[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 21 KB, 249x234, 1512340457511.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10121202 No.10121202 [Reply] [Original]

(1+2+3+4+...) - (1+2+3+4+...) + (1+2+3+4+...) - ...

What's it equal you faggots?

>> No.10121206

(1+2+3+4+...) - (1+2+3+4+...) + (1+2+3+4+...) - ...
= (1 - 1 + 1 ...) + (2 - 2 + 2 ...) + ...
= (0 + 1) + (0 + 2)
= 3.

>> No.10121211

>>10121202
Its equal to
(1+2+3+..)

>> No.10121212
File: 100 KB, 921x640, 1536792066752.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10121212

>>10121202
>adding infinity

>> No.10121330

>>10121202
>faggots
Why the homophobia?

>> No.10121334

>>10121202
7

>> No.10121339

>>10121202
= -1/12 + 1/12 -1/12 ...
= -1/12(1-1+1-1+1...)
=-1/12x1/2
=-1/24

>> No.10121344

is an alternating series that gives -1/12+1/12-1/12+1/12-... and this is -1/12 multiplied by the geometric series (-1)^n and using the formula 1/(1-(-1))=1/2

we must multiply it by our -1/12 to get -1/24 as our final answer

>> No.10121358

>>10121202
-12

>> No.10121381

>>10121202
≈6.3

>> No.10121704

>>10121202
each series diverges. there is no sum

>> No.10121807

>>10121212
Based

>>10121704
This is the only correct answer.

>> No.10121838

>>10121339
Based.
>>10121206
>not going from the second line to (1-1+1-1+....)+ 2(1-1+1....)+.....=0.5 + 1 + 1.5 +....=1/2 (1+2+3+....)=-1/24
Fool.

>> No.10122345

>>10121344
lol

>> No.10122474
File: 9 KB, 224x219, pidar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10122474

Equal to A + B + C + ...

>> No.10122639

>>10121202
It's not well-defined, you can arrange the sums to add up to any integer.

>> No.10122647
File: 110 KB, 657x539, 1512371442092.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10122647

>>10122639

>> No.10122726

>>10121202
Parallel universes colliding

>> No.10122778

>>10122647
It's the truth though, that's one of the examples they show you when first explaining calculus, convergence, etc.

Consider:
(1+2+3+4+...) - (1+2+3+4+...) + (1+2+3+4+...) - (1+2+3+4+...) ... = ((1+2+3+4+...) - (1+2+3+4+...)) + ((1+2+3+4+...) - (1+2+3+4+...)) ... = (1-1 + 2-2 + 3-3 + ...) + (1-1 + 2-2 + 3-3 + ... = 0

But then I can also make the sum equal infinity:

(1+2+3+4+...) - (1+2+3+4+...) + (1+2+3+4+...) - (1+2+3+4+...) ... = (1+2+3+4+...) + (-(1+2+3+4+...) + (1+2+3+4+...)) + (-(1+2+3+4+...) + (1+2+3+4+...) ) ... = (1+2+3+4+...) + ((1+2+3+4+...) - (1+2+3+4+...)) + ((1+2+3+4+...) - (1+2+3+4+...) ) ... = (1+2+3+4+...) + ((1+2+3+4+...) - (1+2+3+4+...) + (1+2+3+4+...) - (1+2+3+4+...) ) ... = (as shown in the previous refactoring) (1+2+3+4+...) + 0

Or, as another anon has already shown, you can make it equal any integer: >>10121206

The fundamental issue is that the commutative and associative properties do not actually apply to infinite sums like this. You need to be more mathematically rigorous to work with them correctly.

>> No.10122780

>>10122647
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandi%27s_series

>> No.10123016

>>10121704
that is too fair. so certain its a singularity.

>> No.10123051

goddamn you again /sci/

it doesn't converge

>> No.10123838
File: 14 KB, 791x247, 1425310471168.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10123838

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuIIjLr6vUA

>completely fucking annihilates your meme video
Nothing personnel redditphile

>> No.10123839

>>10121330
Why the fuck do you always post this do you really believe you can save 4chins from mean words