/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 108 KB, 1536x864, 5d4d70b74335840001108ac4-image_e33ce574.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Feb 20 15:58:58 2023 No.15217252 [Reply] [Original]

Are holograms dead tech? It's been decades since there's been any forward progress whatsoever with them

Anonymous Mon Feb 20 16:20:19 2023 No.15217297

>>15217252
Nobody has even the faintest idea how to protect an image into the air like is seen in the film without a medium to contain the image. It's like trying to make an image with just the electron gun of a crt it's not possible without a medium to throw the image onto,

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 20 16:41:53 2023 No.15217331 >>15217297 Yeah it really feels like they're just totally clueless on it. It might be impossible, you're basically trying to just make the air a different color

Anonymous Tue Feb 21 05:45:40 2023 No.15218879
File: 99 KB, 670x632, 1578371902423.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15217297
nooooooooo!!! why can't SCIENCE!! make my disney movie fantasy live come true?!?! you're lying, SCIENCE is gonna bring me my disney princess fairytale life that i was promised as a child. also santa is going to bring me a pony

Anonymous Tue Feb 21 05:56:33 2023 No.15218884

>>15217252
holograms are definitely dead tech. using an analog film to make 3D imagery is as outdated as Polaroid cameras. except for holograms, you need to shoot your polaroid picture in a dark room illuminated by only a monochromatic laser. not a really useful technology.

and keep in mind i am talking about the real holograms that made a splash in physics in the 20th century. not the meme stickers they put on credit cards. two different things, and the things on credit cards aren’t true holography

real “hologram” technology is dead. the analogy is, for example, Plasma TV screens. they had promise to do something at one time but conventional technology managed to supersede all of the advances they might have offered at one time

>>	bodhi Tue Feb 21 05:59:24 2023 No.15218887 File: 125 KB, 228x219, shreked.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15217252 >he doesnt know about project blue beam

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 05:59:45 2023 No.15218888 >>15217252 3d Skype is so useful you can stare at the speakers ass instead of her face

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 06:10:52 2023 No.15218903 >>15217297 Maybe use sound waves from multiple directions that collide at some point and heat air in that specific location strong enough to glow/ionize?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 06:15:44 2023 No.15218910 >>15217297 >>15217297 Well star wars and star trek guys know how

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 06:17:56 2023 No.15218913 File: 36 KB, 878x293, zoom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15218888

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 06:18:06 2023 No.15218914 >>15218887 That projects the hologram onto the firmament.

>>	Bookshelf Thread Tue Feb 21 06:27:46 2023 No.15218924 >>15218903 Imagine the literal cancer

>>	bodhi Tue Feb 21 06:30:12 2023 No.15218926 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPKvChFRe0A

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 06:37:37 2023 No.15218935 >>15218924 Cover it with leaded glass

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 08:12:02 2023 No.15219048 >>15217252 Probably impossible, and no reason to work on it because what does it really accomplish that a screen and a video don't accomplish?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 13:35:08 2023 No.15219457 >>15218935 Why not just use a screen at that point

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 14:42:19 2023 No.15219596 File: 32 KB, 672x343, 3D-Industrie-Laser-Kristall-Glas-Crystal2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I feel like it would be more practical to figure out how to give something like these things "pixels" in a 3D space

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 14:58:45 2023 No.15219618 >>15217297 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oGtgbsmmg8 Already happened.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 15:10:41 2023 No.15219644 >>15219618 This is shocking, surprised I hadn't heard more about this

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 15:20:52 2023 No.15219673 >>15217297 Wait, but I thought EM waves didn't need aether?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 15:46:38 2023 No.15219737 >>15219596 Voxels?

Anonymous Tue Feb 21 16:19:41 2023 No.15219815

>>15217252
Niggers it already happened, they did a tupac and then iirc a michael jackson show too both with holograms, just youtube "tupac hologram"
>Reee link?
No niggers search it for yourself you guys literally wondering when will happen something that already happened years ago

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 16:30:18 2023 No.15219842 >>15219815 Like OP said that was over a decade ago around the time the original Avatar film premiered and the tech was shit and hasn't improved considerably.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 16:31:29 2023 No.15219846 >>15219815 Wasn't that a flat projection?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 21 16:41:21 2023 No.15219875 >>15219673 They don't. EM waves don't propagate through a medium, they propagate through the vacuum. What's that got to do with the topic? >>15219815 Pepper's ghost, not a hologram.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]