/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.10129899]

>be evolutionist
>”my ancestor”

[Anonymous No.10129909]

>>10129899
What the fuck are you trying to say? Use your fucking words.

[Anonymous No.10129918]

>>10129909
My ancestor

[Anonymous No.10129921]

>>10129918

What of it? What is your argument? What is your point? Get the fucking dick out of your mouth and fucking communicate.

[Anonymous No.10129932]

>>10129921
>*throws shit*
My ancestor.

[Anonymous No.10129944]

http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/88/20/9051.full.pdf

[Anonymous No.10129955]

>>10129944
>Publishes scientific paper based on conjecture
My ancestor

[Anonymous No.10129964]

Remember to sage kids.

[Anonymous No.10129970]

>>10129955
If you read the paper would you mind answering some questions about the content of the paper? Or are you satisfied with calling it conjecture?

[Anonymous No.10129977]

>>10129970
>He thinks evolution is scientific fact and not conjecture

[Anonymous No.10129981]

humans have a common ancestor with apes. fact.

prove me wrong.
protip: you can't
but this time it's because it's true

[Anonymous No.10129988]

>>10129981
You fuckwit humans are apes god damnit how do I sage you absolute cunt

[Anonymous No.10129998]

>>10129977
Evolution is a fact. You're mistaking human evolution with human history. The sun literally mutates your cells, it's why skin cancer is the most common type of cancer. You can't deny evolution, you may be skeptical about human evolution, and that is totally reasonable, and conjecture. However, denying evolution is a thing is absolutely retarded.

[Anonymous No.10130006]

>>10129981
Humans have a common ancestor with the banana. Prove me wrong. Pro tip: you can’t

[Anonymous No.10130008]

>>10129998
>what is equivocation
Nice try anon. Nothing personal kiddo
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation

[Anonymous No.10130011]

>>10130006
well, they do, that's part of the hypothesis. all life shares a common ancestor. obviously!!!!

effin' brainlet

[Anonymous No.10130014]

>>10130008
Heh, that wasn't my argument. Nice try kid.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

[Anonymous No.10130016]

>>10130011
>all life shares a common ancestor and the complexity of life we see was just an accident

[Anonymous No.10130019]

>>10130016
darwin provided the model for why it is not "an accident"

prove darwin wrong
protip: you can't

[Anonymous No.10130023]

>>10129998
You absolute fuckwit, sunlight does not mutate your cells it kills skin cells and they mutate incidentally during the replacement process due to chemical reactions from toxins in your body. Using your retarded logic, prostate cancer is more common not because of the sheer number of cell divisions which occur there, but because of radiation in you jizz, which is just not at all a plausible or coherent explanation, and basically, you are inferior to me in every way.

[Anonymous No.10130026]

>>10130023
somebody is SUPER SALTY over how super butthurt they're feeling!

[Anonymous No.10130027]

>>10130014
This whole thread is about human evolution. Nobody said they were skeptical of mutation or change as we see it today. This is equivocation.

[Anonymous No.10130034]

>>10130023
No, it literally damages the DNA even if the cell does not die.

"UV exposure doesn’t always lead directly to mutations in the DNA. In fact, UV-A radiation commonly causes the creation of a free radical that then interacts with and oxidizes DNA bases. These oxidized bases don’t pair correctly during replication, causing mutations."

[Anonymous No.10130035]

>>10130019
Prove Darwin right. Pro tip: you can’t. Literally, becuse humans weren’t around to witness the beginning of human life so we can’t say evolution is he cause of it. Any claim that it was for a fact is just conjecture.

[Anonymous No.10130040]

>>10130026
>he thinks that is me

[Anonymous No.10130041]

>>10130027
Well then it would stand to reason that if mutations take place in our DNA today, that mutations took place in our DNA then. These mutations caused different mutations in humans. Some of those humans survived to pass on their mutated genes. I dont see how that's complicated.

[Anonymous No.10130044]

Annunaki

[Anonymous No.10130046]

>>10130040
Most of us here know which posts are you. You refuse to capitalize letters and use punctuation. Your posts are pretty obvious.

[Anonymous No.10130047]

>>10130041
>mutations imply human evolution and the changing of life from one kind to another
What did he mean by this

[Anonymous No.10130048]

>>10130046
A lot of posters do that, especially people from twitter

[Anonymous No.10130049]

>>10130023
>>10130026
>>10130046
*samefags to make another poster look dumb*
What did he mean by this

[Anonymous No.10130050]

>>10130034
Clear skinned niggas be like

[Anonymous No.10130051]

>>10130047
I meant exactly what I said. Maybe it is more difficult to grasp than I thought. No, you're just dumb.
>>10130048
Only idiots.

[Anonymous No.10130056]

>>10130051
>he still thinks witnessing human mutations today implies the changing of life from single celled organisms to multicellular organisms, and from asexual to sexual reproduction
Whew lad

[Anonymous No.10130063]

>>10130051
>having improper grammar on an anonymous anime image board makes one an idiot

[Anonymous No.10130065]

>>10130056
I don't see why not. Biology doesn't really give a shit about your opinion. I don't think Darwin invented evolution, stupid. He discovered it. Meaning it was happening before, as we can see between different types of birds. Again, this isnt difficult.

[Anonymous No.10130068]

>>10130065
>I have no argument so I just say “I don’t see why not”
Ftfy. Evolution is your religion. You probably think that you are so secular and intelligent but you are not.

[Anonymous No.10130073]

>>10130065
good post.

[Anonymous No.10130075]

>>10130063
No, being an idiot makes you an idiot. Idiot.
>>10130068
My argument was "biology doesn't care about your opinion" my evidence for that are the different types of birds. I think you missed the entire point of the post.
>>10130073
Thank you.

[Anonymous No.10130076]

>>10130065
>implying natural selection implies life can change from one kind to another
I see you drank the koolaid about those meme birds

[Anonymous No.10130081]

>>10130076
>implying it can't
See how shitty of an argument you're making?

[Anonymous No.10130082]

>>10130075
>My argument was "biology doesn't care about your opinion"
So no argument? See >>10130076

[Anonymous No.10130084]

>>10129899
I would have preferred 'muh ancestor' but I do appreciate this thread, good job OP.

[Anonymous No.10130087]

>>10130082
See
>>10130081
Again, see how shitty of an argument you're making? Of course not, you referred to it again.

[Anonymous No.10130088]

>>10130081
Okay, so if it can then show me one observable example of it happening. Afterall that’s what science is about isn’t it?

[Anonymous No.10130090]

>>10130088
No, it's about being repeatable under the same conditions. Why the fuck are you on this board if you dont even understand the scientific method? Is it repeatable? Yes, as there are plenty of different species of birds that seem to be adapted to their environment. I.e. some birds have hooked bills to crack nuts. Some have long skinny beaks to drink nectar. There is more than 1 species of hummingbird, therefore the process repeated itself at some point on time. Just because I can't give you a date, doesn't mean the theory is debunked.

[Anonymous No.10130099]

>>10130090
>I can’t come up with an example so I will delude myself into thinking natural selection is the same thing as a monkey turning into a human and try to use that as an argument
Oh you evolutionists and your mental gymnastics.

[Anonymous No.10130100]

>>10129932
Irony being, of course, that this post is nothing but the verbal equivalent of throwing shit.

If anything these posts truly show how close to these animals we still are

[Anonymous No.10130102]

>>10130084
>muh ancestor
>not classic "my ancestor :)"

[Anonymous No.10130107]

>>10130100
>i get upset at memes and shitposting on an anime website full of retards

[Anonymous No.10130111]

>>10129899
ITS TRUE, ALL OF IT

[Anonymous No.10130113]

>>10130102
Yeah, I didn't understand the pedigree. I retract my initial statement. My ancestor is superior.

[Anonymous No.10130114]

hi every1 im ur ansestor!!!!!!! *holds up stick* my name is lucy but u can call me t3h PrImAt3 oF d00m!!!!!!!! lol…as u can see im very old!!!! thats why i came here, 2 meet random ppl younga than me ^_^… im 3.2 million years old (im mature 4 my age tho!!) i like 2 eat ants w/ my girlfreind (im bi if u dont like it deal w/it) they r our favorite!!!

[Anonymous No.10130116]

>>10130099
This isnt even fun. I could go to /pol/ for this level of retarded discourse. You have yet to provide any evidence against the theory of evolution. I have provided plenty. You're the idiot who keeps moving goal posts.
>Hurrrr it has to be observable check mate!
>That's not what the scientific method says at all
>Hurrrr das mental gymnastics
Like, I honestly don't even give a shit you're wasting your Friday night here. But why waste it pretending to be a contrarian retard, and then refuse to participate in actual discussion? Do you want discuss the theory of evolution, or are you just going to keep goal posts. You're right, I can't prove humans came from monkeys. You can't prove they didn't. However, I have provided evidence that genes mutate. You haven't provided any evidence to the contrary. From the very beginning of this thread here
>>10129921 you've been called out for shit posting. It's not even good shit posting.

[Anonymous No.10130117]

>>10130107
There are boards for that though. Like, specifically. It's a global rule to not be a low tier idiot. I just wished it was enforced where it should be.

[Anonymous No.10130123]

>>10130116
>even more mental gymnastics
You have provided no proof whatsoever. You have simply falsely equated natural selection and evolution and claimed this as evidence. It is not up to me to provide counter evidence when there is no evidence to begin with.

[Anonymous No.10130144]

>>10130123
You seem to have a lot of anger in you personally, something wrong anon?

[Anonymous No.10130146]

>>10130144
>I have failed to provide evidence for evolution so now I will resort to calling my opponent angry

[Anonymous No.10130160]

>>10130146
I’m not even in this thread, I didn’t read most of it except for yours seemed stressing. You want to talk about something man?

[Anonymous No.10130163]

>>10130160
>the guy shitposting memes is angry but not this guy >>10130116
Yeah, you are totally not the same guy

[Anonymous No.10130183]

>common guys I thought /sci/ was where all the smartfags were

[Anonymous No.10130211]

>>10130163
No not the same guy. He is angry because he took the bait but yours is more intentional and not reactionary

[Anonymous No.10130242]

>>10129921
Communication? Argument? Get the fucking dick out of your mouth?

What the fuck did you just say about me? I'll have you know that I'm about to absolutely dismantle your illusory feelings of superiority with divine reason. What exactly are YOU communicating? You place value on communication like it means something what at its most basic level it is at best a defense mechanism from danger after one is no longer dependent on caretakers for subsistence. Communication as you refer to it is but a means of assigning soft meaning to ideas to grant you feelings of intellectual gratification. Real communication is the production of expressions and sounds recreated from memory to dissuade potential confrontations so that your chance of passing on genetic material is higher. Moreover, the concept of argument can serve two practical purposes, if we decide to be generous. In posing an argument, one is only hoping to further their ideas into a culture where they can be scrutinized. An "intelligent" arguer knows to withhold information as to no give other an edge in the intellectual marketplace, where certain strains of multiculturalism actually fucking let you become a tenured professor. But I digress. In the scrutinize of an idea, the one who posits the argument can see where his perceptions of self fall short. In seeing where he falls short, he will consequently tighten up his arguments to construct a self that will yield more pussy. O fucking P doesn't need to argue because thousands of incestuous professors have already done that for him while he was out smashing beautiful lotus petals with his destructive meathammer. Yes, he was bouncing woman on his uncircumcised and therefore more sensitive penis. Yet you sit here on an online "social media" platform not picking apart other people's psyche to see if the effects are tangible within the real world. Fuck evolution. Fuck creation. Fuck bitches.

[Anonymous No.10130255]

>>10130242
Can you paraphrase this please?

[Anonymous No.10130273]

>>10130114
lmao

[Anonymous No.10130309]

>>10130255
Hold my beer
>I'm a big smelly willie. But I digress. I have dick cheese smegma because I am an unclean nigger of some kind

[Anonymous No.10130315]

>>10130255
Sure. I'm letting off frustration with academia in its current cucked state. I'll pict the noteworthy ones and clarify.

>Communication as you refer to it is but a means of assigning soft meaning to ideas to grant you feelings of intellectual gratification.
Intellectual masturbation. It's pretty much just masturbation. If you look at mathematical achievements of import, their done in teams of people who "sexualize" eachother's ideas, or by standalone autists like Perelmann who is probably an alien.

>Moreover, the concept of argument can serve two practical purposes
1. Learning weaknesses to remedy them
2. Probing into the ideas of others to profit from them. Usually arguments are mutually profitable in some way, but if all arguments were mutually profitable then arguing would be as interesting as breathing. While important, they would only be for those who care about learning, whatever that means.

>certain strains of multiculturalism actually fucking let you become a tenured professor

If you appeal to authority and can suck a mean dick, you actually get a job where you are used as a puppet to further other's political agendas

>yield more pussy
Woman are secondary to men in society. They do not control markets, shape land, and create bombs. They hold no "power" (power is illusory) over the masses. They only hold power over penises. That is why most of them are so petty. There are anomalies, but there aren't.

>Yet you sit here on an online "social media" platform not picking apart other people's psyche to see if the effects are tangible within the real world

This was a shot at my own self because I am not using my time wisely, despite shitposting being immensely fun.

4chan is a platform to let the unconscious run wild with little to no real-world ramifications. I prefer it because people don't hold back like they would on facebook out of "fear" of losing ground on their "socially perceived" self.

Hit everything?

[Anonymous No.10130330]

>>10130315
What if Perelman is Rasputin?

[Anonymous No.10130336]

>>10130330
>was a Russian mystic and self-proclaimed holy man
>Rasputin had a religious conversion experience after taking a pilgrimage to a monastery in 1897

I'd love to have tea with him.

[Anonymous No.10130374]

>>10130144
>who hurt you sweetie?
Time to go back

[Anonymous No.10130486]

>>10129918
Other current ape species are not our ancestors.

[Anonymous No.10130489]

>>10129932
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5737791/Woman-poops-middle-Tim-Hortons-Canada-hurls-employee.html
It checks out.

[Anonymous No.10130578]

>>10129899
>evolutionist
...creationist buzzword for "scientist"

[Anonymous No.10130725]

>>10130578
>All scientists believe in evolution

[Anonymous No.10130726]

>>10129909
based

[Anonymous No.10130727]

>>10129899
looks mongolian

[Anonymous No.10130729]

>>10130725
I'm sure there are some that don't, but evolution has already been accepted by all of the biggest Christian denominations, so there's no point fighting against it now.

[Anonymous No.10130733]

[Anonymous No.10130739]

>>10129899
Fuck off back to pol faggot

[Anonymous No.10130862]

>/sci/ falls for cheap bait again
is it autism?

[Anonymous No.10130897]

>>10130315
Can you paraphrase this please?

[Anonymous No.10131057]

>>10130897
Sure
You’re a incel faggot

Hit everything?