Quantum Monism

[Anonymous No.10444305]

It's a lot, so I recommend actually reading this article.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/quantum-monism-could-save-the-soul-of-physics/
But the biggest takeaway for me is that the hope that there is, or ever could be, a grand unifying theory of physics is nearly dead. What do you all think about this?

[Anonymous No.10444376]

>>10444305
Interesting article, don't know how much is rigorous science or journalist misinterpretation though.

[Anonymous No.10444384]

>>10444376
It's written by a physicist

[Anonymous No.10444412]

>>10444305
>blogs.
not science

[Anonymous No.10444426]

>>10444412
see
>>10444384
>It's written by a physicist
That's WHY it's a blog post, written by an actual physicist, and not an article, written by a clueless journalist.

[Anonymous No.10444435]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

[Anonymous No.10444438]

>>10444412

[Anonymous No.10444444]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL88omsU5dU

[Anonymous No.10444447]

>>10444444
The holy sextuplet

[Anonymous No.10444451]

Everything has an explanation. Even if such an explanation would take infinity time to explain. So whenever we encounter any phenomenon that would require such an explanation, we become angry, and deny this phenomenon even exists.

[Anonymous No.10444454]

>>10444444
Witnessed

[Anonymous No.10444458]

Everything has an explanation. Even if such an explanation would take infinite time to explain. So whenever we encounter any phenomenon that would require such infinite time to explain, we become angry, and deny that this phenomenon even exists. I'm talking about consciousness, of course.

[Anonymous No.10444465]

>>10444444
sexy get

[Anonymous No.10444500]

>>10444444
all i can see is that body

[Anonymous No.10444514]

>>10444444
This is it. Cherish this post before [{(they)}] get here.

[Anonymous No.10444517]

>>10444305
>But the biggest takeaway for me is that the hope that there is, or ever could be, a grand unifying theory of physics is nearly dead
Seems to imply the opposite to me

[Anonymous No.10444539]

So we're back to the philosophical debate between Monism and Non-Dualism huh?

I was hoping for some profound critique but all we got was more or less a review of what we already know.

[Anonymous No.10444542]

>>10444444
>talk like robo-autismo
>be showing off sexy bod
>this is a symptom of excessive privilege that I am displaying here.
>Many-worlds says that there are regions of the amplitude distribution in which you find yourself absolutely in madness. You are in a betrayal branch where you stab all the people around you just because all of a sudden you get a feeling that you have to stab them.
This dude might be a potential school shooter/schizo murderer.
I pray the people around him don't push him into the betrayal branch.

[Anonymous No.10445262]

Is the proposition testable?

[Anonymous No.10445284]

>>10444438
kek, see we are smart after all, who else would make that virgin-chad meme besides an academic

[Anonymous No.10445286]

>>10445262
No dumbass. This is simply a replacement for the current axiom. Axioms are not testable but rely on perceived truth.

[Anonymous No.10445288]

>>10444458
Consciousness has been explained for years

[Anonymous No.10445294]

>>10444444
is this the power of the happa?

[Anonymous No.10445362]

>>10444444

[Anonymous No.10447047]

>>10445262
>Is the proposition testable?
>>10445286
>No dumbass. This is simply a replacement for the current axiom. Axioms are not testable but rely on perceived truth.
This. It's sad how many people on this board don't understand such simple things.

[Anonymous No.10447103]

>>10444444
he is among us

[Anonymous No.10447607]

Nature looks divided into separate pieces but this is an artifact of your perspective.

Based