[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 30 KB, 576x213, ModernScience.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9964581 No.9964581[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>Corporate product A is good for you, Corporate product B does not cause mental illness
>[Source Needed]
>*Shitty p-hacked study done by Goldstein,Rosenberg, et al.
>10 yrs later...
>Studies Corporate product A and B which were discontinued 3 years ago causes Autism.

>Mixed babies have higher test scores and circumcision have many health benefits
>*300 studies from Weinstein,Silverstein...
>0 studies even looking at the opposing arguments
>"circumcision is liek gud for u, look at these sources"-Shitty Redditor
>"Maybe cutting a piece of your body off isn't actually good for you"-Rational person
>"sources needed"-Shitty Redditor


The state of science today...
I can't trust any statistical studies anymore
WHAT DO WE DO?

>> No.9964586
File: 92 KB, 500x377, 1528179106599.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9964586

>>9964581
the problem is smart people are so much smarter than the average person that to your average person science looks more like magic than anything comprehensible.

Also scientists have to eat too just like the dumb masses. So when they get a grant from a corporation to do research into a narrow scope they will take the cash and do the studies.

But your average moron will say that publicly funded science is jewish hitler communism.

So you cant win.

I just hope the robots kill all the stupid people while im still alive to enjoy the show.

>> No.9964589

t. /pol/ schizo

Don't you have nigger-cocks to be obsessing about?

>> No.9964591

>>9964581
Lol, the ROGD study was conducted by surveying members of online "gender crit" forums. Not exactly the most unbiased method.

>> No.9964594

>>9964589
>cliche "/pol/ poster" ad hominem
Is this the new "you're hitler" insult?

>> No.9965070

>>9964581
Reminds me I saw a new paper on /fit/ about how any alcohol is bad for you, largest study ever about alcohol, recommendation is to completely avoid it now. If you read the paper they claim the group that drank zero alcohol was the healthiest, then you read that they define zero alcohol as anything less than 0.8 glasses a day. That's not fucking zero.

>> No.9965076
File: 31 KB, 640x360, Kek.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9965076

>>9964586
When a scientist takes over he lacks the ruthlessness of a dictator. Poor Marx never knew what hit him.

There is only one scientific phenotype with the aggressiveness to offensively decimate everything in his way. He is fantasy but through method acting...he can be channeled.

You must channel him only in direst of needs. When the brainlets have gotten too big for their britches.

>> No.9965092

>>9964581
>Studies Corporate product A and B which were discontinued 3 years ago causes Autism.

Is there an actual example for this?

>> No.9965240

>>9964581
>Would you say it is safe to say
I would never say anything that trite.

>> No.9966646

>>9965070
Really? That's what that study was based on?

BWAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH

>> No.9966685

>>9965070
>>9966646
I think there is a small amount of alcohol present in food/cosmetics/preservatives/by-product of cooking. So it's impossible to completely eliminate exposure