[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 39 KB, 998x720, 1538003543965.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031650 No.10031650 [Reply] [Original]

https://iqhaven.com/mytests1/cfiq-test/index.htm
I found this IQ test
It was actually difficult and fun desu
>18/25, 145 15SD
Post results and/or screenshots

>> No.10031672

>>10031650
i fuck asian girls for sport. the life of an expat in korea. they all hurt.

>> No.10031675

>>10031650
I rawdog every bitch. ass first pussy later.

>> No.10031676
File: 17 KB, 300x300, 1519049514516.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031676

>>10031672
nice

>> No.10031777

I got 124 on a non-meme test by a psychologist and got around 130 on online tests linked on this board

>> No.10031798

>>10031777
What about the test i fucking posted

>> No.10031868

>>10031650
Hmm, easy to get lucky but feels hard enough, got 142 which I would say is about right

>> No.10031871

>>10031798
I just tried it and got 162, it's horribly inaccurate

>> No.10031926
File: 44 KB, 1448x847, too ez.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031926

>>10031650
I believe in God.

>> No.10031927

>>10031871
if you got 23/25 you're genius level for sure, but maybe you just got lucky. Any test this short is gonna be pretty unpredictable.

But yeah, guessing randomly you would get about 100 iq, so...

Anyways, I got 130, pretty good considering pattern recognition(which is all IQ describes) was never my strong suite, I'm a much more creative than reactive learner. Also feel like I got pretty unlucky.

>> No.10031941

>>10031927
>But yeah, guessing randomly you would get about 100 iq, so...
Yeah, but the test is hard enough that some one with an IQ of 100 (that was trying) would only get 4 right

>> No.10031944

>>10031941
3 or 4 of them were very obvious, then if you guessed the rest of them you'd still end up with 6-8 right. Of course, I don't know what it's like to be 100 IQ but I doubt you would not know any of them.

>> No.10031947

>>10031650
>IQ norm is still very theoretical
wew lad goes in all fields

>> No.10031948

>>10031941
Picking randomly gets you 4/25 which is 100 IQ, so why would someone that's not guessing and not retarded still only get 100?

>> No.10031955

>>10031948
because op finally found a test he did well on so it must be valid.

>> No.10031971
File: 17 KB, 400x174, nerd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031971

>>10031650
>hey I just came form rebbit and I'm 16 yo, what's your IQ? I'm very special because my mom tells me

>> No.10031973

>>10031955
https://iqhaven.com
There are plenty of tests, if you want to find the most accurate be my guest

>> No.10032171

>>10031973
giqtest.com is a lot more accurate. Search the warosu archive for a way to get your results on it without paying.

>> No.10032183

>>10031941
Yeah but what about the time? If you picking them up randomly you are not wasting trying to solve them.

>> No.10032187

So I haven't done anything academically challenging in the past 1.5 years. Basically rot and neeted away. Let's say I take a iq test now and then study math for some time and retake the test, would you expect any change in my IQ?

>> No.10032290

>>10032187
I would say that if you learned any new concepts that stuck with you, then yes you might see a positive change.

>> No.10032298
File: 26 KB, 470x309, result.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032298

This corresponds to an IQ of 148 according to the "still very theoretical" norm provided.

>> No.10032313
File: 1.76 MB, 500x275, fuck you.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032313

>FBI shill trying to collect data for his jew overlords.

>> No.10032350

>>10032298
I did another test on this site and got an IQ of 124. This much variance between tests is proof that they're junk. Sorry OP.

>> No.10032355

>>10031944
>3 or 4 of them were very obvious
That doesn't mean a below-average person will figure them out.

Check out this article if you want to be scared:
> http://www.unz.com/akarlin/stupid-people/

>> No.10032432

>>10032355
I'm only scared by the number of people willing to argue with the author.

>> No.10033810

What are the rules for 2, 4, and 5?

>> No.10033868

>>10031650
According to the test I'm around 136, that doesn't seem even close to accurate.
I'm pretty sure I should be about 110 at the most.

>> No.10033871
File: 21 KB, 872x483, test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033871

>>10033868
>According to the test I'm around 136, that doesn't seem even close to accurate.
>I'm pretty sure I should be about 110 at the most.
forgot the pic.

>> No.10033879

Lol

I have a rule with IQ tests if you put the same answer and get anything above 70 it's a piece of trash

All 1s get you 4 right answers which means a 100iq on this test a monkey can get.

Got 16, and I'm slightly above average IQ irl.

Subtract about 35 IQ points to what the test gives you for an accurate rating

>> No.10033892

>>10033810
>What are the rules for 2, 4, and 5?
Answers are 1,3,5

>> No.10033921

...I only got 11 right.

Should I just kill myself, /sci/?

>> No.10033992
File: 101 KB, 640x640, matrix15.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033992

On the topic of IQ tests, anyone know how to solve this matrix? Did giqtest.com and my results lined up with childhood testing (only got two points higher for a 144), but I can't figure out this one.

>> No.10034061

>>10033992
My guess is (1)

Going from left to right on each row, the total number of enclosed spaces in each square decreases.

3,1,0
7,3,1
2,1,?

Therefore box #1 is the only sensible answer, as it doesn't have any enclosed spaces.

>> No.10034077

>>10033992
>>10034061
yeah, my best guess was going to be something like entropy increasing or decreasing. There's no way there is some sort of consistent transformation happening here.

>> No.10034101

>>10033921
Nah dog. I got 140 on an actual IQ test, only got 14 on this one. For some reason I couldn't make sense of like half the dots in a grid ones.

>> No.10034145

>>10034061
That isn't it. Took that test twice, the only thing I changed was my answer to that question, from 2(?) to 1, and ended up with the same score.

>> No.10034152

>>10031798
All tests that claim to go beyond 140 are likely bullshit or based on the "other" SD

>> No.10034416

>>10033992
It's the triangle. Search the warosu archive for the explanation.

>> No.10034477

>>10032355
>an IQ of 100 (that was trying) would only get 4 right
>That doesn't mean a below-average person will figure them out.
100 iq is average.

>> No.10034485

>>10031927
Randomly, i get 112

>> No.10034522

>>10034101
Some dots are intuitive connections.
Most create a consistent movement pattern if you isolate certain dots/dot collections, and move them as components of the whole.

It's pretty difficult but once I saw that I saw what I was doing wrong, and that was treating it as a whole moving part.

>> No.10034657

>>10034477
Picking randomly gets you 4 right

>> No.10036308

>>10032171
>result 141
>still a social retard

>> No.10036332

>>10034657
No.

>> No.10036344

Got a 14/25 with sequence 6423652563633455265424441

>> No.10036509

>>10033879
>tfw i got 100iq on this test

>> No.10036783

>>10031650
>online iq test
Did a full psych eval because my dad thought I was a schizophrenic 'sperg. Stanford Binet test said I was 136 +/- 5 iq, convinced the test I wasn't a sperg, and the rest of the test said I had borderlinepd.

>> No.10037531

>>10033992
It's the triangle. The last row, the circles are compressed into lines, one per picture. There were 3 circles, that eventually turn into 3 lines, which happen to form a triangle.

that's how I see it at least

>> No.10037641

>/sci/ unironically posting online IQ tests and taking them and posting results
oh man I'm definitely not going to find anything interesting on this board.. y'all make a mockery of science desu..