/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9827109
Wrong board

>>9827109
enjoy the ban /pol/ pig

>>9827110
Race realism is based on scientific evidance, its related to science more than anything.

>>9827109
No. Fuck off.

>>9827111
Why are you so mad?I supose you disagree with the idea, if your right you shouldn't have any problem proving me your point of view.

>>9827119
Explain what bothers you.

mfw retards think intelegance is effected by enviroment to the point that it matters.

>>9827109
Fuck off asshole.

>>9827136
>b....bu....but muh feels are making me uncomfortable to talk about seperation of subspecies in homo sapiens
Science is right either you like it or not

>>9827111
These results are real. This is real scientific data.
What are you hoping to gain by censoring it?

why albania has such a low iq?

>>9827142
>>9827153
Alright I'll take the bait. What is your scientific hypothesis and, given that data, your conclusion? Let's see if you're as scientific as you claim to be.

>the racists were right
life sucks

>>9827184
>Alright I'll take the bait.
NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS
>What is your scientific hypothesis,
NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS
>and, given that data,
NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS
>your conclusion?
NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS
>Let's see if you're as scientific as you claim to be.
NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS

>>9827115
Flat earthers day the same thing.

>>9827200
Yep, basically what I was expecting.

what does it measure?

>>9827184
First of all you need to aknowlage the existance of race, the homo sapiens has developed sub-species called which we call ''races''.Populations of homo sapiens have been seperated for thousands of years and thus developed diferant charecteristics, INCLUDING intelegance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHB6PrpHAGI

>>9827203
So your saying race dosen't exist, or that there are no diferances between races?

>>9827231
Incredible scientific citation.

>>9827231
>aknowlage
>existance
>called which we call
>seperated
>diferant
>charecteristics
>intelegance
Oh, lord. Please, please tell me this is bait.

>>9827245
>if oposing party has a bad grammar it means anything they say is false
T.You
Im not native English speaker but, i am able to speak fluidly 4 languages, but that is besides the point, which you realy don't have sir.

>there is a difference between races
>blacks in the united state have lower average iq than whites
>intelence is highly gentics
anything new?

>>9827236
Science says race is a social construct.

>>9827250
Oh boyyy a race denier, you guys are like left wing version of climate change denyers, give me your best shot boy!

>>9827231
>Populations of homo sapiens have been seperated for thousands of years

>the science is conclusive
>race doesn't exist
the absolute state of leftists

>>9827249
Pure sub saharan africans have IQ of around 70, african americans score around 85IQ on Average, a stupid person would say ''oh this proves that IQ is enviromental'' but it all brakes apart when you realise african americans have around 20% European genes.

To native africans african americans are like mestizos are to Europeans.

>>9827115
> Race realism is based on scientific evidance
> evidance

>>9827256
Because native Americans where mixing with Australian aboriginals a lot right?

>>9827248
> i am able to speak fluidly 4 languages
Retard, trollspeak and shitpost don't count

>>9827260
>>9827248

>>9827255
I'm not a denier. Race totally exists as a social construct.

>>9827264
>race is a social construct
Because you have a hard time telling a diferance between Australian aboriginal and a Swede right?

Hey these girls are Swedish right?Race is a social construct, anyone can be Swedish!

>>>/pol/

>>9827267
but I bet you can easily find the Australian Aboriginal in a room full of sub-Saharan Africans, huh?

>>9827267
>>9827274
I can. I can also tell the difference between many different people of the same race amazingly. They don't all look exactly the same.

>>9827231
>INCLUDING intelegance
Why do you think that your race is more intelligent?
In populations of hunters there is actual selection for intelligence, because hunting and surviving is a tricky business. While harvesting crops doesn't require much intelligence.
If anything, primitive hunters should be more intelligent.

>>9827276
>but I bet you can easily find the Australian Aboriginal in a room full of sub-Saharan Africans, huh?
Yes, yes i can, race is not only about how one looks but also how one acts, when Europeans discovered populations of Australian aboriginals they IMIDIATLY signed them up as a diferant group from Sub saharan africans.

>>9827277
So?I never said they all look same, what im saying is surtain groups have specific characteristics, which other groups lack.Just like dog breeds.

>>9827285
Europeans also considered peoples of Europe as different races though, with all sorts of stereotypes. Why are you going to listen to 18th century science? Genetics say all humans are extremely similar.

>>9827287
Dog breads can have characteristics too. Behold, the many races of dachshund. Humans are all one breed.

>>9827278
>Why do you think that your race is more intelligent?
My race is not the most intelegant one, ashkenazi jews on average score 115IQ, and it wery well aligns with their contribution in science, crime rate, and average income.

>>9827288
Yes Europeans as well can be devided in groups, though thats a whole other topic.

>>9827291
And?What is your point?

>>9827299
It's all just grouped characteristics. You can do it for any characteristic at all. It's defined however you want it, that's why it's a social construct.

>>9827308
So Polar bears and grizly bears are same too?

>>9827312
I'm no expert. Wikipedia says they kind of are:

Further, somecladesof brown bear, as assessed by their mtDNA, are more closely related to polar bears than to other brown bears,[25]meaning that the polar bear might not be considered a species under somespecies concepts.[26]The mtDNA of extinct Irish brown bears is particularly close to polar bears.[27]A comparison of thenuclear genomeof polar bears with that of brown bears revealed a different pattern, the two forming genetically distinct clades that diverged approximately 603,000 years ago,[28]although the latest research is based on analysis of the complete genomes (rather than just the mitochondria or partial nuclear genomes) of polar and brown bears, and establishes the divergence of polar and brown bears at 400,000 years ago.[29]

But they split off way longer than any human population.

>>9827322
So. your saying, because they are geneticaly simmiar it means they are a same thing?Humans and chimpanzees have 94% simmilarity in genes, does that mean humans and chimps are same?Even small diferances in genes can lead to large diferances between organism or populations of organisms.

>>9827331
94% is way too far any definition of species. We are 90% genetically similar to cats by the way. All humans are in the 99.9% range.

The garbage that is ruining /sci/, ladies and gentlemen. "Politically incorrect" ideology justification threads and IQ threads.

>>9827344
>All humans are in the 99.9% range.
Yes and 0.1% is a lot, its enough to make a diferance between humans real and noiticable.

>>9827349
>0 arguments

>>9827356
Ok... We are going in circles. The 0.1% is enough to give different characteristics, like the dachshunds above. We can look at these characteristics and use them to make all sorts of groupings to our whim. It's not enough to give any solidly defined biological groupings. The groupings you make will be socially constructed, not biologically.