Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

2017/01/28: An issue regarding the front page of /jp/ has been fixed. Also, thanks to all who contacted us about sponsorship.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 54 KB, 1024x709, David-Ricardo-2-1024x709.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10172849 No.10172849 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe]

>what even is the point of this
I've seen a pretty large number of economists here.

F.A.Q.
>is economics a science?
Yes.
>you sure?
Yes.
>absolutely sure?
Yes.
>were there any other good economists besides based Neumann?
Yes.

GOAT edition.

>> No.10172853

>>10172849
>>>/biz/

>> No.10172855

>>10172853
Economics is a science. It's in the FAQ.

>> No.10172876
File: 42 KB, 334x506, 1529383122473.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10172876

Dropping economics to study math. Kiss my ass, kikes.

>> No.10172989
File: 63 KB, 900x650, 1540861668393.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10172989

>>10172876

>> No.10173044

>>10172876
>not studying both

>> No.10173307

>>10172876
if you went to a school worth shit they would be very similar already

>> No.10174267
File: 85 KB, 440x348, QiraGEd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10174267

>>10172876

>> No.10174297
File: 118 KB, 576x768, ep3zd7vbxha11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10174297

>>10172849
What a great thread you've created. It will surely spark hours of intelligent and constructive discussion.

>> No.10174537
File: 560 KB, 637x515, 1542927805557.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10174537

One day people will finally realise you kind belong on the shelf with homeopathy.
Name one economist capable of predicting any metric reliably for years.
ProTip: >>>/youcant/

>> No.10174601

>>10174297
>implying the rest of the board is any better
>>10174537
>you can't
Yes, exactly. Because if a large enough group could predict it, they'd use this knowledge for mad cash, and this would obviously affect the economy, thus rendering the predictions wrong.

>> No.10174794

>>10172849
>Economics
not science or math

>> No.10174809
File: 183 KB, 572x692, 1541341772731.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10174809

>>10174794
Economics isn't a science or math? Heavens no. You must be mistaking me for a finance major. I study the highly mathematical economical sciences. We do important work such as analysing firms and market structures and use advanced maximization techniques to theoretically derive free market's behavior from basic game theory. Without us, the economy would go broke. Our theoretical subject uses far more maths than any engineering discipline or science, including computer science, and we're practically a superset of maths.

>> No.10174815

Economic and Maths at the LSE for undergrad
Maths postgrad at Cambridge

>> No.10174824
File: 445 KB, 746x676, 1542491772044.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10174824

>>10174809
Yeah whatever dude

>> No.10174834
File: 25 KB, 324x299, 1542749371038.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10174834

This autistic /sci/ guy was walking by me and said economics wasn't a science. He must be mad a chadonomics major stole his gf. Doesn't he know about all the job openings available to people formed in economics? I bet he's jelly his field doesn't have the opportunity our does. That's why he's going to work at McD's while I get six figures starting. All he must know about economics is supply and demand. Anyone who's actually studied economics knows it's all hard maths and research. We learn about Calculus like integrals, multivariable like Lagrangians, probability like the normal distribution, game theory like Nash equillibrium, linear algebra like matrix multiplication and stochastic calculus like summing a white noise or brownian motion to a tendency function. If you think this stuff is easy then clearly your school must have been shit and didn't do them in detail like our extremely rigorous math courses. End of the day, we control the money, and we control the funding this guy gets to do his stupid research on quantum skeletons and algebraic schemes. Maybe we'll give him some breadcrumps. Oh, he's going to be sorry.

>> No.10174837

>>10174809
>we're practically a superset of maths.
You mean a supercategory.

>> No.10174862

>>10172855
It's not a science are you fucking retarded?

>> No.10174872
File: 129 KB, 393x469, 1513280435584.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10174872

>>10173307
>not studying economic galois theory

>> No.10174927

>>10174834
Kek

>> No.10175235

>>10172849
Right, my goys. I have an essay for tomorrow where I have to write about this dude's international trade theory. Tips?

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
reCAPTCHA
Action