Dropping birth rates

[Anonymous No.10195160]

How do we fix the dropping birth rates all over the world?
Even Africans are having fewer children.
We can't let this happen. At this rate every "race" is going extinct. Even black people.
It's not actually white genocide. It's genocide of everyone.
We need to make it a more attractive to have children somehow.

[Anonymous No.10195162]

>>10195160
Nothing wrong with this. People finally realized that life is fucking shit and no one should bring more people to this world.

[Anonymous No.10195166]

Birthrate of 2 with 0 child mortality means stability, not extinction.

[Anonymous No.10195168]

>>10195166
Fertility rate*

[Anonymous No.10195188]

>>10195166
That's because of immigrants who come and get their standard of living increased and then gradually taper off again. I really doubt it's going to stay stable at 2

[Anonymous No.10195190]

>>10195160
Intersolar Lebenstraum

[Anonymous No.10195191]

>>10195166
>Keep population stable
>War/disease happens
>Population drops and doesn't recover because the rate is always 2
>No surplus humans to sacrifice for science or space colonization

[Anonymous No.10195205]

>>10195160
Africa’s population is going to continue to grow for the next 50 years so we should allow their birth rates to plummet, and we should start sterilizing and euthanizing them while we’re waiting for their broods to slow down.

Whites and Asians live in dysgenic environments that disincentivize breeding, so nothing can be done.

[Anonymous No.10195214]

>>10195160
Natural selection will gradually cause fertility rates to rise again. The problem is that in the process, the world will turn into an idiocracy run by religious fundamentalists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYEyv5a_3LM
https://phys.org/news/2011-01-religiosity-gene-dominate-society.html
https://futurism.com/genetic-idiocracy-genes-associated-with-high-education-are-becoming-rarer/
https://www.unz.com/isteve/cochran-harpending-paper-on-amish/
https://www.unz.com/jman/liberalism-hbd-population-and-solutions-for-the-future/
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/stupid-people/
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/short-history-of-3rd-millennium/
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/not-sending-their-best/
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/nor-breeding-their-best/
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/paper-review-icelandic-dysgenics/
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/dysgenic-deutschland/
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/cicerone-on-dysgenic-decline/
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/frito-effect/

[Anonymous No.10195221]

>>10195214
Its already becoming idiocracy, g is falling pretty steadily in the west and even places like Sudan and Brazil

[Anonymous No.10195237]

>>10195160
>post yfw the great filler is birth control

[Anonymous No.10195238]

>>10195214
we should put in incentives to decrease the population on welfare, maybe only single children can receive welfare, children of professors get free tuition, housing(encourages growth of intelligent population)

i know none of this will happen though all the smart people don't have many children

[Anonymous No.10195243]

the dumb will inherit the earth

[Anonymous No.10195277]

>>10195238
This would stop poor people from breeding excessively, but it wouldn't stop religious fundamentalists from breeding excessively.

[Anonymous No.10195285]

>>10195160
you can help by pouring gasoline on your stupid balls and lighting them.
ty for leaving the gene pool

[Anonymous No.10195286]

>>10195160
OH NO
HOW WILL THE ECONOMY GROW?!?!
WE ABSOLUTELY CANNOT DO WITHOUT ECONOMIC GROWTH!!!

[Anonymous No.10195291]

>>10195214
Replacing all europeans from the Americas with Amerindians will solve this problem, knowing that Amerindians have more civilization potential than europeans.

How is this hard to get?

[Anonymous No.10195314]

>>10195166
actually if you account for accidents and such, you need a birth rate of about 2.3 per family to mantain a balance

[Anonymous No.10195319]

>>10195160
Women are not stupid they are waiting for artificial womb or maybe even reconstructive surgery that allows for women to go back to pre pregnancy body after they deliver

[Anonymous No.10195359]

>>10195191
Eh, that's kinda a stupid assessment when looking at history.
Wars tend to create boom generations, and a global pandemic could just as easily.

[Anonymous No.10195373]

>>10195160
The UN projects that it is possible that we will not even reach 10 billion before the fertility rate reaches replacement level. I don’t know why but for some reason it saddens me, like mankind has hit a great cap for the first time

[Anonymous No.10195381]

>>10195373
That would be a tragedy of epic proportions. Economic growth would end.
Or maybe the UN is just making stuff up to relieve people's concerns about overpopulation. That seems more likely.

[Anonymous No.10195494]

>>10195359
>Wars tend to create boom generations

No not really. The Baby boom is an exception and it only happenend in a few parts of the world..

[Anonymous No.10195496]

>>10195314
That's what twins are for.

[Anonymous No.10195613]

>>10195160
Less people to consume resources and destroy the planet? Oh no!!

[Anonymous No.10195688]

>>10195162
Based antinatalist

[Anonymous No.10195702]

>>10195237
you meant filter but what ever
also
>implying there is a great filter

[Anonymous No.10195712]

>>10195277
*tips fedora

[Anonymous No.10195713]

>>10195160
Less niggers

[Anonymous No.10195723]

>>10195160
>We can't let this happen.
What do you mean by "we", Peasant?

[Anonymous No.10195961]

The population can't grow infinitely, i guess something like this graph will occur at some point.

[Anonymous No.10195967]

>>10195160
How does Israel sustain their population?

[Anonymous No.10195994]

>>10195160
I'm not convinced this is a problem, seems like a solution to over population. The problem is these dropping rates probably don't apply for the poorly educated

[Anonymous No.10196008]

>>10195961
The difference? We have technology. With every potential population dropoff, we just happen to come along with a new technology that allows us to continue to grow. Sadly, technology is not a gradient. It's not a slow and even progression. It staggers in sudden spurts, otherwise known as a REVolution (as opposed to the slow and constant progressive and inevitable evolution that most people imagine it to be) and who knows if there even will be another technological revolution in the foreseeable future. For all we know there might not be another one for millennia. Or even at all.

[Anonymous No.10196050]

>>10196008
The difference is that rabbits can breed infinitely and quickly, unlike mineral deposits and petroleum, both of which take thousands of years to restore.

[Anonymous No.10196052]

I’ve thought of having kids, but as of right now, the future that I think about is just having money and free time to do things I enjoy. Maybe people feel like they dont want to go through that process of raising kids and essentially losing freedom.

[Anonymous No.10196056]

Birth Control

[Anonymous No.10196063]

Serious question: why does it matter to us?
Current gen is already getting fucked up old people.

[Anonymous No.10196093]

>>10196050
and we have innovation and discoveries. We used to use whales for their oil. Now we don't.

[Anonymous No.10196098]

There is literally no reason for there to be more than 60-600 million humans on earth.

[Anonymous No.10196103]

>>10195286
WE MIGHT EVEN HAVE TO RESTRUCTURE SHIT
THATLL BREAK THE STATUS QUO
GO BACK GO BACK GO BACK

[Anonymous No.10196166]

>>10196098
Yes there is. That number of people died in ww2

[Anonymous No.10196173]

>>10195373
It makes me sad too. All those books I've ready about halo and Warhammer 40k, where humans reach hundreds of billions, it seems like a nightmare if we don't reach that level desu. If we reach the cap right here, we'll be done.

[Anonymous No.10196424]

>>10196166
Why does that matter? Do you think as many people would have died if there was less people?

[Anonymous No.10196492]

>>10196098
more like 100-300 million per continent then we can get things done on a large scale and everybody can have a nice bit of lands. real issue is the existence of the megacity.

[Anonymous No.10196500]

>>10195160
Why is this a bad thing?

[Anonymous No.10196811]

>>10195160
There are 7 billion of us, maybe it would be better if we halved that.

[Anonymous No.10196832]

>>10196811
I was here for 3.5 billion. The world wasn't noticeably better then.

[Anonymous No.10197085]

>>10196811
I was here when it was 3.5 billion like>>10196832 the world wasn't better back then. We didn't even have smartphones.
There wasn't a difference actually. I think the people who were born don't consume alot of resources

[Anonymous No.10197137]

>>10195160
/Sci/ bros I need your help. I'm looking into moving to Japan to help alleviate the decline birth rate. As a foreigner how can I successfully move there? I'm currently doing a doctoral degree so I won't be low-skill level labor. But as far as I know I need a sponsor? Pls help.

[Anonymous No.10197141]

>>10197137
It's a shit country to live in as a foreigner. Don't go there.

[Anonymous No.10197147]

>>10197141
Seriously? :(
Why so.

[Anonymous No.10197287]

>>10196492
mega cities are inevitable. It's where the jobs are.

[Anonymous No.10197290]

>>10197147
they make you work too hard.

[Anonymous No.10197305]

>>10197085
I'm gonna guess you don't live in China or the Niger delta. The extra 3.5 billion people weren't born in the west.

[Anonymous No.10197337]

Up, up and awaaaaaaaaaaaay......

[Anonymous No.10198104]

>>10195160
this is straight lies. aurope has 1,5 average. latina merica 2,7 asi aprobably has like 3,2 this is bullshit

[Anonymous No.10198110]

>>10195160
>World population declining from 1960 to now.
That doesn't even make sense, when you think about it.
>>10197337
This is way more accurate.

[Anonymous No.10199145]

>>10198110
Lol brainlet

>>10197337
This is wishful thinking. And my sources are better than yours.

[Anonymous No.10199319]

>>10195160
>At this rate every "race" is going extinct.

LOL

must be bait. Yea, dropping off from 8 billion is extinction

[Anonymous No.10199501]

>>10199319
Growth is living. Extinction is death.

[Anonymous No.10199584]

>>10199501
until everyone is dead, there is no extinction.
so, lowering the population by a jew billions isn't extinction

[Anonymous No.10199589]

>implying it's a problem
>implying overpopulation is good

[Anonymous No.10199662]

The population doesn't need to constantly be growing unless you're a boomer who needs someone to pay for their social security

[Anonymous No.10199705]

>>10199589
Overpopulation doesn't exist. The seas, and deserts are uninhabited.
And vertical farming hasn't been tried

[Anonymous No.10199732]

>>10195160
Why? Why does it need to be "fixed"? Humanity did well with just a couple of billion people for thousands of years and I would be quite happy to let it drop to those numbers again. The only reason people want growth is for retarded economic reasons.

[Anonymous No.10199751]

>>10195160
>Going extinct.

No it's a natural stabilization of the population.

[Anonymous No.10199758]

>>10199732
Humanity didn't do well till the population grew

[Anonymous No.10199772]

>>10199758
What do you mean? It survived. And society and technology slowly but surely developed that entire time. Population grew because of advances, not the other way round.

[Anonymous No.10199800]

>>10199772
Causation is not correlation but I think the chances of producing a genius is greater in a bigger population

[Anonymous No.10199822]

>>10195160
It’s completely policy. (((They))) are encouraging Whites to stop reproducing by creating the social and economic conditions we have today.

Jews in Israel have the highest birth rate in the entire world, and essentially a National Socialist state that encourages them to reproduce. Secular Jews there average three children while the orthodox have on average 8+ children. Yet these are the same people that promote anti-natalist policies like (((feminism))) and (((no-fault divorce))) while they are in White countries. It’s entirely policy.

[Anonymous No.10199828]

>>10195291
>Amerindians have more civilization potential than europeans
How?

[Anonymous No.10199833]

>>10195160
Subsidize low births with robots. It will create an "artificial" threat which will kick the drive to breed into hear across the spectrum. Everybody wins.

[Anonymous No.10199876]

>>10195160
So what? Populations are technologically advancing. Survival rates and education rise, so birth rates drop in response.

Shit will really hit the fan when resources start running low.

[Anonymous No.10199883]

>>10199822
>Yet these are the same people that promote anti-natalist policies like (((feminism))) and (((no-fault divorce))) while they are in White countries.
Now explain the low fertility rate in Japan. And then kys.

[Anonymous No.10199889]

>>10199828
They built bigger civilizations in a shorter amount of time. The Europeans got a head start and just happened to get large ships and guns in time to colonize them.

[Haruka !!4UVLZShmoI3 No.10200192]

>>10199889
Which they got from Chinese people.

[Anonymous No.10201726]

>>10195160
Is that graph credible? African population is set to explode, last I read.

[Anonymous No.10201729]

>>10199751
>No it's a natural stabilization of the population.

Except that it is not stabilization, it is a decrease. Anything below 2.1 children per couple leads to decrease and unless reversed, extinction.

[Anonymous No.10201733]

>>10201726
it is credible but African population will still explode, birth rates are simply so high in Africa that even with decreasing birth rates we can expect African population to quadruple to over 4 billion people during the course of the century

[Anonymous No.10201736]

>>10195160

>every series converging to 2

This strongly appeals to my autism

[Anonymous No.10201743]

>>10197137

Get a job as a research scientist in Japan. That's what I do. You don't need to know any Japanese at all.

Of course the barrier is being at least a decent scientist in your field and having a PhD, though there are also graduate fellowships to work in Japan, which I've done.

[Anonymous No.10201748]

>>10197141

This is not true. My life in Japan is way more comfy than in the US.

More and more research labs are becoming more western-style. Like you can go in to work whenever you want as long as you are productive.

[Anonymous No.10201749]

The problem is not that birth rates are decreasing, it is that birth rates are decreasing quickly among the wealthy and educated, while they are not decreasing or decreasing slowly among the underclass and the brown people.

The end result is global average intelligence decreasing significantly.

We are in for some fun times.

[Anonymous No.10201771]

>>10195238
I think there is something similar operating in Singapore.

[Anonymous No.10201784]

>>10197287
>mega cities are inevitable. It's where the jobs are.
That assumes there will be jobs in the future. In just a decade or two practically all drivers will be expected to lose their jobs just like elevator operators did 40 years ago.

[Anonymous No.10201792]

>>10197141
I worked there, can recommend. You need a good degree though.

>>10197290
No harder then elsewhere I have worked.

[Anonymous No.10201926]

>>10201749
>91-83 is so bad that we are in for some fun times
Wew.
It's not even 10 IQ points.

[Anonymous No.10202828]

>>10195494
>No not really.
Yes, really.
Lrn2history fgt pls

[Anonymous No.10203838]

>>10201733
Of course it's gonna jump. Africa was always historically extremely underpopulated and no matter what once states have access to modern medicine and mortality reduction measures birth rates would increase. 4 billion is a pretty weird estimate though.

[Anonymous No.10203841]

>>10195191
>Keep population stable
>War/disease happens
>Population drops and rebounds quickly with another baby boom like last time

[Anonymous No.10203843]

>>10195214
>religious fundamentalists
Odd way of saying muslims and oogaboogas

[Anonymous No.10205269]

[Anonymous No.10205317]

>>10205269
Then the graph tapers off and humanity is stuck at 13 billion or something.
My Warhammer 40k books say that a hive planet should be capable of having about 10-100 billion people on it.
We should go to 50 billion at least.

[Anonymous No.10205335]

>>10199883
Japan has literally been occupied since the end of WWII by the (((Allied))) powers. Do you not see how the defeat of a historically spiritually strong people such as the Japanese, and the replacement of their national pride with globalism and materialism could lead to a lack in births or the ability for them to see a future for themselves?

It’s the same story with Germany. It isn’t unintentional that the world liberal order refuses to give these counties back their freedom.

[Anonymous No.10205357]

>>10195160
What's wrong with lower fertility rates? The human population is simply plateauing off, there's not an issue with us hitting a point where we're as populated as we're going to be on earth.

[Anonymous No.10205378]

>>10195160
But we need stable populations. Right now it is unstable.
Throughout history the birth rate was stalled by the high likelihood of death due to disease and what not. Our problem is that we've largely overcome many of those concerns. Even the radiation isn't dramatically impacting that.

Disease was our predator which we've began to eliminate. So now the problem is like with deer numbers when their predators became non existent I think.

[Anonymous No.10205380]

>>10205378
Oh and the "mind disease" is taking the place that the physical diseases used to take as a predator.

[Anonymous No.10205382]

>>10205357
It's not a sign of biological superiority

[Anonymous No.10205387]

>>10205382
But a sign of self awareness may be.

[Anonymous No.10205390]

Population density by continent (people per square mile):
Asia: 246.11
Europe: 187.84
Africa: 87.15

[Anonymous No.10205445]

>>10199145
>wishful thinking
Nigger it's a graph of the past.

[Anonymous No.10205467]

>>10195238
>we should put in incentives to decrease the population on welfare
Or rethink welfare entirely and put the entire race on it - per some favour organised by the system.

Neither will work I think, we need to go further with the technical process of the economy.

[Anonymous No.10205469]

>>10195243
>only stupid people earn small amounts
This is not accurate. Many smart people choose the simpler life and do not focus their life on obtaining money.

[Anonymous No.10205475]

>>10195961
This used to describe the upper European and lower European classes in older times. Now it's in the process of modifying, adding the other races to that system. I think it will result in a caste system like in India.

[Anonymous No.10205477]

>>10196424
He's saying "there's safety in numbers".
Who knows what we will need the numbers for.

[Anonymous No.10205479]

>>10197085
>>10196832
Some would argue that the world was much worse at a time when the world was populated by less than a billion people.

[Anonymous No.10205481]

>>10198110
The population isn't declining. The rate of growth is declining.

[Anonymous No.10205484]

>>10195160
Wireless devices and various forms of sociocultural disruption.

Tried to tell you.

[Anonymous No.10205485]

>>10199589
>>10199705
Overpopulation and a lack in growth in population are both concerns. Neither is a good thing.

[Anonymous No.10205488]

>>10201749
>IQ decline
How can this happen? I thought IQ was a standard distribution of the world's IQ?
Wouldn't it always have a mean of 100?

[Anonymous No.10205494]

>>10205488
.. wiki says it's the rise in "raw scores" that indicate an increase in IQ.
I don't see how it could increase/decrease the mean though.

[Anonymous No.10205495]

>>10201749
This is also iatrogenic and caused by various forms of environmental pollution, including electromagnetic.

[Anonymous No.10205498]

>>10205495
The IQ drop, that is.

[Anonymous No.10205499]

>>10195160
Just get rid of birth control

[Anonymous No.10205503]

>>10205488
Tests are standardised on reference populations, such as the UK. Everyone get's compared to those people.

[Anonymous No.10205507]

>>10205503
So it's not compared to older raw scores?

[Anonymous No.10205513]

we don't need more people. so many jobs could be automated if we didn't have to worry about people losing them

[Anonymous No.10205526]

>>10205513
People create the jobs anon. More people = more demand.
Derp.

Who's asking for the stuff these robots are producing? Robots?
>actually...

[Anonymous No.10205529]

>>10205507
No. Scores keep rising (or used to). This is called the Flynn effect. Why they keep rising is highly debated, but to keep things centred on 100 they are renormed every few decades.

[Anonymous No.10205534]

>>10199800
The chances of producing a genius is the same; The chance of seeing a genius being produced would be higher.

[Anonymous No.10205537]

>>10205513
When the world is depopulated they're going to either get rid of you, keep you around for various forms of slavery, or put you into such a state of permanent serfdom you will never emerge. That's the problem with allowing the sterilization agenda to play out. It's part of a broader plan, and if you make it, you're part of it.

[Anonymous No.10205548]

>>10205529
That's what I meant by "rising raw scores".
So the world IQ is not declining going by raw scores?

[Anonymous No.10205560]

>>10205537
Depopulating the world decreases demand, leading to economic issues.
The biggest issue with declining population is whether we may need the large numbers.
I think that's our biggest concern nowadays, though mainly when we leave the rock. On the rock, the overpopulation might be creating issues (though it is stimulating the economy).

What we need to do is develop an economy that can allocate a supply of goods efficiently to all people regardless of the population. We've clearly got an oversupply of goods right now, the issue is getting it to people. If that need required an increase of supply, I don't think we'd have that much of an issue until later next century (exception: fuel, which is the biggest concern of our supply of goods).
Jobs help with creating the goods, but they also develop allocative inefficiency without a proper coordinator to allocate work. Welfare is meant to cover that gap... but it is also leading to decline in jobseekers, leading to a decline in the supply of goods.

[Anonymous No.10205584]

>>10205560
>leading to economic issues
There's no need for a strong economy, the infrastructure and what human labor is still required is already there and well controlled. It's a steady state model, and either it's sufficiently global or the technology to maintain it is good enough, that competing with other groups is no longer a factor.

>What we need to do is develop an economy that can allocate a supply of goods efficiently to all people regardless of the population.
I used to have all kinds of thoughts and ideas concerning this, and how you would maintain an environment and the means for a life worth living throughout. But the forces which drive events clearly have a different model, so no longer. There's clearly a sterilization agenda, I'm trying to figure out precisely why and what we're being transitioned towards.

So we're really having two different conversations. I've largely given up on where you're coming from, at least as far as discussing it. There's no reason to say anything to anyone. That's what they've done.

[Anonymous No.10205601]

>>10205548
I'm not sure, I don't know if such data exists. It's a pretty good bet that intelligence relative to the UK is decreasing.
I would be sceptical of these increases in IQ representing real increases in intelligence, because it implies a country with an IQ of 80 in modern terms created the first nuclear bomb, and then put a man on the moon. And we know what a country with an IQ average of 80 in modern terms looks like.

[Anonymous No.10205629]

Do none of you spastics learn about the demographic transition model in geography?

[Anonymous No.10205632]

>>10205584
>There's no need for a strong economy
>just let people starve anon!

> the infrastructure and what human labor is still required is already there and well controlled.
No labor should be there, but isn't. Why? Because the labor isn't being effectively allocated. It is FAR from well controlled anon. Otherwise we would not have any problems.
Furthermore, the people are the consumers, you eliminate the people, you eliminate the very thing the supply is meant to be for.

>But the forces which drive events clearly have a different model
It has no model. It's chaos. That's the very demon all of humanity is trying to conquer.
You are asking to sterilize the very thing the supply is meant to supply for. I don't see how this is even a solution.

>>10205601
> It's a pretty good bet that intelligence relative to the UK is decreasing.
I agree, it is decreasing relative to the UK but NOT compared to the past. You'll find it increases as the less developed nations adapt more and more to what I like to call the "machine culture". People confuse this culture with western culture. Western culture has been dead since the world wars. All cultures are dying and being replaced with this machine. Likewise, the machine tunes the people that follow it to it's culture more, hence the increase in raw score IQ. But relative to the UK, the rest of the people are not increasing in intelligence at the same rate. This is because the population has not plateaued enough yet, but it soon will plateau... hopefully (doubt it, Africa is not as we thought it was... it seems to be r-selective - though africans do seems to be more K selective outside of Africa... might be the geographic location).

[Anonymous No.10205646]

>>10205632
The world is not random. People won't starve, their "natural" death rate is being increased and they're being sterilized.

>That's the very demon all of humanity is trying to conquer.
Ignorance and evil are the demon.

>You are asking to sterilize the very thing the supply is meant to supply for. I don't see how this is even a solution.
It's not about me, it's just what's happening. All the market mechanics and motivations are out the window, I'd stop thinking in those terms. Ask yourself, "people", why? Why people? Look to your neighbor. Look to yourself. Ask, why? Why? Why any of it? What good is it? Why should you be allowed to even exist and engage in activities of any kind? What good is that?

That's their perspective. The herd has grown, too many cattle to manage. It's not a cull it's just a purge. Don't ask me entirely why, I don't know.

[Anonymous No.10205648]

>>10205629
Everyone knows that. The problem is the impact this has to economies that seem to be declining in allocative efficiency, hence why people say the economy is becoming like a ponzi... with no one intending that - because the elites would be making their own ticking time bomb. Of course, I'm assuming they are smart enough about capital to realise this major problem. I think the major issue is the middle management, not the elites, that create this major fuck up in capital allocation. They don't seem to get how important their job is. Hence why you have dipshit CEOs that get caught out with millions in pocket (god speed to the CEOs that realise why they get the pay check - it's to pay your legal bills).
This should be a /biz/ thread, but if you see that board they would not discuss this at all.

[Anonymous No.10205654]

>>10205646
>Ignorance and evil
You're implying people understand their system well enough. They don't, we are a system that is essentially a clueless beast. Not even the smartest people on the planet can comprehend the difficulty of tackling the problem. It's too heavy for superman to lift.
The worst part is that I don't think the problem is solvable with decreased population. You're playing wack a mole with a infinite headed hydra.

[Anonymous No.10205657]

>Endless replies of random anons' random theories explaining whatever conspiracy they believe
The only good thing about this thread is that it distracts you /pol/tards from shitting up the rest of the board

[Anonymous No.10205666]

>>10205657
Regarding the issues of economies and our population... many of us have tackled the colossus as a focus of our studies.

And at least the /pol/tards try at discussing the situation. The rest don't even discuss it anon. That's why everything is shit.

[Anonymous No.10205667]

>>10205654
>You're implying people understand their system well enough.
Indeed, they do not. Because of:
>Ignorance
Which is an overexpressed state created by
>Evil

Man collective is no more a writhing mad beast than your muscle fibers extend randomly. There are control structures, they are tightly regulated, you just need to look and accept your own will, and the will of those around you, is not so free and individual as you might like. You need to learn to anchor on the macro, as well as the local, because these are the times we're living in.

Reducing and maintaining population solves all the problems. Man is the problem, man can be the solution, lack of man is that solution. Automation and 5G are likely the key.

[Anonymous No.10205685]

>>10205667
>Ignorance
>an overexpressed state created by
Ignorance is a concept used in conjunction with a delusion that you can fathom the problem to begin with. You can't really. You can grow the fields and consume the crop but at the end of the day, you can only do what you can do within your environment.
People did not purposely create our population crisis, it did so as a natural consequence of our scientific innovation. It is a natural end to our natural human instinct. It is the environment which we grow our own crop within.

We're in a famine of opportunity anon. We don't have the correct conditions and we cannot artificially create the correct conditions. That is the problem.
But that's not an excuse to not try regardless.
I think if we sort out the middle management issues, allocated things better amongst corporation to corporation, realising we're in a bleak situation as a collective, then maybe we might be able to either fight the fire enough to save the situation, or even strengthen the fire and grow in it.
It starts with education. It starts with the pen. That is why the internet was let loose anon. It was the last ace we had.

[Anonymous No.10205797]

>>10205534
The greater the population the bigger the bell curve. Since the number of geniuses is more important than having a low population with more resources, the greater population will always have an advantage.

[Anonymous No.10205805]

>>10205797
The most important thing is to have large number of Jews, since they create geniuses at 17x the rate of everyone else. There was far more innovation and scientific advancement in the 19th and early 20th centuries than there is today with a much larger world population

[Anonymous No.10205823]

>governments push for lower birth rates for years
>"why birth rates go down lets import immigrants"

[Anonymous No.10205838]

>>10205823
There isn't a single day that goes by where I don't daydream about killing all the bureaucrats and lawyers in the world.

[Anonymous No.10205944]

Why do China and India have so many people? Are they just more horny than everyone else?

[Anonymous No.10205953]

>>10205944
He shou wu, have many wife, many kid, live to 200+, best erection in town.

[Anonymous No.10205959]

>>10205953

[Anonymous No.10205967]

>>10205944

[Anonymous No.10206091]

The future is brown and that's a good thing.

[Anonymous No.10206094]

>>10206091
They're being sterilized as well.

[Anonymous No.10206096]

>>10206091
>16 billion in sub-saharan Africa alone with no sign of slowing
bwahahaha. Don't get your data from /pol/ kiddo

[Anonymous No.10206102]

>>10205632
>just let people starve anon!
>people starve without muh economy
Did cavemen starve?

[Anonymous No.10206104]

>>10195160
You don't need to. There are far too many people on the Earth as it is.

[Anonymous No.10206114]

SImple, improve living conditions. Not that it's necessary to increase the birthrate. We should definitely reduce the population by a billion or so and get our shit together.

[Anonymous No.10206116]

>>10206091

>extrapolating exponential curves into the future forever

This should seriously be required in all middle schools

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZA9Hnp3aV4

[Anonymous No.10206118]

>>10199889
Sad, deluded, and eternally butthurt mestizo/indio here

>>10200192
And how is it they were able to do so much more with these things in the last few centuries? I'm sure I'll get nothing more than a bunch of oriental we-wuzzing....

[Anonymous No.10206659]

>>10195160
That's normal in demographics.

[Anonymous No.10206685]

This doesn't mean extinction at all you massive fucking retard.

Once birth rates actually drop below 2, more opportunities will be open and it will be more advantageous to have children.

Birth rates in large populations work to correct themselves.

[Anonymous No.10206713]

>>10205469
In general the smarter you are the more you earn

Smart people may choose to earn less, but dumb people cannot choose to earn more

[Anonymous No.10206777]

>>10195162
>>10195166
>>10195191

Good goys, dont reproduce and let your race go extinct.

[Anonymous No.10206794]

>>10206118
>/pol/ conveniently lives only in the last few centuries

[Anonymous No.10206884]

>>10198110
ooooo a real life brainlet! Mommy can we keep it?

[Anonymous No.10206894]

>>10195160
Pop growth went down because we neutered the economic output of children. Bring back child labor and birth rates will explode again.

[Anonymous No.10207093]

>>10195160

wanna fix birth rate decline?

start a nice WW3, no nukes, and re-unleash European madness.

you'll see a nice economical rebound and a consequentially birth spike.

Also if the WW2 started the space race and we went to the moon, this time we're gonna go full Interstellar.

[Anonymous No.10208485]

>>10206116
>extrapolating exponential curves into the future forever
they didn't do that though, and they already took into account falling fertility rates
https://population.un.org/wpp/

[Anonymous No.10208490]

>>10195160
ask Japan

[Anonymous No.10208496]

>>10195160
Most problems in the world are because people cant keep it in their pants. Let us reduce our population, we are too many anyways. 7 billion was a mistake
Inb4 thanos snap

[Anonymous No.10208504]

>>10206713
>youtube celebs

[Anonymous No.10208512]

>>10208504
way smarter than their subscribers and viewers

[Anonymous No.10208556]

So when 110 billion people have lived until now, how long would it take from now to have the next 110 billion that have ever lived on earth? so 220 billion in total

[Anonymous No.10208582]

>>10206777
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jews#Demographics

>The population of Americans of Jewish descent is demographically characterized by an aging population composition and low fertility rates significantly below generational replacement.[60]

[Anonymous No.10208729]

>>10205944
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7oiro8tYA4

[Anonymous No.10209426]

>>10208582
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.10210405]

>>10195243

This, but only because western civilization lost its mind and decided that subsidizing idiots was somehow a good idea.

[Anonymous No.10210467]

>>10210405
rich doesn't mean smart dude

[Anonymous No.10210478]

Thot patrol
Women do what men do nowadays and former natality roles are suspended or ended.

[Anonymous No.10210530]

>>10210467

If you're making minimum wage, you're sure as hell not smart.

[Anonymous No.10210534]

>>10210530
ok

[Anonymous No.10210541]

>>10210467
>rich doesn't mean smart dude
There is a correlation dude. And that is what will determine future demographics, not the outliers.

[Anonymous No.10210549]

>>10210541
there's plenty of poor people with degrees who can't pay off their student debts. Those people might reproduce alot if they had money

[Anonymous No.10210718]

>>10210534

He probably wasn't making minimum wage and clearly wasn't that smart.

[Anonymous No.10210720]

>>10210549

Smart people don't take out student loans for jobs they aren't going to be able to get.

A degree is hardly a measu

[Anonymous No.10210732]

https://humantslife.wordpress.com/2018/12/12/population/

[Anonymous No.10210739]

Guys, your income says nothing about your character and your intelligence

[Anonymous No.10210815]

>>10210739

Sure it does.

[Anonymous No.10211748]

>>10210718
You need 124 IQ to get a PhD

[Anonymous No.10211763]

>>10195160
Effect of overpopulqtion on mices

The last generation "beautiful ones" has some similarities with our current generation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgGLFozNM2o

[Anonymous No.10211767]

>asking a board full of virgins how to improve birth rates

pfft ahah

[Anonymous No.10211911]

>>10195160
How is this a problem? Dropping birth rates is a good thing you fucking retard

[Anonymous No.10213269]

>>10211911
Natalism is the only defensible moral code.

[Anonymous No.10213746]

>>10195160
RAPE

[Anonymous No.10213757]

since there are no national values anymore (like expanding or discovering). then the idea of having kids is less appealing. you are no longer living in a developing country like pioneer-era USA. there is no point to having babies anymore. once capitalist USA collapse, we can start talking about correcting the mistakes of the past.
consider this world as finished. onto the next civilization/society.

[Anonymous No.10213767]

>>10213757
cont. most modern woman view children as a parasite or a nuisance. they are not mentally ready to be mothers. and nor do they want to.

this is of course contradicts with the trope of the 'commitment-phobe men'. its actually the woman refuse to have babies, not the men.

[Anonymous No.10213859]

>>10195291
>>10199889
tranny spotted

[Anonymous No.10214324]

>>10195214
This simple extrapolation is pretty silly, religious fundamentals always had more children but they don't always grow up to be like their parents, if they did the world would have been over run by them centuries ago.

[Anonymous No.10214365]

>>10196098
With more people there is a more overall innovation instead of just certain areas at a time.

[Blank No.10214385]

>>10195221
Its been idocracy since 1800s, atleast in the west. The rest of the world has always been retarded

[Blank No.10214388]

>>10196050
>Humans return to hunter gatherer post apocalypse survival and stay there for hundred of thousands of years,
>Oil and minerals return
>Repeat indefinitely until universe death
Nothing to worry about

[Anonymous No.10214389]

>>10195190
lol nice freudian slip

[Anonymous No.10214391]

>>10214388
Next 200k years earth will be uninhabitable, this is our last chance.

[Blank No.10214407]

>>10206102
Yes, and modern Cavemen starve to this day With shitty diets and for demonic reasons

[Blank No.10214412]

>>10214391
Maybe for modern humans, but not post-apocalypse humans

[Anonymous No.10214426]

>>10210478
cute JC

[Anonymous No.10214452]

>>10214412
They will have to live in the outer solar system, the oceans will boil off from solar heating.

[Anonymous No.10215528]

>>10214452
This is not 40k

[Anonymous No.10215711]

>>10196166
>both armies are proportionally smaller so less people die
oh no

[Anonymous No.10215787]

>>10209426
Who will we blame for all the world's issues in 50 years?

[Anonymous No.10215807]

>>10211748
Thats not smart

[Anonymous No.10216272]

>>10206794
>Africa above north America
How

[Anonymous No.10216331]

>>10199822
>and then the rando schizo shit/pol/ster appears
I gotta give it to /sci/ though. It did take around 30+ posts before one of these morons showed up.

[Anonymous No.10216338]

>>10201749
>extrapolated doom scenario paranoia
If you should know anything is that population projections are notoriously uncertain and useless beyond a very short time window.

[Anonymous No.10216363]

>>10211748
You need at least 122 IQs to recognize if you only have 123 IQs you are nothing but a useless brainlet. I know this becuase my 124 IQs mean i am always right. And no, you cant get more IQs only find them in tests.

[Anonymous No.10217292]

We give people free orgies

[Anonymous No.10219101]

>>10216272
https://www.researchtrends.com/issue-35-december-2013/the-bibliometrics-of-the-developing-world/

[Anonymous No.10219232]

>>10201749
> it is that birth rates are decreasing quickly among the wealthy and educated, while they are not decreasing or decreasing slowly among the underclass and the brown people.
So give the underclass and brown people more money and education? Problem solved.

[Anonymous No.10219381]

>>10219232
Problem not solved at all, you merely somewhat slowed the degradation. The only way to solve the problem is to ensure that upper classes have HIGHER birth rates than lower classes. Othewise there is a dysgenic trend (mediated by both genetic and social pressure towards poverty).

[Anonymous No.10219533]

I think it's too financially impractical to have kids in the modern day compared to the past.
Boomers had kids because why not.

[Anonymous No.10219538]

>>10219381
Lmao fuck off to >>>/pol/