/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 1.37 MB, 2960x1440, 1657604619888.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

/sfg/ - Spaceflight General Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:10:07 2022 No.14648744 [Reply] [Original]

Stephan's Quintet edition
>Previous thread: >>14643168

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:11:33 2022 No.14648746 File: 2.88 MB, 1920x1080, CSI Starbase-1546610765511245828-20220711 164155-vid1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Reminder: It's over

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:12:08 2022 No.14648747 File: 2.90 MB, 1286x720, NASASpaceflight-1546605684070006784-20220711 162144-vid1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:13:25 2022 No.14648750

>An interesting anecdote from Ignition, but John D. Clarke, was a proposition for a monopropellant that was just a mixture of liquid methane and liquid oxygen. The substance was so unstable that it would detonate if you shined a light on it.

>If you mix gaseous methane and oxygen in the combustion chamber at sufficient temperature, pressure, and velocity, they may just spontaneously combust on contact, hence why they no longer need igniters in the main chamber.

is ignition worth reading?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:14:59 2022 No.14648753 File: 2.79 MB, 960x540, 8Mpszbb-1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14648750 Yes

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:17:45 2022 No.14648759 File: 340 KB, 2048x1536, 1653381353634.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] South Korea is gaan to the moon in a few weeks.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:18:14 2022 No.14648760 File: 950 KB, 958x1196, rocketman.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14648744 Glass the Earth, demigod war now

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:25:18 2022 No.14648775 File: 3.52 MB, 1x1, ignition.pdf [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14648750 Yes. Do it immediately

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:26:59 2022 No.14648779

>Base of the vehicle seems ok by flashlight. I was just out there about an hour ago.
This is the billionaire equivalent of when I was little and my dad would hear the furnace/blower fan/water heater/whatever make a weird noise, and so he'd get a flashlight, go grumbling up into the attic, and just give the machinery up there a stern look for a minute.
Except Elon was probably at home in Austin watching an internal stream of the test, saw the explosion, sighed and went to get in his plane to go check things out.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:27:10 2022 No.14648780

>>14648750
Yeah, it's a great informative read about all the different approaches to fuel and also mentions a bunch of stuff that never made it to production and why. Also, some sections like the CFl3 history and the story about the bats in the test stand had me in stitches.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:28:52 2022 No.14648783
File: 2.73 MB, 1920x1080, 1628373001793.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

July 12 1230 EDT - CASC - Long March 3B/E - Xichang, China - Communications satellite.
July 13 0100 EDT - Rocket Lab - Electron - New Zealand - Classified NRO payload.
July 13 0713 EDT - Arianespace - Vega C - French Guiana - Debut flight, LARES-2 magnetic sensing satellite.
July 14 2044 EDT - SpaceX - Falcon 9 - 39A, Florida - Cargo Dragon 2, ISS commercial resupply.
July 16 - SpaceX - Falcon 9 - Florida - Starlink 4-22.
July 22 - Rocket Lab - Electron - New Zealand - Classified NRO payload.
July 24 - CASC - Long March 5B - Wenchang, China - Wentian laboratory module for the Chinese space station.
July 30 - JAXA - Epsilon - Uchinoura, Japan - RAISE-3 technology demonstration payloads.
August 2 - SpaceX - Falcon 9 - Florida - Korean Pathfinder Lunar Orbiter.
Q3 - Astra Space - Rocket 3 - TROPICS-2 & 3.
Q3 - Relativity - Terran 1 - LC-16, Florida - Debut flight.
Q3 - Landspace - ZhuQue-2 - Jiaquan, China - Debut flight, first Chinese private and methalox rocket.
Q3 - ABL Space - RS1 - Alaska - Debut flight.
Q3 - NASA - SLS - 39B, Florida - Artemis I, uncrewed debut flight to lunar orbit and capsule reentry.
Q4 - SpaceX - Starship - Texas - Debut flight.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:41:54 2022 No.14648804
File: 2.87 MB, 320x240, 1374032485710.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

random cringe from last thread

>Reddit is saying the reason Biden is making this announcement is because Webb actually found aliens. This is a big deal

>no, I think exactly the opposite. Biden wouldn't spend time on this if they were getting word that the images were underwhelming

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:44:59 2022 No.14648810 File: 211 KB, 900x1200, DfJaAVXUwAAovqY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14648804 all in all it was a good thread

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:46:28 2022 No.14648811 >>14648775 Great book was surprised to find it on audible too.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:51:49 2022 No.14648818 >>14648746 If jet fuel could melt the twin towers imagine what rocket fuel could do to the launch tower, it's officially over.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:06:12 2022 No.14648842 File: 40 KB, 618x354, 1651436465713.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:08:23 2022 No.14648845 >>14648759 For what purpose? Rover? Orbiter? Crash into it like the poos?

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:11:49 2022 No.14648853
File: 3.72 MB, 2001x3000, FXUVurcWQAAnjTl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1546727913944502274
>Base of the vehicle seems ok by flashlight. I was just out there about an hour ago. We shut down the pad for the night for safety. Will know more in the morning.

doomers BTFO

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:17:59 2022 No.14648861 File: 347 KB, 916x1500, N1_1M1_mockup_on_the_launch_pad_at_the_Baikonur_Cosmodrome_in_late_1967.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:19:19 2022 No.14648863 >>14648853 Cope harder, it's done. Thunderchad doomers assemble

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:29:36 2022 No.14648878

>>14648853
>An excess fuel detonation is part of every booster startup/Starship launch just like the Delta IV Heavy fireball
>"If you've never seen one of our launches before, you may be concerned by the fuel-air explosion below the booster immediately before engine ignition and liftoff. Don't worry, this is perfectly normal, but can be quite startling to the unprepared."

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:30:39 2022 No.14648881 File: 79 KB, 571x282, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I hate earthers so much

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:35:34 2022 No.14648895 (Derogatory)

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:46:50 2022 No.14648912 >>14648746 >>14648747 What's going wrong with these? How common is it for rocket stuff to explode like this?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:48:42 2022 No.14648915 >>14648912 It's surprisingly common with in development rockets. This one was relatively benign: it wasn't enough of a kaboom to blow up, or even noticeably damage, the rocket.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:52:16 2022 No.14648919 >>14648915 But they have had successful of this version right? Are they repeating the recipes if success, or tinkering to find beenficial changes, or what's? With the long history of successful rocketry, what is the main source of these failures?

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:56:49 2022 No.14648929

>>14648919
>Unprecedented size
>Unprecedented propellant combination
>A highly non-conservative development program that's prioritizing speed of development above all else
>A design methodology that results in finding out that they did, in fact, need to include something that was absent in the original design

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:05:49 2022 No.14648944 >>14648929 >>14648919 >>14648915 >schizo replying to itself again

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:27:58 2022 No.14648971 >>14648746 If they cant prevent some ground equipment from exploding how will they prevent a damn rocket from exploding

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:29:46 2022 No.14648974 how many engines was the static

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:33:23 2022 No.14648982 >>14648853 >QA inspection passed verified by flashlight >ready for flight >signed Elon Musk

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:34:14 2022 No.14648986 >>14648881 America is such a strange place.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:35:00 2022 No.14648989 File: 1.57 MB, 948x971, Screenshot 2022-07-12 012929.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Are there any side-by-side comparison images of the Hubble's picture vs JWST's?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:37:14 2022 No.14648993 >>14648986 It's not just America, sadly.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:39:54 2022 No.14648998 >>14648993 The difference is America has spacefrens and anti-space doomers

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:45:12 2022 No.14649010 >>14648974 It wasn't supposed to progress beyond a spin-up test, but according to Elon, all 33 engines.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:48:24 2022 No.14649017 >make a ship that requires a precise, timely in-flight relighting of its engines or it crashes >give it engines that have an unreliable startup sequence starship is doomed. rocketlab will prevail if they can make neutron real.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:57:49 2022 No.14649029 File: 456 KB, 1920x1080, HubbleWebbFadeTransition8330.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14648989 best I can offer

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:58:50 2022 No.14649031 >>14649010 isnt a spin up test just spinning up the turbines with nitrogen

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:59:55 2022 No.14649032 >>14649031 Apparently they do that with propellants now.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 09:03:53 2022 No.14649041 File: 3.27 MB, 800x600, CryogenicPump.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] could this type of pump work with cryogenic fluids and could it be powered by a turbine

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 09:19:00 2022 No.14649053 File: 1.32 MB, 2000x1000, a90sd8fm0as9d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14648989 detail side by side, pretty clear how much you can see.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 09:56:27 2022 No.14649087 >>14648746 Is this the biggest rocket explosion to ever not blow up the rocket?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 09:59:08 2022 No.14649092 File: 189 KB, 2000x1125, 1652322202418.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] long march 9 design has been changed. it's now a chinese version of starship.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:02:57 2022 No.14649096 >>14649041 So fucking gross. That goodness we don't have one of those things inside of us keeping us alive

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:05:16 2022 No.14649102 >>14649092 lol >2035 >tiktok sponsor lmao

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:09:34 2022 No.14649114 musk is finished

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:13:09 2022 No.14649118 >>14649092 wait a minute.... china stealing some design instead of coming up with one of their own? no way, get out of here

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:18:08 2022 No.14649126 >>14649092 yeah we knew this over a year ago

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:22:42 2022 No.14649139
File: 27 KB, 1024x565, chink gemini 714-and-shuguang1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14649118
>Shuguang-1 never got off paper, but what we know about it suggests the same basic setup as a Gemini capsule. There was a forward re-entry capsule meant to house two and an aft equipment module. Like the Gemini, the equipment module was designed to sever in two just before re-entry, exposing four retrorockets that would bend its trajectory back to Earth and not incidentally lighten it to make its return through the atmosphere less rough. Even so, it’s estimated that the journey would be considerably rougher on its passengers than either a Mercury or Vostok: up to 11 G’s on the ride to orbit and 8 G’s on re-entry. Despite its relatively large size it would have been lighter than a Gemini or even a Vostok, easily the lightest two-man capsule ever built, and as part of the return on that its taikonauts would have had to suffer 150 decibels during the launch. It’s unknown if it would have landed on solid ground or on water, though it’s worth noting that the Chinese did develop a small squadron of ships to let them communicate with satellites when they weren’t over Chinese territory—they may have been intended to serve double-duty and recover crew capsules after an ocean splashdown.
https://falsesteps.wordpress.com/2012/08/04/project-714-and-shuguang-1-the-first-chinese-space-program/

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:39:22 2022 No.14649284 >>14648971 But anon, rockets are supposed to explode.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:40:25 2022 No.14649285 >>14648750 Ah I forgot about that anecdote, that's probably how they start Raptor now It's just fucking hypergolic once they have the preburners started

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:43:48 2022 No.14649289 >>14649092 >Starship but painted in Long March decals Kino. Also paint-mass-autists btfo

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:49:12 2022 No.14649293 File: 1.09 MB, 3000x2001, FXbBZDiXwAUi-kp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Base of ABL space system's rocket. >>14648747 big F for that ventilation hose. >>14648775 nice

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:49:37 2022 No.14649294 >>14649139 imagine the perspective of being honorably "chosen" to ride this shit bucket into orbit..

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:52:00 2022 No.14649301 >>14649294 >perspective did you mean prospect

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 11:09:10 2022 No.14649332 >>14649301 right, in my native language the meaning of prospect sounds almost like perspective lol.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 11:24:54 2022 No.14649362 >>14648753 The cows are confused.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 11:34:56 2022 No.14649387 File: 18 KB, 636x350, 20220712_043434.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14649362

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 11:36:50 2022 No.14649393 Wasn't supposed to return on the Moon? Did I dream?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 11:43:23 2022 No.14649412 Star ship with aerospike?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:01:42 2022 No.14649450 >>14649118 >Noooo you can't make a tube with engines! >When you come up with something first no-one is allowed to copy you! Wise Chinese proverb: The second mouse gets the cheese.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:07:58 2022 No.14649467 So why is /sfg/ on /sci/ and not on /g/? Spaceflight is apparently closer to technology than to science?

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:09:58 2022 No.14649471

>>14649412
Only makes sense if you need performance from sea level all the way to vacuum.
Starship only burns for like 10 seconds in the thick part of the atmosphere.

It doesn't make sense for mars either because mars has basically no atmosphere, so you can use mostly vacuum adjusted nozzles at the surface.

The only application it really makes sense for is an SSTO or shuttle style craft, however both of those are crappy compared to a TSTO.
Any SSTO with a TWR of 1.5 at launch is going to have a TWR of 15 with empty tanks, even more with drop tanks.
It's just dumb.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:12:46 2022 No.14649475 >>14649467 Technically it's close4 to /n/, but I'm not going to that faggot board.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:12:56 2022 No.14649476 >>14649467 /g/ isnt "technology", it's consumer electronics and IT

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:13:26 2022 No.14649479 >>14649467 it clearly should be on /n/

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:15:45 2022 No.14649483 >>14649475 what's faggot about /n/?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:16:48 2022 No.14649487 >>14649475 >>14649479 Nice try NTSB

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:28:29 2022 No.14649516 >>14649092 looks more like chinese new glenn

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:32:41 2022 No.14649523 >>14649467 It should be on auto. Rockets are automotive.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:36:07 2022 No.14649533 >>14649467 it should be on /biz/

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:36:54 2022 No.14649534 >>14649467 Because /g/ is for faggots

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:39:09 2022 No.14649542 >>14649467 it should be on trash because spaceflight is closer to being furry porn than science

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:42:08 2022 No.14649548 >>14649534 yep, /sci/tzos > fa/g/gots

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:52:07 2022 No.14649560 File: 130 KB, 512x512, Demon Core.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14649467 /sfg/ should have its own board

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:59:16 2022 No.14649569 File: 96 KB, 780x1173, 1639264482708.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] anthropomorphic rocket girls should have their own board and /sfg/ should be moved there

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:00:39 2022 No.14649571 >>14649569 might as well migrate sfg to /a/

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:00:46 2022 No.14649572 >>14649569 >anthropomorphic rocket girls should have their own board Yes it is called /d/ and you should depart there now.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:01:06 2022 No.14649574 >>14649092 Oh neat more slides.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:06:52 2022 No.14649580 >>14648853 A little explosion, but looked ok by flashlight. Not great, not terrible

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:11:21 2022 No.14649591
File: 4.00 MB, 5000x5000, smacs_0723_by_jwst_in_hubble_acs_wfc3ir_requal.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Alpha Centauri observation proposal: https://www.stsci.edu/jwst/phase2-public/1618.pdf
>so bright and fast they need special procedures

>>14648989
See 14647745
It's not side-by-side, but you can open the original and my composite in two tabs and switch between them or put them in two windows side-by-side or just quickly put them side-by-side in an editor.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:12:38 2022 No.14649594 >>14649591 >>14647745

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:20:30 2022 No.14649610 File: 1.89 MB, 1226x1103, comparison2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14648989 You can make them easily, or view them together with an image viewer that supports syncing between windows like nomacs. I posted some in >>14647281

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:25:26 2022 No.14649620 > The experiment is admittedly high risk, but the prospect of directly imaging a planet around our closest stellar neighbor is an exciting one btw hubble couldn't direct-image some planet of Alpha Centauri due to weak magnification capabilties?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:35:39 2022 No.14649655 >>14649610 ai would do it better

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:38:35 2022 No.14649662 File: 68 KB, 1002x281, 1619603452787.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14649560 notto dissu shitto agen

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:43:04 2022 No.14649678 >>14646444 this was the best thing to come out of JWST

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:48:13 2022 No.14649690 >>14649678 anon leaking the image 30 minutes early was pretty good too

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:57:18 2022 No.14649709 So SpaceX is doing another closure probably today. Why exactly? They already looked at the rocket at night and they don't need a closure to examine it further.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:58:35 2022 No.14649714 >>14649709 tank farm gonna explode

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:59:23 2022 No.14649715 >>14649714 Pretty sure they vented it all yesterday, so the tank farm should be empty.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:05:28 2022 No.14649728 >>14649709 out of spite and contempt for summertime beach-goers in the larger Brownsville area of Texas

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:19:15 2022 No.14649762 >>14649450 What a disgusting and shameless people.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:30:05 2022 No.14649802 File: 234 KB, 948x633, 1641829995098.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] New Lego Ideas kit just dropped

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:32:00 2022 No.14649815 Its already scuffed

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:34:54 2022 No.14649843 File: 8 KB, 168x300, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14649802 Chinese citizens included

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:36:35 2022 No.14649867 >>14649802 >not Megabloks

>>	Todd howard Tue Jul 12 14:36:41 2022 No.14649869 >>14648747 Oh no muskrats how will we ever recover. Thunderchad was right all along!

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:37:50 2022 No.14649888 What a gay post that was.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:37:56 2022 No.14649890 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey4yqSHOQO0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey4yqSHOQO0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey4yqSHOQO0

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:42:07 2022 No.14649943 >>14649888 speak of the devil 14649890

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:42:09 2022 No.14649944 File: 61 KB, 600x651, raff-1605319427229.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14649867 I raffed

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:43:28 2022 No.14649964 >14649869 >>14649888 gay post confirmed digitally

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:44:43 2022 No.14649990 File: 43 KB, 679x679, apollo18_ g.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >No Starship orbital test this year

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:44:45 2022 No.14649991 Why only women? Did no men work on this?

>>	Todd howard Tue Jul 12 14:48:07 2022 No.14650055 >>14649991 Space is female. Gurl power is real. This display of female power has be convinced that women are just better at everything.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:48:42 2022 No.14650058 >>14650055 not just this, even other nasa presentation have all-female crew

>>	Todd howard Tue Jul 12 14:49:16 2022 No.14650071 >>14650058 So powerful

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:50:06 2022 No.14650088 >>14650058 NASA's public communication team is probably all women. Most are.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:50:43 2022 No.14650095 >>14649890 BASED i was just about to post this

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:52:57 2022 No.14650132 >>14650071 >/v/ leaking

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:00:18 2022 No.14650242 fuck, they need to just upload the full resolution images at the start of the presentation the nerds that actually want to look at them don't need to be convinced that they're cool

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:00:38 2022 No.14650245 File: 389 KB, 2048x1218, FXeVO6jWQAEMU_3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:01:47 2022 No.14650259 File: 616 KB, 1920x1292, main_image_exoplanet_wasp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:03:06 2022 No.14650271 File: 183 KB, 900x750, its_von_over.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650245 >Those ruptured pipes Yeah it's fucking over

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:04:05 2022 No.14650288 >>14650271 I see some gross welds, but where are you seeing ruptures?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:06:07 2022 No.14650321 >>14650288 The white sections of the pipes behind the engines, they looked fucked, and you can clearly see some of the sky behind them

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:06:27 2022 No.14650330 File: 34 KB, 499x403, pol pot keep you.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650259 nice error bars nerds, well worth the $$$

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:07:26 2022 No.14650347 File: 3.63 MB, 4833x4501, SouthernRingNIR.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:08:17 2022 No.14650355 Fucking pajeets

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:08:50 2022 No.14650364 File: 1.66 MB, 1306x1133, STScI-01G786E1PW9RMK51EP0DZSM03B.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650330 The spectrum is on an exoplanet 1150 light years away. That's pretty damn good, honestly.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:09:32 2022 No.14650377 >>14650259 >no photo just a graph its over just throw the fucking thing away and get a real telescope

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:09:48 2022 No.14650385 >>14650364 is this hubble?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:10:56 2022 No.14650402 >>14648744 Holy shit. The OP image was real. Another leak like yesterday.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:12:00 2022 No.14650423 >>14650385 It's JWST MIRI. >>14650377 Real telescopes do spectroscopy.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:12:06 2022 No.14650424 Someone is really leaking thew Webb images in this fucking shithole? Lmao

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:12:22 2022 No.14650428 >>14650385 It's the mid-infrared wavelengths, which are longer, and thus lower resolution than the near-infrared.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:12:51 2022 No.14650438 >>14650385 yup

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:13:29 2022 No.14650446 File: 81 KB, 796x636, mars base tent.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650364 >finding one of the most common molecules in the universe in a planetary atmosphere forgive me if I don't dance a jig

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:13:46 2022 No.14650450 >>14650347 >>14650364 That's my rectum after eating Mexican food.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:13:53 2022 No.14650451 >>14650245 I give it four weeks before they finish fixing the pad.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:14:11 2022 No.14650461 >>14650424 >NASA has members shitposting in /sfg/ Hi NASA

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:15:19 2022 No.14650478 File: 304 KB, 2090x1752, FXeaI1MXkAYp_Zr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I'm assuming this is MIRI again, Stephan's Quartet

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:15:42 2022 No.14650483 >>14650451 it won't take them 4 weeks to fix some broken GSE, but it might take them 4 weeks to fix the issues with SH

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:16:21 2022 No.14650493 >>14650478 *Quintet, fuck

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:16:41 2022 No.14650498 orbital isn't happening this year it's over

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:16:59 2022 No.14650502 File: 52 KB, 640x480, 1401291932806.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650245 It looks fine, let's punch it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:17:19 2022 No.14650510 File: 124 KB, 402x430, sfg_ aliver.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650424 We are growing stronger

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:17:38 2022 No.14650515 >NASA can't even keep a 720p stream running stable for the picture unveils. What the fuck, man? Are they using the DSN to connect to youtube?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:18:14 2022 No.14650523 >>14650515 it's not that easy in livestreaming

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:19:42 2022 No.14650541 File: 3.74 MB, 3500x3355, main_image_galaxies_stephans_quintet_sq_nircam_miri_final-4mb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:19:57 2022 No.14650543 >>14650347 Ok that looks absolutely insane, ngl

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:20:22 2022 No.14650548 >>14650515 They're using an handheld camera. ISRO-tier stream almost

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:20:46 2022 No.14650554

>>14650483
I think FUDers are stupid honestly. This was a detonation of the fumes outside the booster. They will repaint and refurbish the mount and continue testing very soon

This whole thing has looked like a nothingburger from the very start. Remember when everyone cried that they would scrap the booster when that guy leaked the pipe that turned into an accordion under the intense pressure and they literally just replaced it with a new one a few days later?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:21:22 2022 No.14650571 >>14650541 I can see this image becoming a wallpaper on many monitors around the world. >10b dollars for a sick wallpaper

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:22:22 2022 No.14650589 File: 9 KB, 225x225, 1657639298728..png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] It's all fake, but impressive nontheless.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:24:45 2022 No.14650621 FUCK OFF BALLAST

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:24:51 2022 No.14650624 File: 115 KB, 756x818, distant galaxy SMM J2135-0102.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] wow I take it back spend even more on webb

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:25:15 2022 No.14650632 File: 562 KB, 2000x1158, FXecm6vXwAMPhoc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:25:22 2022 No.14650634 >>14650271 >when you do not know what you are looking at but must give a hot take anyway

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:25:56 2022 No.14650638 less webb more gravity wave inferometers

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:26:07 2022 No.14650642 man am I sick of ballast bill get this gerontocrat off my screen

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:27:34 2022 No.14650656 nice but not worth the $10b we shoul have built 20 such scopes for $10b

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:27:37 2022 No.14650660 >>14650259 >no atmospheric o2 >no atmospheric co2 it's over for aliens

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:28:06 2022 No.14650665 https://webbtelescope.org/resource-gallery/images

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:28:37 2022 No.14650670 [DELETED]

File: 79 KB, 680x847, cringe soyence.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14650259
>best fit model
>correlation = 0.1488
>no mention of near zero correlation on nasa's propaganda graphic
the sois will assume its legitimate science and many NASA legos and JWST bongs will be sold to them

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:29:29 2022 No.14650678 >>14650632 now that's a desktop background looks good on multiple monitors too

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:29:31 2022 No.14650679 >>14650656 How does the budgeting for that work out in your head?

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:30:00 2022 No.14650681

>>14650642
Hard retirement age for all government officials should be no later than 70, after that I no longer trust your crusty old ass not to get Alzheimer's and not tell anybody. Sure, it'll weed out some old people who are still sharp as a tack, but I'd rather retire them then continue empowering the elderly in general.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:30:17 2022 No.14650684 >>14650656 Hubble cost 10 billion, even when you don't count the cost of servicing missions or launch.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:32:54 2022 No.14650708 >>14650684 >>14650679 jwst initial budget $500M don't bring in hubble, just because prev scope costly doesn't mean next scope should be you people have no ambition

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:33:14 2022 No.14650713 >>14650665 they started an outside promotional website because NASA doesn't want to be held directly culpable for all of the lies an propaganda that are being circulated to justify their massive wasting heap of diversity and incompetence.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:34:53 2022 No.14650725 File: 1.90 MB, 640x360, tenor-868066904.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650713

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:35:00 2022 No.14650727 Can some smart anon draw a solar system scale on the images?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:35:46 2022 No.14650732 File: 193 KB, 612x752, Rick Guidis torus faceplate.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650638 old hat, imaging neutrino telescopes are the new hotness

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:36:08 2022 No.14650743

>>14650708
Hubble also started with a tiny budget. And JWST was never budgeted as 500 M, it's a myth. If you look up the 1996 article they state that would only cover phases C and D, not including launch and international contributions. By the time it hit the Decadal it was multiple billions, that's is when it got approved and got a real budget.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:36:25 2022 No.14650748 File: 66 KB, 385x367, 1657640175631..png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650632 Aren't these the same pics we already had but with 6 spikes on every star?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:37:04 2022 No.14650751 >>14650748 in 30 years we may be able to upgrade to 8 spikes

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:37:53 2022 No.14650756 >>14650670 >correlation Lel. You're one of those people who uses Excel aren't you? If you're going to talk shit at least use real statistics.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:39:32 2022 No.14650767 >>14650748 Check out the 125 megabyte PNG version of it https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01G7ETPF7DVBJAC42JR5N6EQRH.png

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:39:46 2022 No.14650770 >>14650638 ESA is working on LISA. But you will be disappointed when you realise there are no images and no time series like LIGO.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:40:42 2022 No.14650773 >>14650770 how do they not have timestamps

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:41:27 2022 No.14650779 File: 1.53 MB, 2000x693, STScI-01G7ETZ8AXXQ2EJZ9T448C88HK.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] MIRI version

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:46:21 2022 No.14650810 [DELETED]

>>14650681
>this how i'd run things if i were king of the world
ur cringey power fantasies are a coping mechanism. old ppl run the show because ppl like you are too low IQ to usurp them. you waste your time with cringey escapist power fantasy copes while they maintain a focus on reality, thats why they win and you lose.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:47:08 2022 No.14650818

>>14650773
Because their sources will be very long lives, rather than transient. Most will be almost constant over the mission. The time series will be confused, it will be the combination of all the sources simultaneously. They will have to recover sources statistically. There may be a few very violent events which are seen above the noise, but most objects will not be visible.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:48:10 2022 No.14650821 >>14650773 its easier to fake data and justify wasting billions without the timestamps

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:53:21 2022 No.14650847 File: 3.86 MB, 3600x2085, main_image_star-forming_region_carina_nircam_final-4mb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] More accessible and higher quality sized version of the picture

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:59:40 2022 No.14650879 >>14650847 this is just a hubble image but with more pixels for the false coloring

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 15:59:59 2022 No.14650883 This a pointed.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:01:41 2022 No.14650887 File: 941 KB, 1206x2177, 2215B448-EE62-4018-B2EF-470D90DA0B2E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I hate these faggots so much

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:02:49 2022 No.14650893 >>14650887 it must be satire, no? it's so hard to tell nowadays

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:04:19 2022 No.14650903 >>14650887 conserve your hate for humans, not their species

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:05:20 2022 No.14650909 File: 52 KB, 602x536, brianna moon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650887 never forget

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:06:06 2022 No.14650913 >>14650767 Kinda blurry desu. I like space and telescopes, but this really seems underwhelming.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:07:02 2022 No.14650917 >>14650893 She is a Chink. Of course she celebrates whenever something doesn't go exactly right with SpaceX.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:07:08 2022 No.14650918 >>14650887 >Brianna Wu Now there’s a name I haven’t heard in a couple million years

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:07:13 2022 No.14650919 >>14650887 >fat whore >BLM >tranny flag >follows Brian Wu >unabashed schadenfreude >senseless hypocrisy Checks out.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:07:50 2022 No.14650922 >>14650887 >>14650909 Keep that fucking troon away from here.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:14:07 2022 No.14650956 >>14650887 You mean like the faggots here hoping that Webb or SLS would explode?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:14:54 2022 No.14650962 >>14650913 If it seems underwhelming, it's worth remembering that its science output is going to be much greater than other instruments: what Hubble needed 300 hours of exposure time for, James Webb can do even better in just twelve.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:17:40 2022 No.14650976 >>14650956 >putting basedence before hilarious happenings reddit is just a click away, go and stay go

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:18:20 2022 No.14650981 File: 1.60 MB, 287x200, Me when minority.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650887 What in the name of the Holy Bible, Talmud, and Quran is that fucking thing?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:19:54 2022 No.14650992 File: 331 KB, 1266x1124, twitter_interview.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650887 >>14650956 kek this is going to rustle some jimmies

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:21:39 2022 No.14650998 >>14650962 This is like it's 1400's Spain and people somehow found a way to map out the Ogallala aquifer and take pictures of the Rocky Mountains. Oooh, ahh, who gives a shit?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:22:00 2022 No.14651002 >>14650981 A dumb fat girl who has never been told no because she could shake her tits at people replying to a dude who cut his penis off for memes.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:22:39 2022 No.14651005 >>14650767 I tried setting it as my wallpaper and it didn't work ;_;

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:23:35 2022 No.14651010 >>14651005 Try the smaller version instead >>14650847

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:24:30 2022 No.14651012 File: 1.65 MB, 3024x4032, IMG_0079.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] More stamps arrived, maybe some new countries too

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:31:11 2022 No.14651044 File: 2.18 MB, 3024x4032, IMG_0080.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651012 This is actually more than I even remembered ordering. It might take awhile

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:32:46 2022 No.14651051 >>14651044 cute stamp anon post more

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:32:49 2022 No.14651053 File: 101 KB, 1200x700, backfire.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650887 >AHAH YOUR CAR EXPLODED TO SMITHEREENS YOU SHITBAG How low IQ can someone get and still be able to use a computer

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:34:59 2022 No.14651065

>>14651053
Long ago, talking such shit would earn you a justified beating, which would encourage you to watch what you say and choose your words carefully. These days there are zero consequences for the worst shit someone can say online, and it's encouraged on social media. If somebody kicked that fat whore's ass for talking shit I bet she would be hesitant about what she says going forward.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:36:47 2022 No.14651074 >>14651065 >she

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:37:29 2022 No.14651081

>>14651053
>>14651065
>How low IQ can someone get and still be able to use a computer
the biggest con of computer companies (mainly Apple and Microsoft) making technology more accessible and user-friendly has been the rapid decline of the average IQ on internet forums and now social media. It used to be hard and tedious to use a computer, which was only attractive to nerdy tech types and professionals. Now, every person gets a powerful iPhone/Android phone by age 10 and it requires no skill or set up to connect with millions of other people around the world.

as a result, you have spaces like Twitter, and the fact that there are now freshmen in college who prefer to type up their English essays on their iPhones because they don't know how to use a keyboard or navigate a desktop anymore. We are regressing

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:40:39 2022 No.14651094 >>14650624 This should be named the coffee, java or cappuchino nebula.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:43:15 2022 No.14651112
File: 98 KB, 1920x1277, reentry breakup.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14651074
It looks like it started out as a woman, at least. Hard to tell from a profile pic, I see the troon flag but just assume it's generic "support" and not "look at my feminine cock"
>>14651081
>freshmen in college who prefer to type up their English essays on their iPhones because they don't know how to use a keyboard
That's insane to me, I remember having typing classes in gradeschool since it was considered a valuable thing to learn early regardless of what career you'd eventually end up in.
Touchscreens are gay, I don't care if they make the Dragon2 interior look sleek give me my buttons and switches back.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:44:55 2022 No.14651126 [DELETED]

File: 35 KB, 480x278, pepe cloud.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14650998
This is sort of true, powerful telescopes don't really achieve much beyond general process advancement. Instead we should build:
>The SMUG MACHINE
properties:
>seats one occupant
>about the size of a large van or car
>solar powered
>flies indefinitely via neutral buoyancy
>compact ISS style life support and nutrient bio-reactor
>no windows, just cameras and an AR headset connected to global-hyper-meta-net
>on board medical synthesis keeps occupant healthy and long lived
and the coup de grace, a Neuralink style BCI that elicits whatever state of satisfaction the occupant desires.
the SMUG MACHINE is almost entirely independent of ground based infrastructure. The life support and nutrient devices keep the occupant fed and healthy by recycling waste, supplies only needing to be topped up every few weeks.
The occupant does not worry about natural disaster, geopolitical boundary or anything they cannot gently glide away from. They just hover, SMUGLY.
with the BCI, the occupant feels like they just graduated college. They feel like they just started a new family in a pleasant rural town in a first world country. Whatever their personal definition of attainment is, the BCI can replicate it.
The remaining ground-dwellers in the hyper-slums shake their fists at the mass of silent, hovering entities in the skies above them. Meanwhile the occupants exists in a dreamlike floating world, satisfied, stable, and sustainable for as long as the machine exists.
It hovers. It is SMUG.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:45:35 2022 No.14651129 >>14651112 Oh you don't know Brianna Wu? Look for his statements about moon colonization lel

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:45:46 2022 No.14651131 >>14651112 >It looks like it started out as a woma It didn't.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:52:12 2022 No.14651172 File: 71 KB, 827x629, nostromo kane lambert.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651112 Nostromo bridge is best bridge

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:52:46 2022 No.14651175
File: 1.43 MB, 1360x765, Screenshot 2022-07-12 at 18-52-05 Starbase LIVE 24_7 Starship & Super Heavy Development From SpaceX's Boca Chica Facility.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Employees are back on the pad.
Don't worry, they're expendable.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:54:08 2022 No.14651185 >>14651129 >>14651131 I know all about Brian, I thought you were talking about "kitty buffie kat"

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:59:19 2022 No.14651217
File: 132 KB, 500x500, pepe cloud 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14650998
This is true, large telescopes don't achieve much. Instead, we should build: the COMFY Machine
>seats one occupant
>about the size of a large car
>solar powered
>flies indefinitely via neutral buoyancy
>compact ISS style life support and nutrient bio-reactor
>no windows, just cameras and AR headset
>on board medical synthesis
>Neuralink style BCI that elicits whatever state of satisfaction the occupant desires.
>directional sound projector to taunt the remaining ground dwellers in the hyper-slum
It simply hovers, and is COMFY.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:00:49 2022 No.14651226 >>14651217 I was thinking more "allocate $9b to a lunar outpost, $1b to materials for a telescope next door that ends up being 10x better than JWST" as a step in the right direction.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:03:06 2022 No.14651236 File: 1.53 MB, 2290x1582, crater telescope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651226 We're gonna be on the moon anyway, might as well do this

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:04:23 2022 No.14651242 >>14651236 How do you prevent shit from crashing into it?

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:04:39 2022 No.14651243
File: 505 KB, 2048x1536, thomas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>On a different note, today @ESA
Council addressed the ExoMars Rover and Surface Platform mission, acknowledging that the circumstances which led to the suspension of the cooperation with Roscosmos – the war in Ukraine and the resulting sanctions – continue to prevail.
>As a consequence, Council mandated me to officially terminate the currently suspended cooperation with Roscosmos on the ExoMars Rover and Surface Platform mission.
>New insights on the way forward with other partners will come at a media briefing on 20 July, details to come.
Where's the retard who claimed that ESA will crawl back to POCKOCMOC?

https://twitter.com/AschbacherJosef

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:06:25 2022 No.14651249 >>14651243 Anyone who thought they would is retarded. You don't burn down London bridge and try and make nice before the war is even over.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:10:09 2022 No.14651264 File: 12 KB, 570x365, Apollo 120 in Telescope.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651242 its just cables and mesh, thermal issues are far greater than micrometeor erosion

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:12:00 2022 No.14651269 >>14651236 >>14651226 Fum fact: Even at 5 km the resolution of that telescope would be worse than the human eye. Only ~14,000 times worse than JWST. The Moon is not a good place to put something better than JWST.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:13:06 2022 No.14651274 >>14651243 So it's pretty much obvious that by 'other partners' they meant NASA and some commercial launcher (like SpaceX)?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:14:48 2022 No.14651284 File: 1.37 MB, 1920x1080, _13-26-43 screenshot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:16:00 2022 No.14651292 Maybe they do need water deluge...

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:16:46 2022 No.14651296 >>14651284 They're already digging Starship's grave...

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:20:58 2022 No.14651321 >>14651269 its for low frequency radio waves blocked by our ionosphere, of course its low res compared to IR. and the radio shadow of the Moon is a good place to put it. needn't be a dish tho, watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuA-0DMPgEM

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:27:00 2022 No.14651366 it's over musk is finished starship is a failure space IS hard

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:33:17 2022 No.14651397 >>14651044 >Slav shit I sleep

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:33:41 2022 No.14651400 >>14650981 earther

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:34:30 2022 No.14651405 >>14651094 *galaxy kek

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:34:51 2022 No.14651407 File: 17 KB, 400x290, ernstchan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651236 >We're gonna be on the moon anyway, might as well do this >we

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:36:09 2022 No.14651413 File: 158 KB, 1266x1124, tweddit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14650887

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:39:15 2022 No.14651427 File: 779 KB, 601x850, FXeUTUaXgAIlOaQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] they finally took a real photo of Ariane 6

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:39:32 2022 No.14651428 >>14650887 go back

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:41:31 2022 No.14651436 >>14651427 it's time...

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:41:54 2022 No.14651440 >>14651407 You're not coming?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:42:03 2022 No.14651442 >>14651427 Wish euros weren't so cringe

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:45:18 2022 No.14651467 File: 585 KB, 1920x1080, JWST v HUBBLE.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:47:49 2022 No.14651472 Jwst is

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:49:05 2022 No.14651478 Gonna take a dumb brb

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:49:53 2022 No.14651481 File: 66 KB, 720x644, pepo_thumb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651472 Pretty cool

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:51:39 2022 No.14651497 File: 1.37 MB, 3077x2176, FXe3BFqX0AEoDfH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651427 high res now

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:52:13 2022 No.14651501 File: 1.37 MB, 2176x3076, FXe3DR7XgAE8evN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651497

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:52:46 2022 No.14651504 File: 1.25 MB, 2175x3076, FXe2-vEXoAAXNx5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651501

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:53:33 2022 No.14651510 File: 1.14 MB, 4096x2732, FXe_Yk1WIAAxOJD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:56:52 2022 No.14651522 >>14651510 embarrassing

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:58:05 2022 No.14651527 >>14651510 Yeah, they're gonna kill astronauts

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 17:58:47 2022 No.14651532 >>14651527 Perhaps they can start with an estronaut

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:00:30 2022 No.14651539 >>14651527 Still 15 fewer than NASA at this point - and that's just the ones who died in space flight. It's probably twice that number when you include training accidents such as Apollo 1.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:00:39 2022 No.14651540 >>14651510 this is so scuffed and amateurish

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:00:39 2022 No.14651541 File: 724 KB, 600x900, 084.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >AHHHHH IT'S OVER, WE'RE NEVER GOING TO SPACE AGAIN, I'M GOING INSANEEEEEEEEEEE

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:01:57 2022 No.14651550 File: 605 KB, 1280x720, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651510 >Elon just kind of forgot about methane venting being flammable Where are the sparklers Elon?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:03:10 2022 No.14651555 >>14651427 Is that a purple gender reveal shroud or what?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:06:24 2022 No.14651569 >>14651510 They spent how many billions again on this?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:06:26 2022 No.14651570 >>14651550 BEST PART IS NO PART WE DELETED IT LOL >Going forward we will use sparklers as thats a common sense method hmmmmm

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:07:29 2022 No.14651574 >>14651550 Wasn't it just O2? I don't think they were filling it with methane yesterday.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:08:36 2022 No.14651579 >>14651510 >We were too stupid

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:09:58 2022 No.14651582 >>14651550 I can already see arctoe saying NASA figured this out decades ago. Ahh the smell is so invigorating.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:10:05 2022 No.14651583 >>14651570 >>Going forward we will use sparklers as thats a common sense method Who are you quoting?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:10:06 2022 No.14651584 File: 59 KB, 408x720, 02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] AHHHH SAVE ME ULA HOW DO YOU PREVENT EXPLOSIONS AT THE PAD

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:10:10 2022 No.14651585 >>14651510 damn, every time I see starship infrastructure with humans for scale I'm reminded just how huge all this shit is

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:11:06 2022 No.14651589 >>14651583 An Elon tweet from last night

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:11:38 2022 No.14651591 >>14651583 elon via personal psychic correspondance

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:13:06 2022 No.14651594

>>14651550
Elon should take a trip to Disneyland
>Shortly after this I was doing fireworks with my son Jason on a 4th of July when I got this brilliant idea. I needed a device to shoot sparks which would burn the hydrogen at the exit of the engine nozzle during start. This would keep the hydrogen from forming a large cloud and therefore prevent the explosion from occurring.
>Next day I went to work and called Disneyland to find out the name of their pyrotechnic supplier for their nightly shows. I called the company and explained to them that I needed a device that would shoot sparks about 30 feet at a temperature of 1200 degrees. They told me…no problem, they made that kind of sparkler for the movie industry all the time. The salesman told me that they sold for $9.85 each!!
>I later attended a meeting with NASA in which the engine supplier said they could resolve the explosion problem for $9 million. Needless to say, NASA was overjoyed when I got up and presented my proposal to fix their problem with a few $9.85 sparklers!!! My proposed fix, known as the Main Engine Hydrogen Burn-off System, was implemented and has been utilized on every Space Shuttle launch without a single problem. I should mention however, NASA would not certify my supplier to produce the $9.85 sparklers and the new supplier selected provides the same basic item for about $1200 each…… but they can meet all the required NASA specs!!!

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:14:41 2022 No.14651599
File: 33 KB, 442x558, lol.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14651594
>I should mention however, NASA would not certify my supplier to produce the $9.85 sparklers and the new supplier selected provides the same basic item for about $1200 each

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:15:42 2022 No.14651603 >>14651589 I don't see it. Can you post a link?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:16:33 2022 No.14651607 >>14651603 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1546713443943825408

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:18:30 2022 No.14651616

>>14651594
>new supplier selected provides the same basic item for about $1200 each
That's just criminal, legitimately criminal. It costs $10. They charge $1190 in pure profit.
If the FBI wasn't a terrorist organization themselves, they'd be raiding these thieves.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:21:37 2022 No.14651628 >>14651616 >>14651599 Didn't Elon liquidate SLS's entire yearly budget worth of stock when he was tying to buy twitter?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:22:23 2022 No.14651631 File: 571 KB, 600x580, laughing_man.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651607 ESS EFF GEE IN SHAMBLES

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:26:49 2022 No.14651649 File: 17 KB, 400x326, FBC4E44F-6359-41DF-97A8-F20ED6F81D4D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651510 >>14651607

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:30:11 2022 No.14651659 >>14651628 I'm not sure what that has to do with sparklers getting marked up by thousands of percent anon.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:31:47 2022 No.14651665 File: 2.36 MB, 1280x720, hullo legao.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Analysis of the explosion https://youtu.be/dU4B9Xk7x7c

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:32:02 2022 No.14651666 Elon could put his own "space sparklers" on the web shop and millions of people would buy them. lol

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:37:23 2022 No.14651681 >>14649762 As if Amerimutts didn't steal their designs from Nazis.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:39:28 2022 No.14651686 >>14651681 Didn't steal the designs, stole the designers.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:41:40 2022 No.14651692 >>14651681 Begone chink

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:41:47 2022 No.14651694 >>14650670 >correlation = 0.1488 This isn't a linear model but a spectrum, retard.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:42:15 2022 No.14651696 >>14651686 They took 100 rockets to the US and launched most of them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Sands_V-2_Launching_Site

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:43:14 2022 No.14651702 File: 344 KB, 1920x1484, explorer_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651696 And?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:43:30 2022 No.14651704 >>14648989 I love this picture, it shows the true warped nature of the universe.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:43:31 2022 No.14651705

From Reuters:
>The FAA is in “close contact with SpaceX as the company looks into the fire that occurred” yesterday during Super Heavy tests in Texas, a spokesman says. No formal FAA mishap investigation because the explosion wasn’t part of a scheduled launch campaign.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:43:36 2022 No.14651707 >>14651696 I forgot all about the German Saturn V that was launching during WW2, really makes a motherfucker think.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:43:38 2022 No.14651708 File: 897 KB, 1242x1941, E909AE6B-A27C-480F-BEA6-C2C03BFF1150.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] https://twitter.com/llomjanska/status/1546870694113431553?s=21&t=cxr76cnshc2pHwMVDc1xbQ I hate Russians

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:45:48 2022 No.14651713

>>14651705
>WASHINGTON, July 12 (Reuters) - The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said Tuesday it is in “close contact” with SpaceX as the company reviews a fire that occurred as part of its Super Heavy booster rocket development but is barred from investigating.

>The FAA said U.S. law “limits the FAA’s safety oversight to protecting the public during scheduled launch and reentry operations. Yesterday’s event does not fall under the agency’s jurisdiction.”

Based, we don't need over-regulation

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:46:22 2022 No.14651716 >>14651692 You're a failed British colony and I'm European.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:46:29 2022 No.14651719 >>14651708 >SpaceX rocket exploded It's still right there. Why are you reading the opinions or foreign retards?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:46:50 2022 No.14651720 >>14651713 NTSB can fuck off too

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:47:30 2022 No.14651723 >>14651716 >I'm European My condolences

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:52:08 2022 No.14651736 >>14651708 >>14651413 fuck off, twitter screencap bait belongs on >>>/pol

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 18:58:19 2022 No.14651764 File: 151 KB, 1084x1119, best-roggit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] So we're on track to launch SLS in 3 weeks and Starship exploded? Is SpaceX aware this isnt a good look?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:03:21 2022 No.14651788 File: 142 KB, 1060x720, Screen Shot 2022-07-12 at 3.02.51 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] The coping and seething from russisters because they know roscosmos is toast

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:03:45 2022 No.14651790 File: 24 KB, 706x439, musk just.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651764 muskrats are in denial & in sugarcoating mode, its very sad

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:07:01 2022 No.14651798 >>14651788 Of course they are seething, SpaceX took away a bunch of potential customers from them by providing better prices.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:07:01 2022 No.14651799 >>14651723 >steal rockets from nazi germany >steal culture from europe because you don't have one >steal architecture from europe >y-you chink! Ok, retard.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:07:10 2022 No.14651801 >>14651764 In three more weeks it'll be two more weeks.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:08:14 2022 No.14651809 >>14651716 >I'm European. Post power outlet with time stamp.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:09:24 2022 No.14651816 >>14651809 Give me a while

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:09:27 2022 No.14651817 Is he Fr*nch? Why do those faggots always make us look bad?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:11:50 2022 No.14651828 File: 782 KB, 1280x844, 1614619990302.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651799 Go be gay over on /pol/ or something, this is /sfg/

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:12:46 2022 No.14651832 File: 263 KB, 1170x673, 7096CBF3-CF24-4154-8D87-B3966CE2D7DF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Well /sfg/?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:13:39 2022 No.14651838 >>14651817 The French have no sense of humor and fragile egos, a devastating combination of flaws. >>14651832 Masking tape.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:14:04 2022 No.14651840 >>14651828 I wouldn't complain if not the poster who called me a chink.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:14:16 2022 No.14651845 >>14651832 I don't know nigga, try asking a materials scientist, maybe they can help you. I am just here to watch roggets go up.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:14:33 2022 No.14651846 >>14651832 who is “we,” is he actually doing anything with his darpa money besides shitposting about egypt and dinosaurs?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:15:18 2022 No.14651854 >>14651832 fresh cum ;)

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:15:47 2022 No.14651856 >>14649843 >やろくむ >くふろてそ wtf am I reading?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:16:17 2022 No.14651861 https://twitter.com/BS__Exposed/status/1546836220478627842 These fucking people, they just love to spread FUD and you cant tell they have no idea what they are talking about, highlight the failures and ignore the shit that works and has been working

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:16:21 2022 No.14651863 >>14651832 Check the tape outgassing drive schematics

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:17:46 2022 No.14651870 >>14651861 anon you are letting these people live rent free in your head lmao >80% chance most of them are bots anyways

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:17:51 2022 No.14651871 >>14651861 Please don't tell me that you browse twitter just to get angry at something.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:18:03 2022 No.14651872 >>14651861 Stop linking twitter, retard.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:18:24 2022 No.14651876 Starbase needs a flame trench Elon stop being autistic about it. Just dig the fucking hole

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:19:09 2022 No.14651882 >>14651876 kek

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:20:11 2022 No.14651891 >>14651861 >>14651413 again

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:21:53 2022 No.14651904 >>14651861 I don't have a twitter, but I manage to hear relevant space news through /sfg/. Just leave twitter behind anon, it's no good there and you're hurting yourself. It's bad enough that we're here forever, don't be there forever too.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:23:17 2022 No.14651916 File: 459 KB, 600x663, a50.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651708 >F-35 failed

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:24:17 2022 No.14651922 >>14650071 They have to meet their quota some how, so they just throw them all in PR. Imagine how even more far behind SLS would be if it was 50% women

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:25:16 2022 No.14651929 >>14651681 >He doesn't know about how the Germans copied Goddard's notes

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:31:28 2022 No.14651951 File: 3.47 MB, 384x480, 1832414A-80DD-4E11-A3FB-E6B3EA96C6CF.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651861 So again, just like people here posting about Webb blowing up?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:31:39 2022 No.14651955 File: 66 KB, 999x562, Top-Gun-2-pc-games1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651916 meanwhile all of the Su57 got shot down in a new hollywood movie (I know its CGI)

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:34:18 2022 No.14651969 >>14651904 You hear them because people get those news mostly from twitter.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:35:25 2022 No.14651973
File: 1.23 MB, 1190x752, 33djk.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

After two successful dummy landing attempts in the previous synod, the next one will carry a payload. You are in charge of what to build. After necessary equipment that can lower cargo to the ground you have 115 tons of payload to Mars surface.

What do?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:37:11 2022 No.14651982 >>14651973 Either 100 tons of steel or 100 tons of feathers, whichever is lighter in Martian gravity (Marsgrav)

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:41:28 2022 No.14652000 File: 429 KB, 1032x778, Dm9bRZy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651788 The fuck did Russia specifically do to SpaceX that is no longer being done?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:42:39 2022 No.14652004 >>14651510 Why was there so much shit near it to get blown up during testing

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:42:46 2022 No.14652005 >>14651973 Methane/O2 production plant, any other answer is foolish.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:43:30 2022 No.14652006 File: 106 KB, 1000x770, 1650700713320.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14652000 they gave Elon the motivation to make the company when they refused to sell him a rocket

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:44:47 2022 No.14652014 >>14651607 Not a Krystal link I'm disappoint /sfg/

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:45:52 2022 No.14652018 File: 295 KB, 498x272, 1657271366578.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651665 I could have saved her bros

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:45:56 2022 No.14652019 >>14652005 >wanting to return to E*rth >implying anyone else is a fool Oh sweetie...

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:47:07 2022 No.14652023 >>14652018 Saved from what?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:47:44 2022 No.14652026 >>14651982 100 tons of steel would be less massive on the martian surface compared to 100 tons of feathers

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:48:09 2022 No.14652028 >>14652026 what how?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:49:19 2022 No.14652034 >>14652026 Woah

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:50:07 2022 No.14652038 >>14652019 Its not for return, it's so you can power your generators and land rovers when you get there.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:53:58 2022 No.14652053 File: 1.59 MB, 260x195, hammer and feather beats hammer and sickle.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14652026 Both would fall at the same rate if you removed the atmosphere

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:55:47 2022 No.14652062 >>14652053 They have the same mass

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:57:48 2022 No.14652074 >>14652026 I doon't geet et

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 19:59:11 2022 No.14652083
File: 698 KB, 1012x836, 6x6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14651876
I am actually surprised they
1) built the orbital tank farm so fucking close to the launch pad, AND on the same side as the OLM
2) Don't have a shield protecting the tank farm from maybe small debris
3) Don't have a deflection hole for the exhaust

Those tanks iirc were very expensive and took forever to build and hook up, but what do I know?

>>14651973
The first real mission to Mars, even the first landing attempt, will have a livestreamed Tesla vehicle reveal that would drive around for a few hours and get stuck in the dunes. They wouldn't waste that opportunity with all eyes watching. >>14652005 is a good answer but boring. I propose:
> simple steel + aluminum frame box, 8x8, cameras all over, 10T hardened, thermal controlled battery pack in a 35T vehicle and 10T towable, deployable solar array and more power
>30T+ of battery storage, whatever else is left for additional solar farm
>electric dirt scoop/power hammer thing, ground core drill, large boom arms
>set up solar power farm, leave to explore
It would probably just be a workhorse to set up other shit. Had a dream a while back about something like this, and it dug a hole and found coal.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:00:16 2022 No.14652092 When is the next Cargo Dragon launch?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:02:30 2022 No.14652103 >>14652092 15th

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:12:50 2022 No.14652143

>>14652038
>Space grade methalox generators that don't exist instead of deploying a few solar panels for immediate power requirements or using the panels that will already be on Starship
>Fuel cell rovers instead of battery electric despite that there will be no need to go more than a few thousand km from the base they would setting up
Earther cope. If you ever want to go back, don't go.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:16:05 2022 No.14652155 >>14652083 >Had a dream a while back about something like this, and it dug a hole and found coal. God i wish this happened It would make it alot easier

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:19:06 2022 No.14652168 >>14651861 go back

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:19:48 2022 No.14652171 >>14652155 And your oxygen?

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:21:34 2022 No.14652177

>>14652083
Because they have not enough space there. Not many realize that, but Starbase is a very small launch site, for a super heavy lift vehicle. For comparison, LC-39A is almost ten times larger. If you look at the map, you can see that Starbase is somewhat divided into suborbital and orbital parts. So the very small orbital part has to fit that tank farm, and there are not many options and you see what SpaceX has chosen, build vertical tanks to save space and separate them with a berm. That worked partially, because due to some legal bullshit, methane tanks have to be certified and those at Starbase certainly aren't, so SpaceX had to sacrifice a part of the landing pad for horizontal tanks.
Those issues are not present at LC-39A, where another Starship launch site is being built.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:22:41 2022 No.14652179 >>14652171 If it has coal it probably has way more oxides than we thought And oil too for easy plastics

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:23:16 2022 No.14652181 >>14651861 literal who

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:27:47 2022 No.14652197 File: 429 KB, 893x480, 22-12-30.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14652177 Forgot to include the picture. You can see the boundaries of their land, how almost everything is used, for now they just can't expand.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:31:00 2022 No.14652205 File: 152 KB, 1177x282, ea.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Two lunches tomorrow.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:33:54 2022 No.14652215 >>14652179 Coal needs free oxygen to burn. Using water thermolysis to create it would be ridiculously inefficient.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:35:03 2022 No.14652221 >>14649096 thanks for the comment but I am interested in the application of hearts in rocket propulsion

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:40:23 2022 No.14652233 >>14652205 can't wait

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:42:27 2022 No.14652242
File: 1.62 MB, 320x180, ayy.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14652083
reddit:
>wtf he didn't spend 2 billion making a clean room and cleaning every bolt 5 times shut it down
>you can't just use electric parts from Tesla that's cheating
>noooo your rover has to be made from unobtanium and carry 90 instruments and cost 2.5 billion fucking bastards
The first mission would be a propellant farm test, or mars relaunch test, but that rover idea could probably be sub 5 million dollars kek.

>10 - 15 tons of battery
jesus christ. any math people here able to estimate how far a vehicle can drive with that much battery with mars gravity? If something this big was made, even without these magic panels, could it circumnavigate the planet by land?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:43:42 2022 No.14652246 >>14648929 all these factors and they decide to test all engines at once

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:47:28 2022 No.14652262 >>14652205 >Vega C Can't wait for them to show a picture of a picture of the launch

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 20:59:11 2022 No.14652291 >>14652103 Thamks.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:00:31 2022 No.14652294 Perseverance has taken its first sample from the Jezero delta

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:01:29 2022 No.14652301 >>14652294 only 20 more years until the sample return bros

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:01:33 2022 No.14652303 >>14652294 and is scouting for a good landing location for the eurorover

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:02:47 2022 No.14652309 >>14652303 >>14652294 >>14652301 Use eurorover to collect samples

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:04:10 2022 No.14652319
File: 367 KB, 1824x1408, StephansQuintet_HubbleNobre_1824.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

is it just me or does the JWST image of stephan's quintet not look any better than the hubble version? it looks like they took this and added more lens flares.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:06:46 2022 No.14652330 File: 402 KB, 1000x2000, HubbleVsJWST.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14652319 It's probably a focus thing. They're still setting everything up. Wait for them to specifically take a pic of that area.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:10:32 2022 No.14652348 >>14652319 Stephans quintet is pretty bright and big, so not much difference between nircam and Hubble images. Nircam however has more filters and there is MIRI which shows these galaxies in completely new light

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:10:34 2022 No.14652349 File: 22 KB, 236x385, 1652992196384.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651594 Big brain move

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:12:28 2022 No.14652362 File: 83 KB, 1024x673, 1646071031871m.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14651705 >no FAA investigation WE GAAN, doomers btfo

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:12:48 2022 No.14652364 >>14652319 it's almost like visiblessed light > infraretard (God's house is 640x480, 16 color)

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:13:57 2022 No.14652368 >>14651665 She literally just looks like a teenage Scott with long hair. Not sure if I'd HULLO inside or not

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:15:05 2022 No.14652370 File: 912 KB, 3840x2160, Starship_passing_the_Moon-2018_version.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Is dear moon still possible in 2023 at this rate of Starship R&D?

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:16:19 2022 No.14652375

>>14651594
>NASA would not certify my supplier to produce the $9.85 sparklers and the new supplier selected provides the same basic item for about $1200 each
Holy shit, the amount of grifting, it's insane. And then the snake oil salesman is Musk of course, fucking crooks.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:16:33 2022 No.14652377 >>14652370 yes but the tiles won't be ready for lunar reentry in time so the mission profile's been changed to a manned impactor

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:16:44 2022 No.14652380 >>14652294 It's all just theater at this point right? No doubt we'll have real boots on the ground by the time this is actually ready

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:16:59 2022 No.14652381 >>14651665 thou hast temped me with thy WEBM

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:17:25 2022 No.14652383 File: 140 KB, 808x1078, FQ97xtwWUAA6B8v.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Will B7 launch despite all of the hits it's taken?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:18:13 2022 No.14652387 >>14652383 elon keeps trying to blow it up but so far it refuses to die

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:18:14 2022 No.14652388 >>14652380 Here is your boots on the ground sweets. Remember this rocket was supposed to be on Mars in 2020

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:18:45 2022 No.14652392 >>14652380 The Chinese will have brought some rocks back before then.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:19:15 2022 No.14652394 >>14652388 >>14652383 >>14648753

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:20:07 2022 No.14652398 >>14652026 10000 tons of steel on Mars would weigh less on my soul than a single earther

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:22:31 2022 No.14652406 >>14651973 automated earther prison cell

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:24:01 2022 No.14652408 >>14651973 115 tons of pemmican

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:33:37 2022 No.14652438 Should SpaceX be stopped? I don't like how they're putting employees in danger because they chose not to simulate

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:39:01 2022 No.14652460 >>14652398 true

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:39:17 2022 No.14652461 >>14652438 >Should SpaceX be stopped? Don't worry, that will happen soon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5DypPLBWWE

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:39:27 2022 No.14652463 >>14652438 instead of turning the engines on one by one step by step, they did all of them. Problematic

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:44:48 2022 No.14652487 File: 136 KB, 1096x718, Screen Shot 2022-07-12 at 5.44.12 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] JWST photos of Jupiter coming on Thursday. How often will JWST be releasing pics? How often does Hubble do it?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:47:07 2022 No.14652501 >>14652487 Hubble seems to release an image once per week or so https://esahubble.org/images/page/1/?sort=-release_date JWST needs a lot less time to gather light so I guess it can release faster

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:47:33 2022 No.14652502 >>14652294 Those samples will never leave Mars.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:47:43 2022 No.14652504 >>14652487 cool, can't wait

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:48:31 2022 No.14652505 >>14652438 what are you on about, they do plenty of simulations

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:49:33 2022 No.14652507 >>14652487 Neptune too

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:51:00 2022 No.14652509 >>14652487 Can't wait to see Uranus

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:56:00 2022 No.14652531 File: 1.41 MB, 2908x2314, potw2227a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14652501 That's cool

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:56:36 2022 No.14652532 >>14652505 the explosion yesterday could easily be simulated, yet it caught them by surprise

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:56:38 2022 No.14652533 File: 650 KB, 2560x1440, 7 Starship & Super Heavy Development From SpaceX's Boca Chica Facility_20220712_165620.731.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Inspecting the chopstick

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 21:59:51 2022 No.14652543 >>14652532 >easily shows how little you know

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:00:53 2022 No.14652548 File: 83 KB, 574x612, ariane 6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] eurobros...

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:01:46 2022 No.14652554 >>14652532 Why don't you simulate fucking off?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:02:05 2022 No.14652557 >>14652543 The issue of accumulating fuel gasses is well known and a bit of an embarrassment of an oversight

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:05:16 2022 No.14652568 >>14652554 This is why people dont post here anymore, bullies like you

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:06:15 2022 No.14652572 >>14652319 >tfw no close-by galaxies in the night sky Andromeda needs to get a move on already.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:11:18 2022 No.14652590 >>14652568 I'll run a simulation of me caring

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:11:28 2022 No.14652591 File: 13 KB, 590x430, e2e949ab-e846-4db5-bb0c-8ab4c089fc7a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14652572 I can't wait, Anon!

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:13:53 2022 No.14652606 >>14652568 /sfg/ actually used to be much more aggressive and if you made a stupid post you would get dog-piled by a hoard of angry autists. These days you can literally make shit up and get away with it most of the time.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:22:14 2022 No.14652648 >>14652568 kill yourself nigger nobody cares >>14652487 based

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:30:45 2022 No.14652681 Leakers are saying FAA is gonna close Starbase for the rest of the year at least

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:31:48 2022 No.14652689 >>14652681 Proofs?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:33:40 2022 No.14652696 >>14652681 >>14651713

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:34:11 2022 No.14652699 >starbase is done for oh no no no no

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:34:26 2022 No.14652701 >>14652681 Musk would be on twitter if that was the case

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:35:08 2022 No.14652705 >>14652681 >Yesterday’s event does not fall under the agency’s jurisdiction.”

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:35:16 2022 No.14652706 File: 84 KB, 1887x1415, it's over.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14652681

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:35:46 2022 No.14652710 File: 119 KB, 636x800, mars life fungi a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14652392 the chinks will be dining on Martian fungi before then you mean

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:36:19 2022 No.14652714 >>14652606 True, see >>14652681

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:40:28 2022 No.14652726 >>14652689 it came to me in a dream

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:40:36 2022 No.14652728 >>14652701 he killed himself by drinking liquid oxygen like that broad in Solaris F

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:41:13 2022 No.14652733 >>14652487 Would be cool if they pointed JWST at Tabby's star, or somewhere into the post Neptunian orbital volume to search for Planet 9.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:41:25 2022 No.14652734 >>14652177 >>14652083 Its a very very very small site indeed.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:41:58 2022 No.14652736 >NASA infrared space telescope currently in development and scheduled to launch no later than May 2027. >another infrared Why do we need two?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:42:11 2022 No.14652737 >>14652710 You mean Martian fungi dining on us? I actually don't know if they plan to land the samples directly on Earth or use their station to conduct experiments.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:42:59 2022 No.14652743 >>14652736 This one https://roman.gsfc.nasa.gov/

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:43:12 2022 No.14652744 >>14648989 https://johnedchristensen.github.io/WebbCompare/

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:44:54 2022 No.14652749 >>14652736 >>14652743 jobs simple as. People think the NASA jobs program is a bad thing, but it is a national security interest. Much like how base level steel producers are often bailed out and protected from cheaper, foreign steel counterparts.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:45:57 2022 No.14652752 >>14652744 looks like hubble catches out some detail that gets blown out by JWST I hope we can see some composites that go for as much data as possible

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:47:50 2022 No.14652764
File: 71 KB, 667x570, Orbiting Quarantine Facility.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14652737
fuck knows what those yellow fiends want but there was a US plan for an orbital quarantine station for Mars samples
https://falsesteps.wordpress.com/2012/07/24/the-orbiting-quarantine-facility-keeping-earth-safe-from-martians/

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:50:36 2022 No.14652772 >>14651510 so... October for otf?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:54:49 2022 No.14652787 File: 993 KB, 1903x977, hubble.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14648989 >>14652744

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:56:08 2022 No.14652789
File: 958 KB, 1903x977, jwst.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14652787
https://johnedchristensen.github.io/WebbCompare/img/Hubble%20Cropped.png
https://johnedchristensen.github.io/WebbCompare/img/Webb%20Deep%20Field%20Cropped.png

I cropped it even further to a small section.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:56:36 2022 No.14652791 If anyone ever tries telling me time dilation is real or that Einstein was right about anything I WILL VIOLENTLY DESTROY THEM

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 22:57:45 2022 No.14652794 >>14652791 With spaghettification, right?

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:01:42 2022 No.14652805

>>14652794
IF LIGHT MOVES AT LIGHTSPEED AND WE CAN MEASURE THE TIME IT TAKES FOR IT TO MOVE AND IT MOVES AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT THAN HOW CAN TIME BE DILATING FOR THAT LIGHT? THE ONLY WAY TO JUSTIFY HUMAN CENTRIC TIME DILATION IS DIVINE INTERVENTION WHICH NECESSITATES GOD WHICH SCIENCE REJECTS THERE'S NO GOOD REASON TO BELIEVE ANY OF IT EINSTEIN WASN'T EVEN SMART ENOUGH TO NOT BE A JEW

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:03:05 2022 No.14652813 >>14652805 I hate /polsci/

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:03:56 2022 No.14652816 >>14652805 Retard lol, it's not human centric it's mass centric A stopwatch experiences time dilation the same as you

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:04:53 2022 No.14652820 >>14652606 yup >>14652805

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:06:16 2022 No.14652824 File: 96 KB, 678x538, nig einstein n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14652791 >Einstein was right about anything deboonk the photoelectric effect then, I double dog dare ya

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:07:25 2022 No.14652830 >>14652816 LIGHT HAS BEEN SOLIDIFIED IT HAS MASS

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:09:33 2022 No.14652843 >>14652824 SHITSTEIN DIDN'T COME UP WITH IT

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:14:04 2022 No.14652868 >>14652843 deboonk his explanation then, tick tock loony

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:16:18 2022 No.14652877

https://spaceref.com/press-release/maiden-flight-of-vega-c-top-of-new-european-rocket-from-beyond-gravity/

>Every single payload fairing for any European rocket comes from Beyond Gravity and is being produced in Emmen.

Bragging about having a monopoly is a pretty quick way to piss off regulators

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:17:43 2022 No.14652885 >>14652868 WHO CARES ABOUT IT? I DON'T. E=MC^2 REFUTES TIME DILATION BTW IRONICALLY

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:19:46 2022 No.14652894 >>14652877 Whats the issue though? Europe is fine as long as its not American

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:21:44 2022 No.14652898 >>14652894 From a disaster planning standpoint any issue with the fairings means Europe's space programs come to a screeching halt if anything happens to these guys

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:22:33 2022 No.14652901 >>14652898 Not really an issue when they're just launching handful of times a year.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:25:02 2022 No.14652911 https://youtu.be/b6se10w-6Aw

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:29:07 2022 No.14652921 >>14652749 Is there JWST CIA equivalent? Similar to how the hubble was a repurposed spy sat

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:30:49 2022 No.14652928 File: 98 KB, 538x874, djt vs musk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] its so over

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:32:56 2022 No.14652933 >>14652928 >rocketships to nowhere He's clueless and seething

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:33:53 2022 No.14652937 Could someone please point me to a good website with an expert who discusses these images and tells me what's interesting about them? Or just any good astrophysics/astronomy blog in general

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:34:33 2022 No.14652939 >>14652928 I missed the Trump roasts, but I wish he'd aim elsewhere. They'll be more powerful as allies than foes.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:34:40 2022 No.14652941 >>14652937 Phil Plait is about the only astronomer I know who does a blog

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:34:51 2022 No.14652942 >>14652928 Trump is a dead end so I don't understand why he's trying to become relevant again. No one wants an old person to lead the country. Someone who doesn't change their mind needs to be removed.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:34:53 2022 No.14652943 >>14652877 are you underage? literally no ones cares about monopolies

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:35:18 2022 No.14652945 Been away for a few days, what happened? Looks like fuel was flowing but ignition was massively delayed

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:35:47 2022 No.14652947 >>14652937 This but BIPOC +/ LGBTQIA+ sources preferred only please

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:36:10 2022 No.14652949 >>14652928 lol, i kinda wish this was real

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:37:38 2022 No.14652955 >>14652939 >Allying with literal retards You would deserve to get burned. If Republicans in general don't wake up to this soon we'll be doomed to another term of Bill Ballast.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:43:06 2022 No.14652967 >>14652955 Based two party system imbecile

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:43:58 2022 No.14652970

>>14652937
You don't even need an expert to tell you why its important to have accurate information.

The picture shows more accurate data than the stuff we launched 30 years ago. The question now is why more data is important? Its so we can build a better model of the universe with more granularity, with more precision, with more understanding of the nature of planets/galaxies/solar systems/etc. The fundamental limits of physics for the last 50 years or so have been raw data. The problem lies at the very top level (solar system/galaxy/cluster/universe) and the problem lies at the low level (atomic/subatomic).

For a more mundane reason, the higher precision instrument allows us to measure planet's orbit/atmospheric composition/water level/mass/etc. Which can determine if there might be chance of life/etc.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:44:08 2022 No.14652971 >>14652967 It'd be neat if we got some new ones for a change, it's been a while.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:45:20 2022 No.14652976 >>14651427 >it's a pathfinder OHNONONO

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:46:32 2022 No.14652980 >>14652967 A 3rd party candidate hasn't even won a state since Wallace you idealist histlet. I would have voted for Crawford in 1824 same as any good contrarian but you have to work within the two-party system primaries in the current year.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:48:05 2022 No.14652985 File: 20 KB, 521x873, original terran.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >the first draft of terran 1 looked like new tron what could've been

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:50:34 2022 No.14653000
File: 180 KB, 640x360, oj0hra7ap6b91.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14649571
>the CHADS of /a/ officially start characterfagging as rockets
>SLS-SAMA PLEASE KISS MY WIFE
>Starshipbros.....
>AIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>14650887
I love how these queers act like they are the oh-so-hecking wholesome proletariat, yet all they do is galavant on twitter about how their lack of balls and worship of niggers makes them great.
>>14651427
Some moeshitter's gonna draw his barely relevant ariane character in purple panties, isn't he?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:55:08 2022 No.14653020 >>14652971 Yang just started a new one if you're into that type of faggotry

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 23:57:29 2022 No.14653025 >>14650887 nothing says mediocrity like starting several companies that completely change the industry they're in, fucking celebrities and becoming a trillionaire

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:09:43 2022 No.14653056 >>14652928 …why? Does this all stem from elon saying he didn’t vote R? This is so retarded for so many reasons >>14652949 it is real lol

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:22:08 2022 No.14653086 >>14652945 No ignition was supposed to take place. Something went wrong.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:23:18 2022 No.14653095 >>14653056 I'm guessing Trump is sperging out because Elon backed out of buying Twitter, and Trump wants his dopamine drip back. >>14652949 >it's real https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/108636743295734643

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:33:44 2022 No.14653135 >>14653056 >stem from elon saying he didn’t vote R? and Trump claiming Musk had told him he voted for him. Who's lying?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:36:42 2022 No.14653144 >every single thread about JWST is filled with 1) flat earthers or 2) spectroscopy deniers go ahead and look through the catalog. If only you knew how bad things were

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:36:57 2022 No.14653145 >>14653135 At this point I don’t care, I just want off this stupid rock. Too bad clown world has infiltrated aerospace now. Is there any escape?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:37:59 2022 No.14653148 >>14653144 >spectroscopy deniers Wut. Like, they’re denying Webb’s spectroscopy data? Or they flat out don’t think spectroscopy is real

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:40:12 2022 No.14653159 >>14653148 >>14649147 >>14649166 >>14650871 >>14650906 >>14650910 Everything. It's pretty bad.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:42:48 2022 No.14653172 >>14653144 real flat earthers dont exist anymore, at least on 4chan, they are basically sneed posters now.

Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:44:20 2022 No.14653178

>>14653159
Okay well he is technically right, but still wrong if you know what I mean. It’s like saying the photograph developed from my oldschool canon film camera isn’t “true” color because the film has chemicals sensitive to different wavelengths compared to actually seeing the event in real life through a prism that bends the light into my eye in real time

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:46:56 2022 No.14653183 >>14653056 Trump is a huge ego maniac. You kiss his ring or he casts you out.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:48:55 2022 No.14653194 >>14653159 This one was moved from /pol/ or /int/

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:49:13 2022 No.14653195 File: 767 KB, 2056x1132, Screen Shot 2022-07-12 at 8.48.27 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >All the suppliers to Artemis I https://esahubble.org/images/heic1502a/zoomable/ Dios mios....

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:50:14 2022 No.14653198 >>14653195 post da webm

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 00:54:39 2022 No.14653218 >>14653215 r8 my b8

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 01:02:10 2022 No.14653236 >>14653218 7/10, made me reply.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 01:03:50 2022 No.14653242 File: 1.73 MB, 788x1872, 1657670007792.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Oh it's happening A war is starting

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 01:05:02 2022 No.14653248 >>14653242 The /sfg/ schism begins now... Trumptards vs muskrats.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 01:05:34 2022 No.14653250 >>14653242 He should've just brought up how he quit Trumps tech council or whatever when he backed out of the Paris climate deal to directly disprove that he's as big a Trump fan as he said Instead he posts this...

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 01:08:03 2022 No.14653257 File: 42 KB, 492x878, oval office musk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14653242 oh no no no

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 01:10:42 2022 No.14653263 File: 115 KB, 602x633, jeffy b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14653248 I choose a 3rd option

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 01:14:49 2022 No.14653274 >>14653271 >>14653271 >>14653271 stage sep confirmed

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 01:25:17 2022 No.14653309 >>14653242 The finno-korean hyperwar was started with one tweet

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 01:32:23 2022 No.14653339 >>14653248 I am both and wish they wouldn't fight.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 02:12:29 2022 No.14653484 >>14653095 trump wanted elon to buy twitter and then beg him to come back

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 02:47:02 2022 No.14653606 >>14653000 You need to leave /a/ too you fag Go back to /v/

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 13 03:17:15 2022 No.14653670 >>14652568 You should have run simulations first to predict that you'd get called a faggot. Also, hang yourself.

Anonymous Wed Jul 13 04:00:14 2022 No.14653763

>>14652921
What? No. NASA was given like 2-3 additional Hubble-like Spy sats which they're going to repurpose for science missions. Hubble is not a repurposed spy sat. Also, no, having a JWST like mirror pointing down to the Earth would be too reflective, it'd be easy to find when looking at the sky.
Also, literally no racket in the US repertoire currently or in the past 10 years, has the fairing size available to launch something like the JWST but for NRO purposes. JWST itself was launched on the Arianne5 and it BARELY fit inside the fairing. JWST is absolutely massive in terms of an observatory and basically maxes out everything in the market for size/capacity.

That said, I hope Starship succeeds so that we can get: https://www.space.com/42952-nasa-space-telescope-ideas-for-2030s.html, LUVOIR-A instead of LUVOIR-B. A 50-feet across hex mirror like JWST, but able to capture visible light means that its just at the bare minimum "big" mirror to be able to point at Alpha Centauri and get a fuzzy image of a planet in the habitable zone. To get a blue/green or blue/brown image back. But multiple Starship flights over the next 20 years, will potentially unlock our ability to construct a 50 meter across or bigger visible light collecting telescope, like LUVOIR-A; for a 150 feet across mirror. Collecting light with that and focusing it onto a sensor, would be sufficient to then basically fully image a planet and get cloud patterns, landmasses, greenery, big storms, etc. The larger the mirror surface area, the amount of light you can collect exponentially increases, and the resolution/clarity/detail of what you're looking at increases by the same amount or more.

JWST's mirror is just big enough to detect exo-planets around Jovian bodies and take their atmospheric spectra or outright take the atmospheric spectra of terrestrial worlds, but can't image those planets themselves; mirror too small.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]