/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.12647930]

Fuck the niggers who want to disassemble the planets for resources. it's our *HOME* system you animals, these things are named after gods.

[Anonymous No.12647973]

>>12647930
Cope. Planets and other objects orbiting the sun WLL be dismantled and used for Chad's space habitats.

[Anonymous No.12647982]

>>12647973

Space habitats are good, but you rootless spacer scum will not be allowed to multiply at the expense of planetary nations. Go shit up your own systems. Also, leave Sol.

[Anonymous No.12647987]

>>12647982
>NOOOOOOOOO! YOU CAN'T JUST DESTROY MY ANCIENT, DANGEROUS, AND UGLY BROWN ROCK! THIS IS HECKIN UNFAIR! JUST GO AWAY!

[Anonymous No.12647996]

>>12647987

You think a swarm of habitats hell-bent on destroying everything will be good for humanity and aren't a threat? I can only wonder what kinds of mutants, cultists, and pedophiles are in those spacer cylinders

[Anonymous No.12648018]

>>12647987
>supporting a literal all-consuming swarm

[Anonymous No.12648021]

>>12647996
They'd be peaceful amongst each other, advanced civilizations can't get anywhere if they're constantly fighting. The only people in trouble would be the priminiggers living on rocks and wasting resources. Perhaps they can have their own little rock somewhere though, if Chad feels like it.

[Anonymous No.12648024]

>>12648021

Where is the line drawn? Is Earth itself on the chopping block?

[Anonymous No.12648035]

>be me
>be average, 233 years old, 400IQ, 6'5, genetically modified blue hair
>be year 2621
>live in space habitat 9b
>gf wants children
>ask AI if we can
>"no"
>something about "max population"
>fuckit we try anyway, fuck the AI ruler
>me and gf have best coom in months
>everything is fine
>gf gets fetus forcibly removed a month later
>degenerate furry transhumanist next door has non-human child the next day
>mfw
When did it all go wrong /b/ros?

[Anonymous No.12648037]

>>12648024
Maybe not earth for historical reasons. The line isn't clear, as these would be very intelligent beings but the majority of the volume of the solar system would be owned by space habitats. Energy harvested from the sun.

[Anonymous No.12648044]

>>12647973
>Get one disease
>Half the population dies

>No biological evolution in such a small closed system
Go live in the ISS, faggotron, I’ll be chilling in the venusian rainforest

[Anonymous No.12648045]

>>12648037

Is the Oort cloud not enough?

[Anonymous No.12648055]

>>12648021

We evolved on rocks, Habitats are only for poors that can't afford to live on rocks.

[Anonymous No.12648066]

>>12648044
>>No biological evolution in such a small closed system.
>Thinks he knows what evolution is or what a space habitat is like.

>>12648055
>Wants to live on a rock with a bunch of excess useless material

>>12648045
I just don't see the point in keeping all this junk. It would be much better if we used it for modeling are own system.

[Anonymous No.12648068]

>>12648066
our*

[Anonymous No.12648075]

>>12648018
Why yes, I do support the human race.

[Anonymous No.12648078]

>>12648075

Proxima Centauri is that-a-way.

[Anonymous No.12648082]

>Build ringworld
>Destroyed in a few centuries from gradual meteorite damage/solar wind ablation
>Realise that ringworlds are not viable
>Build cylinder colonies
>Destroyed in a few centuries from gradual meteorite damage/solar wind ablation
The only viable habitat needs an atmosphere at least 50 miles thick and a huge magnetic field to protect the atmosphere from being eroded. That means a terrestrial planet.

[Anonymous No.12648221]

>>12648082

Are habitats really that vulnerable to meteors and dust?

[Anonymous No.12648246]

>>12647930
You build space habitats with material from asteroids and comets, not planets. Dwarf planets at the very most.

>>12648221
If you didn't maintain and repair them, yea. If you can build such a megastructure you probably have the capability of maintaining it though. They'll never top a planet like Earth, but they may be easier than trying to terraform uninhabitable planets like Mars.

[Anonymous No.12648261]

>>12648044
>implying our dna will be stock and un-upgraded

[Anonymous No.12648267]

>>12648221
Not really, magnetic fields are easy and cheap and the idea that you can build a mega structure but not shoot down meteors or maintain it is just dumb.

[Anonymous No.12648299]

>>12647930
But if we dismantle the planets we can build a dyson swarm to house a trillion bugmen niggers consuming and fornicating forever until the sun burns out.
Isn't that the whole objective here?

[Anonymous No.12648303]

>>12647930
>these things are named after satanic trickster demons
Fix'd for you :^)

[Anonymous No.12648305]

>>12647973
And if your collective social credit falls too low, the megacorp that owns the station will vent the atmosphere.

[Anonymous No.12648383]

>>12648066
>Wants to live on a rock with a bunch of excess useless material

We can dig so deep we can un"earth" Balrogs but we still don't need to dissassemble the planets for just yer even more people on top of the Gorrillions we would already have at that point. Can't we keep nice things for once?

[Anonymous No.12648391]

>>12648303
Saturn is basically Yahweh so I see your point

[Anonymous No.12648473]

Well, there should be an exact replica of our Solar System 10^10^118 meters from here in any direction so what don't you disassemble that system? Not to mention the literal infinite other solar system in the universe.

[Anonymous No.12648710]

>>12648221
Habitats will most likely burrowed into asteroids and thus shielded from the impacts. Such habitats may have a longer lifespan than earth's natural biosphere as it could survive sun's red giant phase.

[Anonymous No.12648732]

>>12647973
that's not how you use cope. go ahead and wojak me.

[Anonymous No.12648756]

>>12648035
Your AI is bullshiting you, even with exponential growth in the nest 10000 years we won't fill even a fraction of the dyson swarm especially if we add star lifting to it. Also, why keep flesh? To the Moravec Uploads belongs the cosmos.

[Anonymous No.12649674]

>>12648756
>Also, why keep flesh?

I'm opposed to suicide.

[Anonymous No.12650056]

>>12649674
That`s why you go moravec.

[Anonymous No.12650599]

>>12647930
It wouldn't be practical to use Mars for building resources, at least first, because of the gravity well. It makes more sense to mine asteroids for zero g industry than to spend all that delta v getting stuff off of Mars. The Moon is also a good option, since its gravity is so low and and its closer to Earth. Mars will probably be useful for inhabitation and some forms of mining if it has rare stuff, but otherwise it won't make that much sense to start mining mars, especially if Mars starts getting terraformed.

[Anonymous No.12650613]

>>12649674
There's a whole bunch of ways to cheat ego death. They're all theoretical for now, of course, but some of them are more feasible than others.

[Anonymous No.12650623]

>>12650599

Please don't tear up the moon, or at least the side that faces Earth.

[Anonymous No.12650721]

>>12650623
Why not? It's just a big hunk of grey stuff. Besides it's so massive, trust me, it'll take a while to go through it all.

[Anonymous No.12650870]

>>12650721
>It's just a big hunk of grey stuff

A hunk of grey stuff that we don't understand how it works.

[Anonymous No.12651600]

>>12650870
The fuck you mean we don't understand how it works? We understand exactly how it works.

[Anonymous No.12651690]

>>12651600

OK. How does electricity get turned into experiences? How does the brain do that? We know very little so far.

[Anonymous No.12651725]

Personally I support leaving our system intact, and instead dismantling the nearest billion or so galaxies.
As well as digitising everyone to use as little energy as possible, and remove any chance of someone doing something stupid like causing a grey goo apocalypse.
Also digitising any sapient species that might evolve on Earth while we're gone, in case they do stupid things too.

[Anonymous No.12651727]

>>12647930
What do you mean "disassemble"? I don't think anyones trying to get rid of an entire planet and fuck up everyone's orbits.
Mine it? Yes. Explody bits? No

[Anonymous No.12651729]

>>12651725

It's Dr.Robotnik here.

[Anonymous No.12651735]

>>12647930
>>12647973
What the fuck even is the point of life. Living and spreading like a insect infestation for the sake of it? Whats the endgame here?

[Anonymous No.12651755]

We should eat most of the asteroids and moons, but there's quite a lot we should save as human birthright. Without keeping these things, how will later generations understand why we expanded to the stars in the first place? Truly understand it - not just the hard numbers.

[Anonymous No.12651771]

>>12651735
We ARE parasites. Either embrace it or don't, simple as.

[Anonymous No.12651793]

>>12651735

Shaking our fists at entropy.

[Anonymous No.12651795]

>>12651735
Biological programming commanding us to maximize successful reproduction because that ensured our ancestors' survival.

[Anonymous No.12651825]

>>12648299

I'd argue Habitats serve a function of letting people go build their ow nations and societies free from Earth politics to at least some degree. As well as making sure humanity doesn't die if Earth does. And being a convenient middle-ground between now and colonizing other star systems. Building a swarm doesn't check those boxes, and doesn't spark joy.

[Anonymous No.12651877]

>>12647930
you have to kill the gods if you want to become one

[Anonymous No.12652294]

>>12651795
>CONSUME. MATE. DIE. CHILDREN REPEAT PROCESS. AD INFINITUM.

I don't want to just be a gene host only to curse my offspring to the same fate. I want to transcend beyond this biological automaton fated to decay and rot to the cruel arrow of entropy and become on with the aleph. I want to bend reality to my will and turn the universe into my playground. And to see what lies beyond this universe and whatever is next.

[Anonymous No.12652902]

>>12651877

I don't, tho.