automaton isn't going to do shit, people will just dismiss it even though it is exactly what it says it is. Vaccines are real and people don't give af. Hell, half our country does not even believe in evolution. The only way to approach something this radical IMHO is through actual structure: an advanced school that produces students who are so much more advanced than the standard quote that the world...

[Anonymous No.10517277]

>>10517266
Excellent denial, Gary. But you're not fooling me. Remove the paywall and I'll give you 80% off access to my new patreon-based ivy league, "The Optiscam Institute"

[Anonymous No.10517279]

... That the world will have to take notice. We have serious problems in this country / world, and the models of our common knowledge need a serious kick in the ass. Our species has a serious shot at galactic colonization and eternal life NO BULLSHIT but we need to get our shit together. People always say this kind of thing is impossible, mother fucker, the time between the Wright Brothers first flight and landing on the Moon was less than one lifetime. DON'T TALK ABOUT IMPOSSIBLE. But success is NOT guaranteed. Look at what the Moron Egyptians did, spent all their resources building stupid fucking pyramids - not that they aren't cool, but do you see any of those King Tut mother fuckers around today? No! Their way of life died. They were inefficient. They were un-Optimum.

[Anonymous No.10517283]

... So what I'm going to do is say, "fuck Patreon". I'm going to build my own website, which was always the plan all along until my automaton went D-list internet famous, and then with my own website I'll let any of you fucks who can actually program and improve the simulation join for free, but until then eat a bag of dicks

[Anonymous No.10517287]

[Anonymous No.10517299]

>>10517271
>Just releasing the automaton isn't going to do shit, people will just dismiss it even though it is exactly what it says it is.

What kind of logic is this? Just saying "it is what I say it is, you just have to BELIEVE ME guys" isn't going to get you any support. If the automaton does what you claim it will, people WILL recognize it.

/sci/ supports [math]\LaTeX[/math] and /g/ supports code blocks. Either post an actual detailed mathematical description of the system or the pseudo code. If you truly had faith in your automaton you would have no qualms about releasing it for analysis.

[Anonymous No.10517314]

>>10517271
>>10517279
>>10517283
dude your dedication to helping others and furthering research is admirable, i can tell that's what you really want, you have a good heart and you actually care about the problems you're trying to solve. it's just that you're going about this wrong, you want the money for your credit but you don't have the credibility yet. if your theories are as powerful as you believe, then they can actually help others, generate research, generate further investigation - but only if you're willing to give the people who can help you something tangible instead of some pretty mirage that hasn't sated anyone's thirst.

coming to 4chan wasn't a bad idea for you at all. many wonderful things have been created because of 4chan. the raw power is here. but you have to give us a reason to believe in you.

[Anonymous No.10517326]

>>10517287
Gary, you forgot to reply to a post again.

Legitimate response to your recent replies: People doubt your validity and won't pay $99 to learn from you unless you show proof that your patreon isn't going to just be pseud nonsense about money and relationships without any sort of scientific reasoning.
>Just releasing the automaton isn't going to do shit, people will just dismiss it even though it is exactly what it says it is.
If you released the source code people would be able to judge if you have ideas worth paying for, but right now there really isn't much to go on. I suspect if you just shared the automaton and it was actually novel, many people would be willing to pay to listen to you.

[Anonymous No.10517330]

>>10517266
still didn't read the original post where I destroyed the paywall idea? you are more delusional than gary by a mile

[Anonymous No.10517352]

The system, as is, has already proven that it cannot be trusted to advanced the UTOE. they are spending all their money on fucking colliders (the 21st century version of an Egyptian Pyramid). If you understand Unified Physics you would understand that what they are doing with those colliders is essentially just pushing bubbles around. It gave us some great data about how fundamental particles behave, but we have enough data to simulate unfied reality now. They could give me even a million dollars and I would have a photoreal fucking Matrix like out of fucking Hollywood, last week. The system is, frankly, heading for a dark ages without intervention. Go listen to the TedTalks with those people, they have already accepted this broken world; ex. they have bought into finite-life so hard that they actively OPPOSE life extension technology. They have already bought into this bullshit slavery system where a few at the top control the money supply. It's fucking slavery. Not metaphorically. Fucking literally. They try and obfuscate it, and pretend like Capitalism is some kind of reality show where anyone can win, and sometimes they even let a few retards like Cardi B make it just so that people will believe, but ask yourselves this, "why is inflation going up but not wages?" I'll tell you why, because these fucks are printing money for themselves. Literally just printing money. And then they use that money as their slave tokens, i.e., us. You do what they say, or you starve, like a slave. UBI breaks that cycle. Everyone wonders why white, Western birthrates are down: because the system is fucking bullshit. It cannot be trusted. So we're going to fund the future ourselves, or not at all.

[Anonymous No.10517361]

>>10517352
Just post the code, Gary.

[Anonymous No.10517383]

GARY IF YOU GIVE ME THE RULE I WILL PAY YOU $150 YES 1.5* YOUR STATED CHARGE

I WILL NOT RELEASE IT PUBLICLY IF YOU DONT WANT ME TO BUT IF I CANT RUN IT MYSELF I HAVE TO ASSUME YOURE A CONMAN PEDDLING BULLSHIT. PLEASE

FUCKER THIS IS WHAT I LIVE FOR AND YOURE A DISAPPOINTING CUNT ABOUT IT

[Anonymous No.10517393]

Should've peddled this shit on /x/ or /pol/ where they'd actually be stupid enough to fall for it mate

[Anonymous No.10517398]

>>10517314
I have already tried to approach "the establishment" about this simulation. They are not even remotely interested. They find the most bullshit reasons to mock it, references 11 dimentinal space and hologram bubbles and other bullshit; the entire trick they are pulling is a smoke screen and gas light. They want people to feel stupida nd just giveup even though the equations they offer are completely fucking fake and designed specifically for ofuscation. Why? Because they are focused on a 21 billion euro new collider. That's the real game here. 21 billion greases a lot of palms. And yet even the collider is fake. It's an Egyptian pyramid. An impressive feat from the outside until you realize that its just a way for the slavemasters to give the slaves something to do. We have the data RIGHT NOW to simulate realty. This system cannot be trusted. We have to advance knowledge ourselves now, as a hivemind. But perhaps even hiveminds need a little direction - Idk on that point.

[Anonymous No.10517407]

>>10517326
The money goes toward improving the simulation, which will be necessary for stage 2, upload.

[Anonymous No.10517415]

>>10517407
you have a bunch of people here who want to do that work for free, I wouldn't look that gift horse in the mouth

[Anonymous No.10517423]

>>10517398
Your algo speaks for itself if legit

Fucking tell me what it is

[Anonymous No.10517426]

>>10517383
WTF? I already said to join the Patreon for $99 and I will give you the rule. Why would you pay $150? Then just cancel before the end of the month. I never wanted the charge to be recurrent, but Patreon does not allow one time payments. It's right here, bro: https://www.patreon.com/Optimum_Institute

[Anonymous No.10517433]

>>10517415
You people are ridiculous. Fine I will post the automaton. Give me an hour. *eye roll*

[Anonymous No.10517435]

>>10517426
Gary, if you just post the code more than just that one guy will be happy to work with you to make UTOE better. If it works then it works and people will be willing to give money to help. But no one here is just going to believe you based on faith that it works. Focus on stage 1. Post the code, Gary.

[Anonymous No.10517440]

>>10517433
Praise Gary

[Anonymous No.10517441]

>>10517435
I said I will. Give me around a hour.

[Anonymous No.10517446]

>>10517441
>>10517433
based gary

[Anonymous No.10517499]

>>10517426
Gary you can upload the code to mega.co.nz and put it behind a paywall

[Anonymous No.10517500]

>>10517433
consider setting up a patreon where people can contribute any amount they want, I know a lot of people here will appreciate you sharing your knowledge

[Anonymous No.10517508]

this one's bumplocked
started a new thread here: >>10517506

[Anonymous No.10517512]

>>10517426
Because Im happy to pay 150 if its legit but I don't want to give you a cent if it isnt.

Youre asking me to have faith im not wasting my money. Im asking you to let me at least compute it myself with no risk to you and yet you are all weird about it

I hope you can see why you sound like a con man with this strategy. If your work is legit, you have nothing to fear by letting people have the equation free. They still either need to buy the paper to fully understand it maybe.

[Anonymous No.10517517]

>>10517433
>Give me an hour
YOUVE GOT 45 MINUTES

[Anonymous No.10517561]

>>10517446
God I hope this isnt bullshit

[Anonymous No.10517585]

Time's up!

[Anonymous No.10517608]

It's going to take more than an hour, fags. I started recorded and once I start talking I cannot stop. So explanation for how the automaton works is taking me over an hour to record and then I have to edit it down so you don't see me scratching my balls etc.. I will post shortly

[Anonymous No.10517635]

>>10517608
>calling us fags
i like it. you're toughening up. i like it a lot.

[Anonymous No.10517993]

The thread is about to die because it's reaching the max replies count, and only people who are patreon supporters of 4chan (500 bucks/month) will be able to make make a new thread. This might be your last chance to prove to us that you've actually made a real scientific breakthrough here, and are not just peddling self help/political bullshit.

[Anonymous No.10518093]

>>10517103
>hes for UBI, he obviously doesnt have any econ background

What economic arguments are there agianst UBI? I though it was supported by a large number of economists.

[Anonymous No.10518171]

>>10517271
>Just releasing the automaton isn't going to so shit
Selling it is going to do even less

[Anonymous No.10518709]

>>10510590
How did u get 7.5%?