Real science.

[Anonymous No.10408441]

>Water does not bend and curve around balls, nor does it take the exterior shape of objects.

Water always seeks to be level, for example:
Cup of water is level, sink is level, bath is level, local swimming pool is level, lakes are level - ALL OCEANS ON EARTH ARE LEVEL as shown to us in the science world daily.
> At what stage and scale does some new property go into the water to allow it to stick and curve around a spinning cartoon space potato?

The only place Earth is a ball, is in bogus cartoon images and crap math equations.

[Anonymous No.10408444]

>Level.

[Anonymous No.10408445]

HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS

[Anonymous No.10408449]

>Scientific myth.

[Anonymous No.10408452]

The stars in the Northern Hemisphere appear to rotate in a CLOCKWISE direction around a point over the North pole. The stars in the Southern Hemisphere appear to rotate COUNTERCLOCKWISE around a point over the South pole. You can verify this yourself using nothing but your own first hand observations. You dont even need any tools or technology to do it if you are really determined to do so. Try and draw a flat Earth map where this is even possible. I fucking dare you.

[Anonymous No.10408458]

>>10408441
>>10408444
>>10408445
>>10408449
What did op mean by this?

[Anonymous No.10408459]

>>10408452
>Looking at things in the sky has no bearing on the shape of the Earth.

It's like saying "The balls on this snooker table are spheres, so the table is also a sphere".

[Anonymous No.10408462]

>>10408452
That's not the worst problem, constelations in the southern hemisphere don't work in a flat earth

[Anonymous No.10408463]

>>10408452

[Anonymous No.10408466]

>>10408462
They work perfectly fine - as recorded for over 20k years. Don't believe everything mainstream media tells you...

[Anonymous No.10408470]

>>10408462
>Hmmmm...

[Anonymous No.10408471]

>>10408458
He sucks cock, can't you see?

[Anonymous No.10408476]

Heliocentric model = planets go around sun.
Geocentric model = everything rotates above Earth.

Everything about stars and shit can be explained by both models with great ease.

The issue with globetards is they use the heliocentric model, and remove the sphere earth and insert a flat earth disk to mock it - without ever understanding what tf flat Earth even is.

1. Flat Earth is not a disk located in space.
2. Space is not what you think it is.

>>10408462

[Anonymous No.10408477]

>>10408466
Media never told me that, it's just that I can see they Southern Cross from Santiago and Auckland at the same time, the opposite of what happens at >>10408463

[Anonymous No.10408478]

explain this, flattard

[Anonymous No.10408479]

>>10408477
>Irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.10408481]

>>10408478
Explain what? Your picture of a model spherical Earth?

[Anonymous No.10408483]

>>10408478

[Anonymous No.10408484]

>>10408459
You moron, this is basic topology. I would prove it to you mathematically, but since you aren’t understanding the “Why Earth is a globe: for dummies” version it would be a waste of my time. Im not saying that things that go on in the sky determine what goes on on Earth. I am saying it’s physically impossible to have a flat plane where the observations of the stars are consistent with what we see. Go ahead and try to draw it. You could spend the rest of your life trying to make it work and you never would. On a globe Earth its just a byproduct of rotation about an axis.

[Anonymous No.10408487]

>>10408479
Why is it always a burger?

[Anonymous No.10408490]

>>10408484
>Wrong.

[Anonymous No.10408493]

>>10408441
Water curves, you lose.

[Anonymous No.10408495]

[Anonymous No.10408496]

>>10408466
Fuck that guy. It doesnt matter if the constellations are possible on flat earth or not. Because this...
>>10408452
Is not possible on a 2 dimensional plane. You could still make an argument for a cube, or pyramid, or really ANY other 3D polygon. Just not a flat plane.

[Anonymous No.10408499]

>>10408441
All photos of earth using varying camera apparatus from varying vantage points. Water does not "curve" around balls because the relative gravity of earth (which is much stronger) pulls water downward (toward its gravitational center)

[Anonymous No.10408501]

>>10408493
>Derp.
>What is perspective?

Educate yourself.

[Anonymous No.10408502]

>>10408476
They changed a bit, it's just that the space is so big that the distance we travel is irrelevant

[Anonymous No.10408503]

>>10408490
Prove it faggot. I know you are trolling anyway, so you will just continue to post memes, and say I am wrong without any evidence or reasoning. Thats just as good as losing an argument in my mind.

[Anonymous No.10408505]

>>10408502
>They have not changed in over 20k years.

[Anonymous No.10408506]

>>10408503
You prove your silly religious cultist cartoon ball Earth belief.

Can you demonstrate water curving around a ball? Or any object for that matter?

[Anonymous No.10408508]

>>10408501
Perspective doesn't create a curve, the tops of the pylons forms a curve. You lose, thanks for admitting the earth is round.

[Anonymous No.10408510]

>>10408506
I already proved it, all you need to do is spend a few nights watching the stars with nothing but your own eyes.
>>10408452

[Anonymous No.10408511]

>Proof

Understand you were brainwashed as children by government school education systems into a cultist belief.

[Anonymous No.10408512]

>>10408511
go on and educate yourself with youtube

[Anonymous No.10408513]

>>10408511
You already admitted the earth is round, no need to show us the rest of your folder.

[Anonymous No.10408516]

>>10408511
No. Proof of the globe is right here. Its one paragraph and it’s literally indisputable.
>>10408452


Like this anon said
>>10408496
You could make an argument that is consistent with these observations for basically any shape of Earth besides a 2D plane.

[Anonymous No.10408517]

>>10408508
>>10408510

>Stupid people.

[Anonymous No.10408518]

>>10408516
>Thinks oceans curve around a spinning space potato.

Can you show me a curved ocean? A non CGI /spliced image?

[Anonymous No.10408519]

>>10408484
It works with a flat torus in 3-sphere.

[Anonymous No.10408520]

>>10408517
No argument, so you confirm that water curves and the Earth is round. Awesome.

[Anonymous No.10408522]

>>10408518
Already done here >>10408493

[Anonymous No.10408524]

There's a saying about wrestling with pigs. You both get dirty, and the pig enjoys it.

[Anonymous No.10408528]

>>10408518
I dont even need to take fluid dynamics or gravitational attraction of water into account because the star paths I mentioned are topologically impossible on a flat plane. You literally could not make it work, no matter how much mental gymnastics you did.

>>10408517
Still waiting on a rebuttal to this.
>>10408452

[Anonymous No.10408529]

>>10408522
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVchRD7p-TU&feature=youtu.be

[Anonymous No.10408531]

>>10408528
A flat torus in 3-sphere.

[Anonymous No.10408534]

>>10408522
>>10408529
Didn't think so.

>What is perspective?

[Anonymous No.10408541]

>>10408501
>>What is perspective?
Hilarious that you can say this when their image literally had the flat earth perspective comparison image.

[Anonymous No.10408542]

>Kek NASA
>Was another plane following the cartoon one above the cartoon Earth? Where are all the satellites?

[Anonymous No.10408543]

I want to go in space and see if it's a flat disc at this point
You guys know where I can buy cheap tickets?

[Anonymous No.10408545]

>>10408541
>Doesn't get it.
Educate yourself.

[Anonymous No.10408546]

>>10408542
>how do lenses work
Try harder, my dude.

[Anonymous No.10408548]

This is now a fat fetish thread

[Anonymous No.10408550]

Because literally anything is better than flat earthers

[Anonymous No.10408552]

>>10408546
>Lenses

Nice try, kek.

Look into it.

[Anonymous No.10408553]

>>10408545
>horizon
Yeah uhh I don't think this proves what you think it does.

[Anonymous No.10408554]

[Anonymous No.10408555]

[Anonymous No.10408556]

Why the fuck do you even entertain these retard trolls?

[Anonymous No.10408559]

[Anonymous No.10408558]

>>10408553
> I am still being brainwashed by highschool teachers into believing in a cartoon ball Earth.

> I understand water is always level, as I use water every single day, but I suspend my knowledge into believing it curves around a spinning space potato.


O________O

[Anonymous No.10408561]

>>10408531
Im still not even sure this is accurate but ok, I will bite. This would require there to be a hole in one of the poles of Earth and would require a dimensionallity of space time that is demonstrably inaccurate using a variety of tests you could do at home. Most easily performed of which would be throwing a rock. You could even get that to work if you wanted to extensively modify the way gravity works, but then there are other tests you could do that would prove those gravitational theories to be wrong aswell. Most easily performed of which would be dropping a rock. So its still not consistent with reality.

>tl;dr: you are still wrong until you can provide a model that is consistent with reality.
Do that and you will have officially convinced me that Earth is flat.

[Anonymous No.10408565]

[Anonymous No.10408567]

>Potato

Belief in the ball Earth is no better than the belief in bogus religious stories.

Real science is real. The ball Earth is not real science. Cartoons are not evidence of reality.

[Anonymous No.10408569]

>>10408558
>I've seen water appear flat on scales much smaller than the curvature of the earth, therefore it must always be flat.

lmao

[Anonymous No.10408570]

>>10408561
Forgot pic. These are flight paths over the arctic circle.

[Anonymous No.10408572]

Clearly anime doesn't have enough of an impact

[Anonymous No.10408576]

>>10408542
It does not make sense to reply, but satellites are a way higher than 120 feet away from earth

[Anonymous No.10408578]

[Anonymous No.10408579]

reminder that flatearthers themselves proved that the Earth is curved, then lied about it and keep lying about it to make more money from other retarded flatearthers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMjDAzUFxX0

[Anonymous No.10408581]

>>10408531
This is not consistent with the phenomenon of having “midnight” sun at both the Arctic and Antarctic circles. You can take tours of Antarctica that will show you this and you can live in Alaska to experience the other side of it.

[Anonymous No.10408583]

>>10408534
See >>10408508
You lost, you admit the earth is round.

[Anonymous No.10408585]

[Anonymous No.10408591]

[Anonymous No.10408592]

>>10408561
>This would require there to be a hole in one of the poles of Earth
Pic related.

Gravity isn't real.

[Anonymous No.10408597]

>>10408592
>Gravity isn't real.
prove it

[Anonymous No.10408598]

>>10408444
you can actually see the curvature in the top left one

[Anonymous No.10408599]

I approve

[Anonymous No.10408603]

[Anonymous No.10408605]

I'm not in the mood to tackle yet another flatearther's pratt's, but there are two things that refute the flat earth notion.

>Sunsets & Sunrises
>Time zones

The flat earth notion can't explain these without appealing to solipsistic arguments.

[Anonymous No.10408609]

[Anonymous No.10408610]

>>10408567
THIS!

[Anonymous No.10408613]

Fat fetish best fetish

[Anonymous No.10408614]

>>10408592
See
>>10408581
You have already been disproven, you just choose to ignore things that dont fit your narrative. Even with a flat torus Earth, midnight sun wouldnt be possible at both poles, with all points between them experiencing day/night cycles.

[Anonymous No.10408615]

>>10408581
>You can take tours of Antarctica that will show you this
Can you find one?

[Anonymous No.10408618]

>>10408603
>>10408609
>Triggered cultist balltards, kek.
Are you mad your cartoon religion was crushed?

Relax. Rofl.

[Anonymous No.10408621]

>>10408597
Space and time are metaphysical concepts.

[Anonymous No.10408623]

>see this on your walk around town
wat do

[Anonymous No.10408625]

>>10408623

[Anonymous No.10408626]

>>10408592
What makes this picture any more real that the pictures NASA gives you? Is it those totally not artificially added latitude and longitude lines? If globe Earthers cant use pictures as evidence neither can you.

[Anonymous No.10408630]

>>10408618
Flattards are only here to be laughed at
And, whenever I see an opportunity to spread my fetish, I do!

[Anonymous No.10408636]

>>10408630
>Still raging

Kek!

[Anonymous No.10408639]

>>10408615
https://www.polarcruises.com/antarctica/destinations/crossing-antarctic-circle
2 seconds on Google. There are like 5 other companies that offer it aswell. Are you even trying?

[Anonymous No.10408640]

>>10408625
She's completely stuck and nobody's around. No need to blue-ball yourself here

[Anonymous No.10408642]

>200 proofs Earth is not a spinning ball.
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html

>Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ax_YpQsy88

>Website
HTTP://IFERS.INFO


Wake up you filthy religious balltard faggots.

[Anonymous No.10408644]

>>10408636
Au contraire, my dear friend. It is you who is angry. I'm just horny.

[Anonymous No.10408648]

>>10408626
Are you claiming there is no hole at the North Pole?

[Anonymous No.10408650]

[Anonymous No.10408651]

>>10408639
Which one allows the midnight sun to be seen brainlet?

[Anonymous No.10408657]

[Anonymous No.10408659]

>>10408648
Prove it without pictures.

[Anonymous No.10408661]

[Anonymous No.10408662]

>>10408579
Don't forget about that one flatearther who proved that the Earth rotates using a gyro. I recall that he said something along the lines of "well, we can't accept that.".

Flat earth theory is a joke and has been a joke for a long time.

[Anonymous No.10408663]

>>10408651
https://www.swoop-antarctica.com/cruises/circle
I did my own 2 second google search to satisfy you.

[Anonymous No.10408666]

>>10408642
your own people proved the earth is a globe, you're just way too far gone the rabbit hole to ever admit it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMrYo9CrxNI

[Anonymous No.10408669]

[Anonymous No.10408672]

>>10408441
Why can't I find a clip where there's liquid mercury surrounding a sphere magnet?

That would show the mechanism of gravity on water on the earth

[Anonymous No.10408676]

>>10408659
North Pole elevation is below sea level.

[Anonymous No.10408677]

[Anonymous No.10408678]

>>10408651
Any of them that take place during the summer solstice in the Southern Hemisphere(late December) they are all multiple day trips. How dumb are you?

[Anonymous No.10408683]

Feels good that there's a 50/50 chance of scoring a fat girl in any pub
Why aren't you fucking fat girls yet, anon?

[Anonymous No.10408685]

>>10408676
Prove it. I provided evidence of a globe Earth that requires nothing but eyes to verify. You should be able to do something like this for flat Earth, if Earth is indeed flat, and you arent retarded.

[Anonymous No.10408687]

[Anonymous No.10408688]

>>10408666
This.

Flatties are never interested in learning about the world around them, they're only interested in reinforcing their notions. When Jeranism saw the ISS with his own eyes (and caught a video of it passing over the moon too) which is something that is impossible on the flat earth, he simply rejects the observation with no reasoning.

[Anonymous No.10408690]

[Anonymous No.10408696]

The earth is FAT and you know it

[Anonymous No.10408699]

[Anonymous No.10408701]

[Anonymous No.10408704]

>>10408663
Antarctica is the highest elevated "continent" in the world. That, coupled with the extremely clear, cold, unpolluted air means light will travel much further through it, therefore the sun will be visible for a longer period of time during its wider, more elevated path in the sky.

This movement works perfectly fine on a flat torus in 3-sphere.

[Anonymous No.10408706]

[Anonymous No.10408711]

[Anonymous No.10408714]

alright fatfag signing out

[Anonymous No.10408716]

>>10408685
> Elevation extremes: Lowest point: Fram Basin –4,665 m. Highest point: sea level 0 m.
https://www.infoplease.com/world/polar-regions/arctic

[Anonymous No.10408724]

>>10408678
Who owns Antarctica?

[Anonymous No.10408737]

>>10408716
How do I know thats true? They could easily be lying to me.

[Anonymous No.10408739]

>>10408724
http://lmgtfy.com/?iie=1&q=Who+owns+Antarctica%3F

[Anonymous No.10408753]

>>10408737
Do you apply that same view regarding the globe?

[Anonymous No.10408754]

>>10408739
No one owns Antarctica, yet it is controlled regardless. That doesn't make any sense.

[Anonymous No.10408755]

>>10408753
Hey flattard why are you ignoring the evidence?
The Flat Earth community spend $20.000 to buy a ring laser gyroscope to prove the earth is stationary, can you guess what happened when they turned it on?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pf44njV8g0
And can you guess what the guy in charge of the gyroscope said?
https://youtu.be/WMrYo9CrxNI?t=16m3s
"This is bad for us", "We don't want to blow this" - what a complete fucking joke
It's obvious you people will never accept any kind of proof that contradicts your point of view, please get the fuck off /sci/ and never come back, maybe >>>/x/ will take you, but I doubt it.

[Anonymous No.10408762]

>>10408452
most people - and therefore most flat-earthers - don't cross the equator much
so they can just deny the stars and not think about it

[Anonymous No.10408780]

>>10408755
Those faggots have always been shills - the dome flat earth model is a psy-op to pit religion vs scientism again.

The truth always lies in between. The earth is a flat torus in 3-sphere. The ground is stationary, the "toroidal/torus field" moves around us, causing the stars and sun etc to move with it.

The laser gyro will also move with this field. The Allias Effect also demonstrates this effect clearly during solar eclipses with Foucault pendulums. These devices are not being affected by the movement of the earth, there is no experiment that has ever proven this, hence why relativity was pushed extensively, to ignore this fact and keep the mainstream view of reality alive.

[Anonymous No.10408793]

>>10408780
or maybe, MAYBE, nasa isn't lying? doing impossible uninterrupted hour long ISS tours and having a non-stop stream looking at the Earth
whatever, a torus, sure

[Anonymous No.10408814]

>>10408793
>or maybe, MAYBE, nasa isn't lying?
You trust this military wing of the government because...?
>doing impossible uninterrupted hour long ISS tours
Why's it impossible? You don't believe they could have invented a way to mimic anti-gravity for long periods of time by now?
>having a non-stop stream looking at the Earth
whatever, a torus, sure
The one I've seen is the same looped clips over and over again. I have no doubt something is up there, but the video cannot be trusted, there's clear manipulation. It's just not good enough for 2019, we should have 4k live streams from the moon, or other areas above the earth, filming solar and lunar eclipses, the orbits, etc etc. What we have is pathetic, and it is space autists like yourself that should be the most angry about it.

[Anonymous No.10408819]

>>10408814
>they have magic tech to fake whatever I don't like
yeah, okay

[Anonymous No.10408834]

>>10408819
It's not like we're talking about the world's wealthiest country with the biggest military budget or anything. They've likely mastered diamagnetic levitation in some way.

[Anonymous No.10408840]

>>10408834
no, truth is you just want to live in a fantasy world with a giant conspiracy where everyone is lying to you, even though that makes no sense, you're just too used to that idea and that thought pattern that at this point you'd believe anything to keep it going
please stop replying to me, I'm out

[Anonymous No.10408860]

>>10408683
Your round girls are nice but I prefer strong tomboyish girls that can do /fit/ things with me!

[Anonymous No.10408866]

>>10408840
>>10408840
>no, truth is you just want to live in a fantasy world with a giant conspiracy where everyone is lying to you
Are you lied to by politicians, religions, adverts, media etc? It would be stranger if NASA didn't lie. They're simply a PR front for the tax payers.

[Anonymous No.10408868]

The flat guy could go to Argentina, they have cruises to Antartica

[Anonymous No.10408872]

>>10408449
can't argue with that

[Anonymous No.10408873]

>>10408868
Has this route ever been done?

[Anonymous No.10408892]

>>10408873
I don't know, if it has not been done you can be the first because no one will stop you

[Anonymous No.10408898]

>>10408892
>no one will stop you
Is that right? I can just sail/fly to the coast of Antarctica and begin my journey from one end to the other with no bother?

[Anonymous No.10408919]

[math]\color{#781b86}{\text{Go}}\color{#6b2a96}{\text{d'}}\color{#5e38a6}{\text{s }}\color{#5147b7}{\text{In}}\color{#4456c7}{\text{ H}}\color{#4567c6}{\text{is}}\color{#527bb3}{\text{ H}}\color{#5f8fa0}{\text{ea}}\color{#6da38d}{\text{ve}}\color{#7ab77a}{\text{n.}}\color{#85b871}{\text{ A}}\color{#90b968}{\text{ll}}\color{#9bbb5f}{\text{'s}}\color{#a6bc56}{\text{ R}}\color{#b1bd4d}{\text{ig}}\color{#bbb849}{\text{ht}}\color{#c5b345}{\text{ W}}\color{#cfae41}{\text{it}}\color{#d9a93d}{\text{h }}\color{#de9738}{\text{th}}\color{#dd7a32}{\text{e }}\color{#dc5c2d}{\text{Wo}}\color{#db3f27}{\text{rl}}\color{#da2121}{\text{d}}[/math]
[math]\color{#781b86}{\text{Go}}\color{#6b2a96}{\text{d'}}\color{#5e38a6}{\text{s }}\color{#5147b7}{\text{In}}\color{#4456c7}{\text{ H}}\color{#4567c6}{\text{is}}\color{#527bb3}{\text{ H}}\color{#5f8fa0}{\text{ea}}\color{#6da38d}{\text{ve}}\color{#7ab77a}{\text{n.}}\color{#85b871}{\text{ A}}\color{#90b968}{\text{ll}}\color{#9bbb5f}{\text{'s}}\color{#a6bc56}{\text{ R}}\color{#b1bd4d}{\text{ig}}\color{#bbb849}{\text{ht}}\color{#c5b345}{\text{ W}}\color{#cfae41}{\text{it}}\color{#d9a93d}{\text{h }}\color{#de9738}{\text{th}}\color{#dd7a32}{\text{e }}\color{#dc5c2d}{\text{Wo}}\color{#db3f27}{\text{rl}}\color{#da2121}{\text{d}}[/math]
[math]\color{#781b86}{\text{Go}}\color{#6b2a96}{\text{d'}}\color{#5e38a6}{\text{s }}\color{#5147b7}{\text{In}}\color{#4456c7}{\text{ H}}\color{#4567c6}{\text{is}}\color{#527bb3}{\text{ H}}\color{#5f8fa0}{\text{ea}}\color{#6da38d}{\text{ve}}\color{#7ab77a}{\text{n.}}\color{#85b871}{\text{ A}}\color{#90b968}{\text{ll}}\color{#9bbb5f}{\text{'s}}\color{#a6bc56}{\text{ R}}\color{#b1bd4d}{\text{ig}}\color{#bbb849}{\text{ht}}\color{#c5b345}{\text{ W}}\color{#cfae41}{\text{it}}\color{#d9a93d}{\text{h }}\color{#de9738}{\text{th}}\color{#dd7a32}{\text{e }}\color{#dc5c2d}{\text{Wo}}\color{#db3f27}{\text{rl}}\color{#da2121}{\text{d}}[/math]

[Anonymous No.10408951]

[math]\color{red}{\mathbf{ITT:~INFIDELS~BOUT~TO~RIP~THIS~PLACE~A~NEW~EYE~OF~TERROR}}[/math]

[Anonymous No.10408958]

>>10408898
>Is that right? I can just sail/fly to the coast of Antarctica and begin my journey from one end to the other with no bother?
Yes! You just need to have enough food.

[Anonymous No.10408960]

>>10408444
>rivers, literally not level
lmao

[Anonymous No.10408966]

>>10408958
Proof?

[Anonymous No.10408982]

IM ADDICTED TO KRATOM

[Anonymous No.10408984]

>>10408441
>flat earth returned
Well, the hiatus was fun while it lasted.

[Anonymous No.10408987]

This thread is hilarious.
The same old debunked arguments like they are wirth anything.
I oarticularly liked the Anon who posted picutures of land appearing to not curve away in response to the pylons over water. The reason flatties like water is because it "finds its level", land does not lol.

[Anonymous No.10408993]

Normally when browsing a dumb thread I like to think "I could be doing homework right now." This thread is so dumb I instead thought, "I could be browsing reddit right now."

[Anonymous No.10409009]

>>10408966
Proof to what?

[Anonymous No.10409016]

Questions for Flattards

>Question 1:
Looking down onto a supposedly flat surface, our view of it is abruptly cut short at a relatively short distance. Why? Back up your answer with geometry, assuming perfectly clear viewing conditions.

>Question 2:
We can see distant objects that are tall enough to peek over the horizon, so why can't we see all of the supposedly flat surface leading up to said objects? Back up your answer with geometry, assuming perfectly clear viewing conditions. Provide a diagram of a viewer on a flat surface, with a detailed explanation as to why that surface can't be seen all the way to that distant object on that same flat surface.

>Question 3:
Why does the height of the observer affect the distance that can be seen when looking down onto a flat surface?

>Question 4:
Provide a formula that can be used to calculate the distance at which land or sea stops being visible to an observer at a height H meters above a flat surface.

>Question 5:
Use your formula to calculate the altitude an observer would have to be situated at above the North Pole to see the whole of the giant Frisbee you think you live on.

>Question 6:
The moon appears to change orientation as a function of the observer's latitude. For example, in Australia the moon appears upside down. Why?

>Question 7:
If you track the positions of stars, they appear to rotate around Earth's axis. They appear to rotate around this axis clockwise in Britain and counter-clockwise in Australia. At latitudes close to 0 degrees N/S they trace a hyperbolic arc overhead. Why? Back up your answer with geometry, and provide a diagram that shows how the same star can appear to rotate in both directions depending on how far from the disc's hub an observer is standing.

[Anonymous No.10409019]

>>10409009
Proof that any anon here can rock up to Antarctica and cross it from one end to the other without being stopped.

[Anonymous No.10409031]

>>10409019
What will stop you is running out of supplies before you've crossed 2% of Antarctica, if the cold doesn't take you first.

Do you think there are people waiting to catch you along 11,165 miles of coastline? Pick a fucking random place to land, chances are your party will be the only humans for hundreds of miles.

[Anonymous No.10409034]

>>10409019
I have never tried it so I don't know, I just know that you can go to Antartica from Argentina and that they have no reason to stop you

[Anonymous No.10409047]

>>10408753
I do. Which is why I verify its a globe with this method. No second hand information required.
>>10408452

[Anonymous No.10409135]

>>10409016
I'm your side but nigga wtf

[Anonymous No.10409141]

>>10409135
>wtf noooo stop humiliating flattards with this one neat copypasta
kill self

[Anonymous No.10409170]

>>10409141
No anon, you're the one making US look bad with most of your questions.

[Anonymous No.10409177]

>>10409170
Who the fuck is "Us"

[Anonymous No.10409185]

>>10409177
(((WE ARE)))

[Anonymous No.10409186]

>>10408449
i swear to god what is the point of this, the earth is not flat

[Anonymous No.10409196]

>>10408524
Based post

[Anonymous No.10409197]

STOP POSTING FAT GIRLS HOLY SHIT IM GOING TO VOMIT

[Anonymous No.10409199]

>>10409186
An attempt to appeal to common sense, "looks flat is flat".

However, the entire theory falls apart once observations, that can be easily done by anyone, are made that falsify the flat earth. Then the flatties would attempt to appeal to unfalsifiable effects (perspective is making everything look like its a globe! Jewish Irish reptilian Illuminati conspiracy hologram! Special atmospheric refraction that no one else knows!) which then blow out their previous goals of appealing to common sense, exposing how stupid the whole thing is.

[Anonymous No.10409220]

>>10409199
[math]\color{#781b86}{\text{Wr}}\color{#74208b}{\text{on}}\color{#6f2591}{\text{g }}\color{#6b2a96}{\text{ag}}\color{#672f9c}{\text{ai}}\color{#6333a1}{\text{n,}}\color{#5e38a6}{\text{ A}}\color{#5a3dac}{\text{no}}\color{#5642b1}{\text{n.}}\color{#5147b7}{\text{ T}}\color{#4d4cbc}{\text{hr}}\color{#4951c1}{\text{ou}}\color{#4456c7}{\text{gh}}\color{#405bcc}{\text{ G}}\color{#4060cc}{\text{od}}\color{#4567c6}{\text{ a}}\color{#496ebf}{\text{ll}}\color{#4e74b9}{\text{ t}}\color{#527bb3}{\text{hi}}\color{#5682ac}{\text{ng}}\color{#5b88a6}{\text{s }}\color{#5f8fa0}{\text{ar}}\color{#649699}{\text{e }}\color{#689c93}{\text{po}}\color{#6da38d}{\text{ss}}\color{#71aa87}{\text{ib}}\color{#76b080}{\text{le}}\color{#7ab77a}{\text{. }}\color{#7eb777}{\text{Yo}}\color{#82b874}{\text{u }}\color{#86b870}{\text{ca}}\color{#8ab96d}{\text{n'}}\color{#8eb96a}{\text{t }}\color{#92ba67}{\text{us}}\color{#96ba63}{\text{e }}\color{#99ba60}{\text{yo}}\color{#9dbb5d}{\text{ur}}\color{#a1bb5a}{\text{ h}}\color{#a5bc57}{\text{um}}\color{#a9bc53}{\text{an}}\color{#adbd50}{\text{ u}}\color{#b1bd4d}{\text{nd}}\color{#b4bb4c}{\text{er}}\color{#b8ba4a}{\text{st}}\color{#bbb849}{\text{an}}\color{#beb648}{\text{di}}\color{#c2b446}{\text{ng}}\color{#c5b345}{\text{ o}}\color{#c8b144}{\text{f }}\color{#ccaf42}{\text{th}}\color{#cfae41}{\text{e }}\color{#d2ac40}{\text{un}}\color{#d6aa3e}{\text{iv}}\color{#d9a93d}{\text{er}}\color{#dca73c}{\text{se}}\color{#dea13a}{\text{ t}}\color{#de9738}{\text{o }}\color{#dd8d36}{\text{ma}}\color{#dd8434}{\text{ke}}\color{#dd7a32}{\text{ t}}\color{#dc7030}{\text{he}}\color{#dc662e}{\text{se}}\color{#dc5c2d}{\text{ b}}\color{#db522b}{\text{ol}}\color{#db4829}{\text{d }}\color{#db3f27}{\text{cl}}\color{#db3525}{\text{ai}}\color{#da2b23}{\text{ms}}\color{#da2121}{\text{.}}[/math]

[Anonymous No.10409232]

>>10409220
I piss on your faggot god, find a better argument, retard

[Anonymous No.10409236]

>read this comment
>The stars in the Northern Hemisphere appear to rotate in a CLOCKWISE direction around a point over the North pole. The stars in the Southern Hemisphere appear to rotate COUNTERCLOCKWISE around a point over the South pole. You can verify this yourself using nothing but your own first hand observations. You dont even need any tools or technology to do it if you are really determined to do so. Try and draw a flat Earth map where this is even possible. I fucking dare you.
>go to flat earth discord server
https://discordservers.com/server/317165289769009152
>start debating with these niggers'
>niggers think that in order to look up, you would also have to look in either north south west east
>say that that is twodimensional, and looking up being the third dimension has nothing to do with it
>nigger says he has seen it for himself
>keeps asking me if i had also seen it
>saying that empiristic claims should be open for rational criticism
>get banned
>mfw i see the discord server completely ignoring me

[Anonymous No.10409237]

>>10409232
this site is for 18+

[Anonymous No.10409242]

>>10408534
The horizon lies below the vanishing point. Also the vanishing point is imaginary, and infinitely far away, not a few km away.

Thanks for your time.

[Anonymous No.10409294]

>>10409242
No no no anon. You're thinking about perspective which makes logical sense and makes predictions about reality.

Flat earthers have their own special form of perspective called flerspective. Which states that all observations of a round earth are because of some magical phenomenon that somehow alters everyone's view of reality. No model of this flerspective exists you're just supposed to assume that it happens for no reason other than to allow the mind to believe that the Earth is flat.

You might ask "well if all of reality is contorting itself to appear round when it's supposedly flat, then what's the difference between that and the Earth just being round?" That is called using your brain, and flatearthers can't let you do that. Its a sin!

[Anonymous No.10409358]

Explain this, flattard!

[Anonymous No.10409364]

Oh and btw, those flights exist...

[Anonymous No.10409413]

>>10408487
It's not always a burger.

[Anonymous No.10409412]

>>10409016
>Looking down onto a supposedly flat surface, our view of it is abruptly cut short at a relatively short distance. Why? Back up your answer with geometry, assuming perfectly clear viewing conditions.
Great point. If the earth was flat, we'd be able to see infinitely far. Alas, we cannot, therefore the earth is curved.
>We can see distant objects that are tall enough to peek over the horizon, so why can't we see all of the supposedly flat surface leading up to said objects? Back up your answer with geometry, assuming perfectly clear viewing conditions. Provide a diagram of a viewer on a flat surface, with a detailed explanation as to why that surface can't be seen all the way to that distant object on that same flat surface.
Another great point. If the earth was flat, nothing would obstruct the bottoms of distant objects because nothing is in the way, not even the air.
>Why does the height of the observer affect the distance that can be seen when looking down onto a flat surface?
Excellent question. If the earth was flat, you'd already be able to see infinitely far, so changing height wouldn't make a difference.
>The moon appears to change orientation as a function of the observer's latitude. For example, in Australia the moon appears upside down. Why?
Fantastic point. We all know the only reason for this is because the earth is a sphere, no other explanation is possible.
>If you track the positions of stars, they appear to rotate around Earth's axis. They appear to rotate around this axis clockwise in Britain and counter-clockwise in Australia. At latitudes close to 0 degrees N/S they trace a hyperbolic arc overhead. Why? Back up your answer with geometry, and provide a diagram that shows how the same star can appear to rotate in both directions depending on how far from the disc's hub an observer is standing.
Incredible. A globe, and only a globe, works with this. A flat torus in 3-sphere? Ignored.

[Anonymous No.10409416]

>>10408501
You are a retard.

[Anonymous No.10409418]

>>10409031
Have you seen past expeditions you brainlet? They travel more than 2%. Many reach the geographic south pole, but make a diversion as soon as they pass it.

[Anonymous No.10409422]

>>10409034
>they have no reason to stop you
Don't they want to "preserve" Antarctica? I thought you were highly restricted in what you can bring and where you can go. Show me otherwise.

[Anonymous No.10409426]

>>10408625
retard.

[Anonymous No.10409427]

>>10409047
That is observational evidence of light moving in a spherical fashion. It doesn't prove the surface you are standing on is spherical.

[Anonymous No.10409428]

>>10408441
based and flatearth-pilled

[Anonymous No.10409430]

>>10408642
Level is not a synonym of flat.

[Anonymous No.10409437]

>>10409416
Well OBVIOUSLY that's flerspective at work. It's the flatearther's flex tape. If the observations say that the Earth is round, then it must be reality tricking your brain into seeing the observation. Why? Because the Earth MUST be flat, no questioning it! Evidence? A model? Something that's falsifiable? Ha! None are needed.

[Anonymous No.10409443]

>>10409437
Perspective is to flat earthers as quantum is to new age boomers

[Anonymous No.10409444]

>>10409427
Evidence?

[Anonymous No.10409448]

>>10409437
This "curvature" can't make its mind up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyLzdQFU3Og

[Anonymous No.10409450]

>>10409448
retard.

[Anonymous No.10409451]

>>10409427
It doesnt, but it DOES prove the surface I am standing on is not a flat plane, because it’s topologically impossible for the star paths to work like that on a flat plane. If you were to claim the Earth was a cube, you may have something, but this observation of star paths means the Earth is 100% not flat.

[Anonymous No.10409458]

>>10409444
Evidence for what?

[Anonymous No.10409461]

>>10409448
Keep ignoring important details in footage and surely you will stumble upon PROOF of the flat earth. Don't let evidence ever change your mind!

[Anonymous No.10409462]

>>10409450
What's the matter?

[Anonymous No.10409466]

>>10409451
It works on a flat torus in 3-sphere.

[Anonymous No.10409470]

>>10409462
Nothing, I just enjoy calling flat earthers retards.

[Anonymous No.10409471]

>>10409448
The clue is in the name of the video. It's a superior mirage.
This video explains it: https://youtu.be/XzYJ61EC9XI?t=462

But oh cool, you found one situation where the curvature of the Earth looks weird. This doesn't explain other observations that show that the Earth does curve. Such as sunsets, sunrises, and time zones. Such as the southern celestial pole. Such as circumpolar stars and the variations of them depending on latitude.

[Anonymous No.10409473]

>>10409461
>observing objects over stretches of water is scientifically valid and proves curvature because they are obstructed

[Anonymous No.10409476]

>>10409470
>projection

[Anonymous No.10409484]

>>10409471
>The clue is in the name of the video. It's a superior mirage.
>This video explains it: https://youtu.be/XzYJ61EC9XI?t=462 [Embed]
>But oh cool, you found one situation where the curvature of the Earth looks weird.
You think it's uncommon to see such effects over stretches of water? It always happens.
>This doesn't explain other observations that show that the Earth does curve. Such as sunsets, sunrises
Optical illusions, see delayed sunset, advanced sunrise.
>and time zones. Such as the southern celestial pole. Such as circumpolar stars and the variations of them depending on latitude.
Works perfectly fine on a flat torus in 3-sphere.

[Anonymous No.10409491]

>>10409473
>being this retarded
>can't explain how an equatorial mount works on a flat earth.
>>10409476
ur mom gay.

[Anonymous No.10409493]

>>10409466
Firstly, prove it.
Secondly, even if it does, it requires modified theories of gravity which are demonstrably false.

[Anonymous No.10409494]

>>10409473
I thought water always seeks its level and level means the same thing as flat, right?

[Anonymous No.10409509]

>>10408484
Why can't the stars just move on their own individual trajectories over a flat earth?

[Anonymous No.10409514]

>>10409491
>>being this retarded
>>can't explain how an equatorial mount works on a flat earth.
It's called a flat torus in 3-sphere, learn about it. Although being a globecuck it may be too much for you.
>>10409493
>Firstly, prove it.
>Secondly, even if it does, it requires modified theories of gravity which are demonstrably false.
A flat torus in 3-sphere is topologically identical to a sphere, but experienced flat.

All theories of "gravity" are false, typical globecuck trying to hold onto their gravity god.

[Anonymous No.10409520]

>>10409494
I thought the only thing that can obstruct objects in the distance is curvature, right? Not natural miraging effects...

[Anonymous No.10409532]

>>10409509
Why can you see the same constallations, upside down in two different places of the Earth (Australia and Argentina) that are in the same hemisphere?

[Anonymous No.10409536]

>>10409532
Because the earth is a flat torus in 3-sphere.

[Anonymous No.10409539]

>>10409514
just what's underneath your stupid freesbee you call Earth? a pile of rocks and satan, of course??

[Anonymous No.10409554]

>>10409539
>just what's underneath your stupid freesbee you call Earth?
It's not a frisbee you buffoon, keep straw manning. The concept of "underneath" can't even apply to a flat torus. It is also stationary, unlike your schizo cult ball that's flying aimlessly through a void of pointlessness.

[Anonymous No.10409555]

Imagine not knowing topology and posting on /sci/

[Anonymous No.10409560]

[Anonymous No.10409563]

Imagine being a flat earth tard
Imagine believing the Earth is Flat and created by God while at the same time using evolution to "argue" that white people are the master race (we all know they're the same guys doing this).
Imagine your ideology being so inconsistent then coming to a board full of people who study mathematics and logic and trying to beat them.

[Anonymous No.10409575]

>>10409563
Imagine being a flatearther and accepting that your view of reality can't explain sunsets and sunrises.

[Anonymous No.10409578]

>>10409563
>Imagine believing the Earth is Flat and created by God
The earth is a flat torus and not created by some "God".
>while at the same time using evolution to "argue" that white people are the master race (we all know they're the same guys doing this).
Evolution is nonsense. Race is a psy-op for divide and conquer.
>then coming to a board full of people who study mathematics and logic and trying to beat them.
Extremely easy.

[Anonymous No.10409584]

>>10409578
>The earth is a flat torus
holy shit my dude

[Anonymous No.10409585]

Hey eveybody, fuck your common senses because big floating objects that you see in that void of pointlessness called space are not rounds, they are in fact big donuts

[Anonymous No.10409586]

>>10408672
Mercury's not magnetic and spherical magnets don't have spherical magnetic fields.

[Anonymous No.10409590]

>>10409584
What brainlet?

[Anonymous No.10409593]

>>10408545
You can see the curve in that bottom photo. There is a gap between the ocean and the red line on the left and right sides of red line that isn't present in the middle of the red line.

[Anonymous No.10409598]

>>10408441
I came thinking this was a flat earth and found it was a fat earth thread.

[Anonymous No.10409600]

>>10409585
>lights in the sky look round so the earth is round

[Anonymous No.10409602]

>>10409600
>Our current understanding of the world makes the most sense if Earth were like the planets we see in the night sky.
>The planets we see in the night sky are round
>Ergo, the Earth, being like the planets we see in the night sky, is round too.

[Anonymous No.10409607]

>>10409520
MIrage distorts, it doesn't obscure. Learn the difference and realize how retarded you have been.

[Anonymous No.10409616]

>>10408452
only because you asked

[Anonymous No.10409619]

>>10409602
>>Our current understanding of the world makes the most sense if Earth were like the planets we see in the night sky.
Within the confines of the big bang creation theology.
>The planets we see in the night sky are round
Those planets named after ancient deities? I wonder why?
>Ergo, the Earth, being like the planets we see in the night sky, is round too.
The earth is nothing like the "planets".

[Anonymous No.10409624]

>>10409607
>MIrage distorts, it doesn't obscure. Learn the difference and realize how retarded you have been.
It very much looks like it obscures, which is all that matters when you consider such a thing as evidence of curvature.

[Anonymous No.10409635]

>>10409619
>Within the confines of the big bang creation theology.
The Big Bang theory isn't a theology under any definition that makes sense. Also that theory is irrelevant to the point I made.

>Those planets named after ancient deities? I wonder why?
How is the name of an object relevant to its shape outside of geometry? How is the naming relevant to this?

>The earth is nothing like the "planets".
The Earth is very much like the planets. They all orbit the Sun. They obey the laws of physics as we measure them here on Earth. For the inner planets, they're rocky like Earth.

And this is all ignoring other observations that the Earth is round. Such as sunsets, sunrises, and time zones. Which don't make any sense if the Earth were flat.

[Anonymous No.10409640]

>>10409536
How do you even explain eclipses

[Anonymous No.10409665]

>>10409418
You'll run out of supplies though because you're an untrained retard.

>make a diversion
They're in on it, flat earth confirmed.

[Anonymous No.10409666]

>>10409635
>The Big Bang theory isn't a theology under any definition that makes sense. Also that theory is irrelevant to the point I made.
A Catholic priest came up with the theology that you now practice. You're free to practice your religion, I'm not going to stop you, but I can't pretend that it's true either. If you feel its irrelevant to your point, then what part of your scripture are you referring to?
>How is the name of an object relevant to its shape outside of geometry? How is the naming relevant to this?
Your theology has deified the lights in the sky, but not the earth, but in your faith the earth is still the same kind of shape as the planets and stars because the laws of your God (universe) dictate it so. Observations appear to support a globe, but it's still not proven unless you believe the images and videos of space agencies.
>The Earth is very much like the planets. They all orbit the Sun.
The earth is stationary.
>They obey the laws of physics as we measure them here on Earth. For the inner planets, they're rocky like Earth.
According to your cult leaders.
>And this is all ignoring other observations that the Earth is round. Such as sunsets, sunrises, and time zones. Which don't make any sense if the Earth were flat.
Flat torus in 3-sphere.

[Anonymous No.10409669]

>>10409616
That's not flat.

[Anonymous No.10409675]

>>10409412
>A flat torus in 3-sphere? Ignored.
>former flattard adopts absolute insanity to sidestep the simple globe

[Anonymous No.10409682]

>>10409640
Sun and moon have a symbiotic relationship, connected in some way, rather than being random objects that coincidentally eclipse for no reason other than chance.

[Anonymous No.10409684]

>>10409682
okay, were on a /sci/ board here, now explain the eclipses with mathematics rather than mysticism or gtfo

[Anonymous No.10409693]

>>10409665
>You'll run out of supplies though because you're an untrained retard.
I could just drink the ice and snow you moron, no need for anything else.
>They're in on it, flat earth confirmed.
Are they allowed to go where they want?

[Anonymous No.10409698]

>>10409666
>A Catholic priest came up with the theology that you now practice.
Are you just going to ignore Alexander Friedmann?

>You're free to practice your religion
Big Bang cosmology isn't a religion under any definition that would make sense. The mathematical formulation of it came from Einstein's General Relativity. Some of the first empirical observations of it came from Edwin Hubble who found that more distant galaxies are more red-shifted which means that they're moving away from us, consistent with the mathematical formulations. The Big Bang model isn't a religion because it's not built on faith, its built on repeatable and useful models of reality backed up my observations and experiments.

>Your theology has deified the lights in the sky, but not the earth
When did I say that it's mine? Sure the Western names for the planets derive from Greek and Roman mythology, but a for example, Mars is just called "Fire Star" in China. The names of the objects in the sky have no bearing on their properties.

>in your faith the earth is still the same kind of shape as the planets and stars because the laws of your God (universe) dictate it so
First, its not called a faith, its called science. Second, we know that the Earth is a spheroid because of empirical observations such as what I have previously listed.

>Observations appear to support a globe, but it's still not proven unless you believe the images and videos of space agencies.
You have this backwards.

>The earth is stationary.
Prove it.

>Flat torus in 3-sphere.
That makes no sense.

[Anonymous No.10409702]

>>10409675
A flat torus is the most accurate model possible.

[Anonymous No.10409707]

>>10409693
You are a survival expert.

>>10409666
>>10409702
This is the first time I've seen the flat torus and 3-sphere bullshit meme but it's beautifully unfalsifiable. And as ever you can just mix in geocentrism by changing the frame of reference. Really good job.

[Anonymous No.10409715]

>>10409684
>were on a /sci/ board here
>mathematics
Pick one. You believe the moon is 400 times smaller and 400 times closer to us making it appear the same size as the sun in the sky, due to pure chance. That's nuts.

[Anonymous No.10409716]

>>10409702
Prove it.

How do time zones work in this model?

[Anonymous No.10409719]

>>10409702
Except the images from space comport with a globe earth.