/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9986316
>gets images of earth right off the satellite
No, he gets a data feed that lets him download patches of areas covered by the satellites imaging sensors at a certain point in time. Then he stitches the images together using software to create a composite image of the earth.

>>9986498
So is there not a single satellite out there that photographs the earth whole?

>>9986551
there is. its that japanese one

>>9986551
There's a handful of satellites that produce "full disk" images, though they're fairly uncommon due of the lack of detail.

>>9986556
>>9986574
nice try, but i dont buy it. earth's flat.

If you though earth was flat to begin with you are retarded.

>>9986608
why don't they send satellites to the opposite side of flat earth so we know what's over there? we know less about the far side of flat earth than we know about our deepest oceans

>>9986551
There are several. I'm thinking weather satellites put up by various stakeholder countries into geosynchronous orbit. The most frequent updates I've seen is every half an hour and in several bands of light. Start here:
https://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/geo

>>9986608
Fortunately, you're irrelevant.

>>9987160
SO ARE YOU

THE EARTH EXISTS WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT

AND BUDDY YOU BETTER BELIEVE IT'S THERE AS FLAT AS A PANCAKE

>>9987166
Which is why you can measure a non-local curvature across it? Yeah, sure.

>>9987168
>you can measure
i certainly can't
have you? with what?

>>9987166
Golly, that's so eloquent and convincing.
Can't possibly be bait.

>>9987172
Go to the sea side, find a cliff. Wait for the Sun set. Go prone, or kneel down and wait for the Sun to set. Then stand up and watch the Sun set again.
Then, jump off the cliff:
>https://www.astro.princeton.edu/~dns/teachersguide/MeasECAct.html

>>9987179
fine

>>9987179
>what is perspective

>>9987282
Perspective makes things smaller, dunce, it doesn't hide things.

37 experiments supporting flat earth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoxhDtnRmBk [Embed]

Let's see yours oblate spheroidians.

>>9987282
I don't think you know that yourself, my friend. Because it has no impact upon being able to witness the curvature of the Earth in such a scenario. You do know you've known the Earth is spherical since BC, right?

>>9986551
bro just bend the light around the back

>>9987300
> it doesn't hide things.
Yes it does, in combination with the air, particularly the thick later atop the surface of the earth, which things disappear into as they get further away bottom up.

>>9987306
See
>>9987316
>You do know you've known the Earth is spherical since BC, right?
No, I don't actually, could have easily been made up. The experiment is valid, but does not prove a globe, it works on a flat plane with a local sun circling above.

>>9987320
How high up is that? Because I don't think you appreciate just how massive the planet is.

>The experiment is valid, but does not prove a globe, it works on a flat plane with a local sun circling above.
No it doesn't mathematically.

The Earth is basically a giant drop of water with some rocks mixed in floating in space. Drops of water in the air are spherical, with the exception of a tail caused by wind resistance/drag. If drops of water are sphere, why shouldn't the earth be too?

>>9987320
substitute sun for ship sailing over the horizon, unless you believe ships travel in circles too

>>9987320
Also, that video. REKT.

>>9987337
>How high up is that? Because I don't think you appreciate just how massive the planet is.
I likely know more about the globe model than you do.

>No it doesn't mathematically.
You sure about that?

>>9987353
>I likely know more about the globe model than you do.
That's not an answer, or an argument.
How high up is that?
>You sure about that?
Prove it then, faggot. Using geometry, because I guarantee it doesn't work.
See: >>9987344
That's a curvature, but because it isn't that high up, the curvature is very little.

how did a thread on such a cool topic get derailed by flat earthers?
these cancerous faggots should be removed, mods need to start banning flat earthers

>>9987338
>The Earth is basically a giant drop of water with some rocks mixed in floating in space.
Jej, you crazy.

>If drops of water are sphere, why shouldn't the earth be too?
The earth's supposed to be in a vacuum. What shape is water in a container?

>substitute sun for ship sailing over the horizon, unless you believe ships travel in circles too
What's going on in webm?

>>9987364
What distance is that? Because it's probably a flatwat not understanding just how massive the globe is.
>The earth's supposed to be in a vacuum. What shape is water in a container?
What is gravity?

>>9987316
>Yes it does, in combination with the air, particularly the thick later atop the surface of the earth, which things disappear into as they get further away bottom up.
How does the air make things disappear?

>>9987344
>thinking that's "globe curvature"

>How high up is that?
I don't recall, but this one is about 124,000ft up.

>>9987364
Also, that video shows the boat disappearing bottom first nearer the end. You spastic.

Flattards BTFO

>>9987376

>>9987364
That's a mirage and can't explain ships disappearing over the horizon since mirages only occur in certain situations and are clearly visible. When the weather is clear and there is no visible distortion, the ship still disappears. The only thing that can explain this is the curvature of the Earth.

>>9987358
>Prove it then, faggot. Using geometry, because I guarantee it doesn't work.
Imagine a light on a ceiling in a room, with a flat surface. Observe your shadow while standing in the room. Imagine the light start circling around the room. Observe your shadow. It behaves the same as someone's shadow on a 93 million miles away sun shining upon a 24,901 miles in circumference oblate spheroid rotating on its axis.

>>9987389
That experiment doesn't rely on shadows. Why don't you actually go and read what it asks you to do?

>>9987374
>What distance is that? Because it's probably a flatwat not understanding just how massive the globe is.
So the air has no affect on the visibility of things, particularly the air above the surface of the oceans?

>What is gravity?
Exactly, no one knows. Don't pretend you do.

>>9987378
Doesn't matter you spastic because observing it unaided with your eyes will show it looking like it's going behind something as the bottom of it continues to merge with itself and the ship as a whole gets smaller and smaller.

>>9987406
It does matter, because regardless what you're observing is a curvature. Dumb dumb.

>>9987379
You're an embarrassment to science.

>>9987401
>So the air has no affect on the visibility of things, particularly the air above the surface of the oceans?
You do know the atmosphere gets thinner, right?
>Exactly, no one knows. Don't pretend you do.
Gravitons, and I'm not even memeing, they are the gauge bosons of gravity.

>>9987381
Where's the globe curve?

>>9987415
Not an argument.

>>9987385
Show me a full, unedited video of a ship going behind globe curvature.

>>9987419
Look at the line, you disingenuous faggot.

>>9987423
Lmao, your video isn't valid proof because... you don't like the fact we found the flaw with it? Hilarious.

>>9987399
Why do you assume you can see further through dense air compared to less dense air?

>>9987412
Show me a full, unedited video of a ship disappearing behind globe curvature.

>>9987434
>through dense air compared to less dense air?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opacity_(optics)

>>9987421
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5_efcyCjBo

>>9987436
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNGorPyX9OQ

>>9987444
You can still see the curvature, you massive idiot.

>>9987416
>You do know the atmosphere gets thinner, right?
Yeah, at the top, which is my point. Things will disappear bottom up as they further away, as they will get lower and lower due to perspective.
>Gravitons, and I'm not even memeing, they are the gauge bosons of gravity.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>9987424
Stab your both your eyes with a line.

>>9987423
>spoon feed me moving goalposts so I can continue to call you an embarrassment and then ignore you completely while I go off into another thread on another tangent

fuck you

>>9987429
Show me a full, unedited video of a ship going behind globe curvature.

>>9987461
>Things will disappear bottom up as they further away, as they will get lower and lower due to perspective.
What does this have to do with density of the atmosphere, you fruit?

>>9987464
This, everything we've disproved, he just disowns. See: >>9987465

>>9987465
I fulfilled want you wanted me to, and gave you an unedited video of what you asked for. Fuck off, idiot.

>>9986316
REMINDER: FLAT EARTH IS A CIA PSYOP TO DISTRACT FROM CONCAVE EARTH

>>9987447
I mean really? I said unedited. Pic is why I asked for that, why does the horizon rise as the video goes on?

>>9987453
Moron.

>>9987439
Transmission decreases when the att. coefficient increases, and the coefficient is proportional to air particles n, as far as I understand it.

>t. morons who actually believe the Earth is real

We're living in a simulation. You can't prove the Earth is flat or round because none of you have seen the real Earth. You've just been programed to think you have seen it.

>>9987478
Because the camera is holding the camera, zooms the camera in and the boat vanishes over the horizon. You moron.

>>9987478
But when using optical zoom, you can make the ship reappear. I've seen videos of people showing this.

>>9987464
Lil' bitch can't post a simple video.

>>9987487
>Not taking video at sea level.
Whoa, so smart.

>>9987482
You do not need to see something to prove it exists.

>>9987468
>What does this have to do with density of the atmosphere, you fruit?
Because light cannot pass through denser air as easily as less dense air, hence things will disappear first bottom up as they go off in the distance, being "pulled" down by perspective.

>gave you an unedited video
NOPE.

>>9987471
Dome model is the psy-op, along with the globe model. Infinite plane is the truth.

>>9987486
>*cameraman

>>9987497
>Because light cannot pass through denser air as easily as less dense air, hence things will disappear first bottom up as they go off in the distance, being "pulled" down by perspective.
If you''re a sea level, watching a ship go over the horizon, you're probably at near enough the same atmospheric pressure. You spastic.

>NOPE.
YUP.

>>9987439
The fuck is that supposed to prove?

>>9987486
SHOW A FULL UNEDITED VIDEO. WHY IS THIS HARD?

>>9987500
>the horizon,

Which is only an optical effect, otherwise >>9987487 wouldn't be possible.

>>9987505
I SHOWS A FULL UNEDITED VIDEO, YOU FUCKING CUNT.

>>9987487
STOP DEFLECTING AND ANSWER THE QUESTION.

>>9987491
burden of proof

show me a video of where a ship goes on forever and ever and ever and always remains in view even when it's docking in another continent. If this were true we wouldn't need spy satellites. We'd just need a very tall tower and a telescope to spy on enemy countries on the other side of the world.

I bet you believe if you looked out over the ocean on a clear day, you can see Russia.

>>9987506
It isn't possible at sea level, all of you fruits don't film at sea level, because you're disingenuous fuckheads. Show me a video of this AT SEA LEVEL.

>>9987471
>>9987499

both wrong! DO NOT LISTEN TO THESE GLOW IN THE DARK C*A NI**ERS

FLAT EARTH AND CONCAVE EARTH ARE JUST TO DISTRACT FROM HOLOGRAM EARTH

>>9987500
>If you''re a sea level, watching a ship go over the horizon, you're probably at near enough the same atmospheric pressure. You spastic.
IT'S A GRADIENT YOU FUCKWIT, IT MAKES PERFECT SENSE.

>>9987507
IT IS NOT UNCUT IS IT FAGGOT?

>>9987511
ONLY RETARDED GLOBECUNTS THINK THIS. STOP PROJECTING YOUR RETARDEDNESS ONTO ME.

THERE IS A THING CALLED AIR THAT LIGHT PASSES THROUGH YOU MONUMENTAL FUCKNUT. MORE AIR LIGHT PASSES THROUGH, THE LESS LIGHT WILL BE VISIBLE. DO YOU UNDERSTAND?

>>9987534
>MORE AIR LIGHT PASSES THROUGH, THE LESS LIGHT WILL BE VISIBLE

but how can you prove that? if you can't prove it it's just a conspiracy theory. I mean air is invisible after all. Show me a picture of air, or a video. Where's the proof air even exists?

>>9987526
>IT'S A GRADIENT YOU FUCKWIT, IT MAKES PERFECT SENSE.
WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE AT SEA LEVEL. YOU FUCKING IDIOT.

>IT IS NOT UNCUT IS IT FAGGOT?
YES IT IS, NOTHING BUT THAT FOOTAGE IS SHOWN, FROM START TO FINISH.

>>9987320
>>9987344
There's one thing I don't get about people who believe in a disk earth and use these videos as "proof". If the earth was a disk and you sent a camera floating high above it, wouldn't you just see the edge of the disk, which would be a curve? I know everyone who posts that trash here is trolling, but I've never heard the true believers explanation for that.

>>9987509
What question?

>>9987534
SHOW US A VIDEO OF A SHIP VANISHING, THEN YOU ZOOMING IN AND IT APPEARING AGAIN, AT SEA LEVEL. DO IT FAGGOT, FUCKING DO IT.

>>9987534
NO RETARD FUCKHEAD CONCAVE EARTH HAS LOBACHEVSKYAN BULK AND GEODESICS CAUSE NATURAL ATTENUATION OF BRIGHTNESS

AIR LIGHT IS CIA BULLSHIT

>>9987540
YOU CAN FEEL IT.

>>9987545
Not if it is an infinite plane, the dome model is horseshit.

>>9987548

>>9987540
Fog is a good example. The more dense the fog is, the less you see.

THIS THREAD IS FILLED WITH DEEP STATE SHILLS. QANON AND FLAT EARTH ARE REAL.

>>9987562
That's not sea level, you faggot. First of all, the road is elevated, and then the cameraman is further elevated.

>>9987516
don't listen to illu*inati propaganda, hologram earth is just to distract from fractal earth

>>9987553
THERE'S NO MEASURABLE CURVATURE YOU CONCAVE CRETIN. YOU'RE LIKELY CIA TRYING TO MUDDY THE WATERS FURTHER WITH YOUR JUVENILE CONCAVE/DOME PSYOP BULLSHIT.

>>9987567
>QANON
Not real.

>FLAT EARTH
Infinite plane is real.

>>9987547
Why isn't there a full, uncut, unedited video of a ship going behind globe curvature?

>>9987567
why is /pol/ so afraid of jewish globalists if /pol/ doesn't believe in globes? wouldn't it be jewish flatists?


Also, attention to mods. THIS THEAD IS WHY FLAT EARTH SHIT NEEDS INSTA BAN.
We just wanted a nice thread discussing scraping data from weather satellites till everything went to hell.
I'd recommend a soft 1 hour ban from posting on all other threads for anyone posting in /pol/. Just so /pol/ retards don't cross post all day long shitting on other boards all day.

>>9987570
Why does it need to be sea level you faggot?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZjoOQXz6zM

>>9987584
>We just wanted a nice thread discussing scraping data from weather satellites till everything went to hell.
No you didn't you deceptive fucker, the mods see right through your game.

>>9987598
>Why does it need to be sea level you faggot?
>What is geometry?
That's why, you spastic.

>>9987583
Why are you lying?

https://youtu.be/sT5oB_fk7eg

>>9987320
nigger

>>9987598
>Zooming out just at starts to go over the horizon.
Lmao, you fucking cope faggots. Eh?
Question, how do ships GPS systems work without satellites?

>>9987604
no that video is a CIA simulation, using future technology teleported from an alien civilization by the satanists at CERN

>>9987612
Please be a troll?

>>9987617
Retard

>>9987619
Retard2.

>>9987604
that's clearly just a mirage, or an artifact of the lens, or a trick from the camera zooming in on it
or it could be the ship is actually sinking.

>>9987623
Cringe

>>9987602
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSSFfoAIx04

>>9987624
Stop fucking deflecting! He gave you what you wanted! We're on a globe! A big beautiful globe!

>>9987630
The ground isn't perfectly flat, you massive spastic. Otherwise hills wouldn't exist.

>>9987635
hills are a myth created by the infinite plane conspiracy
Earth is actually a rhombus.

>>9987643
It's actually a scutoid.

>>9987604
Jej, at what point does the ship actually go behind globe curvature rather than just get smaller into the distance? Show a full one in the day.

>>9987606
Fish eye lens, the globefag's weapon of choice.

>>9987647
see pic

According to topology, if you stretch and deform it Earth is actually human shaped. What if the Earth is a living human and we're all just bacteria living on it's skin?
People get confused with sphere/flat because some people live on the head where it's round, and other people live on the back where it's flat.

>>9987652
>goalposts = moved
Is this that flatwats only defense?

>>9987608
>Question, how do ships GPS systems work without satellites?
Land based triangulation, buoys, undersea shit. You can bounce radio waves off the ionosflat too.

>>9987656
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKAblynZYhI
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8W-auqg024
No fish eye lens, REKT.

>>9987647
it’s actually a seven pointed star, and winter is coming

>>9987661
This might be the most retarded post I've ever seen.

>>9987635
Same principle applies you faggot. The densest layer air sits above the surface of the earth, therefore things will be distorted by it, creating the illusion of things going behind something.

>>9987671
STOP GOING ON ABOUT DENSITY, YOU MORON. IT DOESN'T DIFFER THAT MUCH, UNLESS YOU'RE CLIMBING A FUCKING MOUNTAIN!

>>9987659
>As a globefag, pic related is good enough evidence that the ship is behind earth's curvature. Who needs to watch it during the day?

>>9987676
You can clearly see the mass of the ship disappearing below the horizon. Unless you're blind, are you?

Also, see: >>9987665
Footage of the curvature, from really high up, without a fish eye lens making it more dramatic.

>>9987665
Very interesting how fish eye go-pros are always the camera used with weather balloons to get this footage, and it is always the camera included when buying these kits: https://www.highaltitudescience.com/products/eagle-pro-near-space-kit

>>9987674
>IT DOESN'T DIFFER THAT MUCH
The ocean's surface, with evaporating water, doesn't differ that much in density from inch to inch.

>>9987688
You can see from the raw footage when on the ground that it isn't a fish eye lens, you spastic.
Stop being disingenuous, the Earth is a globe and that video proves it.

>>9987669
Says the faggot that believes satellites are real and orbiting the earth at 1000s of MPH.

>>9987692
>How big is a ship.

>>9987699
More realistic than all of the interference you'd get from doing it under the ocean, idiot.

what's the irrational logic for the shape of other planets? Are other planets flat too? or is Earth just special?

>>9987665
unironically good video.

now let me go back to making troll posts....

INFINITE PLANE EARTH IS JUST TO DISTRACT FROM 2D ANIME WAIFU EARTH

>>9987712
They're ZOG illusions to distract you from Satanism.

>>9987695
What camera was used you cretin?

>>9987715
I asked for irrational logic. Not batshit crazy.

>>9987700
IT GETS SMALLER DOESN'T IT MORON THAT'S WHAT PERSPECTIVE DOES.

>>9987721
this is obvious if you STOPPED BEING DISTRACTED BY FLAT EARTH, ITS CONCAVE EARTH WITH LOBACHEVSKIAN BULK DUH

geodesics arriving from infinite plane jupiter are warped by hyperbolic curvature to look round, LEARN SOME CONCAVE EARTH DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY

>>9987712
What's the irrational logic for believing that image is actually a photo of a real object? Do you know who produces that unconvincing bullshit? And no, it's not NASA.

>>9987719
You can see, from the footage when on the ground, that it isn't a fish eye lens. You can see that, without your own eyes.

>>9987727
It gets smaller... and starts to disappear bottom up as it travels down the curvature of the Earth.

>>9987733
You can literally go and look at planets with a telescope, you retard.

>>9987705
>what are radio towers

>>9987733
This is how it looks with an ordinary pair of binoculars. You could go out tonight and look, assuming you're not in the city. How would they fake that?

>>9987737
The curvature of the Earth limits their range, moron.

>>9987734
WHAT CAMERA WAS USED, I WANT TO SEE THE PROPERTIES OF THE LENS.

>It gets smaller... and starts to disappear bottom up as it travels down the curvature of the Earth.
AHAHAHAHHHAHA. YOU THINK THE OCEAN'S SURFACE, COMPOSED OF WATER, CURVES? SORRY KID, YOU HAVEN'T THOUGHT THIS THROUGH, YOU CAN'T IGNORE THE CLEAR DISTORTION LAYER ABOVE ALL OF THE OCEAN'S SURFACE AND INSTEAD THINK IT'S EARTH'S CURVATURE.

>>9987736
>You can literally go and look at planets with a telescope, you retard.
I'M TALKING ABOUT THE IMAGE OF SATURN THAT WAS POSTED. IS IT REAL OR NOT? NO ONE CAN LOOK THROUGH A TELESCOPE AND SEE THAT THEMSELVES CAN THEY YOU FRAUD?

>>9987751
YOU CAN SEE THE LENS ON THE CAMERA ISN'T A FISH EYE LENS, KNOWING THE MODEL ISN'T REALLY IMPORTANT. YOU CAN SEE, WITH YOUR EYES, THAT IT ISN'T A FISH EYE LENS. YOU CAN SEE THAT.

>AHAHAHAHHHAHA. YOU THINK THE OCEAN'S SURFACE, COMPOSED OF WATER, CURVES? SORRY KID, YOU HAVEN'T THOUGHT THIS THROUGH, YOU CAN'T IGNORE THE CLEAR DISTORTION LAYER ABOVE ALL OF THE OCEAN'S SURFACE AND INSTEAD THINK IT'S EARTH'S CURVATURE.
Do you know what gravity is? Or surface tension? Have you ever seen a water droplet? It curves.

>>9987744
no, this is a psyop by the CIA

turn on a shortwave radio. you can hear stuff from japan. becuase the glow in the darks couldn't jam the shortwave band with their chemtrails. steve jobs (who is still alive) lobbied the illuminati to ban chemtrails that jam the shortwave band; since jobs is actually the second coming, and he had to fake his death to avoid the CERN satanists from using the LHC to kill him by causing an einstein rosen bridge to form in his cranium

>>9987754
>goalposts shifted, again

>>9987759
I am a HAM radio enthusiast, and that's utter bullshit. No you can't.

>>9987743
THIS IS MY POINT, IT LOOKS NOTHING LIKE THAT GARBAGE NASA IMAGE. YOU'RE A FAGGOT THAT THINKS IT'S MADE OF GAS, HOW RETARDED DO YOU HAVE TO BE?

This is the average flat fag:
>hurr look at me im being so smart and contrarian durr hurr
>*BRRAAAAP*
>hurr fucking goverment wants to hide the truth im too intelligent for them durr
>umm it smells like dorito's
>*cracks*
>*sip*
>flat earth, now that's a real earth shape, not like the """round""" earth bullshit kids eat up nowadays
Why don't you stop wasting oxygen and kill yourselves?

>>9987762
You can't see the ice wall, why do you believe in it?
I mean, at least we've seen pictures, you haven't even seen pictures of your ice wall.

>>9987744
SURE IT DOES, STOP AFFIRMING THE CONSEQUENT YOU LYING FRAUD.

>>9987762
>IT LOOKS NOTHING LIKE THAT GARBAGE NASA IMAGE
A photo from across a ravine looks nothing like a headshot taken from 3 feet what's your point.

>>9987769
Go and get a HAM radio license and try to listen to transmissions from the other side of the GLOBE. Good luck, you can't.

I'd like to try this in my back yard, if I had a spare satellite dish

>>9987767
That's your average flatoomer, yes.

>>9987775
Go and steal your neighbor's Sky dish. He was probably only watching Hawaii Five-0 anyway.

>>9987757
STOP MOVING THE GOALPOSTS AND TELL ME WHAT LENS WAS USED.

>Do you know what gravity is? Or surface tension? Have you ever seen a water droplet? It curves.
DO YOU KNOW WHAT A BODY OF WATER IS? DO YOU KNOW THAT THE SURFACE OF A BODY OF WATER DOES NOT DISPLAY THE SHAPE OF THE BOTTOM OF THE CONTAINER IT IS IN? DID YOU KNOW THAT? PLAY AROUND WITH A BATH OR SINK SOME TIME, OBSERVE ITS BEHAVIOUR. TEST IT, MEASURE, REPEAT IT, THIS IS CALLED "SCIENCE".

>>9987782
>STOP MOVING THE GOALPOSTS AND TELL ME WHAT LENS WAS USED.
YOU'RE THE ONE WHO MOVED THE GOALPOSTS IN THE FIRST PLACE. FROM A FISH EYE LENS TO "I NEED TO KNOW THE EXACT MODEL AND BATCH NUMBER". IT, ISN'T, A, FISH, EYE, LENS. THE EARTH IS A GLOBE. BlownTheFuckOut!

>>9987760
BACKTRACKING, AGAIN.

>>9987762
1st, nobody believes gas giants are made of gas, they're made of liquefied elements that are gaseous in earth like pressures/temperatures

2nd, it looks exactly like the nasa image except it's lower resolution/detailed

3rd, you're deflecting from the fact that even with binoculars you can see it's clearly sphere shaped and avoiding answering how you rationalize Earth would be shaped different because you have no answer

answer the question clearly and concisely without REEEEing in all caps or I'll screen cap this thread and post it on /pol/ every day for a month with the subject title "flat earther gets BTFO'd"

hi, here flat earth like i do happy me

earth plate big, ball round planet no happy. happy me sun shine chariot spotlight, star hole ceiling nice twinkles

bouncy earth ball stinky ghost poo poo

>>9987786
What's your address? I'm tired of this. I'll move in without, and together, we'll build a rocket-ship. Then, we'll fly into a geostationary orbit, and then re-enter and deploy a parachute. Where do you live? I'm going to do this, so you can finally see that the Earth is a globe.

>>9987791
>*I'll move in, and together...

>>9987767
THIS IS THE AVERAGE GLOBE FAG:

>huuuuuurr look at me i know "science" i'm so smart look at all the "smart" people in "science"
>*BRAAAAAAP*
>huuurrr governments wouldn't lie about where we live i'm too intelligent to be lied to from an early age
>globe, now that's the real earth shape, that's what i was taught in school, i didn't eat it up like those flat fags eating up youtube videos, i watched bill nye

wait so what changes if earth is flat or round

>>9987794
This whole thread has BTFO and your friend, multiple times.

>>9987795
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pa5X2rj65Qo

>>9987768
Something has to keep the water in doesn't it you dipshit? Antarctica is the highest altitude of any land mass in the world. It is also the most heavily protected. Do the math you imbecile.

>>9987770
Prove the shape of saturn without resorting to NASA bullshit.

>>9987516
>He self censors the word nigger

>>9987794
S E E T H I N G

>>9987771
Why would I do that faggot? Radio waves travel easier the higher the altitude, so if you went up high enough you would pick up more.

>>9987799
But you haven't seen it, or taken pictures of it. Where is it? Where are the pictures?

>>9987807
There are websites online ran by academic institutions that give you access to their radio antenna. Try and pic up chatter from across the globe. Good luck.

>>9987803
>he doesn't self censor the word n*gger
welcome to the cia watch list. please pay no mind to the black helicopters

>>9987802
Get a pair of binoculars and look up.

>>9987797
>video
sum it up in 10 words or less

>>9987814
The Earth wouldn't work proper. Watch the video.

>>9987785
DO YOU SERIOUSLY BELIEVE THAT IF A LENS ISN'T FISH EYE IT STILL WON'T CREATE CURVATURE OF THE HORIZON LINE, JUST AT A LESSER EXTENT? DON'T BE SO RETARDED.

>>9987166
In all honesty, nobody on this board can prove that the Earth is round. Nobody, except me.

Take a picture of the ocean horizon on a lens that gets shots as accurate to the naked human eye as possible. Upload this to a computer with Windows and then load it into mspaint. Use the straight line tool to trace the point where the horizon meets the sky, from one edge of the image to the opposite edge of the screen where the horizon meets the sky.

Notice anything strange? Anything.... Curvy? Remember, water creates the flatest average surface on the planet.

>>9987816
>The Earth wouldn't work proper
thanks for summing it up

>>9987820
OH, MY, GOD. THERE IS NO CURVATURE WHEN AT GROUND LEVEL, WHY WOULD IT SUDDENLY APPEAR WHEN IT GOT JUST PERFECTLY IN PLACE? BECAUSE THE LENS ISN'T DOING SHIT, THERE ACTUALLY IS A CURVATURE, BECAUSE THE EARTH IS GLOBE! YOU SPASTIC! THAT'S RAW FOOTAGE, WITHOUT A FISH EYE LENS! THIS IS WHAT YOU ASKED FOR! STOP SHIFTING THE GOALPOSTS! BEFORE I STOVE YOUR FUCKING HEAD IN LIKE AN ANGRY CHIMP!

>>9987788
>1st, nobody believes gas giants are made of gas, they're made of liquefied elements that are gaseous in earth like pressures/temperatures
OH BE QUIET, STOP PARROTING HORSESHIT THAT YOU'VE BEEN FED.

>2nd, it looks exactly like the nasa image except it's lower resolution/detailed
IT REALLY DOESN'T, AT ALL. THE "RINGS" LOOK ATTACHED IN THE AMATEUR PHOTO, THEY LOOK FLAT, RATHER THAN CIRCLING AROUND A SPHERE.

>>9987829
>When you just avoid the question you dislike the most.
Why're you so fucking disingenuous?

>>9987788
>3rd, you're deflecting from the fact that even with binoculars you can see it's clearly sphere shaped and avoiding answering how you rationalize Earth would be shaped different because you have no answer
NO YOU CAN'T SEE THAT AT ALL. THE IMAGE IS STILL GOING THROUGH TWO SETS OF LENSES, THE BINOCULAR/TELESCOPE LENS, AND THE CAMERA TAKING THE PICTURE. NO ONE KNOWS WHAT SATURN ACTUALLY IS, STOP PRETENDING YOU DO.

>>9987836
GO AND LOOK AT IT YOURSELF, WITH A PAIR OF BINOCULARS, YOU SPASTIC!

>>9987791
>THINKS THE PUBLIC CAN JUST GO INTO SPACE

UNLESS YOU'RE A FUCKING AGENT OF COURSE? NO, DEFINITELY NOT, THEY DON'T POST THEIR BULLSHIT ON 4CHAN.

this is by FAR the funniest thread on /sci/

flat earth threads are the true "/sci/ humor" threads

thanks anons for all the trollposts and baiting this retard flatearthkin, so funny

>>9987844
HOW EXACTLY WOULD THEY STOP US?!

>>9987797
>>9987804
GO TO CLASS AND WATCH BILL NYE LIKE A GOOD BOY AND DO YOUR HOMEWORK. THIS IS HOW SCIENTISTS ARE MADE.

>>9987808

>>9987810
What happens if you move the antenna up higher and higher?

>>9987855
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/diving-scientists-report-big-changes-beneath-antarctic-ice-shelf/

>>9987858
Although, there is a structural limit, before the antenna would just fail.

>>9987802
OK....

>>9987828
YES THERE IS YOU DUMB BLIND FAGGOT

>>9987584
Just because you use sock puppets to argue with yourself and insenuate pol in any of this doesn't mean that's what it's like there. People get btfo there all the time when they try and shill flat Earth stuff. I would say low tier bait, but you got some bites. Are you using senko worms?

>>9987841
>THINKS LOOKING AT A LIGHT IN THE SKY WITH BINOCULARS IS SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF ITS SHAPE.

ABSOLUTE MORON.

>>9987871
That's because it starts to ascend. Look at when he's going it, does the image look curved? No? NO? NO IT DOESN'T!

>>9987875 see >>9987868.
You can make this observation yourself, as many hobby astronomers do.

>>9987877
>*holding

>>9987598
boat disappears over curved horizon of water, yakking idiot claims it's all still there
LMAO

>>9987882
It's because of how far they are into their delusion, they've literally brainwashed themselves.

>>9987836
>THE IMAGE IS STILL GOING THROUGH TWO SETS OF LENSES

Did you ever stop to think your eyes are shaped like orbs. There for any round object you look at is a trick of your eyes, like the orb shape of your eyes for instance. Your eyes are actually flat. They just look round because the eyes you use to look with are round.

>but, that's circular/round logic
NO IT'S NOT!!! IT'S FLAT LOGIC!!

>>9987849
They wouldn't need to because space is fake.

>>9987886
Let's do it then!

>>9987885
flat eyes are just a cia psyop to distract from concave eyes

really your eye is concave -- the universe is contained at the center of the eye, the eye is surrounded by infinite brain

>>9987893
What about beyond the infinite brain?

>>9987860
>ice shelf

You need a wall to have a shelf.

>>9987897
well the infinite brain is sitting on the back of a turtle

>>9987862
Do you understand how radio waves propagate? Because based on your image you don't.

Goatse earth > Flat earth > Globe earth
The hands can stretch it at will so nobody can ever see the edge and therefore give it an illusion of curvature.

>>9987907
based and redpilled.
/thread

>>9987868
That's proof?

By the way, it's interesting how you pick Saturn, which supposedly has "rings" going around it, but the earth doesn't? No other planet does? All these planets each have very unique features despite coming from the same explosion and existing in very close proximity to each other in terms of the massive size of the universe.

Let's also not forget that Saturn's rings are flat, orbits are flat along a plane, galaxies are flat, the universe is flat. But earth HAS to be a planet because of images and certain observations that don't prove anything.

>>9987871
THERE'S NO HORIZON LINE AT THAT POINT IS THERE DINGBAT? THAT'S THE POINT OF REFERENCE.

>>9987916
checked, no other planets have rings.

>>9987916
>All these planets each have very unique features despite coming from the same explosion and existing in very close proximity to each other in terms of the massive size of the universe.

You are pretty close to a bunch of rock but the only thing you have in common is your dense head.

>>9987877
THERE'S NO HORIZON LINE AT THAT POINT IS THERE DINGBAT? THAT'S THE POINT OF REFERENCE.

>>9987879
LOOKS FLAT.

>>9987882
>>9987884
Can't even prove curvature using a laser. The only video that claims to do this was produced by the Discovery Channel, who have been spewing out pseudo scientific bullshit for years now.

Show me a laser test, not done by the Discovery Channel, that proves curvature of the ocean.

>>9987900
No.

>>9987901
Of course.

>>9987903
You're retarded.

>>9987927
You're an idiot, go and look at video of confirmed fish eye lens: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWvaqPY6JVA
Watch the whole video, he explains it in detail.

>>9987885
When you don't have an argument, just attempt to mock instead. You can believe that looking at a light in the sky with binoculars will give you 100% proof of its shape without actually going there and empirically measuring it.

>>9986551
DISCOVR does. Sometimes the moon even passes in front of it

>>9987891
You would have already done it, in fact if a faggot like you could build a rocket and orbit the earth, then it would have been done many times already by amateurs. NOT ONE AMATEUR HOBBYIST HAS SENT A ROCKET INTO SPACE. NOT ONE.

Is water wet?

>>9987919
Earth isn't a planet though.

>>9987921
Atheists really are some of the most monumental fools, thinking they're the children of star dust which is even more insane than what theists peddle.

>>9987376
124k ft is actually still extremely close to the earth, not even 25 miles.

The diameter of the earth is nearly 8,000 miles by comparison.

Big shock that the curvature is barely more noticable, and yet it STILL CLEARLY IS DOOFUS BECUASE THE EARTH IS ROUND 6 PEOPLE LIVE 200 miles above us at all times on the ISS JEEZ

>>9987938
>No.
Erm, yes.

>You're retarded.
How do radio waves propagate you pussy? Oh, you don't know?

>You're an idiot, go and look at video of confirmed fish eye lens
You need a 70mm lens to get rid of any lens distortion. But if you have a fish eye lens, you can fix the distortion of the horizon by placing it directly in the center of the frame.

>>9987943
>You can believe that looking will give you 100% proof of its shape without actually going there and empirically measuring it.

But, your argument is against flat earth. How do you still believe in flat earth? Have you been EVERYWHERE on Earth and measured it everywhere? Have you been in space and measured Earth from a great distance? Have you seen the great flat landia with your own eyes?

>>9987945
what about elon musk?

>>9987967
Just to confirm, you believe the ship further away in pic related is sailing on water that is actually lower than the water the ship closer is sailing on? Despite the water the ship further away is sailing on appearing to be higher than the water the close ship is sailing on?

How do you explain this on a globe where we should be looking down on things that are getting lower and lower, not up.

>>9987972
I don't need to - there is no measurable curvature, it is only assumed, not actually observed, measured, tested and repeated.

If there is no measurable curvature, but there is measurable flatness (see Kansas for example), or simple laser tests you can do yourself, then flat earth is the logical choice. The surface of contained bodies of water is yet more damning evidence that you have to suspend your common sense regarding everyday reality and objective, measurable, testable repeatable behaviour of water in favour of some "force that isn't really a force it's actually curved spacetime" making the oceans' surfaces conform to the exterior of a spinning spheroid.

Where's your actual empirical experiments proving this curvature? Where are your laser tests? Don't give me that bullshit from Discovery Channel, give me a real scientific demonstration of lasers showing the curvature of the ocean or a big body of water.

>>9986608
>>9986620
>>9987826
There's no point in 'measuring curvature' from a photograph on ground level, that's not proof of anything.
Gee, if only there was other experiments that could prove or disprove a flat, centric earth... Darn, why did no one ever think of any?!

>>9988144
>there is no measurable curvature, it is only assumed, not actually observed, measured, tested and repeated.

There's thousands of pictures. You just refuse to believe they're real and assume it's a conspiracy.
Experiments that you can't believe cause you don't understand.
Tests you could do yourself but refuse to do because you're too lazy or afraid they'd challenge your views.

Even if I gave you EXACTLY what you asked for. A laser scan of the earth from orbit, peer reviewed and repeated with several other laser scanning satellites from orbit, you still couldn't believe it was real. You're incapable of accepting any fact that doesn't fit your fantasy. Just admit that you have been brainwashed.

>>9988172
I have been brainwashed.
Have.

To be honest with you, in a pascal-wage kind of honesty, it really does not fucking matter if the earth is flat or round, it matters that the government sucks regardless of them keeping an absurdly hard to conceal fact from your daily lives for centuries or not.
so as long as you say "fuck the corrupt, fuck the government, fuck the jews" it's all great to me, flat, sphere, toroid or velociraptor it really doesn't matter at that point

>>9988189
>absurdly hard to conceal fact
Like the existence of god?
Didn't say which one ;)

>>9988189
What if it were the government trying to make you argue with strangers on the internet needlessly about inane things, so you can't talk about important things. Like, teaching people how to scrape data from satellites and such. I'd imagine if it became a popular hobby it'd be problematic for the government. And then this thread gets derailed to hell and back again. Coincidence? Or government intervention?

I bet there are people here who don't even know what they're doing. All it takes is to say a few trigger words which people have been conditioned/brainwashed to respond to in a certain way (flat earth for one) and they become your own personal army.

>>9988171
>Earth rotates once in about 24 hours with respect to the Sun, but once every 23 hours, 56 minutes, and 4 seconds with respect to the stars.
Still checks out. You can measure the rotation by swinging a giant pendulum with large weight that will swing for hours in a room with no major air flow that would effect the pendulum.

>>9987344
>inverted curvature

WTF the Earth is not flat, it's actually a T O R E.

Here's the deal: there are three types of Flat Earthers who have regularly posted to 4Chan: the rare prankster intellectuals who troll to challenge your knowledge and debate skills, the occasional literal Bible interpreters, and far and away the most proliferate: the juvenile-level troller.

None of them provide any evidence of phenomena that *require* a flat Earth model to explain, but rather place the onus on you to prove the round Earth (again, and again, and again, ...) while belligerantly disavowing or ignoring any science or proofs put forward. They will post memes that ostensibly 'prove' some flaw in the round Earth model, but containing geometry, maths, logic, and facts so absurdly wrong that you are compelled to display your superior intelligence and knowledge. You will never experience gratitude for your efforts to educate. By responding, you've taken bait.

They don't care whether the Earth is flat or round. Your posts are met with insulting responses or more made-up nonsense, because the game is all about the lulz from getting you to spend time responding. They will provoke you with the classic, "If you don't respond, you prove me right." If you reference web-based information (that they could have looked up, had they interest) they will accuse you of being a shill for a conspiracy.

It is simply impossible to keep pace with their barrage of flaws, and the anonymous mask of 4Chan removes culpability and enables the prankster. Arguing is akin to painting over mud - you just end up with a dirty brush.

>>9987166
This is because gravity only pulls in one direction, so it develops flat structures. Only up to a certain mass though.

>>9988303
This. I was about to respond to a troll post in this thread before realizing there's basically no chance they were actually being genuine. This board is incredibly easy to troll.

>The Earth is Flat
>Space/spaceflight is a lie (space station isn't real, moon landing was a hoax, etc.)
>Global warming is a hoax
>What is the evolutionary advantage of X? (not really a troll, but always a shit thread with a lot of replies saying the same thing over and over again)
>Race and intellegence
>X mental illness/disorder isn't real because we don't know the mechanism that causes it (even in cases where the mechanism is known)
>Evolution is a lie

I'm sure I'm missing some but those are the big ones I usually see.

>>9988182
666 is not real number of beast anyway

>>9988303
>>9988341
More I see flatards more I don't belive they are trolls anymore (even on 4chan). They are really brainwashed or brain damaged with cult like mentality.

>>9988369
Either way, the only thing flatards have ever proved is that arguing with them is not worth your time.

>>9987376

>>9988002
What about him? Do you actually take him seriously? He's just a front man, playing a Tony Stark like character. We always have these "eccentric geniuses" or "risk taking billionaire" types that are constantly in the media. There's a reason they're in the media a lot, it's because they're supposed to be as part of their role.

>>9988303
isn't this the same with all conspiracy idiots?
>qanon
>deep state
>rothschields
>soros
>911 denial
>sandy hook denial
>satanism
>illuminati
>living in the matrix
>chemtrails
>fluoridation
>CERN something something retardation
>reptilians
>knights templar
>pizzagate

it's all the same tactics as flattards afaict. i think there must be a "conspiracy theorist's playbook" or something, or they just learn from one another

>>9987376
>>9987381
>>9988492
It is really necessary to understand the behaviour of geometry in wide-angle imagery to be able to interpret what you see correctly. It is necessary to know where the center of the photograph is (cropping can shift that around). When using wide-angle lenses, only lines *radiating from the center* show their true linear geometry. If a horizon passes under the center, it will bend upward at the edges. If above, then downward. Pic related. The closer a line passes the center, the less the distortion. When you see a round Earth and the curvature is convex, you know it has to be convex. When it's concave near the edge, it's exaggerated.

Aside from all that, flattards aren't allowed to use photography, per their own claim that all imagery is CGI, therefore untrustworthy.

reminder to report flat earth retards
they'll be banned eventually

>>9988341
It may be that on 4chan most of these posters are trolls, but the flat earth phenomenon on the internet in general is not. It's the culmination of conspiratorial-minded people all connecting to each other through the internet/social media and pushing their ideas through to their most extreme conclusions.

This has created a large community of people who will buy in to any idea that fits a general worldview of the "illuminati" or whatever you want to call them hiding true reality from the brainwashed masses. They tell us 9/11 was a terrorist attack, so it must be an inside job. They tell us we evolved from apes, so evolution is a lie. They tell us we landed on the moon, so it must have been faked. They tell us the earth is round, so it must be flat.

The actual details about a particular idea entails are mostly irrelevant, it only matters to what extent that idea fits their template for how they have decided the world is. Whether they can be said to really, truly believe these things is kinda hard to answer, but for the most part they are not trolling.

>>9988589
here's how it works

you're an aspiring conman. you think "how do i get people to give me money? well i know already i need to get my pitch out there... i need to get them to listen to me. who do people listen to, even when what they say is basically fiction?"

"hmmmm what about being a priest?"

"oh shit, wait... priests just go up there, talk about fairy tales, and then say 'now is the time to put money in baskets'... and people actually do it..."

so what do the conmen do? they make up fairy tales about the "evil forces", and then go on to use the old priest pitch "only me and my bretheren are fighting the evil! so please, put a few dollars in the basket"

conspiracy theories are a big con, and they've used the classic mind-control/believe-in-my-fairy-tales shit borrowed from the mind control apparatus known as religion

>>9988274
Watching the Foucault pendulum knock over little wood blocks is so entertaining
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nB2SXLYwKkM

This thread is hilarious XD trolls are out in force

>>9987944

>>9987762
Here's a picture of Saturn taken by an amateur astronomer and there are countless more

https://www.astrobin.com/42448/?data_source=&nc=all

>>9987944
>>9992051
And flatards believe it's specifically made to prove something and its just CGI. And also they find numberous things "wrong" with it due their lack of knowlage how things really work.

>>9992077
That is just shit loads of photos layered by a computer program to make it look 3D

>>9992739
No, it's a shit load of photos stacked togheter to average out atmospheric distortions in order to get a crisp image.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcKfadjnKxE

>>9988171
>>9988274
this

Also, if you're actually interested in learning here's another scientific proof we've known for a while, called the Sagnac Effect. Essentially we can precisely measure the Earth's rotation by small differences in light's wavelength as it travels around a loop. Establish 3 axes of this loop and you can model the rotation in every direction.
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htm

>>9988303
I'll just repost proofs most people don't know about. education is good regardless of the recipient

lmao this thread

>>9992759
We don't know what the fuck Saturn is, stop getting your bullshit information from NASA and "astrophysicists" who are talking shit.

Nobody believes flatneets are as retarded as the claim anymore. The flat meme is dead, give it up retards.

>>9988172
Jej, what a cop out. If the earth was actually a spheroid there'd be 100s of laser tests done by amateurs confirming this. They all confirm it's flat.

>>9993151
AHAHAHAHAHA globe agent #33 on their shift tonight, posting retarded webms of perspective and atmospheric distortion by raising and lowering a camera.

Don't worry people of 4chan, it's not flat okay? I-it's just a t-troll, DO NOT LOOK INTO IT. Just check these cool pics and webms of atmospheric distortion and perspective instead...

>>9993183
Everyone sees through your act. Nobody is actually as retarded as you claim to be.

>>9993183
>perspective
you have no idea what that word means.

>>9993194
I see through you Mr Agent. You post the same nonsense images from Metabunk run by Mick West, another agent.

Do they make you in a fucking lab or something?

>>9993198
>what is a mirage

>>9993198
>what is a mirage from another angle

>>9993198
Oh dear, no "curvature" this time.

If you want to know where most of the money allocated to NASA goes, it's actually to fund Agent Smiths like the few in this thread to post pro-globe bullshit, and to ad hominem any supporting flat earth evidence on the internet.

They probably released the retarded dome model as well to get the retarded biblefags on board. Very clever, well done.

>>9993213
>you can easily tell something tilted away from you!
Absolute
>>9993214
>the mirage causes things above the mirage to curve towards the mirage!
fucking
>>9993215
>but this one photo appears to show no curve so that proves the two previous photos that appear to show a curve wrong!
brainlet

>>9993268
>>you can easily tell something tilted away from you!
Look how sharply it is "curving", fucking brainlet!

>the mirage causes things above the mirage to curve towards the mirage!
See webm brainlet.
>but this one photo appears to show no curve so that proves the two previous photos that appear to show a curve wrong!
There should always be curve if there was actually curve you monumental pissant.

>>9993183
No, actually people should really look into Flat Earth.
See how much moronic and ignorant they really are.
Flatard words are best argument against flat earth and other conspiracies.

>>9993285
Most popular "flat earthers" are shills anyway who support the retarded dome model.

The best thing a real scientist can do is try to disprove the globe model. Once you actually start challenging it, you will uncover hole after hole. Most staunch globe believers have never actually challenged the model before, instead they defend it without question which isn't how science should work.

>>9993283
>Look how sharply it is "curving", fucking brainlet!
Less than 10 degrees? It's not even sharply in focus, how would you expect to be able to tell if it is leaning away from you?
>See webm brainlet.
There is nothing in the webm above the mirage that curves down into the mirage, only stuff within the mirage.
>There should always be curve if there was actually curve you monumental pissant.
>everything is always exactly how it appears!
It should always be flat if it is actually flat.

>>9993301
>Less than 10 degrees? It's not even sharply in focus, how would you expect to be able to tell if it is leaning away from you?
Are the pylons in pic related leaning away? They're going over a curve right? But the big pylon at the end isn't?

>There is nothing in the webm above the mirage that curves down into the mirage, only stuff within the mirage.
Brainlet, do you retract your statement that mirages cannot curve things downwards?

>It should always be flat if it is actually flat.
Not when there's ocean underneath, stop ignoring such distortion effects. This is the only reason you can post "curvature" using images of things above water. Not scientific at all.

>>9986316
This seems unnecessarily complicated. Just hook up to EUMETCAST, it's an open standard and there's official guides to decode the stream.

Even a fucking Israelite who believes the retarded dome model is able to destroy a globe believer in a debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHEGjUQDWvw

>>9986551
https://eumetview.eumetsat.int/mapviewer/

>>9993300
>wasted digits
You flatards believe everybody is shill working for conspiracy even other flatearthers. No, flatards are either trolls, charalatans who are scaming people and retards drank koolaid and now believe one of flat earth dogmas.

Most "holes" you mention in globe come from ignorance and lack of understanding of science (what you should knew to challange any model for real) mixed with confirmation bias.

Mere ideas to try to get real proof for either dome or infinite ear or conspiracy effort to cover it are dismissed from start and never atempted. So we have no pictures of edge, dome (either when it start in antarctic or at top of sky), high enough picture to show flatland what could not be pictured if land is curved globe) or land beyond south pole. And this will forever that way because flatards are ironically programed to authomatically accept either of these exiting and effort to gain proof for it being futile.

These threads depress me.

>>9987658
Actually humans have a home from their mouth to their butt. So humans are donuts not spheres.

>>9993392
Hole*

>>9993365
>You flatards believe everybody is shill working for conspiracy even other flatearthers. No, flatards are either trolls, charalatans who are scaming people and retards drank koolaid and now believe one of flat earth dogmas.
Jej, how the fuck do you know? People like Mark Sargent are clearly shills, the amount of media, including mainstream, they've been on is enough evidence of that. He also says really stupid shit sometimes and has done 0 science, just parrots the same shit and of course supports the retarded dome model.

>Most "holes" you mention in globe come from ignorance and lack of understanding of science
False. Flat earth is a resurgence back to natural science, the globe is the result of pseudo-science.

>Mere ideas to try to get real proof for either dome or infinite ear or conspiracy effort to cover it are dismissed from start and never atempted. So we have no pictures of edge, dome (either when it start in antarctic or at top of sky), high enough picture to show flatland what could not be pictured if land is curved globe) or land beyond south pole. And this will forever that way because flatards are ironically programed to authomatically accept either of these exiting and effort to gain proof for it being futile.
The flatness can be tested, measured and repeated. That's it, game over. There's no measurable curvature. I don't need the rest of that bullshit. Speaking of the south pole, can you show me a flight from Australia/NZ direct to the south pole? A flight to shut the flat earthers up? Must be possible right?

>>9993406
>? People like Mark Sargent are clearly shills, the amount of media, including mainstream, they've been on is enough evidence of that. He also says really stupid shit sometimes and has done 0 science, just parrots the same shit
Same thing like most of flatards.
Only shill he could be for only scam what flat earth is and nothing more.

>False. Flat earth is a resurgence back to natural science, the globe is the result of pseudo-science.
Your natural "science" is one what is pseudo-science

>The flatness can be tested, measured and repeated. That's it, game over.
Only if you mesure in small scale, and small things or use false science you then will get proof.

>. I don't need the rest of that bullshit.
You just prooving my point.

>>9993300
>Posting clips from "A funny thing".
Do you really want to tie your conspiracy theories to that liar?

Wow. People here are still feeding the flattard trol

He's having one on you, you know?

>>9993313
The big pylon on the end is much taller than the other pylons, thus tou can't compare it to the other pylons visually to determine it is leaning away from you. You would need to calculate it.

The mirage only affect what you see through the mirage, not everthing around it.

Unironically that's the only reason you can take photos of the large distances you claim you shouldn't be able to on a curved Earth.

>>9993745
Read:
>>9988303
>None of them provide any evidence of phenomena that *require* a flat Earth model to explain, but rather place the onus on you to prove the round Earth (again, and again, and again, ...) while belligerantly disavowing or ignoring any science or proofs put forward. They will post memes that ostensibly 'prove' some flaw in the round Earth model, but containing geometry, maths, logic, and facts so absurdly wrong that you are compelled to display your superior intelligence and knowledge. You will never experience gratitude for your efforts to educate. By responding, you've taken bait.

>>9993758
Yes, and they also go back to thorough debunked claims in the next thread.

>>9986316
FLAT EARTH

>>9993446
>Only shill he could be for only scam what flat earth is and nothing more.
No brainlet, globe is the biggest scam.

>Your natural "science" is one what is pseudo-science
No brainlet, you're the one that believes spacetime exists.

>Only if you mesure in small scale, and small things or use false science you then will get proof.
No brainlet, curvature should be measurable at all scales, that's how a spheroid works.

>You just prooving my point.
Still waiting for that direct flight from Australia/NZ to the south pole brainlet.

>>9993689
Nice dodging of the webm.

>>9993745
Jej, stop denying reality. If those pylons were actually going over curvature then the earth would be tiny and barrel shaped. It's ridiculous to think it's not a distortion of light.

>>9994915
No, it's just a function of distance and perception.
Things get smaller the further they are away from you, and over distance the curvature has an additive effect so eventually it becomes visible.
There's no reason why it would be tiny or barrel shaped from that observation, that's just the conclusion you come to.

>>9994888
>Nice dodging of the webm.
Here: http://www.clavius.org/bibfunny8.html
The original footage clearly contradicts Bart Sibrel's claims about the astronauts using an insert or the edge of the window to change the apparent shape of the Earth. He choose to edit those sections out, and only include portions of the video which to support his claims. There is no possible explanation for that other than he was knowingly trying to deceive his audience.

Bart Sibrel is a liar.