[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 1.35 MB, 1239x627, 2MASS_LSS_chart-NEW_Nasa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042770 No.10042770 [Reply] [Original]

what lies beyond the observable universe?

>> No.10042776

>>10042770
The unobservable universe

>> No.10042780

>>10042770
uranus

>> No.10042789

>>10042770
Things that we can’t observe probably.

>> No.10043067

>>10042770
More universe

>> No.10043068

Ligma of course

>> No.10043070

>>10042770
Why dont we just look and make it observed?
Only srs answers pls

>> No.10043080

>>10042770
More of the same stuff

>> No.10043083

Who cares? How would it affect us? The beings who made this simulation did a pretty bad job. Dark matter, dark energy, the gross differences between QED theory and observed phenomena. The whole standard model is ugly and inelegant. The designers doubtless couldn't be bothered to provide a good explanation of why the universe ends, so I doubt we'll ever find it.

>> No.10043180

>>10042780
More like
Ur Anus
Lmpa

>> No.10043184

>>10043068
What is a ligma?

>> No.10043444
File: 54 KB, 686x689, PepeFeel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10043444

>>10042770

An apple logo

>> No.10043521

>>10043067
"Beyond the Alps lie more Alps."

>> No.10043522

>>10043070
>Only srs answers pls

But there are no serious answers to that question.

>> No.10043601

narrativium

>> No.10043625

>>10043083
The amount of brainlet in this post..

You do realize that theory is what we, the humans, use to attempt to explain the things we observe (or might observe, as a logical consequence of). If you expressed all your functions as series approximations things would look ugly as crap, but you would afford some comforting accuracy in many cases just the same, provided you computed enough terms.

>> No.10043632

>>10043601
With scattered pockets of Elephantium and Chelonium.

>> No.10043660

>>10042776
fpbp

/thread

>> No.10043708

>we are at the exact center of the observable universe, down to like a fucking inch
atheists BTFO

>> No.10043712

>>10042770
Qualia.

>> No.10043732

4chan posts

>> No.10043745

>>10043522
autism

>> No.10043754

>>10042770
you're mom, because she lies everywhere lmao

>> No.10043775

>>10043712
looooooooooool

>> No.10044632

>>10042770
Your depression

>> No.10045282

>>10043184
Well, it's not Lupus.

>> No.10045323

>>10043070
on the off chance this isn't bait, it's because light from those parts didn't have enough time to reach us, what with the universe starting at some point.
So we can't, even if we really want.

>> No.10045334

Just more universe. Stars, dust, you know the drill.

>> No.10045336

>>10043708
You know there’s someone out there that doesn’t get this joke and thinks it’s a good point and that’s amazingly funny and sad.

>> No.10045339

>>10042770
Indescriptibles things that would drive you insane.

>> No.10045340

>>10043521
Invalid comparison.

>> No.10045683

If we sent a probe 1ly in any one direction, does the general "observable universe" increase in that direction?

Or does the observable universe for the specific probe increase and the humans that see the data, simply observe outside their observable universe.

Assuming we can send a probe out in that direction faster than the universe is expanding in that direction. Meaning without doubt the probe would have the chance to interact with light that would otherwise never reach earth.

>> No.10045827

Ok serious question ,if the age of the universe is 13+ billion years old and we know the expansion rate ,shouldn’t we have a good idea of how big the entire universe is ? (Including the unobservable universe or is the calculated age of the universe based on the observable universe ?

>> No.10045856

>>10043184
LIGMA BALLS YOU RETARDED NIGGER HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHHAHABAAHA LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOIIIOIOIOOIOIIIOOOOOL

>> No.10045894

>>10045827
AFAIK, the universe has no center. Its a weird blob shape. Thus other parts of the universe may be expanding or even contracting at different rates than our observable universe.

>> No.10046002

>>10045856
Libtard just got owned

>> No.10046009

>>10045827
>is the calculated age of the universe based on the observable universe ?
yes

>> No.10046378

>>10042776
ahhh beat me to it.

Good job, anon

>> No.10048032

>>10042770
>what lies beyond the observable universe?
Presumably more universe.
The particle horizon represents all of the universe that at one point in time was causally linked.
If you could instantly travel to the "edge" of the observable universe you'd just see a new particle horizon around you 46.6 bly wide, and about 14 billion years old.

>> No.10048037

>>10042776
I came here to post this.

>> No.10048060

why can't we observe all of it ?

>> No.10048068

>>10045683
You could send a probe in a direction faster than the universe is expanding near us, but not faster than it is expanding at the edge. It’s kind of beautiful that if we sent a probe in a direction at light speed, it’d never reach the cut-off point where the expansion of space is faster than light (at 1.4 redshift I think, while some of the farthest are +8). Every moment we wait, the list of things we will never reach gets bigger

>> No.10048077

>>10048060
Because its bigger than it is old. Light couldn't make it from one "edge" of the objective universe to the other in the amount of time it has existed.

>> No.10048086
File: 136 KB, 644x632, 1484663015011.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10048086

>>10042770
the bogdanoffs