/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.10335821]

The Wonderlic test. Take the test and post your results.

68 on IQ = 5 on Wonderlic
85 on IQ = 14 on Wonderlic
100 on IQ = 22 on Wonderlic
115 on IQ = 29 on Wonderlic
132 on IQ = 36 on Wonderlic

https://wonderlictestsample.com/50-question-wonderlic-test/

Test is culturally sensitive; and corresponding IQ scores are based on averages of those that have done both. This is not an IQ test. good luck.

[Anonymous No.10335876]

>>10335821
46/50

This test is pretty stupid, a decent chunk of it is just having a decent vocabulary and being able to do quick mafs

[Anonymous No.10335881]

I got 31/50.

[Anonymous No.10335886]

>>10335821
47/50

>>10335876
agreed

[Anonymous No.10335891]

>>10335821
This would not be considered a Full Scale Intelligence Quotient.

[Anonymous No.10335894]

>>10335876
Yeah, it's not an IQ test. It's famously used in the NFL combine. It's used a lot in professional aptitude testing, because a high score is highly associated with workers who can solve problems under pressure.

[Anonymous No.10335896]

>>10335891
As stated, yeah,

[Anonymous No.10335905]

Median scores from different professions from 1983; If I had to guess I would imagine the scores a little higher to today, because, if nothing else, people expect it, and practice.

Systems analyst – 32
Chemist – 31
Electrical engineer – 30
Engineer – 29
Programmer – 29
Accountant – 28
Executive – 28
Reporter – 28
Teacher – 28
Copywriter – 27
Investment analyst – 27
Librarian – 27
Electronics technician – 26
Salesperson – 25
Secretary – 24
Dispatcher – 23
Drafter – 23
Electrician – 23
Nurse – 23
Bank teller – 22
Cashier – 21
Firefighter – 21
Clerical worker – 21
Machinist – 21
Receptionist – 21
Train conductor – 21
Craftsman – 18
Security guard – 17
Welder – 17
Warehouseman – 15
Janitor – 14

[Anonymous No.10335910]

>>10335894
In that case it is a fairly neat little metric.

None of the questions are annoying to solve or take too much effort besides some internal math. I also like the time limit, it was about the perfect time for me to finish while speeding through it quickly.

I definitely agree that equating scores to IQ like OP did is doesn't seem very fair.

[Anonymous No.10335924]

>>10335821
this test rapes people with ADHD lol, this is actually what Taleb is railing against, he's too stubborn to realize it

[Anonymous No.10335933]

>>10335924
Yeah, I struggle with the test because I find it hard concentrate, and usually read things twice to begin with.

[Anonymous No.10335940]

>>10335924
It's basically just the Processing Speed Index, with things that should really be in Verbal Comprehension Index and Working Memory Index (which aren't timed). So it's one hack of a test.

[Anonymous No.10335942]

>>10335933
Its ok its a wagie proficiency test not an autism test like the Raven's matrices or the Wechsler

[Anonymous No.10335944]

>>10335876
also 46/50, which is weird because while I was doing it I really felt like I was getting a lot of it wrong. I chose uncertain for a few of the logic questions (ex. yellow raincoat) and I eyeballed all the calculations. The word combinations seemed out of place because I wasn't sure how they expected you to handle words with multiple meanings, ex. BEAT and POUND, so I assumed they had meant for you to take the literal, most basic meaning of the word (which is also subjective..), but you shouldn't have to assume, the question should say in the most literal sense of the word, or something like that. It was also ridiculous how different versions of that same question had a different format, is that some meta-IQ part of the test where you need to quickly realize you are being asked the same thing?

[Anonymous No.10335949]

>>10335942
It's difficult for people with AS/HFA even if they have a high IQ, because they normally have a very low Processing Speed Index, even if they are highly competent for the rest of the test.

[Anonymous No.10335958]

>>10335944
For the vocab questions I thought if any use of the words lined up, they should be similar

E.g. "equal" and "level" where level can mean something is at equal heights and balanced.

I agree that they seemed a lot stupider than the other questions though

[Anonymous No.10335965]

>>10335876
>a decent chunk of it is just having a decent vocabulary and being able to do quick mafs
>abloo bloo vocabulary testing is racist against dumb people pfffft

[Anonymous No.10335973]

>>10335965
>I don't know intelligence testing actually works, and don't understand the issues with this test because I assume EVERYTHING is about Processing Speed Index.
Tell that to Einstein, nobcheese.

[Anonymous No.10335987]

>>10335965
That's quite an impressive leap you've made there.

[Anonymous No.10335995]

>>10335821
Is pen and paper allowed?

[Anonymous No.10336009]

>>10335995
Yes, but no calculators.

[Anonymous No.10336017]

Why are they asking me burger things?

[Anonymous No.10336021]

>>10335821
>How many ounces are in a pound and a half?
Fuck off with your faggot ass test

[Anonymous No.10336027]

>>10336021
I don't mind that one but how am I supposed to know the states of the west coast?

[Anonymous No.10336042]

>>10335821
As a bong Island native I found I lost time googling how many pounds there were in an ounce and wtf a nickle is.

[Anonymous No.10336047]

>nickels
>yards
the fuck is this 3rd world made up shit

[Anonymous No.10336050]

>incoming phone poster
explanation of this question

I always fuck these ones up and can't quite understand why

[Anonymous No.10336059]

>>10336050
ah wait, does is it uncertain because Julie doesn't necessarily only wear the yellow coat when it rains?

[Anonymous No.10336060]

i unironically got 20. i'm so fucking slow with calculations because i get distracted in the middle and lose interest. and honestly this behaviour is why i fuck up some exams; sometimes i know exactly how to find the answer but i can't be bothered to write it down properly and do the needed work.
any anon has a solution to my condition?

[Anonymous No.10336063]

>>10336050
Maybe they are retarded and think that "has on" is different than "wearing"

[Anonymous No.10336068]

>>10336063
I think it's more like

>when it rains julie wears a yellow coat
>this doesn't imply that Julie only wears the yellow coat when it's raining

[Anonymous No.10336070]

>>10335821
38 but damn I have no idea about anything other than the metric system and feet/inches kg/lbs conversions (because I lift but I can't build muscle), and am not a native so some of the voc questions went over my head. Still this is low. On top of it I can't build muscle. I don't have any good qualities. Why can't I improve at all? OPs IQ chart is overrated, there are already several people nearing 50, I hate myself. Also Im autistic and I have myopia. Why am I alive? When will my suffering end at last?

[Anonymous No.10336075]

>>10336060
It's not really a problem. if you find it hard to concentrate intently then you are bound to do bad on the test, it's no reflection of your actual abilities.
I presume concentration can be trained to a certain extent. Like meditation, just practice on focusing on something intensely, and noticing when your concentration has been broken and bringing it back to the task. Start off slow, do 5 minutes, and work up.

[Anonymous No.10336078]

>>10336050
Julie wears a yellow coat when it rains, but she may wear a yellow coat in other situations.

[Anonymous No.10336091]

tfw brainlet

[Anonymous No.10336093]

43/50 assuming i'm allowed to use a calculator

[Anonymous No.10336101]

>>10336093
you're not allowed to use a calculator

[Anonymous No.10336102]

>>10335821


>In the number 10,987.36 which digit represents the tenths space?


that was nasty, and it fucked me up

[Anonymous No.10336111]

>>10336060
unironically see a doctor and get tested for adhd

[Anonymous No.10336114]

>>10336068
yes, that is it

[Anonymous No.10336115]

>>10336102
hjahaahaha
>>10336111
this needs to be said ad nauseum indiscriminately to most of the posters on this board

[Anonymous No.10336116]

If you feel dumb just look at these lmao

https://footballiqscore.com/wonderlic-score-database

[Anonymous No.10336127]

>>10336115
there is too much stigma about getting meds for adhd. You don't have to take the shit every day and if you can't focus then you're shooting yourself in the foot by not

[Anonymous No.10336135]

>>10336093
>can't even take a test without a calculator
you failed before you even began

[Anonymous No.10336147]

>>10335821
30/50
That's actually not bad, since I'm usually have a pretty slow working tempo. Maybe I'm better at problem solving than I thought. I would've been fucked if they put in spatial reasoning questions though.

[Anonymous No.10336150]

>>10335821
>which number is closest to 0
>0 was an option

almost got me, i chose 0.01 obviously

[Anonymous No.10336151]

>>10336116
*ad nauseam

If you're gonna try to sound smart, at least get it right

[Anonymous No.10336153]

>>10336150
0 isn't a number.

[Anonymous No.10336166]

I should've skipped the ones about inches and stuff, cause I'm european. My actual score could've probably been like 3-4 points higher if I'd skipped those. Got 29. Not the best but at least I'm honest about it. I'm never the first to finish on tests, lot of things take longer cause my working memory is shit and I constantly need to check if everything is right.

[Anonymous No.10336183]

>how many ounces are in a poud an a half ?
retarded American measure units

[Anonymous No.10336189]

>Complete the series
4, 12, 6, 9, 8, 6...
>Correct answer is 10
31, 1031, 402, 16...
>Correct answer is 80

Can someone explain those to me ?

[Anonymous No.10336198]

>>10336189
4+2 = 6 12-3 = 9 The rule changes every other number.

I don't know about the second one either.

[Anonymous No.10336201]

>>10336189
>>10336198
Second is just addition of the digits. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.

[Anonymous No.10336208]

>>10336198
>>10336201
you guys should be working at MIT right now

thanks a lot

[Anonymous No.10336217]

>>10336201
ah shit I hadn't even thought of that. I was looking for patterns in the numbers themselves

[Tuba Jam No.10336233]

[Anonymous No.10336302]

>>10336233
>2 minutes left
>5 mistakes
90IQ desu

[Anonymous No.10336380]

>>10335876
>44/50
>tfw you are a certified brainlet

[Tuba Jam No.10336382]

>>10336302
I don't think it can actually translate to a proper IQ score at all, this entire thread is pretty bad even for IQ threads. There are much better IQ tests like https://discovermyprofile.com/myIQ.html and IQ tests with more elitist meme-value: http://news.generiq.net/ specifically http://news.generiq.net/Trilogica/esoterica.html

[Anonymous No.10336385]

>>10336050
Because the first two statements are true it is not necessary that the last statement is true

[Anonymous No.10336393]

>>10335949
22 with a childhood diagnosis of ASD. Looks like you’re right. Certainly explains why my life has been shit thus far

[Anonymous No.10336427]

>>10335821
This can't be accurate. I took this test awhile ago and got 40+, but the IQ score I got from a proctored IQ test was 123. So your scale isn't close to accurate.

[Anonymous No.10336492]

>>10336021
>>10336027
>>10336042
This. A substantial part of this test is an American culture test, rather than anything to do with intelligence. I know a nickel is a coin, but I don't fucking know what its value is.

[Anonymous No.10336929]

>>10336427
this isnt a real wonderlic test its a sample

[Anonymous No.10337269]

>>10335821
>50 questions
>720 seconds to answer
>14.4 seconds per question
>to find the answer and to read the question and available answers
There is no way someone can finish all 50 questions without guessing, especially when you have to pay close attention to trick and unclear questions. It's takes me about 2 seconds just to select the answers and click continue.

also
>yards
>feet
>western states
>declaration of independence

Fucking bullshit.