GAI approximation with near psychometrically valid tests.

[Anonymous No.12133914]

TRI-52 https://web.archive.org/web/20100122211331/http://www.cerebrals.com/tests/tri/TRI52.html
This will give you a score that you need to convert into an IQ score, use this chart: https://web.archive.org/web/20091229185320/http://www.cerebrals.com/tests/tri/Classeur1.pdf
and this website: https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/iqtable.aspx

Do this test next: https://web.archive.org/web/20160611031125/http://www.cerebrals.org/iaw/index.php
Convert your raw score into a scaled score: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vTAXAOLRctHeY1PAl0-cKQ9duaQU_yp8isN7_urJTKxGhmePI0yPvNHhcX1cVUcehseE_IXtP99QVb8/pubhtml

Then you generate the composite score. Let's say you scored 146 on the TRI52 and 139 on IAW, you would use this formula to generate your composite score: 100+(146+139-200)/1.685 = 150 "GAI"

Good luck, have fun, brainlets.

[Anonymous No.12133946]

>>12133914
Answer is 2

[Anonymous No.12133964]

>>12133914
TL;DR.

Also I say 2.

The middle center+lines flips on the horizontal axis, then vertical lines gets trimmed off. The lines to the left (90-270deg) are xored/ored (doesn't matter), the square is then xored, leaving nothing but the dot.

[Anonymous No.12133975]

>>12133964
You got it correct, but your logic is very retarded.

[Anonymous No.12133983]

Where does this GAI formula come from?
got 825 on TRI52 btw

>>12133964
center lines gets added/subtracted on the last item of a line/culumn based on wheter it is repeated or not by the previous two. Is the same rule for the outside lines but inverted

[Anonymous No.12134006]

>>12133983
Ferguson's formula.
1.685 is the square root of the sum of the correlation matrix between the two tests.

[Anonymous No.12134499]

>>12133983
You have to convert the tri score into an IQ score using the table