[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 377 KB, 1280x1280, serveimage(12).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10323128 No.10323128 [Reply] [Original]

Why is it so taboo to discuss the racial intelligence gap? That is to say, the difference between high IQ Jews and Asians, and low IQ whites. /sci/ is supposedly a science board, but nobody here is willing to discuss the objective racial inferiority of whites. Why do you all deny science? Pic related has gauges and is clearly not the same species as us.

>> No.10323132
File: 38 KB, 396x385, 1511889991657.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10323132

>>10323128
because environment plays a large factor too so it's all pointless unless we're going to stick babies of different races in identitcal neutral laboratories from the moment they are born just to test IQ

>> No.10323133

>>10323132
>muh enviroment

>> No.10323134

>>10323128
just shut up and go back pol/ please

>> No.10323149
File: 32 KB, 1381x623, blacks are good at coding compared to whites.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10323149

>>10323128
Because IQ tests aren't fair.
Black people are ESL and good at different things than whites are.
IQ tests are loaded with the factors that whites are better at so they make whites look better.
Make fair tests

>> No.10323156

>>10323128

Where is it taboo? Did you check the archive?

>> No.10323241

We have this thread every day. Just check the archives. Science already has the answer for you. You just believe science is covering up the truth as part of the big evil Jewish conspiracy. The truth that only some high school level retards are /pol/ are smart enough to know!

>> No.10323283

What's the point of trying to be edgy on a board where 99% of anons are also trying to be edgy?
Why don't you go troll Reddit where you can actually get some normies angry? Why post here?

>> No.10323303

This thread was moved to >>>/pol/200890393