/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.10425096]

>there are brainlets still believing that Newton's 2nd law of motion is [math]\mathbf{F} = m\mathbf{a}[/math] and not [math]\mathbf{F} = \frac{\mathrm{d}\mathbf{p}}{\mathrm{d}t}[/math]
>there are brainlets still claiming that Newton's 2nd law of motion doesn't apply to frames of reference, relativity and quantum physics
Give one case where [math]\mathbf{F} = \frac{\mathrm{d}\mathbf{p}}{\mathrm{d}t}[/math] doesn't apply. You can't.

[Anonymous No.10425104]

>>10425096
>posts smug anime face
>calls others brainlets
>projects a confidence in his understanding that he learned from someone else

If you're so confident Mr. Smug Anime Girl Poster, why even converse with brainlets? Are you seeking validation of your knowledge by interacting with "brainlets"? Therefore can you call yourself not a brainlet if all your information is validated through the same people you believe to be beneath you?

My conclusion, you read a book, you learned something contradictory, and you are seeking an explanation that you yourself can not give.

Thus you are the brainlet, sir.

[Anonymous No.10425111]

>>10425104
I used the wrong image, chill.

[Anonymous No.10425217]

>>10425096
P = mv = m*d/t
dP/dt = -m*d/t^2

ma = m*dv/dt
v = d/t
dv/dt = -d/t^2
ma = -m*d/t^2

What is your point? You can also formulate by differentiating with respect to position instead of time.

[Anonymous No.10425266]

>>10425096
>Give one case where F=dpdt doesn't apply.
Anything going at a speed over [math]10^7\; \mathrm{m\,\cdot\,s^{-1}}[/math].

Weebie weebie go back to classie.
Weebie weebie you're still a freshie.
Weebie weebie you'll never get lady.
Weebie weebie come and give me kyssie.

[Anonymous No.10425621]

>>10425111
>using the wrong concept
>in the wrong context
>with the wrong image
https://vimeo.com/4435893

[Anonymous No.10425635]

>>10425266
>"What is relativistic momentum?"
Dumb frogposter