[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 19 KB, 360x406, 42d8d18401ad173aaa35178380a157d0aefa96f6_00.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9928558 No.9928558 [Reply] [Original]

>human lvl ai can't happen
why ppl say this? couldn't we program every neural interaction in the brain and thus effectively have human lvl ai? granted i realize how slow this would be without massive parallelization.

>> No.9928564
File: 52 KB, 500x750, tumblr_ou2i6oC2A11upiu8jo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9928564

That would be a cybernetic brain though wouldn't it? I would call a cyborg a robot. Rude.

>> No.9928567
File: 28 KB, 700x220, Face.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9928567

would not*^

>> No.9928569

>>9928564
idk why robot has a negative connotation. but in this case it'd be entirely on electrical circuitry. no biological components. simulate every key molecular interaction (probably won't even have to go to this lvl). until you have a conscious ai.

>> No.9928604

>>9928569
So, no biological components, but simulate key molecular interaction. BUT that is NOT a logical fallacy.

I think if you do that, you are making a cybernetic brain. A person with a cyborg arm is not a artificial human after all.

>> No.9928607

>>9928558
>If we make an exact copy of the human brain it would be equivalent to the human brain
hahah nice

But seriously though, when is /sci/ going to learn the difference between semantically possible and feasibly possible?