Can anyone help me with this math problem

[Anonymous No.10300730]

Can anyone tell me how many blue boxes there will be in the tenth one

[Anonymous No.10300735]

92

[Anonymous No.10300744]

>>10300735
This.
The amount of blocks are given by the formula (n+4)^2-4-n^2, with n=1 being the first one.

[Anonymous No.10300748]

>>10300744
no retard, the formula is n*8+12
thus for n=4 (the next iteration) it's 50 blocks

[Anonymous No.10300749]

>>10300748
and for n=10 92
it's just that your formula is shit

[Anonymous No.10300793]

Thanks guys

[Anonymous No.10300806]

>>10300744
>>10300748

it's the same formula
>the absolute state of /sci/

[Anonymous No.10300845]

>>10300806
>it's the same formula
but the first one is way too convoluted, thus making it more retarded. you should always give the simplest expression as a solution.

[Anonymous No.10300879]

>>10300845
Thats the most intuitive form. Square minus square minus four coners.

[Anonymous No.10300886]

>>10300730
Corners are constant = 3*4. The mid circle expands at a rate of 4*2*x, where x is the size of the mid square.

So, tenth one: 3*4+ 4*2*10 = 92

[Anonymous No.10300931]

>>10300879
>it's intuitive to me so it's the most conscise
absolute retardo

[Anonymous No.10301078]

>>10300931
not him but it is the most trivial to see form. yours is its simplification.

[Anonymous No.10301129]

>>10300730
12+8(10)=92

[Anonymous No.10301653]

8(x + n) - 12; where n = 1, 2, 3, 4... k iterations & x = 3 for every nth iteration
So if n = 10 -> 8(3+10) - 12 = 92

[Anonymous No.10301663]

>>10300730

Before you find an answer, you must state the question.

In this case, simply stating the question will probably produce a satisfactory answer.

[Anonymous No.10301704]

Reminder that this visualization is the most intuitive. A kindergartener can look at this and understand. You punkos think they can imagine big squares and shit? My method beats yours to the ground. It is the most pedagogical and robust.

[Anonymous No.10301762]

>>10300931
Why are you being so mad by elementary tier math problem that just can have two alternative answer?

[Anonymous No.10301773]

>>10301704

[Anonymous No.10301820]

>>10301773
fuk

[Anonymous No.10302806]

44

[Anonymous No.10302814]

>>10300735
+1

[Anonymous No.10302846]

4(3+2n) ==> 4(23) = 92

[Anonymous No.10302977]

and this is why I don't do class hw's in pairs. 16 posts for a trivial answer and still managed to have conflict.

[Tuba Jam No.10302990]

>>10300931
he never said it was the most concise.

[Anonymous No.10303132]

>>10301773
noice

[Anonymous No.10303762]

>>10302806
this

[Anonymous No.10303999]

>>10300931
it’s the most geometrically intuitive, brainlet