/sci/ - Science & Math

>physics
not science or math

>>9941967

Look at how Allah will consider the hypercomplex neighborhood around doomsday.

>Muhammad is quoted as saying about the Mahdi:
>His name will be my name, and his father's name my father's name
>Even if the entire duration of the world's existence has already been exhausted and only one day is left before Doomsday, Allah will expand that day to such length of time as to accommodate the kingdom of a person from my Ahlul-Bayt who will be called by my name. He will fill out the earth with peace and justice as it will have been full of injustice and tyranny (by then)

bump for not science or math

>>9941958
Fuck you guys, physics is indeed math heavy and a rigorous science.

>>9941958
They say there was some drama about how long it took Einstein to get a professorship, and in his case he was at least allowed to publish in venues that qualify as "publications" in the technical parlance of those who grovel for the pennies the government throws at them.

>>9943589
You will never publish in arXiv, schizo.

>>9943589
roll

>>9943613
You're probably right about that. Out of a sense of desperation because they are pretending like no one is buying my book due to posts, I am not going to respond to comments with schizo in them so don't put that in there if you have a point other than a straw man to raise.

>>9943633
That is serious checking picking in the way they present the data, btw, if it's true, which I doubt.

>>9943633
>You're probably right about that
Because your "research" is shit.

>I am not going to respond to comments with schizo in them
You have been diagnosed with schizophrenia by a doctor, thus I can call you schizo.

>>9943589
Go away you balding degenerate, no one likes you, neither here nor at arXiv

>>9943647
>You have been diagnosed with schizophrenia by a doctor, thus I can call you schizo.
You are wrong about my research, and you are a feeble-minded person, or a feeble-minded bot put in place by a feeble-minded person. This is why you never refer to the result in the paper. It is as irrefutable, and yet even still more so, than several previous results. Thus, when the doctor enters into the record that she has diagnosed me as schizophrenic because I think I have some great discovery and when she asked why that was I said casually, "I don't know, it's probably the government or something." She paraphrased that in the hearing as me thinking that the government was about to get me, but in reality, I had only speculated regarding her own proposition. Since she has testified that her diagnosis was based on the presupposed invalidity of my theory, so the validity of my result, which have never disputed choosing instead to form needlessly long self-referential strings, "Nuh-uh, no you ditn't."

Also, would the totality of the record show that Helene and the doctor were playing the disguise game, and it was Helene who told that to the judge, and that explains the earlier contradiction when the doctor had told me before the hearing, on a previous day, that she did not think I was paranoid schizophrenic. Was it the doctor herself so that so aggressively dropped the surprise diagnosis, contradicting her earlier statements to me that she did not think I was paranoid schizophrenic, and that she did not believe that I was a danger to myself or others. Was it the doctor that testified that day, or was it Helene who said, "Yes, Your Honor! It's my medical opinion that this man is a danger to himself and others due to his condition of paranoid schizophrenia." I'd like to know. You may be Helene yourself. You should be ashamed.

>>9943697
Go back to your thread and answer the questions you are evading. >>9943418 >>9942971 >>9942924

>It's my medical opinion that this man is a danger to himself and others due to his condition of paranoid schizophrenia.
You are saying that while living in the street and convinced that there is a global conspiracy against your "research"...

>You may be Helene yourself.
Wrong, you schizo.

>You should be ashamed.
But I'm not because it's so funny seeing you so mad.

>>9943714
>it's so funny seeing you so mad.
I hope one day you tell me that you don't think it's funny any more.

>>9943715
Watching you fail at life and worry about getting published while on the bring of homelessness will never get old.

>>9943778
I feel pretty good about proving the single best theorem of the 21st century. I did it on 6/7/2018.

I could never feel like my hands were clean during that homelessness, and that is one thing I will miss a lot about living inside. Yesterday the judge said he or she was giving the order for the cops to throw me out.

>>9943714
At this point I'm beginning to suspect this guy is just endlessly pretending to heckle himself and then putting his name back on
Or less likely he's somehow managed to attract another nutjob and they're yelling at each other

guys, take it easy on the guy lol

>>9944078
>pretending to heckle himself
Satan doesn't get enough credit for the scale of the destruction of his rebellion. In the end it is him who is destroyed, and his followers.

Remainder that mathematically ill defined ideas make theoretical work useless.

>>9944066
haha

sorry bud but my work is even better