[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 43 KB, 500x281, heh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10241736 No.10241736 [Reply] [Original]

Prove that 2π>6 without using a single word or mathematical symbol.

If you can't, you're officially a brainlet

>> No.10241741
File: 10 KB, 500x500, circle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10241741

>>10241736

>> No.10241744

>>10241741
yes and? this proves nothing so far

>> No.10241746
File: 3 KB, 226x217, 2pi vs 6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10241746

>> No.10241749

>>10241746
can someone explain this to me? brainlet here

>> No.10241751

>>10241744
Brainlet

>> No.10241764

>>10241749
2pi is the circumference a circle and the hexagon has 6 sides

>> No.10241766

>>10241746
OP BTFO

>> No.10241768

>>10241749
if you spread out both figures into a straight line, the perimeter of the hexagon will be smaller than the circle's. since he circle is based on the hexagon, the perimeter of the circle is 2piR, the perimeter of the hexagon is 6R. the radius cancels out, so 2pi is greater than 6

>> No.10241777
File: 7 KB, 244x243, 2pi vs 8.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10241777

>>10241746

>> No.10241783

>>10241777
You can't fit a regular octagon with a sidelength of 1 into a unit circle.

>> No.10241790

>>10241783
My point was that the hexagon picture doesn't prove that you can fit a regular hexagon with a sidelength of 1 into a unit circle

>> No.10241797
File: 94 KB, 850x531, __patchouli_knowledge_and_remilia_scarlet_touhou_drawn_by_terimayo__sample-ad96284c916a2e5c6b26afd100f16342.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10241797

>>10241790
Yeah, but if you put all the circles the image becomes a huge mess.

>> No.10241872 [DELETED] 

>>10241746
REKT

>> No.10241880
File: 193 KB, 870x260, 6.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10241880

>>10241736

>> No.10241881

>>10241880
ding ding ding

>> No.10241890

>>10241736
Please kill yourself

>> No.10241899

>>10241880
way too complicated, see the one with the hexagon
>>10241890
brainlet

>> No.10241900

>>10241880
>>10241881
How is that a proof? It just asserts that 2pi > 6. There's no way to make sure that the animation is correct

>> No.10241906

>>10241900
>There's no way to make sure that the animation is correct
What does this even mean. Either you accept this sort of graphical "proof", or there is no proof of this sort at all.

>> No.10241908

>>10241906
It means that gif doesn't prove shit

>> No.10241912
File: 164 KB, 1500x1000, IMG_20181010_162504.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10241912

>>10241881

>> No.10241914
File: 38 KB, 960x640, 1505195660127.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10241914

>>10241908
Nothing really proves anything.

>> No.10241915

>>10241906
>>10241908
To add, I think graphical proofs are possible, but that gif just asserts that the circle has >6 circumference. Adding a rolling animation doesn't make it a proof

>> No.10241919
File: 22 KB, 187x255, Pi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10241919

>> No.10242000

>>10241915
You gotta assume some geometric definition of pi to allow for a graphical proof. So what's the one you'll grant here?

>> No.10242094
File: 1.66 MB, 3264x1836, 20181225_155638.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10242094

>>10241797
>get home
>no one has done it yet

>> No.10242096

>>10242094
anon, I...
>>10241746

>> No.10242097

>>10241746
HOLY FUCKING BASED

>> No.10242101

>>10242094
>he needs circles to see that the hexagonal side lengths are equal to the radius
it's obvious, anon

>> No.10242107

>>10242096
>>10242101
>what is context

>> No.10242115
File: 4 KB, 87x85, a.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10242115

>> No.10242120

>>10242094
We're too busy with nontrivial problems but you're right only engineers could be smug about these elementary questions

>> No.10242132

>>10242120
>smug about elementary questions
>op literally states you're a brainlet if you can't do it

>> No.10242173

>>10241768
how do you know the perimeter of the hexagon is 6R?

>> No.10242182

>>10242094
this is the only correct answer so far

>> No.10242187
File: 33 KB, 408x406, duhhhduhhh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10242187

>>10242173
How do you not know that? It's just a bunch of equilateral triangles. lmao.

>> No.10242189

>>10242096
No. Yours doesn't prove you can fit a hexagon all the sides of which are of length 1.

>> No.10242192

>>10242187
Picture doesn't show that triangles are equilateral.

>> No.10242195

>>10242189
this btfos you >>10241777

>> No.10242198

>>10241736
The proof is trivial.

>> No.10242201
File: 36 KB, 1000x864, scale-clipart-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10242201

>> No.10242215
File: 5 KB, 1059x612, penis.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10242215

>> No.10242365

>>10241777
Side length isn't equal to radius in that picture, retract your claims of btfo.

>> No.10242367

>>10242201
based

>> No.10242373
File: 14 KB, 364x402, 1536608802783.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10242373

Engineer undergrad comin through this counts because I only used words and wolfram did the rest.

>> No.10242392

>>10242373
Based and wolframpilled

>> No.10242396

>>10242373
If Wolfram tells you 2+2=5, will you believe it?

>> No.10242400
File: 15 KB, 413x413, 1523435137776.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10242400

>>10242396
No because it's wrong, and wolfram doesn't do that anyways.

>> No.10242411

>>10242182
>>10242094
doesn't prove anything, sketches aren't proof

>> No.10242422

>>10242396
No. I don't believe wolfram would tell me 2+2=5

>> No.10242501
File: 124 KB, 472x455, 1540248633492.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10242501

>>10241736
for every circle 2piR = C
so for 2pi to equal c you need
2pi equal c/R
so you need pi=c/r/2
or 2c/r=pi
or radius equals 1/2pi *rad
it's impossible
nonsense

>> No.10242510

>>10241736
i just figured it out godamnit
2*3.14(etc) > 6
you nigger

>> No.10242531
File: 43 KB, 355x340, ck_56ec1aa5a2696.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10242531

>>10241736 >>10241746 >>10242115

>> No.10242549 [DELETED] 

>>10241749

Explaining my post :>>10242531

Each triangle has area R2/2
6 triangles have area 3R2
the circle has area πR2

In >>10242531's pic
we can notice that
πR2 > 3R2
i.e the circle is larger than the 6 triangles

dividing by R2 on both sides
π > 3

multiplying by 2 on both sides:
2π > 6

>>10242531 proves without using words.

>> No.10242596
File: 45 KB, 355x600, f.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10242596

>>10242531

>> No.10242608
File: 17 KB, 355x600, g.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10242608

>>10242596

>> No.10242611

>>10242608
holy kek

>> No.10242636

>>10241736
Just measure the fucking circumference, lol.

>> No.10242697

>>10241777
how does one miss the point this badly?

>> No.10242750

>>10241777
Here you proved that 2pi > x > 6, where x is the length of the perimeter of an octagon set in a circle such that the vertices lie on the circle. Which still proves 2pi > 6 I guess, just not as clearly as the hexagon.

>> No.10242767

Define “pi”

>> No.10242779

>>10242767
>econfag spotted
god I hate these fucks so much
they use pi as a variable sometimes

>> No.10242820

>>10241736
Circles are like pies and so if I draw two next to each other (think balls touching), then they look like (i.e., imply) an infinity symbol, which implies a number greater than six. I've used words to convey this but the circles aren't words or symbols, they just imply all of this indirectly.

>> No.10242855
File: 224 KB, 1000x1353, __remilia_scarlet_touhou_drawn_by_no_kan__dcc84fd870ceaa492872b296f26534ae.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10242855

>>10242779
>"let [math] \pi _t= \frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}} [/math], where [math] P_t [/math] indicates the price level at the period t"
>physicsfags and enginnerfags start having seizures

>> No.10242892

sin(x) < x

, set x= pi/6 and you are done

lmfao at all the subhuman engineers in this thread

>> No.10242896

>>10242892
Based first grade illiterate poster.

>> No.10242899

>>10242896

implying a hexagon is not a mathematical symbol

LMFAO do not reply to me again you fulltime brainlet

>> No.10242901

>>10242899
Based first illiterate reddit spacing poster.