[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 397 KB, 1152x594, 2D4DEECB-A667-46A0-B06C-722F122DD2C9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10246987 No.10246987 [Reply] [Original]

Gravity. Visualised

>> No.10246997

>>10246987
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRijc-AN-F0

>> No.10247022

>>10246987
Woah this is a really cool explanation. Thanks, I’ve never seen this before OP!

>> No.10247045

>>10246987
Did you invent this OP? It's really genius. You should patent it.

>> No.10247072

>>10246987
big if true

>> No.10247317

>>10246987
Can we audialize it somehow?

>> No.10247338

>>10246987
>let's explain gravity using a metaphor that relies on gravity

Fucking genius. This has to be the most harmful physics analogy of the 20th century.

>> No.10247339

>>10246987
Gravity wells don't work in 3D.

>> No.10247383

>>10246987
>looks up
wtf, gravity is gone now

>> No.10247392
File: 21 KB, 355x345, stupididea.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10247392

>>10246997
>>10247338
>why are you using gravity to explain gravity!
how fucking idiotic do you have to be to think this is at all an issue
it's completely tangential
you could literally go under the fabric and pull on it somewhere, and the same thing would happen when you rolled the balls around but with no effect on the demonstration

>> No.10247395

>>10247317
I want to taste gravity.
How can we understand it if we don't know what flavor it is?

>>10247339
gravity wells in 3d space extend across the W-dimension in 4d space.

>> No.10247403

>>10247395
>gravity wells in 3d space extend across the W-dimension in 4d space.
Impossible, they can't even exist in 3d space in the first place.

>> No.10247620

>>10247403
Explain

>> No.10247641

>>10247338
You are a dumb pseud. Fuck off back to pol.

>> No.10247642

>>10247339
Yes they do.
Imagine the space being sucked up and compressed into matter, leaving stretched space all around it.

>> No.10247648

>>10247392
It won't work without gravity Wtf you talking about.

>> No.10247713
File: 240 KB, 600x431, f actual.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10247713

>>10246987
Existence's dimensions are longitude, latitude,
field: redshift: time going backwards,
and attraction: blueshift: time going forwards.
Luminal porosity allows fields to cause attraction.
Attractions redshift AKA break up bodies into omnidirectional fields.

>> No.10247738
File: 92 KB, 730x576, Deepening_gravity_well[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10247738

>>10247620
See pic related, notice it uses a 2D plane for the gravity wells. Now imagine the space-time in 3D.

>> No.10247741

>>10247642
Doesn't create a well.

>> No.10247750

>>10247392
>>why are you using gravity to explain gravity!
I ( >>10246997 ) never said that.

>> No.10247764

>>10247741
The well is just a method of explaining it to children

>> No.10247771

>>10247764
There's no other method.

>> No.10247884
File: 14 KB, 230x219, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10247884

>>10247738
>Now imagine the space-time in 3D.

Ok, now what?
Also, pic related in reality has a cork screw effect going on due to the rotation of the Earth, but is otherwise pretty accurate.

>> No.10247891

>>10247884
So space-time is a grid of strings a few thousand miles apart?

>> No.10248083

>>10247891
No, its a visual representation that in this case shows the relative force direction and strength towards the center of gravitational pull.

>> No.10248412

>>10247750
i was quoting the idiotic question he answered in the video, brainlet

>> No.10248414

>>10247891
how can you possibly be this stupid?

>> No.10248784

>>10247884
Dimensions are not cuboid but spherical.
Longitude, latitude,
field: redshift: time going backwards, and attraction: blueshift: time going forwards.
Luminal porosity allows fields to cause attraction.
Attractions redshift AKA break up bodies into omnidirectional fields.

Existence is pure 1:1 hemidimensional math.
Field longitude has ∞ and field latitude has .5∞ which is .5∞^2 inward dimensions.
Attraction longitude has ∞ and attraction latitude has .5∞ which is .5∞^2 dimensions.
There are a min of 4, 2 surface position and 2 "temporal" *vectorial*, and a max of ∞^2 dimensions.

i.4cdn.org/sci/1545955461322.png

>> No.10249173

there is no gravity i've never seen proof where's the proof?

>> No.10249191

Superior demonstration coming through
https://youtu.be/jlTVIMOix3I

>> No.10249200

>>10247338
>tips fedora

It actually is a very good analogy to help people get a basic concept of the geometry of space with gravity. An orbit is after all a 2d concept, albeit embedded in 3d. It doesn't take a huge leap of the imagination to generalise the process above to 3d space. It's a good geometric introduction.

>> No.10249220

>>10246987
Could have just bought an onahole.

>> No.10249267

Friendly reminder that no one knows what gravity is or where it comes from.

Observing effects is not knowing origin.

>> No.10249284

>>10249267
"Gravity" is vectorial field attraction AKA Turnover.

>> No.10249287

>>10246987
>Gravity. Visualised

this visualisation is for very young people and/or for very normies people

>> No.10249291
File: 166 KB, 1200x1000, 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10249291

>>10249284

>> No.10249302

>>10249291
(Part 1/3)
a "field":
A "particle" blowing out pieces of itself that suck whatever they pass through in.
Whatever they pass through are objects with luminal porosity.
This process of turnover fuels intactness. Objects are fueled intactnesses.
"Time" is made of vectors all of which require intact singular objects to move. Things don't stop being objects just due to tininess. Things can move as one, move apart: out, or move together: in. Moving into a mass or apart is separate movement.
Fields are just tiny bodies that can pass through things as they're like scaffolding for something that small. Objects blow out "fields" that slip through what they attract. Fields is a word INT 2's that fail to fathom how everything is physical use.
Objects blow out "fields" that slip through what they attract. All forces both carry & are carried by objects. "Electrons" are just little objects. Electrons are masses. "Fields" are omnidirectional streams of little objects. All objects are masses. Masses are an active blood fueled process of vectorial turnover. Engines cause replacement fuel to rush in to fill what would be a void which is impossible. "Space" is a fluid of bodies that slip past each other due to weak cohesion.
There are NO gaps just an infinite range of sizes of bodies down to buffers that serve as infinitesimal spherical volumes: the actual "pixels" of existence.
Vectors are made of inward vectors whose opposing halves are vectors which are made of inward vectors. Masses are vectorial inwardnesses.
Stillness is impossible because all things are vectorial turnover. Read the 1st 5 words. Those 1st 5 words mean "time" moves in ALL directions.
If you could stop these vectors in their tracks then everything would disappear. Solidity is solidarity. Solidity is hardness. Hardness is solidarity.
Objects are dicks whose solidarity is fueled by the blood that anyone w/ weaker cognitive ability than David Ross Garrett calls space or spacetime.

>> No.10249304

>>10249291
(Part 2/3)
Due to inadequate bloodflow & excessive pressure an object's inner structural volume breaks out as a "field"
that causes things with luminal porosity which it passes through to shift inward replacing what radiated out of it.
This is the literal answer to everything.

a "particle": an OBJECT: a MASS

Vectors are made of masses and masses are made of vectors.
Fields are outward vectors. Attractions are inward vectors.
ONLY our familiar scale lacks a nucleus of inward vectors breaking down into a field of outward ones.
"Protons" don't exist, they are where "electrons" which are masses like everything breaking down and out as a field.
Anything fields pass through shifts inward.
Magnets push what resists the passage of its field like sail to wind, attract anything it passes through,
and are neutral to things where as much is resisted as passes through.
If you took a volume and made it disappear everything around it would shift inward.
A mass IS THE VOLUME there, not an occupant of it. When it becomes a field all around shifts inward.
"Space" is BLOOD that sustains the dicks that are masses in an active vectorial process of turnover.
"Space" is a fluid of bodies that slip past each other due to weak cohesion.
There are NO gaps just an infinite range of sizes of balls that are all in surface contact will each other
and slip past each other due to their fields repelling instead of passing through.
Everything can move or it doesn't exist. To move a thing must accelerate, to accelerate a thing must be a mass.
Vectorial phenomenolgy will be confirmed and your mess of jigsaw pieces will look ridiculous. There are not your other non physical things you consider scientific.

Every volume is a mass with varying levels of unity: solidity: oneness: solidarity.
A thing doesn't move as one unless there are active attractions between its parts. "Stillness" would disperse if disturbed.

>> No.10249307

>>10249291
(Part 3/3)
The attractive force of a mass is determined by how much turnover into a luminal field it is, not a property called mass.
Fields are what masses destruct into due to the test of being forced together in conflict.
To actually travel straight a thing must zigzag or spin. Attempting to travel straight causes, eventually circular, veering.
To actually turn right you must also turn left as much.
To actually stay the same *stay intact* you must replace all your vectors in a process of turnover.
To actually change and be a chaotic fluid like space you must not replace anything.
To actually "create" *bring together* you must "destroy" *disperse* as much.
To actually "destroy" DISPERSE you must "create" BRING TOGETHER as much (combatants into conflict).
A thing is just nothing in two places and if you bring them together in conflict
they make like the Gingham Dog v. the Calico Cat and fly apart into a field that causes all it passes through to shift inward.
You are creating "gravity" *all attractions* by fighting our forward antientropic vectors.

A thing doesn't move as one unless there are active attractions between its parts.
"Stillness" would disperse if disturbed.

You're stupid as hell to dismiss Vectorial Phenomenology as "little pedestrian bricks"
just like any invertebrate that fails to disclose their full name.

>> No.10249309

>>10249302
>>10249304
>>10249307
tldr brainlet

>> No.10249311

>>10249191
>>10247884
The space time in his model wraps otherway then this other explanation says, arent they in contradiction ?

>> No.10249313

>>10247392
>if you pull on the cloth the balls would magically roll towards it gravity isn't needed

>> No.10249391
File: 356 KB, 900x431, tree planet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10249391

>>10249291
>>10249309

>> No.10249431
File: 677 KB, 1024x775, 1529546940488.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10249431

>>10249391

>> No.10249445

>>10249431
Fabric is flat. Turnover is deep.

>> No.10249456

>>10249313
How about magnetism friendo.

>> No.10249460
File: 365 KB, 494x494, 1545312933535.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10249460

>>10249445
>>10249456

>> No.10249509

>>10249456
"Magnets" repel by blocking vectorial fields like sails block wind.
They attract because the volume between them is being spewed out as a field.

>> No.10249636

>>10249431
This is only an issue in the context of a heliocentric view of what the stars are.

>> No.10249638

>>10249460
Can you find that 14 hours flight path on google?

>> No.10249649
File: 381 KB, 1638x2048, motion.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10249649

>>10249509
>>10249636
>>10249638

>> No.10249672

>>10249649
Globe's atmosphere next to the vacuum of space breaks the law of entropy.

>> No.10249689

>>10249672
Everything can move or it doesn't exist. To move a thing must accelerate, to accelerate a thing must be a mass.

>> No.10249797
File: 37 KB, 555x585, comment_rOAiseEIedgzUKbVoz5WDSW0IY78U0fE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10249797

>>10249672
>Globe's atmosphere next to the vacuum of space breaks the law of entropy.
No it doesn't you fucking retard. Show /sci/ again your grade-school level of understanding of what entropy is with the same 3 pictures you continue to post

>> No.10249801
File: 36 KB, 629x504, 1519330507257.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10249801

>>10249689
>light has mass

>> No.10249804

>>10249801
light has energy which has a mass equivalent. It's the absolute lowest amount of mass a "particle" could have but it still has mass.

>> No.10249813
File: 56 KB, 621x702, vO7lRZ7.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10249813

>>10249804
>it still has mass.

>> No.10249822

>>10249804
>>10249689
>>10249672
>>10249649
>>10249638
>>10249636
>>10249509
>>10249460
>>10249456
>>10249445
>>10249431
>>10249391
>>10249313
>>>/x/

>> No.10250275

>>10246987
this thread. Again.

>> No.10250622

>>10249822
You're dumb as hell to not accept vectorial Hemism. It answers everything.

>> No.10250858

>>10246987
Normalfag here.

I see gravity as a series of energy lines connecting two objects. 2d or 3d does not matter. These lines are representing the sum gravaton (or whatever particle carries gravitational attraction) interaction between the two objects. Strength of the interaction can be in line brightness, colours, whatever.

So a group objects gravitational relationships can be reduced to an image representing these lines and how they change over time overlaying positions of the objects.

>> No.10250881

>>10247891
Shaddup

>> No.10250887

>>10250858
Nah m8 you probably have autism.

>> No.10250901

>>10246997
How’s string theory Brian

>> No.10251035

>>10247317
*drawn-out descending slide whistle followed by cymbal*