/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.10291681]

Is he /ourguy/, /sci/?

[Anonymous No.10292996]

>>10291681
Yes

James Watson quotes:
https://liorpachter.wordpress.com/2018/05/18/james-watson-in-his-own-words/
>Some anti-Semitism is justified
>Whenever you interview fat people, you feel bad, because you know you’re not going to hire them
>Japan should be bombed for dragging its feet on supporting the Human Genome Project

>All our social policies are based on the fact that [Africans] intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really
>I think having all these women around makes it more fun for the men but they’re probably less effective
>And there’s a difference on the average between blacks and whites on I.Q. tests. I would say the difference is, it’s genetic

>There is a biochemical link between exposure to sunlight and sexual urges.. that’s why you have Latin lovers
>[The] historic curse of the Irish.. is not alcohol, it’s not stupidity.. it’s ignorance
>People say it would be terrible if we made all girls pretty. I think [doing so by genetic selection] would be great

>The one aspect of the Jewish brain that is not 1st class is that Jews are said to be bad in thinking in 3 dimensions.. it is true
>Women are supposedly bad at 3 dimensions
>People ask about [Rosalind Franklin] and I always say ‘autism'

>[Francis Crick] may have been a bit autistic
>Indians in [my] experience [are] servile.. because of selection under the caste system
>Women at Oxford and Cambridge are better than Harvard and Yale because they know their job is to look pretty and get a rich husband
>People who have to deal with black employees find [that they are equal] not true

>East Asian students [tend] to be conformist, because of selection for conformity in ancient Chinese society
>[Linus Pauling] was probably always half-insane
>Anyone who would hire an ecologist is out of his mind

>[Rosalind Franklin] was a loser
>Disabled individuals are genetic losers
>My former colleagues are pinkos and shits

[Anonymous No.10293015]

based granddad

[Anonymous No.10293562]

>>10291681
He is definitely/ourguy/

[Anonymous No.10293570]

I’m lowkey bleeding heart libtard but I like the candor

[Anonymous No.10293581]

>>10291681
no one else could be

[Anonymous No.10293613]

He stood for the truth against the anti-Science establishment. He's a hero.

[Anonymous No.10293621]

>>10291681
>>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.10293642]

>>10293621
>defending the censorship of scientific research because of political views

You are in the wrong board.

[Anonymous No.10293644]

>>10291681

No.

[Anonymous No.10293647]

>>10291681
A literal saint.

[Anonymous No.10293655]

>>10293642
I was responding to the implication of "/ourguy/". Don't be so triggered.

[Anonymous No.10293667]

>>10292996

so he's pretty much a moron

[Anonymous No.10293707]

>>10291681
DOWNVOTED
>>10293644
>>10293621
>>10293667
UPVOTED

[Anonymous No.10293715]

The greatest hero of science in this decade.

[Anonymous No.10293755]

>>10291681
We are not /pol/. /ourguy/ is either Mochizuki or Perelman.

[Anonymous No.10293775]

>>10293755
Speak for yourself, faggot.

[Anonymous No.10293784]

>>10293755

[Anonymous No.10293821]

>>10293755
>I fucking loving marxist science
>*denies genetics* (human race & sex differences)
>*denies evolution* (whites evolved from blacks)
>*denies statistics* (race correlation with poverty and crime)

[Anonymous No.10293824]

>>10291681
>we have evolved to have very noticeable physical differences
>but it's totally impossible to have even a slight difference in intelligence, goy

[Anonymous No.10293842]

sure is. its a crime what happened to him

[Anonymous No.10293892]

>>10293824

[Anonymous No.10293909]

>>10293621
>>10293644
>>10293667

[Anonymous No.10294095]

>>10291681
Yes he is

[Anonymous No.10294098]

>>10291681
He is

[Anonymous No.10294104]

>>10291681
He most certainly is my guy.

[Anonymous No.10294114]

I support him just to piss off the libshits. He's the Trump of the life sciences, except even more non-PC.

[Anonymous No.10294130]

>In a similar way another psychiatrist who read Honest Jim, said that what emerged most strongly was your love for your sister. This was much discussed by your friends while you were working in Cambridge, but so far they have refrained from writing about it, I doubt if others will show this restraint.
--Francis Crick

https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/access/SCBBKN.pdf

[Anonymous No.10294588]

>>10291681
/our/ /sci/entist

[Anonymous No.10295435]

>>10291681
Intellectually honest to a very impressive level. I hope that I can hold myself to the same standards in my life. He's right, but even if he were wrong it takes immense integrity to challenge what the entire system pushes to be 'true'. A modern Galileo in that way, punished for daring to challenge the status quo, he'll be remembered as an even greater scientist and pioneer in the future when people realize he was the one guy standing for the truth against the masses of 'scientific' insanity.

[Anonymous No.10296041]

>>10295435
No he will be forgotten. The kikes have a stranglehold over science and it will continue to slowly degrade to the point where it's solely a platform to push their globalist agenda. It's already started, kids are being brainwashed from the getgo in overly leftist universities, where feeling are more important than facts. There's no stopping modern (((science)))

[Anonymous No.10297135]

>>10291681 >>10292996
based

[Anonymous No.10297157]

>>10292996
He's Anglo right, bantz must be hereditary also..

[Anonymous No.10297163]

>>10296041
2 of my TAs were anons...

[Anonymous No.10297182]

>>10297163
and?

[Anonymous No.10298507]

bump