/sci/ - Science & Math

The BBC article reads like the writer is having a stroke.

>>9930361
Have you fucking retards not noticed that the news creates articles that create a reaction to acquire more money and clicks? Noone actually thinks that discrimination is this bad or applies to *insert random subject here* except for retards with too much time on their hands.

>>9930361
Don't read this dumb shit.
Dont support the communist propaganda papers.

>>9930361
I puked

>>9930378
BBC is funded by taxes. They shouldn't be motivated by clicks.

>>9930417
More popular = more funding.

>>9930378
This is the BBC. It's supposed to be above clickbait and SJW propaganda. And yet this article exists. I have to pay for this.

>>9930459
>BBC
>above clickbait and SJW propaganda.
Where have you been in the last decade?

>>9930361
So what they're saying is that because people don't ask women to read a map, they don't learn how to read a map and so they suck at reading maps.

>>9930491
Moar like the last century. Even their BBC documentaries are obvious britbong worldview trash.

>>9930371
>>9930378
>>9930389
>>9930392
>>9930417
>>9930453
>>9930459
>>9930491
>>9930493
>>9931594


For a moment there I thought this was /pol/. Why can't you brianlets just stay in your containment board and stop shitting this board? getting real tired with all this misogynistic incel nonsense >>/pol/

>>9930361

>discrimination and unequal opportunities

>goes on in the article to say that in countries with more equality and equity between the sexes there is still a noticeable difference in abilities

>>9931601
I wasn't saying BBC was bad because of the OP picture. Just that they're bad in general. Their documentaries and shit are full of racist content as well.
Shoot a scene where the host is buying something from a store in London:
>Show a montage of all the London sights
>Have the audio play some snazzy music or just have city sounds.
>Interview young hip looking locals.
>Interview the store vendor.
>Interview a doctor or professor.
>etc..

Shoot a scene where the host is buying something from a store in Hong Kong:
>Show a slowed down browned out video with the outside edge darkened depicting a dingy alleyway or a dirt road village.
>Play creepy or spooky music.
>Show the host struggling to communicate with the locals about what they're looking for.
>Have the host talk about the experience of struggling to communicate with the locals. Include a joke about them not speaking English.
>Only include old and poor looking people in the video.
>Interview a British professor or doctor at a British institution.

People in the future are going to look back on us like we're a bunch of retards and religious loons.

>know for a fact that DNA and genes exist
>know for a fact that there are major neurological differences based on sex
>still make up bizarre conspiracy theories and mental gymnastics about how basic observation of reality is wrong
I feel like kids in the year 3000AD are going to ask their history teachers why we were so stupid and they're just going to blame it on plastics in the water.

>>9931622
You're seeing something I'm not. The BBC isn't great in many respects but their documentaries are often very good, better than the Yank rubbish ('ancient ayy lmaos' on the discovery channel holy key)

>>9931673
*kek

>>9931601

>>9931639
>kids in the year 3000AD
don't hold your breath

>>9931673
>BBC documentaries
>good
lmao, even the famous ones are shit.
Attenborough's documentaries are all about fabricating a scripted scene. The locations and shots are all planned ahead of time and all of the animals you see Attenborough handling are actually flown in and handed to him by trained handlers right before the shot. Sometimes the footage is even filmed at zoos. They care far more about getting the sunlight just right than they do about realism. There are literally no wild animals and very little nature in those documentaries.
Louis Theroux is even worse. He's basically Bill O'Relly tier in terms of journalistic integrity.
All of the other big BBC documentary series are full of Britbong pandering, low key racism, and trashy people. You have to be a brainlet to think they're good.

Ancient Ayylmaos is on the History channel which is basically all ridiculous bullshit and overdramatic dramatizations (because that's what the History channel does).

>>9932241
Only /pol/niggers post pictures like that.

>>9933002
FALSE
arctic ice is increasing and not decreasing

>>9930417
They're not clickbaiting, they're telling the British taxpayers what they want to hear.

>>9930361

This is so fucking dumb I can hardly believe it. James must be a huge bitch.

>>9931601
>not listing the OP

Anon, the OP is the /pol/ bait specifically tailored for those types of responses. It is designed to keep people from talking about real subjects of science and math. OP is a spam bot.

>>9931602
>More equality and equity == Complete equality and equity

>>9933001
Some of the scenes are shot in zoos, and there was outrage when everyone found out so know they'll likely tell us when they are. Obviously there are real wild animals, some of the shots can have hundreds of penguins and there's often a scene at the end showing the making of one of the shots where you see the crew hanging out trying to capture the perfect footage. There aren't trained handlers for tiny see through fish that live at the bottom of the deepest ocean. Nobody is flying sharks and orcas out to the oceans where they film them. Nobody is getting masses of lizard eggs and planting them on a beach with a bunch of snakes they all flew in. Obviously the locations are planned ahead of time.

BBC Panorama and BBC Horizon make some great documentaries as well

>>9931639
>People in the future are going to look back on us like we're a bunch of retards and religious loons.
Because we are, en mass. We are the dumbest group of human beings in history. Not even an exaggeration at this point either.

>"But when there's high inequality the difference between men and women is much bigger. And that suggests the culture people are living in has an effect on their cognitive abilities."
I am absolutely certain that the culture in which people live has an effect on their cognitive abilities. Navigation is something you get better at by doing a lot, and I'm sure that in places where women mostly do housework and rarely leave the house or travel anywhere the gap in navigation abilities is larger than elsewhere. But this by no means implies that there isn't also an innate difference at play here.

>>9933207
Watch the behind the scenes footage. They'll show how manage their array of containers with animals.
Panorama and Horizon are exactly the type that do that low key racist shit.

Compare it to a Nova documentary where they focus on the science. Earth From Space for example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpFryXQbVEA

>>9933240
Tbf I've never really noticed the low key racist stuff, may well be true

>>9933002
nice way to confirm the truth of the image
well done

>>9933401
>The set of people I don't like is a subset of /pol/
Yes.

>>9930417
BBC funding is controlled by politicians. BBC TV Three is already a goner.

>>9930378
>Noone actually thinks that discrimination is this bad or applies to *insert random subject here*

Yes they do you mong. People get thrown in prison in Europe for denying, people are losing their jobs in America for Denying it, we have entire political parties, educational fields, and schools of thought built around the fact that every institution in western society is inherently bigoted and oppreseive to everyone who isn't a white straight male.

>>9930361
So the more racist people should be better at navigating?

>Men consistently outperform women on spatial reasoning tasks (with both higher mean performance and standard deviation).
>Men tend to be better at navigating than women.
>It must be the result of systemic discrimination.

>>9931639
>people in the future

Good luck with that.

>>9930459
>>9930491
>almost 2019
>still uses the term "sjw" unironically

>>9935667
Calling them what they really are; retards, would be too insulting to retards.

>>9931601
t.

>>9933615
I'll take why they still haven't caught all the nazis for 6 gorillion, Alex.

>>9931639
>Know for a fact that DNA and Genes exist
Yeah, but it dooesn't matter, it's not a predictor of intelligence or success, culture and social status are.
>Major Neurological differences between sexes
May as well say phrenology. No real difference between men and women. Gender fluidity has existed since before recorded history. Just because your a misogynist doesn't mean you can pretend women are less intelligent than men
>Bizarre conspiracy theories
They're not, though. The society we live in is not a meritocracy. If everyone was judged only by their character, all races and genders would be the same.

>>9931601
>brianlet

>>9931601
You guys never know when to give it up do you?

>>9930361
I love how whenever these studies come out journalists say “yeah but men still suck” as if they can’t just accept we’re better at certain things.

>>9931601
>Hurrr I disagree with this THAT MEANS ITS POL DURRRRRR

>>9931622
Have you actually ever watched the BBC? This is unhinged.

>>9936317
>t. brainlet

>retards replying to a blatant falseflag
When will you learn to stop biting?