[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 59 KB, 780x520, nat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10146655 No.10146655 [Reply] [Original]

>bubble universes

>> No.10147020

>>10146655
http://youtu.be/IcxptIJS7kQ?t=24m40s

>> No.10147047

>>10147020

Interesting, thanks for sharing.

>> No.10147048

>>10146655
Based retard

>> No.10147147 [DELETED] 
File: 41 KB, 500x444, Natalie_Portman_Your_Highness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10147147

>>10147020
>>10147047
>what do i mean that the theory predicts something if it produces anything?
>this is a serious problem for the theory
>there's no prediction or explanation to what we have, it's just a random chance... that's a big concession given where we were starting from. so we began with a theory which we thought was simple, natural, and explained a lot; we end up with a theory that isn't actually that simple, it's kind of this patchwork of ideas. it's not natural,
in the sense that [blah blah blah] and finally does it explain? maybe not....
>you can't prove such a theory....
science at its absolute meme-iest

>> No.10147151

>>10147020
>what do i mean that the theory predicts something if it produces anything?
>this is a serious problem for the theory
>there's no prediction or explanation to what we have, it's just a random chance... that's a big concession given where we were starting from. so we began with a theory which we thought was simple, natural, and explained a lot; we end up with a theory that isn't actually that simple, it's kind of this patchwork of ideas. it's not natural, in the sense that [blah blah blah] and finally does it explain? maybe not....
>you can't prove such a theory....
science at its absolute meme-iest

>> No.10147170

>>10147020
>>10147151
You should check out Roy Kerr (the Kerr black hole guy).
He shits on the big bang and hawking radiation and criticizes modern physics for trying to make predictions beyond where it has any business making predictions.

>> No.10147184

>>10147170
i've studied the kerr metric but i just assumed he was a typical cosmology idiot who goes WAY out on a limb speculating about ridiculously wild nonscientific shit.

anyhow, let me post this
https://youtu.be/beQ9fZ0jVdE

>> No.10147213

>>10147170
>shits on the big bang
into the trash it goes

>> No.10147358

can i bump this thread? seems to be the highest-quality of the first 3ish pages.

i'd rather talk about inflationary models than "black man bad" or "jon tooker good" threads

>> No.10147539

lbkml bump

>> No.10147983

>>10147170
Why do kekers believe opposition values truth?