[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Maintenance is complete! We got more disk space.
Become a Patron!

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 14 KB, 331x499, basicmathematics.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10471795 No.10471795 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe]

This book doesn't make any fucking sense.

>> No.10471833

Welcome to the world of math, enjoy your journey

>> No.10471850
File: 13 KB, 657x527, R14kkDj.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>implying his journey goes further than this

>> No.10471859

I hope OP doesn't get scared off by this book, to elaborate OP,

The difference between somebody who is good at math and somebody who isn't is the person who is good said "this shit doesn't make any sense" and then had the patience to sit there until it did make sense

>> No.10471864

I know sometimes things may not
Always make sense to you right now
But hey
What daddy always tell you?
Straighten up little soldier
Stiffen up that upper lip
What you crying about?"
- Eminem

>> No.10471883

Real shit

>> No.10472575

Lang is a meme.

>> No.10472579
File: 44 KB, 1000x900, 1535849867367.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>he fell for the biggest meme anons in /sci/ push to newfags who want to "start again in mathematics"

>> No.10472584

I have no idea what you're talking about and I'm capable of doing 3D integrals.

>> No.10472586

Flipped through the Amazon Look Inside...what's so difficult about this?

>> No.10472631

it's a good book im learning a lot from it

>> No.10472724

what are you saying? that list was a meme?

>> No.10473092

>t. cs major

>> No.10473244
File: 2 KB, 125x70, 1446395900818s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>3D integrals

>> No.10473490
File: 9 KB, 480x360, hqdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Basically this.
When confused you seek secondary sources, you refuse not to be able to do all the material. At the end of each chapter, you go through all the concepts, and teach an invisible class out loud to test your own learning. If at anytime you fuck up/fumble your words or have to think to remember go back and review the material again. Keep doing this until you can effortlessly explain every chapter. This just takes a few extra minutes after you complete a chapter and the exercises.

When you do an exercise, think 'how can I prove my answer if correct'. If there's an exercise you can't figure out, systematically attack it with tests like replacing all the variables with 0 or 1 to see what happens. Input corner cases like -1 or the square root of 2, see what happens when you try to solve it. See if some kind of pattern is revealing itself. At this point you are now /sci/, operating on a massive dome level than just injesting the material passively and not really ever knowing what's going on.

>> No.10473510

You learned math in school to do calculations. Lang teaches you how to "do mathematics". Brainlets need not apply

>> No.10473548

Is it the best pre-calc book?

>> No.10473563

That book is easy and I never got why people had issues with it. Did every exercise.

On the other hand, Gelfand's problems are MUCH harder.

>> No.10473676

In my opinion the best precalc book is just going through some site, like this one https://www.expii.com/ and spending the bulk of your time solving problems, because you probably know more than you think and don't have to review so much, if you get stuck each module has short lectures/tutorials. It's run by this guy: http://www.math.cmu.edu/~ploh/

Or, just jump straight to the calculus module and try to complete it https://www.expii.com/t/calculus-1

>> No.10474322
File: 678 KB, 1856x2272, 1546455011044.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10474375

Good advice. I do something very similar. Teaching friends who also work on this helps a lot.

>> No.10475610

>Don't buy books
Should be replaced with
>Don't buy books brand new

If you can find a book that interests you for $1 at a library sale then buy it, alongside your libgen PDF version. Physical books are always nice.

>> No.10475761

Using Khan Academy is a sure-fire way of ruining your mathematical education forever.

>> No.10475775

who cares what some random says

>> No.10475857


>> No.10475882

These are the fundamental concepts of math:
>substitute variables or formulas with other variables or formulas, expressions, functions, operators, numbers and so on
Proof methods
>given axioms, use substitution, induction, contradictions, cases, construction, logic, generality, etc to prove a theorem
>As you place further constraints on your problem, it may get easier
>if all else fails, make a list of all possible permutations, all possible cases, all possible truth tables... usually requires writing a computer program for something with even a little substance, since the order of magnitude of your problem done this way usually increases by n! or 2^n. So use this as a last resort.
>very difficult to wrap your head around. Given a very deep question, it can often be near impossible to construct a specific model. Separates pure math from applied math. Requires complete knowledge and understanding of every theorem and technique used up to this point, and finding something common and relevant to solve the problem. Easy examples: using group theory to solve questions in number theory, is there (irrational x)^(irrational y) = rational?

>> No.10475999


>> No.10476008

Which Gelfand do you suggest?

>> No.10476017

Why does the deeper math get it feels like a language?

>> No.10476031
File: 1.37 MB, 1140x4777, official mg curriculum.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10476054

meme-loving fuck

>> No.10476068

notice how the >>10476031 poster never says anything in his posts. Memes have completely consumed him, he no longer has a personality or a face. He is destined to keep posting it everywhere he can because either he's delusional and thinks it's actually funny or he's just too fucked up psychologically to have an opinion of his own.

>> No.10476149
File: 21 KB, 684x517, US.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>All elementary math in just one post
Basic math, just look at the axioms (sometimes called rules) of whatever field you're working in.

A good start is the nine field axioms of Q, which you can lookup anywhere. The axiom a*a^-1 = 1 gives us fractions. The nine field axioms encapsulate the arithmetic of numbers, high school algebra, and many other algebraic systems. (Axiom systems also exist for geometry, number theory, and for mathematics as a whole, though they aren't totally complete, you can still get a solid overview by looking at them.) A system satisfying the nine field axioms has the structure of a field. The first field that we all meet is the system Q of rational numbers, or fractions, but there are many more fields. If we drop the axiom about a^−1, we get eight axioms for a more general structure called a ring. The first ring that we all meet is the system Z of integers. Learn the axioms, now go practice solving some equations in that field, using said axioms. Not very hard is it? There's also an algebraic number field Q(α) to deal with irrationals, it has it's own field axioms. In Geometry, you can use vector spaces over fields to construct new ones. Q(α) is a vector space over Q whose dimension equals the degree of α. See how this is all fitting together? Moving on to more axioms, we also have the theory of finite sets, or axiom of foundation. Finite set theory provides objects like graphs. Finally, Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms (ZF) gives us infinity. When we include the Infinity axiom we get the set N of natural numbers, and its power set P(N), which is effectively the set R of real numbers. From R we can build the concepts of geometry and analysis, and virtually all of classical mathematics. Thus, ZF encapsulates a vast amount of mathematics. This can all be learned in any analysis intro text, like Tao's books, how to build fields (structures), their axioms and how to can derive proofs in that field using the axioms, ect.

>> No.10476155

My favorite /sci/ meme-list to troll newfags is the one that tells you to read two proof books that are basically the same.

>> No.10476162

how is that trolling in any way? When the anon downloads the second book it will be clear that it's the same content and just won't read it. Seems more like retardation to me than trolling

>> No.10476414

it's called multivariable calculus, anon. not "3D integrals."

>> No.10477349

say a lie enough, and people will believe it

>> No.10477367

> Physical books are always nice.
I think building a library with stuff you 've read is pretty cool and one of my long term life goals.

>> No.10477370
File: 35 KB, 1200x630, 13-wojak_00.w600.h315.2x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

> scitards
Omg lulz we trolled this guy into reading 100 books.
> guy who got trolled
pic related

>> No.10477372

way to reveal you're a pseud and don't read a lot of books lol

>> No.10477374

I don't read any books. Haven't read one in decades.
Just thought it would be a nice idea IF I started.
Probably gonna go back to playing video games tho.

>> No.10477377

Schemes over ring, class field theory, Teichmuller space, AND Ergodic theory. at Junior.

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.