/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9960609
>big time high energy theorist
some post-doc working in an obscure group with 5 people total on the large side and shitty funding/person ratio even still

i hope to achieve the same status one day

>>9960609
>ADD
Not a real disease.

what concept was Feynman's inspiration for his formulation of QM?

>>9960609
Why are you such a fag?

>>9960625
Obviously, Feynman had no formal mathematical derivation of the path integral formulation, because that complete imbecile wasn't NEARLY as smart as String Theorists, who are by far the smartest ever. Simply put, he made the naiive assumption that one could sum over all classical trajectories. That's because he was so fucking retarded he never heard of the S-matrix.

We know now FOR ABSOLUTE SURE that String Theory is the correct theory, and SUSY is split, so EAT THAT FEYNMAN, fucking retard!

>>9960633
ok ok but if I put string theory in google images, I get pictures of Feynman diagrams, and if not those, a bunch of tube-strings that are in the shape of Feynman diagrams, so what are all those doing there?

>>9960639
OMFG WHAT A TARD
Ever heard of superstring perturbation theory???
WHY ARE EVERYBODY BUT STRING THEORISTS SO RETARDED?!?!?

>>9960643
I know everything through google images.

Two weird blobby smiley face heads attached to each other by some weird thin connection. Pathetic. Totally incoherent. The lecturer is clearly showing a doodle he made of some creatures he saw while on drugs.

>>9960663
Maybe this will clear it up for you, brainletino: There is a new possible result concerning the "semi dualisation" (in Majid's sense) of H psi bicross A into A* double cross chi H. In general, one can expects that a cocycle bicrossproduct H bicross A (with A finite dimensional) should "semi dualise" to a double crossproduct A* double cross H as a dual quasi Hopf algebra. In particular, one can expect a "co-quasi Hopf algebra" where A is dually paired with H . Note that a general result linking Hopf algebra extensions and quasi Hopf algebras via monoddal categories recently appeared in the Schauenberg's paper "Hopf Algebras extensions and Monoďdal Categories",2001

>>9960676
As far as the general idea of the q-fluctuations of the signature is concerned, this result is far from being "minor" (because - as an application - it allows the construction of the cocycle bicrossproduct between lorentzian and euclidean quantum groups - which by the way was never done before).

did he gain 15kg??

>>9960688
Unfortunately, a recent result by Maldacena has shown that the dS-CFT dictionary gives the result that q-fluctuations of the signature at the initial singularity imply instanton activity during the inflationary period that would be observed as chiral anomalies in the cosmic neutrino background; and based on a 1996 result by Polyakov, this implies all calabi-yau compactifications consistent with the expected neutrino background anisotropies lie in the swampland, see Vafa PRL 7 1842-1854 (2018)

Oh we got ourselves a strong tard.
> muh 26 dimensions

Have fun trying to find anything worthwhile now that supersymmetry was shown being ultra unlikely.

>>9960771
*string. I dun goofed.

>>9960771
NO DON'T BRING UP THE COGNAC BET

Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE in the theoretical physics community who isn't a FUCKING DUMBASS IDIOT believes SUSY is there, it's just split SUSY. It's not observed in experiment BUT TRUST ME ITS THERE

Obviously it just has to be that way because of MUH MATH! ITS SO PRETTY ITS GOTTA BE RIGHT. To hell with "experiments", I have no idea how those silly LHC detectors work anyhow, probably a bunch of claptrap NIM boards or some retard-tier shit.

AND DONT MENTION THE COGNAC

>>9960793

you. I like you.

> split SUSY
People seriously promote this?

>>9960821
I only gave an HOUR AND A HALF LONG TALK ON IT.

WHAT KIND OF IDIOT DOESNT WATCH ALL MY YOUTUBE VIDEOS

https://youtu.be/mRMF4b0GcCw?t=16m30s

>>9960793

this but unironically

>>9960771
>now that supersymmetry was shown being ultra unlikely.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Plenty of space for SUSY to hide up to Planck scale.

>>9960874

Theoretical limits on mass became rather tight in recent years. I wouldn't exactly call the Planck scale plenty of room for it to hide. But i guess currently this is more a matter of taste than actual hard facts.
Apart from of course many experiments not finding expected superpartners. That is evidence of absence. They're not saying "we haven't found anything", they're saying "we can conclude there are no sparticles in this mass range with certainty 12sigma".

>>9960874

t. Gin Rummy
https://youtu.be/_w5JqQLqqTc

anyhow, this:
>>9960931

>>9960609
Which is more pathetic?

(i) A theoretical physicist trying to make them selves feel smart on a Norwegian icefishing fourm

(ii) An undergrad larping as a theoretical physicst on a Somalian pirating fourm

>>9961146
WTF I AM THE GREAT NIMA

Whoa by 50 percent I'm more influential than Richard Feynman, Einstein, Godel, fucking Von Neumann, and Hilbert. By 50 percent more influential than any other human being. DONT FUCK WITH ME. DONT FUCK WITH ME. By 50 percent dead or alive, by 50 percent for the next 1,000 years. Einstein, Nima...

>>9961160
i can't tell if that's a particle physicist or a 90's stoner movie actor

>>9960609
>Well if you idiots can collectively form grammatically questions, I'll answer them for you.
What is your opinion on brushing your teeth and going to the dentist every now and then?

>>9960609
How do I achieve your genius?

>Well if you idiots can collectively form grammatically questions, I'll answer them for you.

Slow the fuck down and try taking your own advice, how has no one picked up on this?

>Well if you idiots can collectively form grammatically CORRECT questions, I'll answer them for you.

>>9960609
How do you define Naturalness of a model?

>>9960609
does cosplaying as a physicist that made up tetrahedrons with no new predictive power make you feel good about yourself?

I'm back dumbasses

>>9961611
You don't. A genius like me only comes around once per universe.

If it makes you feel any better, there are probably a few compactifications in the landscape where you're 25% as smart as me.

>>9961650
It's defined as not having any "fine-tuned" very large or very small numbers in the theory that aren't explained within the formalism of the theory. Only retards don't know that we don't already have a technical definition for this: http://inspirehep.net/record/144074/files/%27t%20Hooft%20-%20Naturalness%2C%20Chiral%20Symmetry%20and%20Spontaneous%20Chiral%20Symmetry%20Breaking.pdf

>>9961675
The amplituhedron is SO FUCKING GENIUS, it's no surprise fucking BRAINLETS DONT GET IT. Probably don't even know that the amplituhedron lives in G(k,k + 4; L), the space of k planes Y in (k + 4) dimensions, together with L 2-planes L(i) in the 4 dimensional complement of Y. WHO DOESNT FUCKING KNOW THIS

>>9960609
is anal better? Bcuz I think it is but my mom says she things its better in the v.

>>9960609
You've already failed OP

>>9960609
>>9960633
>>9960643
>>9960698
>>9960793
>>9960866
>>9963139
This post op looks like steve seagal fucked shawn michaels passing all the downie genes. Sick string theory soliloquy. Do you masturbate while you larp as this fucking chimp?

>>9963179
REEEEEEEEEE

IM STILL HOT