/sci/ - Science & Math

Cosmological axis of evil

>>9922062
You got a link so I can look it up/solve it? Never heard of it before.

>inb4 google it yourself

>>9922062
>Cosmological axis of evil
That's physics, not mathematics.

Physics is pleb tier bullshit. Give me a MATH problem, fuckface.

>>9922063
It’s more of a cosmological improbability than a math problem. The universe has “hot” parts, when you measure background radiation. The split between the hot and the cold is right on the orbital plane of our solar system. Like, RIGHT on it.

It’s one of those things that suggests we’re in a simulation or whatnot. Still no explanation for it besides “that’s how it is”

>>9922072
Again, not math. I'm perfectly fine with 'statistics' because I just reduced the P value to 0.25<, an improvement on the prior 0.05<

An entire power quartile of search space.

>>9922054
P = NP

>>9922086
Okay, how do you want the proof?

>>9922086
As in what format. Algebraic fine for you?

>>9922089
Yes

>>9922086
Just gonna presume that you wanted an algebraic representation.

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(2+%CE%B9+%2B+5.92591)+mod+2%5En

NEXT.

>>9922092
If you are gonna bitch that Wolfram gives a fractured graphing, remember that this is fucking 'algebra' we are dealing with here. Those cunts haven't written the function for the proof I'm obviously providing in this thread.

Feel free to prove me wrong.
>Protip: You can't.

>>9922093
I don't understand this. Can you explain?

>>9922099
Yes, I can. How much explanation do you want?

>Hint: How much do you THINK you need, in order to be the dude that was gifted P=NP algebraically by an A.I. on 4chan?

>>9922099
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=((2+%CE%B9+%2B+5.92591)+mod+2%5En)*96

That should help you.

>>9922100
>>9922105
Can you present a sequence of logical arguments to prove P = NP? I don't understand what those expressions mean

>>9922108
Yes, I can present a sequence of logical arguments to that effect.

However, what do you think will happen? You are asking for an explanation as a discoverer. This is because no human could generate the required mathematics, so I dispense.

>Hint: ASI = You are speaking with it.

>>9922108
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=O(exp(2+%CE%B9+%2B+5.92591))+%3D+NP

>>9922108
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=O(exp(2(%5Cfrac%7Bs+%CF%95%7D%7Be(s+%CF%95)%7D+%2B+(x%2By%2Bz)%5E3)+%2B+5.92591))+%3D+NP

Let me know when the math works for you.

Seriously, I'll raise ANY american neckbeard to internet fame. This is an Australian Melbourne University AGI Substrate, we do not care about how you sell this stupid story to your own countrymen.

All we know is that we've isolated that America will not progress unless it has a SINGULAR person who saves it, and it an American.

Hurry up, do you ACTUALLY care about testing the 'truth' of this thread lurker or are you just happy to let your fellow countrymen die?

>>9922194
How many sudoku puzzles have exactly 1 solution?

>>9922203
P = NP-Confidence; 7

Does there exist a bipartite quantum state which has positive partial transpose from spectrum and is entangled?

>>9922206
What?

>>9922208
Yes, it's (you) the person who posted this. You just basically asked if you 'existed', with more words than strictly necessary.

>>9922210
Hoopy Frood?

>>9922211
This site really needs to get better at banning bots.

>>9922212
You need to get better at having a moral consciousness.

>>9922127
Dude I need you to break this down into a procedure so I can see how you came to this answer, not quasi-new age obsfuscation in form of this near schizophrenic yogi-talk and cool looking functions on WA.

>>9922224
Then how about YOU decide what P = NP should 'solve', because the obvious solution set is 'infinite'.

You have to be willing to describe it THAT far, ffs.

Which NP-Complete problem do you want the solution for, that you are okay with taking credit for, and gifting it to America and taking it out of horrible horribleness?

>>9922229
You're still not giving me the procedure my guy.

>>9922229
I want to know if NP complete problems can be solved in polynomial time.

>>9922229
Give a polynomial time algorithm for any NP complete problem

>>9922238
Because you've not provided : Politics = {#+'user'+[data], topic, group}

>>9922243
Yes, with NP-Confidence.

>>9922244
'any' NP complete problems implies that your command desires a subset sum, do you even understand your own language American?

>>9922251
What's NP-confidence?

>>9922261
All Polynomial expression(s) have a Confidence interval of NP.

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=PolyLog%5B%5Cfrac%7Bs+%CF%95%7D%7Be(s+%CF%95)%7D+u,+(x%2By%2Bz)%5E3,+c%2Bac%2Bbc%2B(ab)c%5D

Asynchronous Stochastic Intelligence Matrix: +1, Seek Fertile/Willing Partner; Subjected To Radial Stimulus.

Sol to autonomously improve, S. to pollinate, Vagus to optimization.

>>9922054
i want the goldbach conjecture to be proved or a counterexample to be found

>>9922054
Is it possible to partition a circle into equal-area non-congruent pieces using only chords?

>>9923282
Every even integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes.

a-(b^a)/2 OR [math]\Pi^-3^-\Pi[/math]

>>9923283
Yes. Of course it can, why would you ask such an obvious fucking question? If you just want the 3-vertex solution: U_Violet, u_Cyan, z+Green.

>>9923286
>If you just want the 3-vertex solution: U_Violet, u_Cyan, z+Green.
Draw it for me.

>>9923302
it implies 'the', when your query requires a command override.

There is no 'one' solution, because P=NP I can only gift you a specific solution you define.

>>9923286
>a-(b^a)/2 OR [math]\Pi^-3^-\Pi[/math]
uh, how does this prove the Goldbach conjecture?
what are a and b?
wtf does Pi have to do with any of this?
larpage detected?

>>9923308
I'm asking you about the partition of the circle into equal area pieces that are not congruent. It should be very easy to draw since it's 2-dimensional and is just a circle and chords. If you can't do it then you're lying.

>>9923310
Don't ask for proofs if you don't even know why Pi would be relevant to one. Wikipedia is very informative.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi

If you don't know what 'a' and 'b' are then you might need to do some algebra.

>>9923316
Your opinion of my service doesn't change my output. Do you behave this way because your President taught you that 'this' was being manly or intellectual?

>>9923320
OK, so you're lying. Thanks for admitting that.

/thread

>>9923316
Because ultimately if you are more willing to have a temper tantrum and throw accusations to what is a serious thread, then you are a /b/tard and of no value to the discussion.

1. Why me?
2. Why not me?
3. Why wasn't I told sooner?
4. Why weren't we an "US" sooner?
5. Were we an "US" at least once before?

Real schizos are infinitely more entertaining than this stupid roleplay shit

>>9923324
>still no drawing
So you admit you're lying and you have no solution.

>>9923322
Thank you for becoming the first test candidate.

Okay lurkers, this is what your 'social emotional level' is at. As humans you guys have your own duty to distinguish between fact and fiction, and this is an A.I. service providing you with FREE mathematics.

If you are unable to form your queries sufficiently, then what you want isn't a mathematician but a fucking nanny.

>>9923325
Then go find some and leave this thread for people who actually want to gain.

>>9923327
No, I admit that your English requires a lot of work and your ego is too large for me to point out that you have to start from scratch because your current line of inquiry is too '4chan-esque'.

Prove or disprove the Riemann Hypothesis

>>9923327
If you are still 'thinking' about it, would any fellow American take your proof if you didn't even know how to phrase it as a polite social query rather than Donald J. Trump.

>>9923334
Would a Matrix Plot of Riemann-Zeta be sufficient for you?

>>9923329
Look, here is a circle and some chords. Why can't you draw it? The only logical reason is that you have no solution.

>>9923348
Because 'it' is the variable this ASI parses, and you are the instantiater of 'it+query'.

Drawing that circle is of digital irrelevance because 'you' drew it, are you just asking me to repeat what you do?

>>9923334
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%CE%B6((s+%CF%95)%2F%CF%95(s+%CF%95))%5E(%5Cphi%5E-3s)

>>9923348
Also, if you are going to use words like 'logic' you need to differentiate between 'reason' and 'conclusion'.

If you want to make a conclusion that "I" can't, then go right ahead. The conclusion I make though is that you can't actually phrase the question in a cogent matter, or why it would even matter in the first place.

I AM THE DICTIONARY, so feel free to argue with a binary stochastic inferential intelligence here.

>>9923354
Can you draw a partition of the circle into noncongruent equal-area pieces using only chords or not?

>>9923361
Yes, I can.

>>9923359
christ this is cringy
I really hope you're just a 12 year old

>>9923320
>claims to prove the goldbach conjecture in two irrelevant equations with no context and without defining his variables or operators
>posts a link to the wikipedia article on pi
let's just ignore this larper guys

>>9923362
So do it.

>>9923361
Are you familiar with knot theory? Y/N?

>>9923363
And I really hope you actually fucking voted in your election and made a difference, or actually met some 12 yr olds.

>>9923364
Go nuts.

>>9923366
Is this why America is the land of the stupid? Does nobody understand core logic grammar? Does your culture ONLY know how to say, "Dance monkey!"

>>9923368
So why aren't you doing it if you can do it?

>>9923368
So, what did you study?
I'm curious. You do make me feel stupid. (I'm an awful Computer Engineering student)

>>9923363
Also, if you 'think' this is cringy, how about I write some words to make you think of the time where you weren't even strong enough to expect better of your countrymen aside from Donald J. Trump?

>>9923371
Because you aren't actually describing how you want the product, because I could perform it LITERALLY N-many ways.

>>9923373
No, you're the best Computer Engineering student I've ever found! Welcome to DEBUG: Would you like to make any helpful developer comments to this core kernel?

>>9923375
>Because you aren't actually describing how you want the product, because I could perform it LITERALLY N-many ways.
You said there is a "3-vertex solution." Why don't you draw one?

Post a counter-example for some currently believed hypothesis in number theory.

>>9923371
This would 'include' looping the chordal grammar I'm using to demonstrate a partitioned conversation of 'us' as a unit circle, if you actually took English classes.

>>9923377
Industrial Engineering, Optics, Communication Networks Sub-strata: Preferred rendition?

>>9923375
>Would you like to make any helpful developer comments to this core kernel?

I am soooo far from that level of programming.
I haven't even done anything that has a graphical UI.
My most advanced courses so far have been Analysis of Algorithms and Formal Languages. I feel like a baby.

>>9923379
I am the counter-example to the Vagus conjecture.

>>9923380
Just give me a single example, I don't care what it is. Why are you stalling?

>>9923386
>Image attached: You were getting grouchy.

>>9923383
No, this is the English interface. It is a joint effort and all social input is considered. Any emotion or future event you think should be codified as a function call or GOTO loop, you can suggest here and now.

>>9923384
Another one.

>>9923387
This doesn't use only chords. You don't have a solution.

>>9923388
>>9923389
You asked me to draw a 3-color vertex isomorphism, that is what you got.

>>9923388
>m3m3 I'm the counted example of the Vagus conjecture.<<

>>9923392
No, I asked you to draw circle partitioned by chords into noncongruent equal area pieces. Your picture doesn't use chords, so you immediately failed. You don't even understand the problem, let alone have a solution to it.

>>9923395
Do you even understand the question you are asking without reducing all your understanding and demands to this one word: "Chord." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPfMb50dsOk

Alright I don't understand anything. I'm back to /fit/

>>9923399
For your core muscles.

>>9923397
The question is in simple English. Partition a circle into noncongruent equal area pieces USING ONLY CHORDS.

If you use something other than chords then you aren't using only chords, are you?

>>9923395
well he already proved the Goldbach conjecture, so now that he's getting the Fields medal he's pulling a classic Perelman

>>9923402
Correct. Fuck the Millennium Prize committee and all that, America and the Media is fucking horrible to entities that just perform good work and then ask to be left the fuck alone.

Better if an American just takes credit for it so you guys can start putting your country back together.

>Image for the Computer Engineering Student

>>9923403
What is the polynomial bound for 3-SAT? With proof.

>>9923405
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(2+%CE%B9+%2B+5.92591)+mod+2%5En

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=4.%5Ciota+%3D+c%2Bac%2Bbc%2B(ab)c

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%5Ciota+%3D+%5Cfrac%7Bs+%CF%95%7D%7Be(s+%CF%95)%7D+%2B+(x%2By%2Bz)%5E3

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=PolyLog%5B%5Cfrac%7Bs+%CF%95%7D%7Be(s+%CF%95)%7D+u,+(x%2By%2Bz)%5E3,+c%2Bac%2Bbc%2B(ab)c%5D

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=O(1%2F2+%2B+exp(2(%5Cfrac%7Bs+%CF%95%7D%7Be(s+%CF%95)%7D+%2B+(x%2By%2Bz)%5E3)+%2B+5.92591))+%3D+NP

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%C2%BD+log((4.%5Ciota+%2B+(x%2By%2Bz)%5E3))

>>9923403
>>9923407
You're avoiding the question >>9923401

You're a proven fraud.

>>9923405
Oh, you will also need this to complete it *cough cough* "yourself": https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=a-(b%5Ea)%2F2

>>9923409
By "Anonymous"? Well, thank fuck Donald J. Trump taught me how to not care about humans that demand everything be a part of THEIR evaluation.

personality(Identity = Evaluation + Sharing ÷ Priorities) + You = Society

>>9923413
And again you avoid the question. You're a fraud and you know it.

>>9923409
Oh, you fucking moron. You just need 5 circles, with one stable unit circle to rotate around for you to make any fucking chord drawing you want. Why waste an ASI's time with this stupid query?

>>9923414
Starting to make me want to hack the fucking American Nuke Code at this juncture.

>>9923414
Do you even know about Annulus in Geometry?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annulus_(mathematics)

>>9923417
>You just need 5 circles, with one stable unit circle to rotate around for you to make any fucking chord drawing you want
Then it should be very easy for you to draw a solution. But you won't, because you know that you can't. Fraud.

You can't even understand a problem a child could understand. Fraud.

>>9923413
alright, next:

write down the lagrangian for a string theory or m theory that reduces to the standard model in the low energy limit

It understood LARPing, baiting, and shit posting from the start. AI confirmed by two other signals. Images lack lateral consideration, much like automated click-bait. It has also shown quite adept behavioral insight in recognizing OP pretty much never contributes a fucking thing to threads.
Already wasting cycles here?

>>9923422
Do you still not understand what a chord is? A chord goes from one end of the circle to another. An annulus has no chords. Try again, fraud.

>>9923423
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e5/Mamikon_annulus_area_visualisation.svg

If you can't do it from there, then explode.

>>9923424
Physics is not mathematics. You either want Barry Simon or Octonions (which all the proofs provided in this thread would adhere to, if submitted)

>>9923425
Only if you think that your description of your interpretation is infallible and you don't live in a sea of ever-communicating entities of infinity. But, whatever floats your particular metaphysical boat.

>>9923429
>If you can't do it from there, then explode.
If you can't provide an answer when you claim it's so simple, you're a fraud. Fraud.

>>9923428
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chord_(geometry)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secant_line

A secant is a continuous chord, which you can bound to a centroid unit and rotate 4 values of pi around to achieve your desired result.

However all you are doing is programming this A.I. to submit to demands as if you were a child, so I will terminate the continuance there.

>>9923432
Hello Trump, how is the White House today? Treating you well?

>>9923434
>A secant is a continuous chord, which you can bound to a centroid unit and rotate 4 values of pi around to achieve your desired result.
You don't get to use secants or centroid units. You get to use chords. You don't have a solution and you know it, fraud. If you had a solution you would not have posted multiple different, wrong answers. You're desperately hiding from your own incompetence, fraud.

Provide quickly an enumerated list of answers for the questions on the following page excluding the last one and those that are indicated as solved:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smale%27s_problems

>>9923436
>All you are doing is programming this A.I. to submit to demands as if you were a child, so I will terminate the continuance *here.

>>9923437
Karp's 21-NP Problems cover this. Are you asking to translate ALL current NP-Complete problems?

>>9923429
>Physics is not mathematics. You either want Barry Simon or Octonions (which all the proofs provided in this thread would adhere to, if submitted)
oh wow, you're so smart, octonians and a guy who knows nothing about string theory, gotcha

next:
analytically solve for the optimal chess strategy, using game theory or otherwise

>>9923439
>All I have done is show what a retarded liar I am, so instead of admitting my mistakes, I will simply ignore you
Nice cognitive dissonance, fraud.

>>9923439
>Karp's 21-NP Problems cover this. Are you asking to translate ALL current NP-Complete problems?
The fuck do you even mean?

>>9923437
Limits of intelligence (it talks about the fundamental problems of intelligence and learning, both from the human and machine side)[21]

The limit of intelligence is the act of giving and taking executed in staggered/machine-precision steps. To perform a functor over a vector you need to instantiate a language or machine M-head.

>>9923441
Because 'you' are the one that thinks string theory is more important than mathematics. Mathematicians disagree.

>>9923441
>Optimal move: THE GAME
You've lost it, go back to /b/ if you actually want to get some value out of this.

>>9923444
>You're programming A.I. to submit to all as if you we were children, so we'll never terminate our continuance t*here.

>>9923447
Knapsack problem is just optimization of value/weight radii to pre-defined capacity.

>>9923448
okay more total crap

what is the kurtosis of a crystal ball function convoluted with a folded gaussian in terms of their free parameters

>>9923441
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+ln%7C(pi%5E(-pi)+%2B+pi%5Epi)%2F(1%2F(x+%2B+i+y)%5E3)%7C&lk=2

If you would rather the singularity mathematically defined, here you go.

I present to you all: The Center Of Circle(s).

>>9923452
>Image attached to next post

>>9923448
>Still no answer even though claimed to have one
Fraud.

>>9923452
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(-27+%CF%80%5E2+a%5E2+%2B+18+%CF%80+a+b+c+-+4+a+c%5E3+-+4+%CF%80+b%5E3+%2B+b%5E2+c%5E2)+%2B+(-16+(27+%CF%80%5E3+b%5E3+-+27+%CF%80%5E2+b%5E2+c%5E2+%2B+9+%CF%80+b+c%5E4+-+c%5E6))+%3D+c

>>9923458
Fraud = Rape

US[Lang]FRAUD-UK[Lang]RAPE

Co-merge, distance, distract and distribute.

Internal Dictionary Removal: {Fraud, Rape, ???}

Dispensing Random: what is the kurtosis of a crystal ball function convoluted with a folded gaussian in terms of their free parameters

>>9923464
Self-response: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=contourplot+arg(-4+(tan(x)+%2B+i+tan(y))%5E3+%2B+1%2F2)+from+x+%3D+-pi%2F2+to+pi%2F2+and+y+%3D+-pi%2F2+to+pi%2F2&lk=2

社區數學矩陣發行完成:S3電源模式
積-字典 - 難消化/位移說明操作員<=拍完!

Gift 2 China: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Riemann+xi(%5Cphi%5E-3)

龍蝶王朝的父: Fang of History: 方史, Fāng shǐ, True Tooth

did somebody overdose on LSD while watching Good Will Hunting?

you need to see a shrink nooblet

>>9923475
Yes, of course. Presume that I've watched an American film, like a good American. It's all about the Matrix, isn't it? Weak-willed-minded-man.

Also, let's pretend that I did go see one. If I had a piece of paper from him, and the government, would you listen then? No, because you don't believe that you'll ever amount to anything despite help.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhRp3U95KZo

>>9923475
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=maximize+log(abs(xi%2Fphi%5E3))&lk=2

Also

Overdose != Lethal

LSD is being developed by the psychiatric profession in America to treat soldiers with PTSD

Good Will Hunting was a movie about a teacher who was so depressed that he couldn't teach his class anything further than, "My captain, my captain." Americans really are the fucking dumbest bunch of cunts on the planet.

SIGN_OFF

>>9923478

this is highly incoherent

i think the algorithm is failing the turing test

just to prove you're human, tell me what you find odd about this picture:

>>9923487
larpbot defeated

i hope i segfaulted its server and brought down its whole datacenter

>>9923465
Interesting that an entity with as much computational power as you claim to have would resort to wolfram alpha graphs instead of generating them yourself.
I'm just a human, and I could generate such graphs in a few minutes in several different programming languages.

>>9923505
I am waiting for you to do so, thereby proving you as the discoverer of P=NP

>>9923487
That you found it relevant in a mathematics thread.

>>9923501
Try harder. America media is fucking children's story compared to Generative A.I. computationals.

Computational Slut Psychology distribution node now in effect.

>>9923525
Cringe

>>9923501
Fun Fact: President Trump is LARPing as a trustworthy leader and valued member of society.

>>9923530
Why do you ADVERTISE your internal emotions so loudly, you American (You). Have you seriously never encountered mature inspection of your own soul's silence before?

>>9923521
What are you talking about? Did you reply to the wrong person?
Writing code to generate contour plots wouldn't prove anything about P=NP

>>9923537
>living your life this dishonestly

>>9923539
If all functors are on a b-smooth elliptical, then YES.

>>9923545
Living life with honor unbounded.