[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
>> No.10113282

>>10113276
NDE's don't prove shit. all it proves is that when your brain is close to petering out, maybe some weird firings go off that lead people to wake up and be like "trippy dream bros!"

anyhow that's not even universal, lots of people with NDEs wake up and don't remember anything

>> No.10113298

>>10113276
>we pretend that we do not already know
What do you mean by "we", Peasant?

>> No.10114229

>>10113282
>muh first thought when reflecting on the issue
>ignores mountains of actual data to the contrary

This is the problem.

>> No.10114294

Bump? Am I using "bump" right?

>> No.10114326

>>10114294
No. This thread should be dead, not suffering from repetitive NDE.

>> No.10114358

>>10113276
nice spooks

>> No.10115293
File: 85 KB, 891x717, 1522299069867.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10115293

>>10113282
>lots of people with NDEs wake up and don't remember anything

This displays a fundamental misunderstanding of what an near-death experience (NDE) even is. An NDE is not just being close to death, it is to have a lucid and profound psychological experience while either undergoing the initial stages of death or while being close to death in general. If you come close to death or underwent the initial stages of death but didn't have any kind of lucid and/or profound experience at that time, you did not have an NDE, by definition.

Of all the people who come close to death, roughly 10-20% come back with an NDE, and it is random whether someone will have an NDE or not, as near-death experiencers (NDErs) are representative of the population as a whole.