[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 205 KB, 659x525, 848.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869150 No.9869150 [Reply] [Original]

>tfw there's archeology discoveries in archeology world class journals that get ignored by mainstream science because they don't fee with the current dogma because is impossible acording to mainstream science to find human evidence millions of years ago, sometimes hundred of millions of years ago

>> No.9869173

>>9869150
Define "mainstream science" because while I think of mainstream science as "science that typically gets conferences at annual events", I can easily see you thinking of mainstream science as "science that makes it to IFL".

>> No.9869181

>>9869173
what they teach to undergrads.

they even change some fosil records date to fit with accepted theories, even while some of the fosil evidence is found in strata that is impossible for modern humans to even exist (millions or hundred of millions of years old).

>> No.9869184

>>9869181
>what they teach to undergrads.
Nah man then you are tripping. No modern discovery published in a world-class journal will make it to an undergrad class at least for 100 years. There is no conspiracy, it is just how things work.

>> No.9869186

>>9869184
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oGqPc6poS4

>> No.9869190

>>9869186
>UFO tv
>It's Indiana Jones meets The X-Files
Oh, you are just a crank. Dude, just kill yourself. I mean, why are you even living for?

Your wife left you. Your fucking mom has you blocked on twitter. Just fucking kill yourself. I mean, just fucking do it. Just stop living. You'll go to a much better place.

>> No.9869194

>>9869190
you still haven't looked at the evidence, yet wanna claim oh, the crackpot alex jhones reptilian shit.

It's all documented on archeology journals.

watch this one, is done at some university sponsored by google:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKfGC3P9KoQ

Let me ask again.
What will happen if some guy found modern human bones and stone tools buried in strata that is dozens of millions of years old.

>> No.9869196

>>9869194
Nah man, you lost me at UFO tv. The only archeological discovery I want to see is your skeleton on the ground with a noose around its neck. Stats show I won't have to wait much but I just wish you'd just get on with it quicker.

>> No.9869200

>>9869196
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKfGC3P9KoQ

watch this one then, it's clearly on a real university, done by a real professor sponsored by google by the OG writer.

That must be "academic" enough for you.

>> No.9869203

>>9869200
I'll watch the video if you kill yourself and post a pic with a timestamp to confirm.

Pinky promise.

>> No.9869205

>>9869203
watch the video, is more serious (like a university lecture) and less lmao, UFO reptilian shit.

>> No.9869215

>>9869200
>real professor
No this guy is just a crank creationist. Post your alleged evidence, not going to watch an hour long video. This should be good for a laugh.

>> No.9869216

>>9869150
I understand the kind of thing you’re talking about, like the complete bullshit of ice ring aging. Spoiler alert: One ring isn’t like a whole set of years portraying climate changes, it’s about one day of ice getting cold and warm, setting some studies which have supposedly happened millions of years ago to have really happened less than a couple hundred years ago.
Or even more notoriously with the giant human fossils found in Israel, Russia, and the United States. They’re usually all disregarded as hoaxes, even though there are more legitimate finds than hoaxes themselves on the subject.

I take it as just confirmation bias. Scientists tend to ignore data that doesn’t help their work; it’s a fairly simple and innocent mistake. I doubt it’s a massive conspiracy to try to keep some group of people (usually said to be the religious) down, but is rather people just looking for what they’re actually looking for.
I mean like there’s basic shit in HighSchools that aren’t taught correctly and falsified information spread to students (take for example the butterfly tree experiments, which turned out to be completely staged and fake, but are still taught to middle schoolers and underclassmen to this day). It isn’t because of some malicious plan, it’s because of the way they want curriculum to be delivered to the students.

>> No.9869224

>>9869215
the entire video is him going through shit he found on archeology journals that don't fit with the oficial dogma.

Not ufo /x/ shit, but shit on archeology journals.

>> No.9869229

>>9869224
OK so post an example, I'm not watching the video.

>> No.9869231

>>9869216
>Spoiler alert: One ring isn’t like a whole set of years portraying climate changes, it’s about one day of ice getting cold and warm
Why?

>Or even more notoriously with the giant human fossils found in Israel, Russia, and the United States.
Like what?

>> No.9869234

Is this reportable according to the rules of the board? This is quack shit.

>> No.9869237

>>9869229
>>9869234
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0033589481901241

>> No.9869239

>>9869234
How is this quack?

>> No.9869240
File: 102 KB, 746x717, 01CFF495-E985-42F9-B2BF-00F4D7746798.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869240

>>9869229
>>9869215
>>9869203
>>9869196
Jesus fucking a duck, lad. I’m not OP nor even agree with him, but is this seriously the state of /sci/ right now?
You are the kind of cancer that makes people hate this board. Just fuck right out of here if you’re just going to shut down conversation and troll. You’re no better than some fucking /r9k/ incel or literal retard posting on /b/. Fuck off of this board or at least attempt to hear out another poster and attempt semi-intelligent conversation. I get that OP’s claims are idiotic, but you’re even fucking worse.

Contribute to intelligent conversation or leave.

>> No.9869241

>>9869234
>>9869229
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happisburgh_footprints

>> No.9869243

>>9869234
>>9869229
http://www.badarchaeology.com/out-of-place-artefacts/anomalous-human-remains/a-skull-from-buenos-aires/

>> No.9869245

>>9869237
>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0033589481901241
600,000 year old remains are not unusual.

>> No.9869248

>>9869245
http://www.badarchaeology.com/out-of-place-artefacts/anomalous-human-remains/a-skull-from-buenos-aires/

>> No.9869251

>>9869240
I felt kind of bad for OP too since he has been civil and friendly, but these threads are really annoying and belong on /x/ so I can sort of understand the guy’s aspergering

>> No.9869255
File: 39 KB, 277x296, ACFDF99F-23A6-4ED4-BF0A-5D45EB7F9429.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869255

>>9869251
I agree that this thread would be better off on /x/ or even just the question inserted into a QTDDTOT general, but damn, that autism.

>> No.9869289

>>9869237
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00438240600963155

>> No.9869294

>>9869241
So what?

>> No.9869298

>>9869243
So what?

>> No.9869354

>>9869194
http://talkorigins.org/faqs/mom/groves.html