Why aren't there more studies of handedness and IQ?

[Anonymous No.10085891]

Left-hemisphere, right-handed brainlets have the qualities most important to being excellent NPCs.
Meanwhile, right-hemisphere, left-handed thinkers are more likely to have the critical traits necessary to ask "why." Only 10% of the population, they have been proven by science to be have superior mental acumen but this line of research has been recently suppressed by modern (((academia))).
This is a continuation of millenia of oppression that left-handed people have suffered at the hands of religious NPCs who hold that left-handedness is "evil" and "of the devil."

Sources:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13803395.2013.778231?journalCode=ncen20
>The findings are considered to support the view that greater engagement of right-hemispheric resources facilitates the performance of higher order functions that orchestrate cognition, such as mental flexibility, inhibitory control, and working memory operations.

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/229/4714/665.long
>The corpus callosum, the main fiber tract connecting the two cerebral hemispheres, was larger by about 0.75 square centimeter, or 11 percent, in left-handed and ambidextrous people than in those with consistent right-hand preference.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0028393286900114
>Among extremely mathematically and/or verbally precocious students (top 1 in 10,000 in such reasoning ability), the following three physiological characteristics were found at high frequencies: left- or mixed-handedness

/sci/, why are intelligence studies predicted on race or gender rather than by the most important attributes, and what can we do about this? Right now, a lot of right-handed idiots are being accelerated into positions in STEM that would be better given to the more intelligent race.

[Anonymous No.10085903]

Left/Right brain is complete nonsense and you should probably actually prove otherwise if you expect to have an actual thread about science, take bullshit to /x/ otherwise.

[Anonymous No.10085910]

>>10085891
>npc meme
>>>/trash/

[Anonymous No.10085921]

>>10085903
>Left/Right brain is complete nonsense
Source?
You sound like an irrational leftist right now, desperately claiming that we're all the same from the neck up.

If there's no difference and it's all nonsense, why is this a fact:
>Left-handers are often excluded from study cohorts in neuroscience and neurogenetics in order to reduce variance in the data. However, recent investigations have shown that the inclusion or targeted recruitment of left-handers can be informative in studies on a range of topics, such as cerebral lateralization and the genetic underpinning of asymmetrical brain development.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260148805_On_the_other_hand_Including_left-handers_in_cognitive_neuroscience_and_neurogenetics

>>10085910
>I can't handle facts and logic

[Anonymous No.10085946]

>>10085903
>complete nonsense
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036036
Pic related
>Figure 1. Hemispheric specialization for affective motivation depends on handedness.
>Conclusion: The hemispheric correlates of approach motivation reversed between right- and left-handers, consistent with the way they typically use their dominant and nondominant hands to perform approach and avoidance actions. In both right- and left-handers, approach motivation was lateralized to the same hemisphere that controls the dominant hand.
I'd tell you to think a bit more critically, let go of your assumptions and consider the evidence, but perhaps that's not something you've been taught how to do. I don't hold it against you but I encourage you to just be quiet while a /sci/ thread is underway.

[Anonymous No.10085951]

>>10085921
>I can't handle facts and logic
I don't really care about your facts or logic I just think it's a trash meme and the fact that you use it makes you a trash OP.

[Anonymous No.10085977]

>>10085951
>I don't really care about your facts or logic
Stopped reading there
I'd ask you to consider why you automatically, robotically reject thinking about a concept just because the OP used a phrase that you find off-putting? And why that phrase upsets you so much?
But to do that would be to presuppose that you are capable of asking why...

[Anonymous No.10085981]

>>10085921
Ben Shapiro TRIGGERS Liberal by SENDING them to NAZI DEATH CAMPS using pure CONSERVATIVE LOGIC and REASONING and then ANGERS SJW by GOING on a RAMPAGE literally RAPING and MURDERING every single MINORITY within a 200 MILE RADIUS then TROLLS Libtard with TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME by licking Donald Trumps MICROPENIS of all the DRIED CUM from the CONCEPTION of Barron Trump and he ANGERS democrat by FEEDING upon the FLESH of ABORTED FETUSES and the BLOOD of EVERY single LIBTARD to literally BECOME a GOD AMONG MEN which TROLLS idiot COMMIES by OPENING the seals of HELL and CAUSING the APOCALYPSE in which the DEVIL RAPES CHILDREN and TEARS OFF the heads of Liberal TODDLERS and LITERALLY setting WOMEN’s RIGHTS a THOUSAND YEARS and also Ben TRIGGERS the SOCIALISTS by RAPING the UNDEAD CORPSE of LEON TROTSKY and JOSEPH STALIN and he PISSES OFF the LEFTISTS by ESTABLISHING a NEW WORLD ORDER in which he is the SUPREME GOD EMPEROR OF ALL OF THE AMERICAS, CHINA, EUROPE, BRITAIN, TAIWAN, and THAT RANDOM ISLAND IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PACIFIC OCEAN and MURDERS all POLITICAL DISSIDENTS within the government and then he LITERALLY summons CTHULHU and have home and the DEVIL FUCK HIM IN THE ASS while he CUMS all OVER the BOTTLE of LIBERAL TEARS and then he PRANKS Chink Ugayer by IMITATING him and literally dying from the ANAL WOUNDS from Literally being FUCKED IN THE ASS by SATAN and CTHULHU and then ENRAGES the COMMIES by RAPING GOD and BECOMING the NEW ABSOLUTE RULER OF THE UNIVERSE!!!!! (LIBERALS TROLLED) (NOT CLICKBAIT) (SJWs and FEMINISTS OWNED)

[Anonymous No.10085982]

>>10085977
>I came here to troll why are you calling me out for trolling?
OK.

[Anonymous No.10085989]

>>10085982
>trolling
I guess all those researchers whose peer-reviewed evidence I linked were also trolling?

[Anonymous No.10085991]

>>10085989
>I can't be trolling if I have links
Sure thing troll.

[Anonymous No.10086135]

>>10085981
Okay, now THIS is epic

[Anonymous No.10086181]

>>10085903
FPBP

It is only used as a way to divide and conquer people, to keep society off balance and easy to control.

[Anonymous No.10086289]

>>10086181
>peer reviewed studies in thread in providing strong evidence for left/right-hemisphere dominance IQ differences: 5
>studies against: 0
>wheres ur proof hurrr g-go to /x/
>best post

[Anonymous No.10086412]

what if i circled an equal amount of both

i-i write with my left

[Anonymous No.10087283]

>>10085891
That image is complete nonsense. I favor my right eye, because my left eye is damaged due to a childhood trauma. Nothing to do with brain.

[Anonymous No.10087373]

ambidextrous master race checking in

[Anonymous No.10087579]

>>10087283
Imagine not understanding averages as you present a lone outlier to "debunk" a claim based on observation of tens of thousands of people.
We are talking about the innate, genetic quality of left- or right hemisphere dominance, it is fixed at birth and persists no matter what you do from that point on.
If I cut off your right hand and you're forced to become left handed, you still have the same brain. If you lost both hands and have to write with your feet, you're STILL the same brain. Not that hard.

[Anonymous No.10087589]

>>10087579
>Imagine not understanding averages as you present a lone outlier to "debunk" a claim based on observation of tens of thousands of people.

The problem is precisely that the image does not mention averages, "tens of thousands of people" or correlation anywhere. The image makes hard, unconditional claims such as "Mostly R's = Left brained," which are simply false.

[Anonymous No.10087688]

Ouch, so the aspect nowadays people write on computer where they use left hand and right hand together is ... how does it feel?

[Anonymous No.10088129]

>>10085921
>You sound like an irrational leftist right now, desperately claiming that we're all the same from the neck up.

>I can't handle facts and logic


You truly DESTROYED that libtard emotional leftist my conservative pal!!!

[Anonymous No.10088145]

>>10085891
The traits don't conflict. If you have some of them underdeveloped, you're just an underdeveloped brainlet.

[Anonymous No.10088185]

that image is fucking retarded. the sides are flipped. This kind of research does not mean that everything about a person is black or white and nobody cares anymore if a person is right handed or left handed so why even bitch about it trying to prove your special

[Anonymous No.10088335]

>>10085981
based AND redpilled

[Anonymous No.10088646]

>>10085891
Devil detected

[Anonymous No.10088683]

>>10086289
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28826694
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1000995

You can find a LOT of studies showing no major differences between left/right-handed people...

As always, you can find studies in pro or against what you want. A study that found a statitistical fluke in a certain test doesn't mean much against hundred of other studies.

Thats why "muh hemisphere" is a meme. It's not like is false, but you use like it's a horoscope.

[Anonymous No.10089134]

>>10088683
>IQ isn't a meme

[Anonymous No.10089142]

>>10085946
He meant that the idea of "right brain feels, left brain reals" is nonsense, not that there isn't localization of activity based on right and left handedness.

[Anonymous No.10089872]

>how to find your stronger eye
That is literally bullshit. You just randomly choose one of the two switches you are seeing, nothing to do with you having a strong and a weak eye.

If you actually want to find out your dominant eye, have your eyes see two completely different but equally stimulating images and see which one of the images overtakes your vision.
Also repeat the experiment a few times and switch sides to be sure. At least for me it's semi random with right eye coming up top more often.

[Anonymous No.10089880]

>>10089872
Correction: you are looking at the switch through one of the two holes you are seeing, not one of the two switches through one hole. I was reminiscing the inversely functioning thumb test that people forced on me when I was younger.

[Anonymous No.10089893]

>>10085891
The 'L' is on the right brain and the 'R' on the left one. Whoever made that picture must have been a truly smart person.

[Anonymous No.10089906]

>>10089872
That test is a pretty common test for eye dominance, if your eye switches a lot, you have no heavy dominance

[Anonymous No.10089909]

>>10085891
Get this NPC non science outta here

[Anonymous No.10090006]

>>10089906
I know it is common but it is also bullshit. The thumb test version of this has you sticking your thumb about 10 inches from your face and covering some distant object like a light switch with it, then closing one of your eyes to see if your thumb still covers the switch and if it does that's your dominant eye.

The problem is that everyone I've ever talked to saw 2 thumbs while keeping both eyes open and only randomly decided which thumb goes over the switch. From that point onwards I don't know how you convince yourself that it's a valid test at all when you are obviously in full control when deciding which eye gets to have the blocked view.

Same principle with the test described in the OP. You're seeing 2 triangles but decide to center the switch using one of them. "You just need to focus on the one that comes to you naturally" arguments don't convince me at all.

[Anonymous No.10090026]

>>10085891
Who the fuck made that picture and why are the "left" part and "right" part of the brain switched?

[Anonymous No.10090028]

>>10085981

[Anonymous No.10090134]

>>10085891
Looks like an NPC

[Anonymous No.10090261]

>>10085891
Absolute bullshit pseudoscience posting

[Anonymous No.10090319]

Im left handed but right eye dominant so it makes shooting a gun annoying but thats about it.

[Anonymous No.10090755]

>>10085891
pseudoscience

[Anonymous No.10090767]

>>10085891
Because we don't have a concrete definition and measure of intelligence and since IQ is closest thing we have, though very flawed, we don't want to waste research with a correlation to a poor metric that people will use absentmindedly

[Anonymous No.10090773]

Can we please get a ride against IQ threads so we can report them specifically?

[Anonymous No.10090869]

>>10085891
Could this board get 5 minutes without pseud garbage?

[Anonymous No.10091271]

>>10085981
In a HEATED debate

[Anonymous No.10092467]

>>10090869
[citation needed]

So far only one person has posted a whopping two studies that didn't come up with results, which is far from convincing. (I can come up with plenty of studies that don't show cognitive differences between races, for example.)
And some morons missing the fucking point of the thread and writing diatribes about the eye test in the OP image

But 90% of the world is right-handed so it's only natural that 90% of replies are from brainlets

[Anonymous No.10092608]

Parents often prevent children from being lefties. Therefore, I'm going to guess that that hemisphere stuff develops at the same time as a child is learning to feed themselves otherwise left biased science studies would run into right handers with right hemisphere dominance because there would be plenty of fake right handed people. Probably some evolutionary trait to be able to protect the strong side of your brain with your weapon. As far as lefties being smarter, probably because every left handed person is exposed to a righty world and must relate to it as others do in order to get by. They also have an advantage in a fight because they are well used to right handed people while right handed people will find them unpredictable. I'm left handed because I picked the red scissors in preschool. I can use chopsticks with either hand because it is not as familiar as a fork. Not because ambidextrous. Anybody can do shit if they practice and lefties get more practice.

[Anonymous No.10092627]

>>10085891
Yeah so what's the difference between "Why" and "How"?