[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 18 KB, 706x498, schumann levitator.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8954365 No.8954365 [Reply] [Original]

So I did recently look into some stuff about the Nazis building flying saucers and stuff (if someone is interested here a thread about the stuff https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/126352757 )
However one thing mentioned frequently is the Schumann levitator which is apparently used to propulse the saucer. Now my question is if a structure like pic related (which allegedly is the schumannlevitator) would be able to let things hover and overcome gravity

>> No.8954369

>>8954365
>>>/x/

>> No.8954379

This seems at best, terribly inefficient

>> No.8954398

>>8954365
why not make one yourself and find out OP?

>> No.8954405

>>8954365
Fuck to the no

>> No.8954423

>>8954398
not talented when it comes to handywork. also i have no idea what "high voltage" is and assume its not the kind of voltage coming out of the powersocket in the wall. also i dont want to accidently electrocute myself

>> No.8956288

just a bump so i get some more oppinions

>> No.8956306
File: 207 KB, 507x476, 8a2dd74dfe7a55f85f13178f3123b6a2c20817fbc3cc022784e9e1fe08833203.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8956306

>>8956288
The diagram is nonsense. Newton is crying.

>> No.8956317

>>8956306
>Newton
>being relevant to electromagnetism
?????

>> No.8956324

>>8956317
Whatever that magnet is attracted to is attracted back just as hard. There is zero net force being produced. It's the equivalent to Newton's laws.

Unless you're meaning to tell me that an electrical field line passing through metal produces a one way force in the same direction?

>> No.8956330

Yes it works. The magnetic field around the coil is proportional to the current through it. The resulting magnetic field interacts with aluminium lattice electron spins, producing a net force opposite to Earth's gravity (Lorentz force).
You just need several kT and you're good to go.

Send from the moon.

>> No.8956348

>>8956324
>i push something with my hand
>newton's 3rd law it pushes back just as hard
>therefore it doesn't go anywhere

da fuq m8, that's not how it works

>> No.8956368

>>8956324
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hv__Zln-h5Q
i imagine it working similar to this principle though. it works through electromagnetism as well so its not that far off. the question is just if it works when structured as inthe OP

>> No.8956375

it actually works, saw one at a science fair. It is terribly inefficient tho, and it would take lots of power to even lift 1 kg. There is no way the nazis would have found an energy source powerful enough.

>> No.8956379
File: 322 KB, 1388x842, Instruction translated.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8956379

>>8956375
well, this shows allegedly how the glocke worked. an anon once mentioned it could be a scalar device producing energy for propulsion, weapons or simple energy source. in case of the glocke maybe all of it. cant tell if this would work, maybe someone of you guys can.

>> No.8956421

>>8956368
>running 25kV across a bare copper wire to lift a triangle made of aluminum sheets

doesn't seem to be worth it tbqh

>> No.8956442

>>8956421
yeah, seems ineffective, but all technology is at the beginning. once we got the principle right we can finetune it and increase the effectivity i guess.

>> No.8957531

some bump since i maybe get more infos

>> No.8957534

>>8956379
>>scalar device
and what the fuck is a scalar device?

>> No.8957593

>>8956368
Lifters don't work via antigravity, they operate under the same principle as a jet engine.

>> No.8958024

>>8957593
i know, not my fault the guy called it that way.

>>8957534
from what i got it supposedly is a device which draws energy out of the ether meaning that tesla apparently was right. however again i know too few about this stuff to be able to say if those instructions hold any ground

>> No.8958857

>>8956379
Complete techno-gibberish. This doesn't even qualify as techno-doubletalk.

>> No.8959050

>>8958857
anything in there you can point out on what wouldnt work specifically?

>> No.8959062

>>8954365
>Schumann
And you don't seem to understand. A shame, you seemed an honest man.

>> No.8959112

>>8959050
There isn't enough of a "there" there to point out anything in particular that is wrong. There's just no reason to expect this to do anything at all. All it's describing is a lead-lined thermos full of radioactive purple ferrofluid you've cooled down to a bit colder than liquid nitrogen and are spinning around with an electromagnetic field.

>> No.8959401

>>8959062
i dont think i get what you mean

>>8959112
ah ok. but can you think of any effect this might produce?

>> No.8959506

>>8959401
No, that's what I mean by there not being any 'there' there. Not only can I not think of anything interesting that might do, I can't even think of why you might expect that to do anything interesting.

>> No.8960342

>>8959506
well, as i said its supposedly some description of the workings of the glocke. finding out if it does something or what it does could tell us if it could be legit or not