>>10004411

There is nothing more retardes than simultaneously believing in infinity but not infinitely small things.

I bet this is how you think infinity works:

>1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,_,inf

>1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,_,inf

>1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,_,inf

You assume to be close to infinity on any given count, where it is the next potential largest value that will be bumped ahead even further if and only if a larger real count is made. "9 tending to infinity? But what of 10! 10 tending to infinity? But what of 11!"

Not how that works brainlet. All real values are 0 compared to infinity. There is no difference between 1 and infinity vs. [math]10^{568754278864334678^{256}}[/math] and infinity. Both values are equidistant from infinity. All values are equidistant from infinity. Tending to infinity NEVER reaches infinity, and tending to [math]\frac{1}{\infty}[/math] NEVER reaches 0.

N E V E R.