I think I've found a way to double computer chip speed and efficiency, and half their size.

File: 104 KB, 2100x1500, biodetransratiometer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

I think I've found a way to double computer chip speed and efficiency, and half their size. Anonymous Sat Jan 19 12:24:50 2019 No.10309736 [Reply] [Original]

Hi 4chan. I'm here to talk about two circuit component inventions of mine, the Biode and Transratiometer. These inventions are silicon or semiconductor based logical processing elements, which are capable of reducing computer circuit complexity to 1/2 the original number of parts. In addition, computers may become up to 2x as fast and efficient by implementing these technologies. Check out the circuit diagrammes I've rewritten and talked about in my scientific paper.

These devices can be made the same way as diodes and transistors, for the biode and transratiometer respectively, as p/n, n/p/n junctions. Simply put, I promise you they are produced equivalently to diodes and transistors - just with a different number of outputs.

I have produced halfway functional models by modifying transistors and diodes, but I do not have the laboratory to produce real models. I come here today to look for research partners or sponsorship.

Here's the paper:

https:[//]www[.]dropbox[.]com/s/cntd1fn27jc7zeb/BIODES%20AND%20TRANSRATIOMETERS[.]pdf?dl=0

P.S. A lot of my circuit diagrammes use resistors in the schematics, but as modern computers do not use resistors so often anymore, but rather have diodes doing the work of the resistor, they can be substituted with diodes in my schematics and the reduction of parts and function remains the same.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 12:48:12 2019 No.10309771 What is your background?

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 12:49:16 2019 No.10309773

Is this a free energy type meme? Did you tried out this with a circuit design software?
Jokes aside, most of the circuit can be made with less transistors, and the transistors can be made with less components. The problem is with the manufaturing process. It is much cheaper to make an entire circuit from only one gate type (NAND), than with the rest of the gates combined.
I don't know whether they can use this technology. If you are searching for sponsorship 4chan is not the place for you.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 12:51:57 2019 No.10309782 >>10309736 how do you make logic gates with these

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:02:13 2019 No.10309799 >>10309771 why would that matter?

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:02:13 2019 No.10309800

>>10309773
I just want support and maybe to find researchers willing to help. I do believe that any of the gates used can be simplified with my designs.
>>10309771
Author, inventor, musician, physicist, chemist. Hours upon hours of reading on Wikipedia. witty-moniker.tumblr.com.

>>10309782
Simply! They are logical processing units like a transistor. The details are in my paper.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:05:31 2019 No.10309809 >>10309800 >Author, inventor, musician, physicist, chemist. Hours upon hours of reading on Wikipedia. Lol

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:06:19 2019 No.10309812 >>10309800 >Author, inventor, musician, physicist, chemist. On an unrelated note, do you know how to ride a unicycle?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:09:27 2019 No.10309816 >>10309812 >>10309809 >>10309800 >>10309799 let's stay on topic, fellows. any college students, professors, friends in the industry want to help me develop these ideas? I'll have silicon chip schematics of my barriers within a few days.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:13:01 2019 No.10309822 >>10309816 Do you know what a crank is, and what particular symptoms differentiate a crank from an autodidact?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:18:30 2019 No.10309830 >>10309822 yeah me crankin the guillotine over yo head

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:22:31 2019 No.10309841

From his blog:

>An interesting electronic/atomic phenomenon is the one based upon my noted assumptions about the trinary structure of light and frequency/polarity substituent conformities, and it declares the phenomena or principle of the connectedness of matter to singularity: by the rule that low-frequency light which has a more linear and thin range of dimensional oscillation, is the kind less likely to transfer oddly in the general circumstance to atoms; higher frequency radiation directed at any point has a higher vibrational tendency, thus further upsetting the perpendicular flow of the colliding electric fields by that tensor-based proportion of action; effectively fundamental to, but not in entirety, such abstract phenomena as the listed: the phenomenon of angles of incidence in reflective surfaces and diffractive indices. Ideally, this means that infinitely low frequencies have the highest probability of either passing straight through a substance, or reflecting directly back.

Honestly these kinds of cases make me sad. I had a very good friend in high school who started talking like this in his early twenties. He became homeless for a while until his parents bailed him out. It's impossible to get through to him.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:23:20 2019 No.10309842 >>10309841 yeah but this is a true explanation of the phenomena of non-absorptive light. so shut up please.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:26:06 2019 No.10309844 I don't see a single transfer characteristics diagram in the paper. How do you know how these components work? Is this "biode" is a diode with a wire on the end of it?

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:31:43 2019 No.10309851

>>10309844
>diode with a wire at the end of it
well, it's a diode with two electrical outputs and one input, so it could have two wires at the end of it. or lines in a computer chip.
maybe you'd be interested in creating some transfer characteristic plots for me? i mean, we haven't made fully functioning models. i soldered an extra wire onto a hand-scale transistor before and got it to work as a transratiometer, but the wire soon broke off because i didnt seal it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:45:37 2019 No.10309882 How would this work physically? What layers of dopants should be used?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:46:26 2019 No.10309883 >>10309882 Any dopant that makes the p type n type, why?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:48:19 2019 No.10309888 File: 90 KB, 568x548, 1522865860645.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10309736 woulndt voltage get halved to the extreme making it unusable? brainlet

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:49:57 2019 No.10309892
File: 427 KB, 800x1000, 1519422164122.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10309736
You're back again, you fucking mongoloid? You made this thread like 2 months ago, got chewed out for having absolutely zero understanding of what electricity is, and then got completely bootyblasted over it. Now you want more?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 13:54:17 2019 No.10309901 Did you work on this with Janeane Garafalo?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 14:15:39 2019 No.10309943 >>10309888 No? U have to look at my circuits >>10309892 Fuck you you piece of shit. You are the one who understands nothing. I will rape you

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 14:28:43 2019 No.10309979 File: 3 KB, 125x81, 1476616029096s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10309816 >>10309800 >Author, inventor, musician, physicist, chemist. Hours upon hours of reading on Wikipedia. witty-moniker.tumblr.com. >>10309736 This fucking thread.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 14:31:14 2019 No.10309982 File: 376 KB, 708x1426, Mike_Darwin_LW.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10309736 Boy have I got the perfect screenshot for you.

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 14:37:39 2019 No.10310001
File: 230 KB, 1483x674, nmos.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

op people will take you seriously if you can show the silicon structure of your proposed devices

>>10309851
>i soldered an extra wire onto a hand-scale transistor before and got it to work as a transratiometer
oh no no no

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 14:39:14 2019 No.10310006 >>10310001 I am coming up with the schematics soon.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 14:50:32 2019 No.10310028 >>10309736 No. Source computer engineering degree.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 14:52:52 2019 No.10310035 >>10310028 I don't need one. My idea is worth many billions, or trillions. And yes, I have patents.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 14:54:16 2019 No.10310038 >>10310035 why not present it to some venture capitalists? even with their cut you'll be one of the richest men on earth

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 14:54:31 2019 No.10310039 GENTLEMEN: After attempting to view OP's """whitepaper""" my browser CPU and memory usage suddenly spiked up and there's unaccounted-for Ethernet traffic; I think it's some exploit that runs a cryptocurrency miner inside your browser.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 14:54:45 2019 No.10310040 >>10309943 hahahaha

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 15:00:25 2019 No.10310052 >>10309782 read the paper.. just dont know these are better

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 15:02:52 2019 No.10310064 >>10310038 I am trying. I will attempt this. I have been in contact with a large mailing list of professors and ceos.>>10310039 No problem with my dropbox link.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 15:16:05 2019 No.10310082 >>10309842 >my meaningless unfalsifiable word salad isnt bullshit though

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 15:18:38 2019 No.10310090 >>10310082 Shut up, you just can't read complex language. Stay on topic.

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 15:18:45 2019 No.10310091

>>10310064
Venture capitalist here, and I've just been talking to the CTO at one of my investments (a VLSI startup) about your idea. He's cautiously optimistic and he wants to run some simulations.

I'd like to get in contact and maybe bring you out here (Seattle) as a consultant. We can license the tech from you or maybe offer you a share in the company.

Please respond.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 15:21:36 2019 No.10310097 >>10309842 no it isn't

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 15:22:45 2019 No.10310099

>>10310090
>you cant understand my rambling run on sentence

I understood what youre saying, more or less, its just unfalsifiable nonsense. The conjecture of an overgrown childs runaway imagination. That stilted writing style really leads me to believe you suffer from some level of delusions of grandeur. Get a grip and stop spamming here, autist.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 15:23:48 2019 No.10310102 >>10310035 Link to patents

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 15:27:20 2019 No.10310112 >>10310091 Sure! My email is in the whitepaper link on the paper.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 15:30:08 2019 No.10310121 so... what can this accomplish that a diode and a solder joint cannot?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 15:32:22 2019 No.10310127 >>10310121 U dont resolder a computer. They are better if done professionally

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:04:34 2019 No.10310204

>>10310064
You look like you have invented something for expressing something that already exists. Because to compactify circuit transistors and diodes that form gates are linked in silicon. Their circuit diagram representation and physical realisation are the different. If essentially have taken those physical short cuts and re-expressed them as new elements, embedding them within circuit diagrams. You havent invented something like the memristor which actually by its unique operation can shrink circuit by replacing sub circuits that would be required to mimic its function, and you haven't invented some new form of computational logic like perhaps stochastic computer will be. Either way your white paper if its expressing a revolutionary concept its doing in a manor too poorly to resolve.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:07:44 2019 No.10310212 >>10310204 are you saying my idea already exists? it doesn't. they are indeed revolutionary and i don't believe they are memristors.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:12:52 2019 No.10310224 >>10310212 >they are indeed revolutionary you have no proof youre lost in your delusions

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:15:21 2019 No.10310227 >>10310224 you have no proof my theory is incorrect. you are lost in YOUR delusions.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:15:23 2019 No.10310228 >>10310127 I mean if companies wanted to average out two voltages or split a voltage with a diode added on, they could just split the wire on the breadboard and add a diode onto the input, right?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:17:08 2019 No.10310234 >>10310228 no, they would have to use a biode. and splitting the wire would not work, because then you need another diode PLUS a transistor. transistor -> 2 lines = transratiometer. serialized/multiple transistor outputs -> 2 lines = biode.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:22:39 2019 No.10310244 >>10310234 ok so how do your biodes and transratiometers have gate logic?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:23:51 2019 No.10310246 >>10309800 include me in the screencap

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:25:29 2019 No.10310248

>>10310244
well, the biode can be stacked in succession to recompare the voltage outputs and function as AND gates. the transratiometer functions as an AND gate that satisfies another transratiometer in one output immediately, for recomparison, without diodes or resistors. they all function most generally as AND gates.

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:27:30 2019 No.10310252
File: 10 KB, 301x168, real_transistors.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10310212
These are how real transistors look, note how a transistor can have multiple collectors and emitters essentially making it function like components you describe. Perhaps there are alternate reasons such designs arent common in cpus relates to complexities in the foundry, even if you can produces these components getting them to work past the 10mn scale required to compete will 5nm transistor logic currently in development might be it fatal flaw.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:36:15 2019 No.10310278 So for the biode what’s the difference between just splitting the wire afterward and having two outputs?

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:40:29 2019 No.10310288

>>10310278
the current is reversible and can go from one end to another. in computers that's a big no-no, and requires two diodes or transistors to stop that.
>>10310252
my inventions are unique and you must be mistaken. there is no reason to not include my number of semiconductor inputs within most computer circuits that current use only transistors.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:51:07 2019 No.10310315 I think you should show these things to an university or something, just make sure they don't steal your ideas

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:51:56 2019 No.10310317 File: 20 KB, 759x684, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] is this a biode?

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:52:10 2019 No.10310318

>>10310288
You literally say "The biode is a two output diode .. sending duplicate signals" and describe the transratiometer as a "two-output transistor". This why schematics are necessary because if walk and talks like a duck... then it must be a duck.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:52:17 2019 No.10310319 >>10310252 also, in my transratiometer, the emitter is not in two parts like a 'multiple emitter transistor,' the emitter simply has two outputs.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:53:20 2019 No.10310323 >>10310315 Think this guy already claimed he had

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:53:55 2019 No.10310326 >>10310317 that's what my biode replaces, effectively. >>10310318 what's your idea?>>10310323 i am mailing over 75 professors and they won't answer.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:54:51 2019 No.10310328 >>10310323 then they're almost certainly producing the ideas in secret after shutting him down by calling him a crackpot.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 16:56:16 2019 No.10310334 >>10310326 Good luck and I hope they answer, if they don't try mailing smaller unis or maybe even unis from poor countries because they will grasp every oportunity they can

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:05:15 2019 No.10310347 >>10310288 >the current is reversible and can go from one end to another What do you mean by this? How is the current reversible?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:06:08 2019 No.10310348 >>10309842 Can you please describe for me what you mean when you say low-frequency light has a more linear range of dimensional oscillation? How is it different from a nonlinear range of dimensional oscillation?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:12:54 2019 No.10310360 >>10310035 >Worth billions, or trillions! >Just solder a wire onto the end of it! Lmao.

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:15:04 2019 No.10310368
File: 70 KB, 800x600, transratiometer biode npn pn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10310347
the current can go to another spot if it is blocked on one end. the biode will not allow the current to go through a resistor if transistor on the other end is blocked off.
>>10310360
i told you not to solder a fucking wire to a transistor to make these. tard.\

here is the biode and transratiometer in a chip.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:17:41 2019 No.10310373 >>10310368 what about a pnp transratiometer?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:19:16 2019 No.10310379 >>10310373 replace the letters buddy

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:21:01 2019 No.10310384

>>10310368
>the biode will not allow the current to go through a resistor if transistor on the other end is blocked off
you mean the diode? Also what’s the actual application of this? When a transistor is off, that’s intentional to give a 0 output. And if the voltage is halved on the other output this won’t read as a logic 1 either way?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:23:18 2019 No.10310390 >>10310384 when the output is halved it's between the thresholds for valid low and high logic signals, so statistically speaking it's both true and false. the instantaneous value is dependent on hysteresis.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:23:46 2019 No.10310394 File: 1.76 MB, 1440x810, yeah.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10310227

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:24:08 2019 No.10310395

>>10310384
no, the biode. a diode with a wire that splits to a resistor/another transistor and a transistor will put full voltage through the resistor/active transistor if the other transistor is not active. if it is a biode, there will be no communication between the collector and the resistor/another transistor.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:25:53 2019 No.10310398 >>10310384 wrong. a transistor output of 1 and 1 current will stack up to be too much for more transistors to compare. halving allows transistors to recompare the voltage easily, and saves you a diode or resistor in the reduction of current.

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:35:58 2019 No.10310419

Guys I’m just talking about valid high/low logic levels. Halting the voltage like that would put you in the indeterminate zone or the low zone depending. What’s the actual application of this?

>>10310390
wat this is in the right ballpark of what I’m saying but I assume you are trolling OP by trying to make him look bad

>>10310395
that’s not what I’m saying

>>10310398
I never mentioned transistors what are you guys talking about?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:38:08 2019 No.10310427 >>10310419 >When a transistor is off, that’s intentional to give a 0 output. you mentioned transistors here. try again troll.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:41:56 2019 No.10310440 >>10310419 It won't put you in the low zone because what comes out of both terminals is enough to power a transistor to half of what it takes to trigger.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:44:31 2019 No.10310446 >>10310440 And, if the collector is not the same voltage as the base, the proportion of the two ouputs in their conductance can be altered to achieve proper voltage.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 17:54:40 2019 No.10310475 >>10310446 Current, not voltage.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:15:06 2019 No.10310536 >>10310326 >i am mailing over 75 professors and they won't answer. Because your idea is unintelligible. You fail to present a use case and even your specification of the components is diffuse.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:17:08 2019 No.10310542 >>10310536 See, the beauty of his idea is ambiguity. Which he hopes the people more intelligent than him will fill, giving him a sense of validation.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:18:24 2019 No.10310549 >>10310536 this is a simple idea. i think i've described it well enough. my specification is well enough, i believe. >>10310542 i want some equally intelligent people to help me by continuing to develop and sell my idea with me.

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:26:28 2019 No.10310569

>>10310549
>i want some equally intelligent people to help me by continuing to develop and sell my idea with me.

Well, you're headed in the right direction, because if you want to find people of equal intelligence, you're better off posting on 4chan than emailing professors.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:27:21 2019 No.10310572 >>10310569 Brutal.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:30:53 2019 No.10310580 >>10310569 i know maam, 4chan sucks, but i am posting here to see what others think. a lot of people have a hard time accepting my ideas are good, but it seems they've helped me develop my idea a bit and convinced me to draw etching diagrammes.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:31:34 2019 No.10310582 From his blog: >Never seem to make the connections with people I desire the most, and it’s usually not even my fault. How can a person I most surely think could come to understand with me, judge me as unworthy? Often their loss.

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:33:22 2019 No.10310589

From his blog:

>There are four types of material forces:

>1) Geometric forces, which defines an ultimately repelling shape or boundary of influence by a functional or linear construction of ultimate directional quality, defining a particle of definite occurrence by a semantic orientation of ultimate non transcendability by which it is not miscible or transformable by other shapes.

>2) The geometrically proximal forces which repel, in a proximal, inversely proximal or instantaneous and unchanging manner, by a continuous addition or state of enactment of force from one particle to the next, but never bypassing or transcending the strength of the geometric force holding it unrelenting to its geometric form.

>3) The geometrically proximal forces which repel, in a proximal, inversely proximal or instantaneous and unchanging manner, by a continuous addition or state of enactment of force from one particle to the next, but never bypassing or transcending the strength of the geometric force holding it unrelenting to its geometric form.

>4) The force of the directional, the subtle force which defines movement in differing directions at times (which you may understand partially as inertial values): or, simply the statement of the enactment and nonstaticity, thus difference in force over the course of a dimensional direction, implying some inner property or force of the dimensional type may be discovered as having perpetuated a new dimensional phenomena of an unsymmetrical type, finalizing in symmetrical finalized measures of dimensions. The experience of rotation is the fundament of the variance in these dimensional/directional forces.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:33:31 2019 No.10310592 >>10310582 stop creepin on the low. people lead me on a lot.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:34:31 2019 No.10310595 >>10310589 dude those are very general forces, let me know if your semantic suckin ass can come up with some better ones.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:38:20 2019 No.10310604 >>10310595 Please entertain the idea that I am being sincere for a moment: You write like you have a mental illness. I'm not trying to mock you, I am honest to God trying to help you.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:39:57 2019 No.10310611 >>10310589 >I stick together clumps of verbosity into vaguety and pass it off as intellect.

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:46:37 2019 No.10310628

>>10310611
I don't think he's a charlatan, I think he's honest to goodness showing signs of schizophrenia.

>some inner property or force of the dimensional type may be discovered as having perpetuated a new dimensional phenomena of an unsymmetrical type, finalizing in symmetrical finalized measures of dimensions.

He doesn't just use terms he doesn't understand to fake credibility (like e.g. Deepak Chopra), he repeats words and phrases in totally disorganized ways-- finalizing finalized measures and unsymmetrical types in symmetrical measures, etc.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:50:09 2019 No.10310638 >>10310628 How old is he?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:53:40 2019 No.10310655 >>10310638 Looks like 20-22 from his photos

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:57:12 2019 No.10310665 >>10310317 Yo prickface I patented that idea last thread prepare to be sued >>/sci/thread/S10217956#p10220061

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 18:59:26 2019 No.10310674 >>10310655 If he considers himself son intelligent, why hasn't he gotten any of his theories published? I'm guessing he has no academic experience.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:04:43 2019 No.10310692 >>10309736 Jesus. Christ. This is revolutionary!

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:06:39 2019 No.10310699 >>10310674 >If he considers himself son intelligent, why hasn't he gotten any of his theories published? Because he's mentally ill.

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:11:13 2019 No.10310711

>>10309736
i mean this seriously OP, i hope you actually patented this idea like you said because this is revolutionary and you will make billions of dollars from it. if you were lying yu will lose out on so much money and you wont even be included as a footnote on the wikipage for this genius idea

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:13:10 2019 No.10310718 >>10310711 Not OP, I just submitted a patent. Absolutely REKT.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:14:13 2019 No.10310722 >>10310699 Very sad, at least he could write for Star Trek though.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:16:17 2019 No.10310727 >>10310718 i saved this thread, i have notarized and published proof that these are my ideas. as well as patents.

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:19:20 2019 No.10310739

>>10310727
>i have notarized and published proof that these are my ideas. as well as patents.
i saved these threads as well. i was in both of them. i have patents as well. and since these white papers really sucks and doesn't test these ideas at all, i did it at my university right before new years and added the results to my white paper. my white paper is better, my patents are better, i came up with this idea.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:21:29 2019 No.10310744 >>10310739 I'll support your patent if you give me 25% of the royalties.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:22:13 2019 No.10310749 >>10310739 no way cunt, i have proof you're a lying slutbag. what's your university?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:23:03 2019 No.10310754 >>10310749 We'll never tell, but you're about to offered tenure at the University of Hard Knocks.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:23:25 2019 No.10310756 >>10310744 They cost quite a lot of money dude.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:24:51 2019 No.10310761 >>10310754 It doesn't matter anyways because my filing date was before yours.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:26:39 2019 No.10310766 >>10310761 Actually, mine was before yours. I have proof I came up with this concept whilst I was on the toilet, back in 2015.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:28:01 2019 No.10310771 >>10310766 Bitch you are stupid. I came up with this in 2015, and if you actually try to steal my idea you are dead.

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:28:29 2019 No.10310775
File: 29 KB, 480x480, 1545766040344.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10310761
>>10310749
i won't say but i will say that my uni has a separate building specifically for electronics engineering which will narrow it down a lot. i came up with this idea. it is mine. my white paper is also better even in it's current state but i'm still working on it with my professor.

>>10310744
who are you?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:29:33 2019 No.10310780 >>10310771 >I came up with this in 2015, and if you actually try to steal my idea you are dead. Come at me, I have a surprise legal team, comprised 1/3rd by dogs, eveyone loves dogs, you're fucked bro. >>10310775 >who are you? Patent officer.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:30:16 2019 No.10310784 Hi, OP. I am rich guy looking to take over the computer market. I am emailing you a proposal to purchase all of your work for a cool $200 million. Looking forward to ruling the market with your revolutionary idea.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:31:17 2019 No.10310786 >>10310780 i mean 25% of a billion is still a lot, so i will take this offer. give me some time to finalize finalized measures aka my white paper and testing results

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:32:14 2019 No.10310788 >>10310786 Absolute boss. Looks like we just rekt Noah.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:32:20 2019 No.10310789 File: 33 KB, 500x415, 1545316769116.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10310784 i am the op, and i will not take this offer for 200 million are you kidding? it's worth much more.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:34:08 2019 No.10310795 File: 1.33 MB, 1440x1430, zlddwxjw3w321.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10310788 we have done some good work today. lets celebrate and meet up in the next thread OP makes. all results will be finalized by then

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:34:21 2019 No.10310796 >>10310789 You drive a hard bargain there friend, how about $500 million then? I can't offer more than that unfortunately.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:35:36 2019 No.10310800 >>10310795 And then we'll celebrate in peson, champagne; bow and bitches.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:36:26 2019 No.10310802 >>10310796 im sorry but i already made a deal with >>10310788 and i will probably end up making at least $750 million from that. you can still join though and i will give you 15% if you handle logistics, leaving me with a measly 60%

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:36:38 2019 No.10310803 >>10310800 >*blow

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:37:36 2019 No.10310805 File: 8 KB, 300x300, s-l300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10310800 indeed

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:37:39 2019 No.10310806 >>10310802 >60+15=75 Who's getting the rest?

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:41:53 2019 No.10310823

>>10310806
patent man is getting 25, rich man trying to take over computer market handling logistics is getting 15, and i am getting 60. i wont use it to buy yachts though.

while i have patented both ideas, the biode and the transratiomater, i will be focusing on the biode until we inevitably make an upwards of a billion dollars by the end of the year. i will then use my share of the money there to reinvest into marketing for the transratiometer since modern scientists might be too stubborn to accept the genius of that particular idea right away. i will use maybe 700 million for marketing and other such propaganda

i can perhaps give you guys a much higher share with the transratiometer profits

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:42:58 2019 No.10310827 >>10310823 R.I.P. Noah, this is how patent gouging works. Welcome to the industry!

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:47:44 2019 No.10310846 File: 21 KB, 852x480, 8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10310827 with my share of the profits for the transratiometer i will use it to make certain noah doesnt even appear on the wikipedia page

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 19:50:02 2019 No.10310851 File: 597 KB, 780x621, Business-deal.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10310846 A deal well done. I'm sure glad I took an MBA, alongside my MSc.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 20:03:27 2019 No.10310874 File: 259 KB, 500x354, 1521002306713.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] o lord what a thread this is put me in the screencap

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 20:41:14 2019 No.10310967

>>10310874
>>10310851
>>10310846
>>10310827
>>10310823
>>10310805
>>10310803
>>10310802
>>10310800
>>10310796
>>10310795
>>10310789
>>10310788
>>10310786
>>10310780
youre all bitches and if you steal my idea youre dead. i have proof from a lot of people that my ideas have been around and in print in their possession for a long time. i have proof from universities that i had this idea in their hands over 1 and a half years ago. if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say it because i will shut you down quicker than you can say 'i'm sorry' if you ever try to take my credit. my patents are getting renewed right now anyways. see you fuckbags later, unless you wanna talk about my inventions in a kind way.

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 20:43:50 2019 No.10310972
File: 576 KB, 700x700, ϛㄣϛㄣ0ᄅƖ6ϛ8ƐϛƖ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10310967
As I said, I filed for exactly this same idea back in 2015, after a spark of inspiration on the toilet.
I am a patent officer, so I shepherded it through, but am willing to drop it for my new business partner. So long as I get my tidy 25%.
Hard luck, buddy, you're done for.
What're you going to do? Actually kill us? Doubt it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 20:46:26 2019 No.10310978 >>10310967 Well you see patents aren't really working out for you, so why don't you just become a fortnite streamer? In fact how about you head over to twitch.tv right now and stay there?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 20:47:18 2019 No.10310981 >anon LARPS as a veture capitalist >”arranges” a 750 million dollar dea through an hour or two of emails What a crock of bullshit

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:00:36 2019 No.10311027 File: 17 KB, 600x600, 1493940375821.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10310981

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:03:33 2019 No.10311036 >>10310981 Bruh, it's all about speed (and cocaine) in this business.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:11:33 2019 No.10311059 >>10311036 Yeah, sure. Im sure OP got a billion dollar deal in this thread. His schizo blog makes this seem even more likely.

Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:12:15 2019 No.10311063

>>10310981
>What a crock of bullshit
seriously Noah, you need to accept it. it's our idea. i have to wait until monday to get access to my uni lab to do more testing. my white paper will probably be finish in a month or so.

and it wasn't a 750 million dollar deal. they get a percentage-based cut of the profits. theoretically, if we only make 10 dollars then we really just arranged a 10 dollar deal

but that won't happen. this will go big, and the three of us (not you) will make at least 500 million each

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:12:45 2019 No.10311064 >>10311059 4chan is where all of the high-rollers meat, there are multimillion deals being cut on /biz/ all the time.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:13:46 2019 No.10311068 >>10311063 It's going to be fucking sweet.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:13:52 2019 No.10311069 >>10311059 you misunderstand. OP is >>10310981 and>>10310967 he is mad about this deal i made because he thinks he came up with it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:15:00 2019 No.10311073 >>10311063 Yeah, sure buddy. Now go take that seroquel.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:16:45 2019 No.10311076 File: 13 KB, 248x454, 93a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10311068 it really is. there's this sushi place in hongdae south korea i want to take you once all is said and done.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:17:55 2019 No.10311082 >>10311076 Good choice, man, I love sushi.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:18:35 2019 No.10311085 >>10311073 it's our idea, not yours. just accept it. i have one professor helping me right now and a few more advisors. they see the merit in this idea, and they agree that it will be big

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:22:36 2019 No.10311104 >>10311085 I will rape your ass, you clowns are just a joke.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:23:51 2019 No.10311108 >>10311104 I'm a fucking patent officer, and since you don't already have a patent, I have a patent for holding purposes, and now we'll have a "realistic patent" too. We've already won. You've been gouged. Get over it, Noah.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 19 21:32:02 2019 No.10311132 File: 17 KB, 238x217, tw4g54w4w.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10311085 >>10311104 >>10311108 thanks guys

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 01:32:34 2019 No.10311492 Haha OP is a dumb shit. All u gotta do to make your computer chip go twice as fast is plug two of them u to the board.. haha dumb ass.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 01:40:37 2019 No.10311500 >>10311492 He is a dumbass, but not for this reason.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 03:15:24 2019 No.10311606 How do you register a patent in Europe? Is it dependent on country? Please answer me.

Anonymous Sun Jan 20 03:20:17 2019 No.10311613
File: 8 KB, 230x230, 719d33UJJNL._US230_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10310967
Noah Girouard King you lost your rights when you posted about your idea on 4channel.org.
Stop posting here or else this thread and your website will be taken down and we'll be forced to pay you a visit.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 11:13:41 2019 No.10312305 File: 537 KB, 629x466, 1357107486136.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] THIS, /sci/. This is your mind on popsci.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 11:27:58 2019 No.10312332 File: 7 KB, 250x174, q5OL30Eh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10309736 damn crackpots like you make me sad, OP pls take your pills

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 13:15:20 2019 No.10312561 based thread

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 15:34:26 2019 No.10312911 >>10311606 just google patent firms iirc it doesn't matter which country you're in, european firms are centralized (even when the UK leaves the EU) t. want to become a patent attorney someday

Anonymous Sun Jan 20 15:42:56 2019 No.10312943

>>10309736
Op, I'm a specialist of semiconductor physics, and work in one of the biggest research institute in the world.

I don't want to sound harsh or to break your motivation, but you are far from understanding semiconductor basics.

Today's architectures are way more complicated than the little "tricks" you are presenting, and involve grid patterns, multi-gate, heterojunctions, floating islands, and a lot of other things.

Even the schematics you present demonstrate you don't know what actual diodes structures looks like.

Also you lack fumdamentals in electricity, your so-called "biode" doesn't divide voltage, but rather would divide the current.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 15:52:01 2019 No.10312975 File: 47 KB, 242x242, 69859081_p0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10309841 >>10309736 what if I become someone like OP I'm so afraid

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 15:52:20 2019 No.10312976 >>10312943 This is a typical Big Diode shill trying to keep people from moving to biodes and making his little industry obsolete. >>10311063 Which country did you guys file in? I'll take the rest.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 16:01:13 2019 No.10313006 >>10309841 >He became homeless for a while until his parents bailed him out. I'm so lucky to come from a poor family so I don't need to worry about this happening.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 16:04:58 2019 No.10313021 File: 71 KB, 480x432, laugh.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10312943 Lmao, OP getting absolutely BTFO out by a professional. Hilarious.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 16:27:45 2019 No.10313094 >>10312943 PWNED No wonder why the 75 specialist op contacted never bothered to answer, his stuff is just actual garbage. Poor guy.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 16:34:26 2019 No.10313107 >>10310580 He was not being ironic, he is saying that you are dumb. Which is a fact, you have zero social intelligence.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 16:59:10 2019 No.10313175 >>10312943 I know it's technically the current they divide, but it's also in a sense a split in the voltage. Anyways, I promise you will find that they are in fact useful to computer chips.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 17:04:03 2019 No.10313189 File: 394 KB, 720x720, 1513303277894.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10312976 >typical Big Diode holy fucking hell my sides

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 17:06:22 2019 No.10313194 >>10313175 Shut up, you moron, a superconductor researcher just told you that your ideas are fucking useless.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 17:07:43 2019 No.10313196 >>10309800 *im bipolar and currently up ftfy

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 17:14:33 2019 No.10313215 >>10313194 You shut up. Plenty of people see the merit in my ideas, and cant help me.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 17:22:09 2019 No.10313228 File: 148 KB, 2048x1462, biodetransratiometercmos.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10313215 OP still, more pics of biodes and transratiometers

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 17:24:29 2019 No.10313236 >>10313228 These look suspiciously like my late father's patents. You sir are a thieving fraud and his estate will see you in court.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 17:28:54 2019 No.10313255 >>10313236 a lot of wafer sketches look alike. guarantee she hasnt seen my shit

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 17:30:53 2019 No.10313260 >>10313236 I'd recognize that villainous tone anywhere. I'll have you know your father pilfered the ideas of my late great-uncle, who worked under him as a post-doc student. I'll be claiming that right as the heir to those patents.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 17:31:06 2019 No.10313261 >>10313228 >Have loads of these complex technqiues. >I'll just stick a path on trivial shit, and claims it's a revolution! >Get you're an idiot by an actual professional. >Omg, I'm so smart! Seek help.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 17:36:54 2019 No.10313286 >>10313261 by all means, if these are not implemented in computers, there's a problem and i see it. it's a very simple invention.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 17:38:38 2019 No.10313295 >>10313286 No, because it is pointless. That's why. You're trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist, like fucking Google smart glasses. That's why it never caught on, and neither will this.

Anonymous Sun Jan 20 17:41:32 2019 No.10313312

>>10313295
Not pointless. Over on my Reddit post there are a billion trolls talking about how the conductance of the N region on my above design will allow electricity to flow between the terminals. I explained the amperage of larger pins would prevent that. Why does 4chan take a different approach to arguing? Well, everyone seems to be retarded in different ways, and this site is the worst because this thread is coming a bit short of a scientific argument to have reached any conclusions. Meanwhile more respectable people on Reddit are nicely criticising my ideas, and I am explaining how they are wrong and I'm okay with that. When you gonna game up, 4-pussy?

Anonymous Sun Jan 20 17:42:53 2019 No.10313319

>>10313255
>she
Who else but you, the transphobic research assistant who stole my father's (formerly mother) research notes as HE lay on HIS deathbed. I demand them back!

>>10313260
Your great uncle wished to keep these ideas buried and prevent any benefit from them. In the pocket of big silicon. How great would the world have been had we had biodes in the 80s? Forget about Moore's Law!

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 18:11:27 2019 No.10313421 >>10313312 >reddit go and stay go

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 19:20:08 2019 No.10313599 I did not understand figure 5. That's an OR.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 19:27:47 2019 No.10313634 >>10313599 was hard for me to understand to. i checked it out when my friend found it, i determined it was an XOR.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 19:28:49 2019 No.10313637 >>10313599 i think you're mistaking the depletion MOSFET for a regular transistor.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 19:36:20 2019 No.10313664 >>10313637 I know what as MOSFET is. I don''t know what that short circuit in the gates is trying to accomplish.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 19:37:14 2019 No.10313667 File: 136 KB, 679x492, 1546148283129.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 19:37:30 2019 No.10313669 >>10313664 this is what wikipedia has listed for an XOR for quite a while. i've looked at it. it seems to put out extra voltage, which my transratiometer can fix, but its an XOR nonetheless.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 19:44:46 2019 No.10313690 File: 18 KB, 280x275, Screenshot_20190120_224032.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10313669 I'm talking about this. There is no short circuit in the wikipedia circuit.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 19:50:15 2019 No.10313706 >>10309736 what are electrons?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 20:36:13 2019 No.10313820 >>10313690 Almost an hour, no answer.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 20:39:58 2019 No.10313831 >>10313312 please link this reddit post

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 20:40:40 2019 No.10313832 >>10313669 >put out extra voltage where?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 20:47:54 2019 No.10313846 >>10313690 hmm? that is a functional xor. it takes only 0,1, or 1,0 for O Xor. it relies on a resistor delay and the transfer of current to each base of transistor in order of the movement of voltage Vdd.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 20:54:18 2019 No.10313854 >>10313846 Explain me how a=1, b=1 results in 0.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 22:14:46 2019 No.10313978 >>10313854 Vdd goes to grnd. 2nd transistor opens.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 22:58:57 2019 No.10314048 >>10309841 I knew a guy like this too. He ended up murdering his parents.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 22:59:40 2019 No.10314050 >>10314048 meanwhile otherfags on this stupid site can't even decode my simple circuits.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 20 23:33:22 2019 No.10314130 >>10309736 I know you're real, I am just a casual-style observer so hope the part of you that needs to hear this does. Break the 4chan mold and free us all.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 01:14:55 2019 No.10314421 >>10309736 Mathematically speaking, this way of achieving logic gates would actually increase performance.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 05:06:52 2019 No.10314736 >>10313978 Then why 1 0 or 0 1 is 1? The tension is the same in both transistors.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 05:33:13 2019 No.10314766 File: 971 KB, 1626x1115, Lancaster Dodd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10309800 >what do you do? >i am a writer, a doctor, a nuclear physicist, a theoretical philosopher but above all i am a man, just like you.

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 05:35:33 2019 No.10314768

>>10309800
I thought it was a joke
>self taught on wikipedia

witty-moniker.tumblr.com
is a real website

He wrote 2 meme tier books
https://www.amazon.com/Noah-Girouard-King/e/B07MCS8XZT/ref=ntt_dp_epwbk_0

But seriosly no one will take you seriously without a degree.
>Hours upon hours of reading on Wikipedia.
Lel.

>>10309809 >>10309812 >>10309816 >>10309979 >>10310246 >>10313196

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 05:38:53 2019 No.10314770 Biodes and transratiometers, from the mind that brought you Greased Thugs https://youtu.be/OyhKIeMWac4

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 05:42:51 2019 No.10314771
File: 56 KB, 640x480, 1547545252664.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10309841
>>An interesting electronic/atomic phenomenon is the one based upon my noted assumptions about the trinary structure of light and frequency/polarity substituent conformities

What the fuck am I reading

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 05:44:55 2019 No.10314773
File: 8 KB, 188x188, Noah Girouard King.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10309736 >>10309800 >>10314768

>https://www.amazon.com/Noah-Girouard-King/e/B07MCS8XZT/

Noah Girouard King

>Author, musician, inventor, physicist + chemist, artist and short film producer.
Hobby isn't profession.

>An avid explorer of nature, I have identified numerous edible species of plants in my living area.
I can imagine the several times that you ate a poisonous plant.

>My books are laced with an exciting respect for physical nature and detail.
Your books are Science Fiction, not Science.

>Check out my blog at witty-moniker.tumblr.com for information on my latest antics
Tumbler is for SJWs & Gays. You should write your blog in Medium or Wordpress instead.

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 05:50:03 2019 No.10314776

>>10314768
>But seriosly no one will take you seriously without a degree.
That is genuinely a problem for modern science, your credentials are infinitely more important than the substance of your work.

That being said i am a 3rd year EE student and without numbers and careful calculations to support graphics and meaningless technobabble, this guys 'papers' have very little to do with actual science.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 06:13:56 2019 No.10314795 >>10309943 >Fuck you you piece of shit. You are the one who understands nothing. I will rape you Spoken like a true scholar

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 06:56:36 2019 No.10314845 >>10310851 JPG handshake images are legally binding OP BTFO

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 07:42:43 2019 No.10314929 >>10314776 OP’s dribble is exactly why people want to see credentials with work.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 07:53:36 2019 No.10314956 >>10314929 Drivel.

Vitruvian !!666fz4vFOJ1 Mon Jan 21 08:06:27 2019 No.10314971

OP, I can see what you're trying to do.

You're too late to the game.

This would have been able to work in the 60's or 70's.

Unfortunately for you, your components exist in current circuitry under different names, and are produced on the scale of atoms, for real, you can count the atoms in these gate gaps.

NAND sand chips are cheap as hell, and as long as DeMorgan's Theorems work, your designs do NOT matter.

If you think you have such a game changing component, do what you want, this won't go anywhere.

Betamax, VCR

Tertiary Computer, Binary Computer

Go look into the Moscow tertiary computer.
It outperformed all binary competitors of it's time period.

Moscow killed it.
Why? DeMorgan + binary circuits are the cheapest for MASS PRODUCTION

Your idea is arguably just a new perspective on an old idea, and requires too much headway. It doesn't have what it needs, to even tap the market, at all.

Your ideas exist in current nano circuitry under different names. You can't get your product to market, before we out scale it's efficiency again. You can not do it.

If you want a real new component idea, let me know, and I can let you into something that's more valuable than this garbage. You seem like the right person to carry a much more important electronics design issue. If you're down with pivoting, I have what you really need to spend your time working on.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 08:09:17 2019 No.10314974 >>10314956 Same thing

Vitruvian !!666fz4vFOJ1 Mon Jan 21 08:16:09 2019 No.10314985

>>10312943

Actually, if he incorporated a "floating island" in between his output pins, it could have the potential to divide both, by varying ratios. Dependent on the dopants and/or characteristics of the island.

For real though, OP's designs have been irrelevant since the first factory to start stamping out NAND IC's, right?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 10:09:05 2019 No.10315160 yikes!

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 10:57:47 2019 No.10315236 >>10314971 Not true. Youre talking about multiole emitter transistors, where the emitters are actually inputs because the transfer in the normal direction is unstable. My model solves instability.>>10314985 Same deal as the previous reply.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 16:47:24 2019 No.10316190 File: 103 KB, 500x700, download.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10312976 >typical Big Diode

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 17:30:39 2019 No.10316331 [DELETED]

>>10309800
>Hours upon hours of reading on Wikipedia.
Nothing wrong with self studying but Wikipedia are written for Laymen.

Self-study on these more advanced websites as

MIT Open Course Ware
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/

Oxford math notes https://courses.maths.ox.ac.uk/overview/undergraduate

Cornel University's ArXiv.org
https://arxiv.org/

Stack Exchange
https://stackexchange.com/

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
https://plato.stanford.edu/

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 17:32:48 2019 No.10316339

>>10309800
>Hours upon hours of reading on Wikipedia.
Nothing wrong with self studying but Wikipedia are written for Laymen.

Self-study on these more advanced websites as

MIT Open Course Ware
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/

Oxford math notes
https://courses.maths.ox.ac.uk/overview/undergraduate

Cornel University's ArXiv.org
https://arxiv.org/

Stack Exchange
https://stackexchange.com/

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
https://plato.stanford.edu/

If the sites above are so difficult for you then start with Khan Academy to review High School subjects
https://www.khanacademy.org/

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 17:34:34 2019 No.10316345 >>10316339 thanks for the references. just got off the phone with about 20 different silicon / semiconductor ceo offices.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 19:37:23 2019 No.10316701 >>10313175 >but it's also in a sense a split in the voltage That's not how it works. Electric potential difference won't change no matter how many times you split the cable. This is like electricity 101.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 19:40:00 2019 No.10316708 >>10316345 >just got off the phone with about 20 different silicon / semiconductor ceo offices. Why?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 19:40:08 2019 No.10316710 >>10316701 The electric potential two either of the two cables is split, though....

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 19:41:10 2019 No.10316714 >>10316708 talking about my inventions.

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 19:44:21 2019 No.10316721

>>10316710
>The electric potential two either of the two cables is split, though....
It isn't. You could add in a billion of new cables, but the electric potential would not split.
Electric potential is similar to the concept of distance, just because there are more paths that leads one place to the other, it doesn't mean that the distance is split between the paths.

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 19:50:02 2019 No.10316735

>>10316721
Okay, but seriously speaking, there is a potential to reach either cable and if the potential takes half the electricity to the other cable, it is splitting potential. Whatever terms you put it into though, my inventions have one physical function, and that's the right one to make things happen in EECS.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 19:52:25 2019 No.10316745 >>10316710 You mean the current Voltage is the same in parallel. Kirchoffs beta bitchboy laws

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 19:55:08 2019 No.10316753 >>10316735 >>10316710 Bruh what education do you have on electricity? I knew this stuff in high school

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 19:55:24 2019 No.10316754 >>10316745 ok, ok. but with less current on each end, it can lower voltage. but whatever.

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 19:57:08 2019 No.10316761

>>10316735
>it is splitting potential
It is splitting the current. Not the potential.
Keeping my analogy, if the Potential is the distance between two places, current are the people who wants to go from one place to the other, they will split when they meet multiple paths, but the Potential(distance) will never be split between them.
Also, "takes half the electricity to the other cable" doesn't mean anything. If this was written on a paper, it would be rejected by ignorance. Even worse it would be saying that the Potential would be split, since it would not only be ignorant, but completely wrong.
This is like the basics of the basics, the thing that they teach at high school. If you don't even know that, you have seriously no hope of actually understanding semiconductors, they are much much more complex than simple "p-material" and "n-material" with cables on it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 19:58:38 2019 No.10316767 >>10316754 >but with less current on each end, it can lower voltage No, the voltage would be the same. As he said, you can add a billion of cables, the voltage on each of them would be the same.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 19:58:47 2019 No.10316770 >>10316761 sure, true. it only splits the voltage for the current to pass through another transistor later. that's what i was talking about.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 19:59:48 2019 No.10316775 >>10316767 voltage to what? if youre talking transistors, it by default halves it to the next transistor emitter.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:01:21 2019 No.10316780 >>10316770 >it only splits the voltage for the current to pass God. You didn't even go to high school. How much self-taught are you?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:03:31 2019 No.10316796 >>10316780 that's out of context. i went through high school, and i read online about EE all the time. listen, we can talk about my inventions or not at all.

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:03:51 2019 No.10316797

>>10316775
Transistors are not a exception to the rule. Voltage does not change from one end to another. If there is a potential difference between a place and another, adding a transistor in the middle will not change that. Even a billion of transistors in series or in parallel in between those points won't change that.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:04:38 2019 No.10316801 >>10316797 a transistor has a different resistance than metal does...

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:08:24 2019 No.10316812

>>10316796
No one will take you seriously unless you start giving a decent base to start of. The very basics of the potential, current, and resistances should be enough, as long as there was at least theory validity(proof by equations), or practical validity(empiric evidence).

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:09:29 2019 No.10316814 >>10316801 This post only shows how little you know about what electricity potential is. And I literally can't think of anything more basic than electricity potential.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:11:02 2019 No.10316818 >>10316814 >anything more basic than electricity potential. Polarity? Not him

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:13:32 2019 No.10316825

>>10316812
fine, i can tell you the voltage from C to B is high (~20), B to E is a little lower(~.7-7), and C to E is high. can tell u the base is more resistant. work it out urself tho.
>>10316814
whatever man, i think of electric potential as the potential for electricity to end up there. idk about you.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:15:24 2019 No.10316835 >>10316818 Polarity is magnetic force, which is considerably more complex depending on the subject. Unless you are talking about stuff like "magnets attracts or repulses". And even then, the equation for it, would be still more complex than potential.

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:22:10 2019 No.10316865

>>10316825
>fine, i can tell you the voltage from C to B is high (~20), B to E is a little lower(~.7-7), and C to E is high
I don't think you understand how this works. You are just assuming its final working range, you are not actually describing how each of them works in an actual architecture like >>10310252.
And I don't think you even got an actual architecture, that is the same as trying to patent the Iron man suit, and just saying "He shoots lasers at 2000º from his hands", and "he can fly up to 200km/h while having an 80kg person inside". You need a diagram of its architecture? Here is a drawing of how cool it looks, it should be enough, right?
And to it off. "Now I just need someone of equal intelligence to actually build after the specifications I gave out".

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:24:08 2019 No.10316869 >>10316825 >idk about you How about using the definitions every researcher uses?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:26:30 2019 No.10316877 >>10316825 Also, just saying, even if you got the architecture down, and managed to describe its basic workings. You would still be far from having a funcional, working, and economically viable component.

>>	Ben Scott Mon Jan 21 20:28:01 2019 No.10316881 >>10309736 >4chan This isn't 4chan, you absolute moron.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:38:57 2019 No.10316921 File: 1.08 MB, 326x183, 2AE5BC64-271C-45A9-B8D4-16279911ECF9.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Great thread guys

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 20:55:41 2019 No.10316944

>>10316869
fine by me, but it's voltage, not electric potential.
>>10316865
doesnt matter, the device in theory works or it doesn't. and it works. it's not very different mathematically from the transistor, but it split the final current in two. or as a diode, it splits the current in two.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 21:00:03 2019 No.10316950 >OP: You can't prove me wrong therefore I win and my theory must be correct https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory >Scientific theories are testable and make falsifiable predictions. lol

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 21:05:32 2019 No.10316958

>>10316944
>but it split the final current in two
How? You know that simply taking out an existing transistor, and adding a split end is completely retarded, right?
Look at this: >>10310252, you need different architectures using different materials to get the desired result of having something like more emitters, or more collectors. Simply adding in more ends to an existing one would make it much bigger by default, since adding a split end too close to the transistor may affect it.
"Ignorance Is bliss", if you don't even understand how retarded what you are saying is, it just shows how ignorant you are. You said that in theory, it works, but where is that theory of yours? Where are the equations that proves that it works? You know that "if X works, then if I add Y to X, it must work too" is not proof, right?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 22:35:46 2019 No.10317107 >>10316958 no shit. i'm basing my designs off crude models that HAVE worked and quantum electrical theory.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 23:09:32 2019 No.10317160 File: 242 KB, 1280x960, meme.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] nice ideas op!

Anonymous Mon Jan 21 23:16:22 2019 No.10317171

>>10316944
>but it's voltage, not electric potential
Voltage IS electric potential. Potential refers to the difference in potential energy. Voltage and electric potential are literally interchangeable in this context, and they’re not affected by the current splitting off in the way that you’ve been saying

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 21 23:38:14 2019 No.10317218 >>10317171 it's not a good term to use. a resistor increases theoretical voltage, but it does not actually increase the power of a current to pass something.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 00:02:59 2019 No.10317250 >>10309736 This again? Have you even studied the basics since last time?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 00:06:34 2019 No.10317257 >>10316710 bruh moment

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 00:11:30 2019 No.10317265 File: 13 KB, 170x184, why~2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10309800 >Hours upon hours of reading on Wikipedia

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 00:11:43 2019 No.10317266 >>10309736 >2x as fast and efficient by implementing these technologies. >I have produced halfway functional models So yo made a normal transistor and diode?

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 01:12:24 2019 No.10317348
File: 36 KB, 400x460, 1541716198883.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10309736
>this entire fucking thread
Fucking platinum quality entertainment. I've been skimming through and laughing my ass in the last 10 minutes. How told does OP need to get before he gives up?

>>10309800
>Author, inventor, musician, physicist, chemist. Hours upon hours of reading on Wikipedia. witty-moniker.tumblr.com.
>Hours upon hours of reading on Wikipedia
Listen fuccboi, wikipedia is supposed to be a basic primer on topics that gets you into serious reading, not where you "learn things" from.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 01:20:03 2019 No.10317361 File: 56 KB, 712x498, 1536469264245.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10317107 >Quantum electrical theory

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 02:23:50 2019 No.10317457 >>10317107 >i'm basing my designs off crude models that HAVE worked That you STOLE from my father.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 02:45:44 2019 No.10317497 File: 219 KB, 320x240, 1474671548811.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10312976 >Big Diode well played

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 02:50:37 2019 No.10317509 >>10314971 >If you're down with pivoting, I have what you really need to spend your time working on. Well? Don't leave us hanging.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 05:01:22 2019 No.10317692 >>10317107 >i'm basing my designs off crude models that HAVE worked Show me the atomic configuration then. You know that modern computer transistors are at atomic levels nowadays, right?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 05:02:33 2019 No.10317697 >>10317107 >quantum electrical theory. >quantum semiconductor Do you know how dumb this sounds?

Vitruvian !!666fz4vFOJ1 Tue Jan 22 05:57:02 2019 No.10317755

When you say the electrical potential is split between the two wires, you're not directly implying that the voltage values split.

You are suggesting that the overall EMF field is stretched evenly between those points, right?

I'm pretty sure I get what you're doing with this design.

Your split occurs, relative to the space-time of everything outside of the local system of your internal component circuit.

I can see why most in the thread are not getting the general idea.

In a way, you're using EMF fields to accomplish something that we can't directly accomplish with normal massful matter.

It would be the equivalent of changing the center of gravity, for a group of massful matter, without actually manipulating or changing the layout of the matter's physical mass.

That's not possible with tangible atoms, but with EMF fields and a local circuit as the consideration... It actually CAN work.

Nice job OP, it is a simple idea, but it has a sort of brilliance to it.

I am still mostly certain that the details which hold back your idea's future are related to economics and cost to market.

It will be cheaper to continue pumping out nano scale transistors for standard compute, for the foreseeable future, unless you have not only come up with your component, but ALSO a method by which your component can be produced at scale, which will economically compete with current NAND IC production.

Even if it did, a top 10 fab would NEVER switch one of their existing contracts off, in order to accommodate your idea.

A best case scenario lead time for you, is 18 months from now, IF you get funding, AND IF you can somehow convince a fab to pick up the contract, at all.
That's pipe dream timing.

Realistically, you may spend the rest of your professional life trying to get market penetration, and by the time you do, someone will have leapfrogged you with a fiber optic/graphene black swan.

I just don't see you realistically making it to mass market, before something better does.

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 08:51:14 2019 No.10317957

>>10317755
>EMF(ield) field
>Your split occurs, relative to the space-time of everything outside of the local system
>normal massful matter
Are you feeling ok, triptard?
You do realize you're actively eroding this guy's already unstable mental health with your ironic larp, right? He's a alt-physics believer so he might just actually bite into this shit. Just leave him be- it's the second schizo thread he gets destroyed in- he's obviously unstable.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 09:06:07 2019 No.10317979 >>10317957 Thats a load of bullshit. Whether i am calling it voltage or current doesnt matter. It is ohms law. Get creative.

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 09:34:11 2019 No.10318016

>>10317979
See
>>10310589
>>10309841
>>10310582
These things are not the writings of a normal mind. Four "material forces", trinary structure of light, phenomenon of angles etc.- are you a fucking elementary schooler OP?
You obviously either have aspergers or schizophrenia. You got absolutely mangled by basically everyone in this and the christmas thread a month ago- I'm afraid you might run amok and kill/maim people in a neurotic outburst irl.

Also, being unable to differentiate voltage and current is a HUGE mistake to make- the kind of mistakes a mediocre 5th grader does on his first physics exam.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 09:46:32 2019 No.10318037 File: 298 KB, 1439x797, Screenshot_20190120-191421_YouTube.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10317107 >putting "quantum" in front of something makes it sound smarter I study quantum mathematics at my uni, I think I can help

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 09:48:24 2019 No.10318040 >>10318037 >It's 2019 and he hasn't uploaded his mind into the quantum consciousness yet

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 09:52:53 2019 No.10318043
File: 108 KB, 800x640, 1547844345303.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10318037
the women say I have a quantum dick...I never get what's wring but I am just never able to put it in.

fucking OP needs help, people need to stop stroking his dick with, revolutionary OP nice one. he needs fucking help. I have a high school understanding of circuits and OP still sounds like a fucking moron.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 10:32:28 2019 No.10318119 >>10316714 *intervention

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 10:36:22 2019 No.10318121

>>10318016
>I'm afraid you might run amok and kill/maim people in a neurotic outburst irl.
That's quite unlikely. Encourage him to get help.

OP I hear counsellers and mental health professionals are known to be really big into investing into thos kind of thing, you should probably contact a whole bunch.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 10:44:11 2019 No.10318138 I love how the ride just never stops. The Keks just keep coming.

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 11:53:45 2019 No.10318271

>>10318138
https://www.reddit.com/r/electronics/comments/ahebpq/i_think_ive_found_a_way_to_double_computer_chip/
tards on reddit are arguing with me about my ideas
some dude whos like
'i have 20 years electrical engineering experience'
must have slept on her textbook too many times
fuming at the hood with these fucking redditors
'oh ohh, resistors don't drop voltage'
'oh ohh, silicon has no resistance'
'your N barrier will share current, but it will also have runaways(current stealing'
bullshit
these people are huffing gas lol

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 12:22:30 2019 No.10318314 Now the baby is arguing that if one output is grounded, all the electrons will go to ground. Not true, if there are free electron holes in both wires, which they both will support the pulse density of the bit signals and so she is wrong again.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 14:02:42 2019 No.10318492 they think electricity always takes the 'path of least resistance' but it actually goes anywhere based on the immediate resistance

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 15:50:53 2019 No.10318702 >>10312975 this, i'm a physics student and schizophrenia runs in my family, i'm so afraid hug me pls

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 16:11:09 2019 No.10318741 >>10318702 >removes all clothes >hugs >"it's ok anon, I am here, I love you, I will protect you anon" >"SIKE FAGGOT, NO ONE WILL LOVE YOU" >become an hero on site

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 16:48:00 2019 No.10318832 >>10309736 I don't get it, why would your bidiode not just behave like a regular diode? Why the voltage drop?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 16:54:44 2019 No.10318837 >>10318832 not sure. they should express amperage. i was saying voltage drop wrong. i meant propensity for current to go in one direction.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 16:58:20 2019 No.10318847 >>10318837 Like a resistor? I'm not sure I'm totally with you here..

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:01:58 2019 No.10318854 >>10318847 Have you read the thread? I suggest you read it all and then come back to your question

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:07:57 2019 No.10318872 >>10318854 I skimmed it, but it still wasn't clear to me why your components get their characteristics, or really what exactly they do after you said you "didn't mean voltage"? I'd really appreciate if you'd quote or link this for me.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:13:46 2019 No.10318882 File: 209 KB, 638x1000, 1543436579270.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10309800 I feel sorry for you. INCLUDE ME IN THE SCREENCAP

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:19:32 2019 No.10318892 >>10318872 that wasnt me. they split current. meanwhile, redditfag says a resistor to GND has 0 ohms no matter what

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:25:17 2019 No.10318898 >>10318892 Copper wires can split current too, I'm probably misunderstanding? And why it happens is really my question.

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:27:45 2019 No.10318900

>>10318892
yeah dude, I went over to the reddit page and read like 60% of it, you got FUCKING REKT BITCH, lmao. get your dual strap on big diode ass out of here, fucking can't differentiate current and voltage/ If you can sell the retards in reddit good luck selling it to someone with a degree or an investor.
>sorry you suffered from fetal alcohol syndrome OP but dont make it our problems
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkmJ9fhovdY

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:29:16 2019 No.10318905 >>10318900 *can't

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:30:58 2019 No.10318908

>>10312943
I'm not this guy but I'm a professional and can follow his lead.

>>10313175
Without being too harsh, there is no sense in which this "Biode" divides voltage. This reply shows a basic misunderstanding not only of Semiconductors, but of basic Circuits 101.

The majority of your study isn't worth much, your PN junction layer diagrams explain your ideas well, but those ideas are wrong. Firstly, Your "Transratiometer" is not a new thing: multi base and multi emitter BJTs are already a thing, so I will just drop this as a subject. The biode, connecting two leads in the same n-well, is not practically different from connecting a cathode of a diode to O1 and O2 and then shunting the two together with a small equivalent resistance. If you isolated the n-wells from each other, that would just be the same as two diodes with a connected Anode, so again it's nothing new.

If you're being totally genuine and this isn't a troll, you're barking up the wrong tree by being hostile to genuine advice and criticism, even if some of us are harsh about it. This doesn't work the way you think, and it isn't new.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:34:25 2019 No.10318914 >>10318898 They cant split current because if one line has a resistance, the current will go the other way from the split if there is less resistance the other way.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:36:45 2019 No.10318917 >>10318908 i dont use multi emitter, because multi emitters use the emitters as inputs because they have thermal runaway problems the regular direction. my designs are different.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:38:53 2019 No.10318920 >>10318908 the resistance between the outputs, the two lines, should be high enough for the current to pass through another barrier without going back and sharing current.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:40:25 2019 No.10318922 >>10318914 But again, this is how a split copper wire would work too.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:41:14 2019 No.10318925 >>10318922 No, because the copper wire has no resistance compared to the substrate. A substrate of slightly higher resistance can also be used.

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:42:59 2019 No.10318928

>>10318917
See, this is what I mean, you're not listening to what people are telling you. This counter is both incorrect and partially irrelevant.

>>10318920
No, you're connecting two metal contacts through n-type material in both "designs". All you're doing is connecting those together by virtual schottky diodes and parallel resistance. At most the resistance would be on the order of hundreds of ohms, which is far too small isolation for any practical use.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:43:39 2019 No.10318930 >>10318925 So we are at a resistor then? I'm honestly trying my best to get this, I'm assuming there is something here I just don't get.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:47:50 2019 No.10318936 >>10318928 but the comparitive resistance of a silicon junction is in the hundreds of ohms, therefore it wil work...

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:49:11 2019 No.10318939 >>10318930 No, I am saying a split cable, one to ground, one to a transistor, will spill all the voltage into the ground because the transistor exhibits resistence.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:55:44 2019 No.10318948 >>10318939 Correct me if I'm wrong here, but you don't generally drop voltage with a reststive load on the circuit, that is very inefficient. Do you feel I'm being difficult, or are you having trouble explaining it?

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:55:50 2019 No.10318949

>>10318936
A few things. Comparative Resistance is not a thing. A silicon PN junction has a differential ON resistance of *hundredths* of ohms, and millions of ohms when off. Junction diodes aren't used for their resistance, they're used for their barrier voltage which acts, in effect, as nonlinear resistance to current flow.

Secondly, there are no practical applications where two lines, intended to be kept isolated, can be considered so if only hundreds of ohms separate them. This "design" basically as the two outputs connected, making only one effective output.

In short, this won't work the way you think it does.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:57:57 2019 No.10318954 >>10318948 >>10318939 >>10318930 >>10318925 Both of you need to stop. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 17:58:46 2019 No.10318957 >this thread I just feel bad

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:08:29 2019 No.10318984 >>10318954 I was genuinely trying to understand your ideas, I even read your paper. And you just give up and shit talk in return? You should have some respect when someone has taken interest in your personal project.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:09:55 2019 No.10318988 >>10318984 Its not like he has the copyrights for it though, the anons above already filed for them

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:16:15 2019 No.10319002 >>10318988 My question at this point would just be patents for what exactly? As far as I can tell its never explained.

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:18:14 2019 No.10319004

>>10318939
Not how a ground works. Voltage potential difference drives electrical charge, resistance in each component determines pathway. Take your DMM, set to ohms, and stick the probes in the ground. Dirt has a pretty good resistance. It’s when things go wrong in the circuit that the voltage potential imbalance becomes greater and overcomes the resistance of the planet.
I might have gotten a few details wrong (it’s been a while since the electrical engineering classes I wasn’t allowed to use), but that’s the basic idea.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:26:57 2019 No.10319024 >>10318984 I'm not op, I'm the one trying to talk OP out of his psychosis. You guys aren't helping, you have no idea how electric circuits work.

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:35:59 2019 No.10319044

>>10318948
maybe so, but i dont believe adding resistance to the substrate is needed in the first place.
>>10318949
exactly. it is off when current is discharged.
it will work.
>>10318984
again that poster is not me.
>>10318988
no they didn't because i have notarized proof i will be showing their universities. and patent apps from last year.

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:38:52 2019 No.10319047

>>10319044
"Current" is not "Discharged". You're mangling these terms. When diodes are turned off, certain technologies discharge *charge*, but in the opposite direction of what you think. Otherwise, current doesn't flow when the diode is off- that's the entire point of a diode.

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:39:34 2019 No.10319050

>>10316770
>>10316735
>>10309736
OP how do you not know Kirchhoff's voltage law? Voltage drops around any closed loop in a circuit equal the voltage gains. Thus if you take a simple parallel resistor circuit, you can easily see that the voltage can't split in half, or the law would be violated.

This is like Year 1 Day 1 Circuit Theory

>>	Principal Dean Tue Jan 22 18:41:30 2019 No.10319052 >>10319044 I represent their Universities and their Universities' interests. I need to see these notarized proofs immediately, otherwise by the principle of market overt you forfeit all right to contend these patents.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:41:34 2019 No.10319053 >>10319050 resistors pairs reduce voltage.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:42:47 2019 No.10319058 >>10319050 http://www.learningaboutelectronics.com/Articles/How-to-reduce-voltage-with-resistors.php

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:52:03 2019 No.10319070

>>10317218
>a resistor increases theoretical voltage
u what mate? resistors don't increase voltage. all they literally do is reduce current. "current sources" don't really exist. adding a resistor isn't going to change the differing charge distributions creating the voltage, it's just going to resist the flow of current trying to naturally even out the differing charge distributions

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:55:43 2019 No.10319078 >>10319070 no it raises the voltage needed... tard.

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:56:31 2019 No.10319079

>>10319053
>>10319058
>voltage dividers divide voltage
are you guys actually retarded? no shit

i never said "voltage dividers don't exist". if you idiots want to use your example, the voltage AFTER the first resistor doesn't split in half just because the wire splits into the second resistor and the load. the potential between the start of the load and the second resistor to ground is the identical

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 18:59:16 2019 No.10319088 >>10319078 holy fuck you guys are brain-dead. needed for what? what in the fuck are you talking about? >a resistor increases theoretical voltage doesn't make any sense, no matter how you twist these words

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 19:04:41 2019 No.10319096 >>10319088 a resistor raises the initial voltage needed to obtain the same voltage after...

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 19:11:04 2019 No.10319109
File: 57 KB, 645x729, pqafkb6d9ba01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10319096
>a resistor raises the initial voltage needed to obtain the same voltage after...
is this real life? if you are OP then you already know you need to seek help. if you aren't, then you do as well

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 19:15:09 2019 No.10319118 >>10319096 >minusing a number raises the amount you need to add to the difference to obtain the number you originally had >this means that minusing something actually increases a number hurr durr semantics 100/100

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 19:40:24 2019 No.10319181

The transratiometer knows its potential at all times. It knows this because it knows where the potential isn't. By subtracting its potential from not its potential, or its non potential from its potential, whichever is greater - it obtains a halving or split. The doping subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective currents to drive the transratiometer from a potential where it is to a potential where it isn't, and arriving at a potential that it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is is now the position that it wasn't, and if follows that the position that it was is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a voltage. The voltage being the difference between where the potential is and where it wasn't. If voltage is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the biode. However, the biode must also know where it was. The transratio transfer characteristics works as follows: Because a voltage has modified some of the information that the transratiometer has obtained, it is not sure just what it is. However, it is sure what it isn't, within reason, and it knows what it was. It now subtracts where the potential should be from where it wasn't, or vice versa. And by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called output.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 19:51:08 2019 No.10319197 File: 52 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10319181 mfw i realized the biode is really a 10 ton missle defence system from the reagan era

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 22:50:51 2019 No.10319544
File: 52 KB, 903x960, 1548114461149.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Typical manic. I remember when I started some powerful antidepressants in my teens I went full manic for 2 days. I could see the meaning of everything. I started seeing patterns everywhere and thought I solved the meaning of the universe. Then it wore off and I realized I was retarded. Long story short, OP is definitely bipolar. Sucks for him.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 22:55:10 2019 No.10319557 File: 2.48 MB, 200x153, 1522000372338.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I knew today was a good day to drop in on /sci/. This shit is better than climate change denial.

Anonymous Tue Jan 22 22:58:26 2019 No.10319565
File: 438 KB, 700x700, BoneHurtingJuice.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10310288
There is a reason why computers use transistors. Electricity flowing between two points a nanometers width apart is completely different from the wires you used to put the sick woofer in your old Subaru before coming here and posting uneducated schlock.
Read a fucking book.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 23:16:07 2019 No.10319608 I like to think this entire thread is just on schizophrenic EE with multiple personality disorder.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 22 23:55:51 2019 No.10319660 >>10319557 It's always a good day to browse /sci/. It's like the best crazy bits of /x/ and /pol/ with actual sincerity, mixed with serious and intelligent discussion

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 23 00:15:18 2019 No.10319696 >>10319660 Shut up you kike.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 23 08:27:17 2019 No.10320313 >>10319696 Quiet, goy

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 23 09:32:45 2019 No.10320418 >>10319565 I argue those small difference in volumes don't matter.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 23 09:49:43 2019 No.10320447 >>10320418 Stop.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math