Differential IQ by gender

[Anonymous No.10139169]

Can somebody explain to me how
>if
God isn't real, then how did natural pressures cause women to be sooooo much stupider than men? Is intelligence stored in the Y chromosome?
>Checkmate, atheists.

[Anonymous No.10139175]

Honestly wouldn't surprise me if most of the male superiority propoganda came from theists.

[Anonymous No.10139178]

>>10139169
What a nice duck!

[Anonymous No.10139193]

>>10139178
That's not Donald. That's a swan and they are mean as fuck.

[Anonymous No.10139200]

>>10139169
it isn't iq
women and dogs don't mix

[Anonymous No.10139201]

>>10139169
Look up the Greater Male Variability Hypothesis.

[Anonymous No.10139203]

>>10139169
women have been abusing dogs and not getting their dogs out of the way lately
this morning a woman let her dog walk down a hallway and I had to get out of the way of the dog
women are demanding their dogs be used for security
they are being very rude and using their dogs to be rude
what women are doing with dogs really pisses me off
women shouldn't be allowed to own dogs

[Anonymous No.10139208]

>>10139169
actually
I would go further
women shouldn't be allowed near dogs at all

[Anonymous No.10139213]

>>10139208
>>10139203
>>10139200
You've made your point.

[Anonymous No.10139217]

>>10139169
>natural pressures cause women to be sooooo much stupider than men
Easier for men to manipulate.

[Anonymous No.10139241]

[Anonymous No.10139247]

Women are just as smart as men.

[El Arcón No.10139398]

>>10139247
Women are, among other things, 10,000x more likely than a man to randomly do something completely insane for no good reason

[Anonymous No.10139401]

>>10139241
t. western european statistics
it's patrician tier to know why the only woman fields medalist is iranian

[Anonymous No.10139459]

>>10139169
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USE86UbsV8c
I know foreigns can be hard to deal with but you have to respect woman dome of it are actually legal, if we mate enuff it can be ass s-mart https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USE86UbsV8c
You trolling?

[Anonymous No.10139468]

As a dog trainer, I can tell you 100% this is not an issue related to women. Most people know nothing about dogs. Even if they have been around dogs their whole life, most people make incorrect assumptions about dog behavior. A great example is Cesar Milan. For someone who has spent their whole Iife around dogs, he doesn't know anything about dogs.

[Anonymous No.10139472]

>>10139241
really makes you think

[Anonymous No.10139671]

>>10139169
>how did natural pressures cause women to be sooooo much stupider than men?
They adapted perfectly fine to what they were required to do - shut up and get back in the kitchen. Being too smart isn't exactly helpful for that.

[Anonymous No.10140104]

>>10139459
Are women a different race than men?

[Anonymous No.10140107]

>>10139468
You said that already.
>>10139208
>>10139203
>>10139200

[Anonymous No.10140173]

If women are dumbing why is my uni full of females becoming doctors?
We have no affirmative action.

[Anonymous No.10140210]

>>10139671
If you are smart you make better food.

[Anonymous No.10140244]

>>10139169
The excel at different fields, it's just that men haven't found a good use for women other than being housewives. Check history. Before they were fighting for the right to vote and started demanding more out of men, the men were the ones advancing humanity. Right now a false rape charge can get me some anal brothers or daddy if I don't watch out for myself.

[Anonymous No.10140304]

>>10139241
IQ doesn't correlate with brain volume. But guess what. Body size correlates with brain volume and now try to think again.

[Anonymous No.10140311]

>>10140304
>I do not research subjects before spouting off my opinion as a fact
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-size-matter-for-brains/

[Anonymous No.10140321]

>>10140311
It's literally my study major, you tard. There is no significant difference in IQ between men and women. Correlations between IQ and brain size are not significant. DTI scans have shown that women tend to have more fibres connecting both hemispheres. Does that make women smarter now ? Just fuck off with your pseudoscience bullshit

[Anonymous No.10140336]

>>10140321
What's your "study major"? Cranial volume correlation with IQ? I find that extremely hard to believe when you are so ignorant and dismissive of existing science in this field.

[Anonymous No.10140350]

>>10140336
Cognitive neuroscience. There is no correlatation between brain size and IQ. Brain size is related to body size which is also determined by the two sexes. Men aren't smarter because their brains are bigger. Men's brains are bigger because their bodies are bigger. This leads to a stronger lateralization of tasks in the brain. Women's brain are typically smaller but show more signs of interconnectedness between the hemispheres. This has nothing to do with IQ. Anatomically differences are not good predictors for IQ.

[Anonymous No.10140363]

>>10140350
>There is no correlatation between brain size and IQ
You keep repeating that like a mantra. Who are you trying to convince?

>Men aren't smarter because their brains are bigger. Men's brains are bigger because their bodies are bigger. This leads to a stronger lateralization of tasks in the brain.
Aren't you just saying the same thing, but in different words? The original claim was "correlate with," not "caused by." Also, no mention of cranial volume differences by race? It doesn't sound like you're doing rigorous science to me.

[Anonymous No.10140383]

>>10140363
I replied to the guy who posted the non sensical gender/brain size chart, which doesn't say anything at all. The facts are that male brains are bigger because men are bigger. Our brains aren't larger because we are smarter. There are several anatomical differences caused by gender but those don't relate to the IQ.
Instead of spouting this retarded "bigger is better" it is much more interesting to consider hormonal differences or sttructual differences in the different areas in the brain. There you actually see a difference between men and women.

>race
I never mentioned that so I don't know what you are referring to. I only made one post in this thread.

[Anonymous No.10140387]

>>10139169
my kangal would eat that swan

[Anonymous No.10140394]

>>10140383
>Our brains aren't larger because we are smarter.
But men ARE smarter because their brains are bigger, so there is a correlation.
>>race
>I never mentioned that
I know. That was my point. If you claim to be an expert in the field, but you fail to acknowledge similar group differences in cranial capacity across races that also correlate with IQ, then I have a hard time taking you seriously.

[Anonymous No.10140401]

>>10140394
I don't care about race because I was replying to that specific image which DOES NOT mention race. That's why I don't talk about race.

>men are smarter
Our intelligence test are designed to control for gender so there is only little overall difference. That's why you won't get any significant differences for gender ever. Men and women differ in spcific tasks because of gender differences. Mathematical abilities is a typical field where men tend to perform better than women.
I wonder what causes these effects. A difference of 100g in brain mass on average or the fact that for their entire lifetime there have been different genetical, hormonal and social factors that lead to different brain anatomies.

[Anonymous No.10140404]

>>10140383
Then why is it that the smartest and most successful negro AND woman has a massively above average cranial capacity?

[Anonymous No.10140406]

>>10140350
>Brain size
There is a correlation, it's just weak.
>Anatomically differences are not good predictors for IQ.
I wouldn't say that yet. Neuroimaging studies are just getting started on this.

[Anonymous No.10140408]

>Differential IQ by gender
The absolute state of this board

[Anonymous No.10140422]

>>10140404
I don't really care about Oprah. I don't get the point.

>>10140406
>There is a correlation, it's just weak.
Possible that a weak correlation exists. But I doubt that it leads to significant differences.
>I wouldn't say that yet. Neuroimaging studies are just getting started on this.
I phrased that wrong. Brain size is not a good predictor for IQ. Other anatomically differences may explain specific differences. I think it's just hard to attribute any findings to specific regions in the brain. I am working on a MRI study and interpreting the results is just painful.

[Anonymous No.10140435]

>>10140406
>I wouldn't say that yet. Neuroimaging studies are just getting started on this.
I have been thinking about this for a few minutes now. Do you have any of these studies ? I really wanna see the study design.

[Anonymous No.10140467]

>>10140435
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008818/
If it's anything like genetics, it will be a great many small variations of small effect that you would never detect with n=28

[Anonymous No.10140494]

>>10140467
I am always kind of sceptical of these GWAS approaches. I think the authors also mention the limitations quite a lot towards the end. However, if I had to choose I would say that genetics will probably explain specific differences in IQ for instance way before neuronal correlates do. At least with the current state of neuroimaging.