/sci/ - Science & Math

By learning to learn to learn.

>>9968408
You don't, your brain already has functions to store information. But you could Google memory training techniques, which keep having a big effect even for quite a while after you stop using them.

A much easyer way is to go to a school that's waaaay to easy for you so you learn how schools work, then step up your game to some university

>>9968408
It also helps a heck of a lot to have a good teacher

>>9968408
To learn you must do. You do more you learn more. The more you learn the more complex and sophisticated you get. You learn from wrong and right. The rest is up to mental capacity.

>>9968465
/thread

Euler did math 10 hours a day, I'm not saying that being an autist is the only way and genetics doesn't matter but that's definitely the most important thing

>>9968466
Having a good teacher helps you learn but teachers rarely teach you how to learn to learn, some can, but that's mostly something the student has to figure out

>>9968408

"When the student is ready, the Master appears"

to start: (formation of Cogent thought processes) 1-2 years

Introduction to logic
Sentential and propositional logic

Wisdom and techniques (2-5 years):
biology
chemistry
mathematics
physics
art
philosophy

soft science (1-2 years)
politics
sociology
psychology

Now you are pretty much towering above others in terms of your knowledge of reality and can handle anything

>>9968408

I will also add that learning logic first is absolutely necessary

>>9968723
how do I learn logic?

>>9968408
by realizing that nothing within reason is beyond your ability to find out. Its 2018 friend, 99% of human knowledge is accessible in .5 seconds with google. If you're a professional in a field, you'll figure out what archives of information are relevant to your field, and you'll get good at pulling from them when and if you need to.

learning boot camp.

what is an "object"? what can you even say about anything? i mean really.
think about "thing" what can you say about thing? i'll help your dumb ass along, you can say thing IS something, describe the thing in the way all the things are, and you can say thing IS NOT something, say what the thing isn't. you can also say SOME ARE or SOME AREN'T. those are the four basic thoughts you can have about anything. congratulations, you're a philosopher.
now, can you draw four venn diagrams explaining those four different things? and what else do you know when you know one of those things about a thing, can you learn hidden information from the known information? (yes)

I actually had a subject that had as ab activity "learning to learn". We did fuck all.

>>9968408
Have you noticed that people who do know how to learn don't ask questions like this to other people?

They figure it out by themselves. Always.
The less questions you ask to other people, the better.
Questions are not bad--it's merely an issue of the target.
Humans are too good at interpreting questions, it makes things too easy.
Asking questions to Google is the preferred method.
Google will not be able to answer your question unless you ask the right question, and since its system is built upon the questions of others, asking questions that other people have asked means you are heading in the correct direction.

Google being unable to answer your question means that you are either asking the wrong question, or that you are forging an entirely new path.
A trailblazer and innovator.
Of course most people are not so narcissistic as to unquestioningly believe the latter.