Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

/vt/ is now archived.Become a Patron!

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 8 KB, 1084x150, png.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10456547 No.10456547 [DELETED]  [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe]

Consider the following function:

https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2019/11/1/1552306699-png.png

Demonstrate that:

https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2019/10/1/1551680129-png4.png

>> No.10456574

>>10456547
baka this is highschool tier
you're never going to make it senpai

>> No.10456595

How to solve this problem please?

Anyone strong in maths?

>> No.10456600

wtf i didn't ever encounter this shit in high school and i did specialist math

>> No.10456602

>>10456547
It's wrong. Ask the local /sci/ schizo.

>> No.10456603

>consider this
Dont tell me what to do you fat nigger granny cunt

>> No.10456607

>>10456602

Can you demonstrate that's wrong?

>> No.10456611

>>10456600
Maths begins after high school

The shitness you learned before cannot be called "maths"

>> No.10456645
File: 245 KB, 787x1016, chie2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10456645

>>10456547
How to read the problem:

When z belongs to the complex numbers, which means z is something like a+i.b EXCLUDING one, f(z) = all that jazz [a fraction multiplied by an infinite sum where the value of n goes from 1 to infinity)

Prove that when the real part (Re(z) is greater than 0, f(z) = 0 and therefore the real part (Re(z) = 1/2)

>> No.10456659

>>10456645
Yes I assume that, now how I can prove it?

>> No.10456668

>>10456547
you need to use the Todd function

>> No.10456686

>>10456645

Not op, but thanks anon. It really helped me.

>> No.10456883

>Riemann zeta function
Extremely low effort and disrespectful.

>> No.10456907

>>10456607
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0222

>> No.10456946
File: 50 KB, 921x516, TIMESAND___arXivRemoved2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10456946

>>10456883
I produced this second, better negation of RH

Real Numbers in the Neighborhood of Infinity
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1811.0222

as a corollary of an intensive 8-12 study program once I got access to regular internet facilities in a private place over the summer (after one year of homelessness and now I have spent the majority of 2019 locked in a small box, probably getting secret anal surgery on my implants.) I am about to stop being homeless, hopefully. I finally calculated the exact number where zeta is equal to zero, but it was very easy because two years ago I already proved that zeta is zero somewhere in the neighborhood of infinity.

I disproved RH originally in this other paper

On The Riemann Zeta Function
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1703.0073

two years ago. Nota bene!!! Since Perelman only published on arXiv, before Perelman could turn down the $1M, Clay had to issue him a waiver in the rules for getting the money because his paper was never peer reviewed. That is the EXACT same waiver I need for my publication on viXra dated two years ago

VERSION 1
http://www.vixra.org/pdf/1703.0073v1.pdf

this month. I am black-listed by arXiv, am I also blacklisted by Clay?

>> No.10457063
File: 340 KB, 716x1180, TIMESAND___duf92d689rwy26i23joge43ty35654gbnnbvr555587ymc0924m7y.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10457063

>>10456946

>> No.10457074
File: 226 KB, 1156x684, TIMESAND___Collage.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10457074

>>10457063
"Golf rumors"
amplification means, I think, free energy.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action