[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 70 KB, 645x729, 1500586644481.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10376745 No.10376745 [Reply] [Original]

>AI revolutionary
>AI replace all jobs by 2045
do brainlets really think this?

>> No.10376749

They'll only replace drivers or maybe some factory jobs. However, with the introduction of more automated machines in factories, there will be new jobs for workers

So, in short only drivers have to be worried

>> No.10376753
File: 3.91 MB, 897x5209, things_to_consider.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10376753

>>10376745
Topical.

>> No.10377018

>>10376745
Labour will simply adapt after a while and everything will continue as normal.

Back in the early 1800s, People were scared that the new tech could make lots of jobs obsolete. But it only made SOME obsolete. And because of said jobs' obsoletion, Demands increased for Labour that didn't go obsolete.

>> No.10377149
File: 113 KB, 809x597, ai.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10377149

>>10376745
...

>> No.10377153
File: 56 KB, 621x702, brainlet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10377153

>we must provide UBI because of AI

>> No.10377174

>>10376745
AI will become so intelligent so fast it'll replace all white-collar jobs first before the blue-collar ones because creating hardware will be slower than just software

>> No.10377186

>>10376745
>do brainlets really think this?
I don't know. You tell us.

>> No.10377191

>>10376749
>with the introduction of more automated machines in factories, there will be new jobs for workers
You might want to double-check the math on this one.

>> No.10377192
File: 120 KB, 334x346, pepe wink cigar.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10377192

>>10376745
Sorry mathfag, but your job isn't secure. Mouth-breathing autists doing formal expression tinkering most definitely are replaceable.

>> No.10377198

>>10376753
>Hur, machines don't have general intelligence like us, so that means they aren't 'really' intelligent, even when they beat us at intellectual activities through complex decision making we don't understand
>let's ignore perform such discrimination and can say that most of our thought processes aren't driven by similarly 'blind' unconscious mechanisms

>> No.10377210

>>10377149
What does "AI expert" really means, and are these not the same kind of people that have been announcing human-level software "coming in the next 20 years" for the past 40 years ?

It's the same running gag as nuclear fusion really.

>> No.10377215

>>10377198
How many intellectual professions can be successfully replaced by those "AI" without relying on a lot of human aid or supervision ?

Also the post you quoted didn't mention a very important problem, how the best-performing AI need a stunning amount of data right now.

>> No.10377223

Considering the average IQ in this thread, humans shouldn't be hard to replace